- 06 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
When btrfs_qgroup_reserve returned a failure, we were missing a counter operation for BTRFS_I(inode)->outstanding_extents++, leading to warning messages about outstanding extents and space_info->bytes_may_use != 0. Additionally, the error handling code didn't take into account that we dropped the inode lock which might require more cleanup. Luckily, all the cleanup code we need is already there and can be shared with reserve_metadata_bytes, which is exactly what this patch does. Reported-by: NLev Vainblat <lev@zadarastorage.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 15 1月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
We forgot to reset the path lock state to zero after we unlock the path block, and this can lead to the ASSERT checker in tree unlock API. Reported-by: NSlava Barinov <rayslava@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
This'd avoid us empty looping. Say we have only one disk and the metadata raid type will be defaultly DUP, and we do not need to start from index=0(RAID10) and get over two empty loops to index=2(DUP). Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We still need to say we're flushing if we're limit flushing to keep somebody from coming in and stealing our reservation. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
- 17 12月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This confuses and angers lockdep even though it's ok. We don't really need the lock for free space inodes since only the transaction committer will be reserving space. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This happens because writeback_inodes_sb_nr_if_idle does down_read. This doesn't work for us and it has not been fixed upstream yet, so do it ourselves and use that instead so we can stop having this stupid long standing lockup. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Raid properties can be shared among raid calculation code, we can put them into a global table to keep it simple. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We forget to release the reserved space in the error path of delalloc reservatiom, fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 13 12月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
This patch adds some code to disallow operations on the device that is used as the target for the device replace operation. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
This is required for the device replace procedure in a later step. Two calling functions also had to be changed to have the fs_info pointer: repair_io_failure() and scrub_setup_recheck_block(). Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
When committing a transaction, we may bail out of running delayed refs due to ENOSPC, and then abort the current transaction to flip into readonly. But we'll hit a deadlock on ref head's lock since we forget to release its lock and other cleanup stuff. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Use WARN rather than printk followed by WARN_ON(1), for conciseness. A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this transformation is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression list es; @@ -printk( +WARN(1, es); -WARN_ON(1); // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 12 12月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Dave gave me an image of a very full file system that would abort the transaction because it ran out of space while committing the transaction. This is because we would think there was plenty of room to create a snapshot even though the global reserve was not full. This happens because we calculate the global reserve size before we unpin any space, so after we unpin the space we allow reservations to occur even though we haven't reserved all of the space for our global reserve. Fix this by adding to the global reserve while unpinning in order to make sure we always have enough space to do our work. With this patch we no longer end up with an aborted transaction, we return ENOSPC properly to the person trying to create the snapshot. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
In some places(such as: evicting inode), we just can not flush the reserved space of delalloc, flushing the delayed directory index and delayed inode is OK, but we don't try to flush those things and just go back when there is no enough space to be reserved. This patch fixes this problem. We defined 3 types of the flush operations: NO_FLUSH, FLUSH_LIMIT and FLUSH_ALL. If we can in the transaction, we should not flush anything, or the deadlock would happen, so use NO_FLUSH. If we flushing the reserved space of delalloc would cause deadlock, use FLUSH_LIMIT. In the other cases, FLUSH_ALL is used, and we will flush all things. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The comment is not coincident with the code. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
div_factor{_fine} has been implemented for two times, cleanup it. And I move them into a independent file named math.h because they are common math functions. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 19 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adam Buchbinder 提交于
"Whether" is misspelled in various comments across the tree; this fixes them. No code changes. Signed-off-by: NAdam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
- 09 10月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I don't think we have the same problem that this was supposed to fix originally since we can allocate chunks in the enospc path now. This code is causing us to constantly commit the transaction as we get close to using all of our available space in our currently allocated chunks, instead of allocating another chunk and carrying on with life, which is not nice for performance. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Everytime we write out dirty pages we search for an offset in the tree, convert the bits in the state, and then when we wait we search for the offset again and clear the bits. So for every dirty range in the io tree we are doing 4 rb searches, which is suboptimal. With this patch we are only doing 2 searches for every cycle (modulo weird things happening). Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Running delayed refs is faster than running delalloc, so lets do that first to try and reclaim space. This makes my fs_mark test about 20% faster. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Call btrfs_abort_transaction as early as possible when an error condition is detected, that way the line number reported is useful and we're not clueless anymore which error path led to the abort. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 04 10月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
nocow_only is now an obsolete argument. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
There is already an 'add free space' phrase in front of this one, we needn't to redo it. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
-
- 02 10月, 2012 9 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Everybody is just making stuff up, and it's just used to see if we really do need to alloc a chunk, and since we do this when we already know we really do it's just a waste of space. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
So we have lots of places where we try to preallocate chunks in order to make sure we have enough space as we make our allocations. This has historically meant that we're constantly tweaking when we should allocate a new chunk, and historically we have gotten this horribly wrong so we way over allocate either metadata or data. To try and keep this from happening we are going to make it so that the block group item insertion is done out of band at the end of a transaction. This will allow us to create chunks even if we are trying to make an allocation for the extent tree. With this patch my enospc tests run faster (didn't expect this) and more efficiently use the disk space (this is what I wanted). Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I noticed I was seeing large lags when running my torrent test in a vm on my laptop. While trying to make it lag less I noticed that our overcommit math was taking into account the number of bytes we wanted to reclaim, not the number of bytes we actually wanted to allocate, which means we wouldn't overcommit as often. This patch fixes the overcommit math and makes shrink_delalloc() use that logic so that it will stop looping faster. We still have pretty high spikes of latency, but the test now takes 3 minutes less time (about 5% faster). Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Mitch reported a problem where you could get an ENOSPC error when untarring a kernel git tree onto a 16gb file system with compress-force=zlib. This is because compression is a huge pain, it will return from ->writepages() without having actually created any ordered extents. To get around this we check to see if the async submit counter is up, and if it is wait until it drops to 0 before doing our normal ordered wait dance. With this patch I can now untar a kernel git tree onto a 16gb file system without getting ENOSPC errors. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We should insert/update 6 items(root ref, root backref, dir item, dir index, root item and parent inode) when creating a snapshot, not 5 items, fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Sometimes we need choose the method of the reservation according to the type of the block reservation, such as the reservation for the delayed inode update. Now we identify the type just by comparing the address of the reservation variants, it is very ugly if it is a temporary one because we need compare it with all the common reservation variants. So we add a new "type" field to keep the type the reservation variants. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This patch adds hole punching via fallocate. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We will stop and restart a transaction every time we move to a different leaf when truncating a file. This is for enospc reasons, but really we could probably get away with doing this a little better by actually working until we hit an ENOSPC. So add a ->failfast flag to the block_rsv and set it when we do truncates which will fail as soon as the block rsv runs out of space, and then at that point we can stop and restart the transaction and refill the block rsv and carry on. This will make rm'ing of a file with lots of extents a bit faster. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Swinging this pendulum back the other way. We've been allocating chunks up to 2% of the disk no matter how much we actually have allocated. So instead fix this calculation to only allocate chunks if we have more than 80% of the space available allocated. Please test this as it will likely cause all sorts of ENOSPC problems to pop up suddenly. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
- 29 8月, 2012 5 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Daniel Blueman reported a bug with fio+balance on a ramdisk setup. Basically what happens is the balance relocates a tree block which will drop the implicit refs for all of its children and adds a full backref. Once the block is relocated we have to add the implicit refs back, so when we cow the block again we add the implicit refs for its children back. The problem comes when the original drop ref doesn't get run before we add the implicit refs back. The delayed ref stuff will specifically prefer ADD operations over DROP to keep us from freeing up an extent that will have references to it, so we try to add the implicit ref before it is actually removed and we panic. This worked fine before because the add would have just canceled the drop out and we would have been fine. But the backref walking work needs to be able to freeze the delayed ref stuff in time so we have this ever increasing sequence number that gets attached to all new delayed ref updates which makes us not merge refs and we run into this issue. So to fix this we need to merge delayed refs. So everytime we run a clustered ref we need to try and merge all of its delayed refs. The backref walking stuff locks the delayed ref head before processing, so if we have it locked we are safe to merge any refs inside of the sequence number. If there is no sequence number we can merge all refs. Doing this not only fixes our bug but keeps the delayed ref code from adding and removing useless refs and batching together multiple refs into one search instead of one search per delayed ref, which will really help our commit times. I ran this with Daniels test and 276 and I haven't seen any problems. Thanks, Reported-by: NDaniel J Blueman <daniel@quora.org> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Arne Jansen 提交于
With commit commit d1270cd9 Author: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Date: Tue Sep 13 15:16:43 2011 +0200 Btrfs: put back delayed refs that are too new I added a window where the delayed_ref's head->ref_mod code can diverge from the sum of the remaining refs, because we release the head->mutex in the middle. This leads to btrfs_lookup_extent_info returning wrong numbers. This patch fixes this by adjusting the head's ref_mod with each delayed ref we run. Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Arne was complaining about the space cache having mismatching generation numbers when debugging a deadlock. This is because we can run out of space in our preallocated range for our space cache if you have a pretty fragmented amount of space in your pinned space. So just increase the amount of space we preallocate for space cache so we can be sure to have enough space. This will only really affect data ranges since their the only chunks that end up larger than 256MB. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Arne Jansen 提交于
Commit a168650c introduced a waiting mechanism to prevent busy waiting in btrfs_run_delayed_refs. This can deadlock with btrfs_run_ordered_operations, where a tree_mod_seq is held while waiting for the io to complete, while the end_io calls btrfs_run_delayed_refs. This whole mechanism is unnecessary. If not enough runnable refs are available to satisfy count, just return as count is more like a guideline than a strict requirement. In case we have to run all refs, commit transaction makes sure that no other threads are working in the transaction anymore, so we just assert here that no refs are blocked. Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
We should release this mutex before returning the error code. Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
-
- 26 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
We were missing wakeups on the delayed ref waitqueue due to races on waitqueue_active. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 24 7月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
For backref walking, we've introduce delayed ref's sequence. However, it changes our preallocation behavior. The story is that when we preallocate an extent and then mark it written piece by piece, the ideal case should be that we don't need to COW the extent, which is why we use 'preallocate'. But we may not make use of preallocation, since when we check for cross refs on the extent, we may have two ref entries which have the same content except the sequence value, and we recognize them as cross refs and do COW to allocate another extent. So we end up with several pieces of space instead of an whole extent. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
Inodes always allocate free space with BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA type, which means every inode has the same BTRFS_I(inode)->free_space pointer. This shrinks struct btrfs_inode by 4 bytes (or 8 bytes on 64 bits). Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
-