The local variables in acpi_bus_get_power_flags() need not be
initialized upfront, so change the code accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

To reduce indentation level and improve code readability, move the
initialization code related to device power states from
acpi_bus_get_power_flags() to a new routine,
acpi_bus_init_power_state().
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken
into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now.

Modify the power resources management code to preserve the
spec-compliant ordering of wakeup power resources.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken
into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now.

Modify the power resources management code to preserve the
spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of
devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for
power resources used for wakeup).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

ACPI power resource objects have struct acpi_device components, but
they are only used for registering those resources in the device
hierarchy.  In particular, power state information stored in them is
completely useless (amnong other things, because the power resources
"devices" are not power manageable), so there is no reason for the
power resources management code to keep it up to date.

Remove the code updating device power states of power resources from
drivers/acpi/power.c.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The ACPI power resources driver is not very useful, because the only
thing it really does is to restore the state of the power resources
that were "on" before system suspend or hibernation, but that may be
achieved in a different way.

Drop the ACPI power resources driver entirely and add
acpi_resume_power_resources() that will walk the list of all
registered power resources during system resume and turn on the ones
that were "on" before the preceding system suspend or hibernation.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the
namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as
soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI
device nodes using them for power management).

For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation
of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device
hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects
actually used for power resource manipulation.  Accordingly, it
doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks
in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether
or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all).

Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are
initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that
also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them
with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine,
acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent
power resources from memory.  Make the ACPI namespace scanning code
in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and
registering objects that represent power resources.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Simplify the code preparing struct acpi_device objects for
registration by removing useless code, moving different pieces of
code into the functions they belong to and making a couple of int
functions always returning 0 void.

This also fixes a possible memory leak in ACPI device registration
error code path by making acpi_device_register() detach data from
device->handle if device_register() fails and prepares the scanning
code for special-casing ACPI power resources (next patch).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Commit 0090def6 (ACPI: Add interface to register/unregister device
to/from power resources) made it possible to indicate to the ACPI
core that if the given device depends on any power resources, then
it should be resumed as soon as all of the power resources required
by it to transition to the D0 power state have been turned on.

Unfortunately, however, this was a mistake, because all devices
depending on power resources should be treated this way (i.e. they
should be resumed when all power resources required by their D0
state have been turned on) and for the majority of those devices
the ACPI core can figure out by itself which (physical) devices
depend on what power resources.

For this reason, replace the code added by commit 0090def6 with a
new, much more straightforward, mechanism that will be used
internally by the ACPI core and remove all references to that code
from kernel subsystems using ACPI.

For the cases when there are (physical) devices that should be
resumed whenever a not directly related ACPI device node goes into
D0 as a result of power resources configuration changes, like in
the SATA case, add two new routines, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent()
and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), allowing subsystems to manage
such dependencies.  Convert the SATA subsystem to use the new
functions accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Should use acpi_device pointer directly instead of use handle and
get the device pointer again later.
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Make acpi_bus_trim() work in analogy with acpi_bus_scan() and carry
out two passes such that ACPI drivers will be detached from device
nodes being removed in the first pass and the device nodes themselves
will be removed in the second pass.

For this purpose split the driver unregistration out of
acpi_bus_remove() into a new routine, acpi_bus_device_detach(), that
will be executed by acpi_bus_trim() in the additional first pass as
a post-order callback.

This is necessary, because some ACPI drivers' .remove() routines
unregister struct device objects associated with the ACPI device
nodes being removed and that needs to happen while the ACPI
device nodes are still around (for example, in case they need to be
used for power management or similar things at that time).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>

The current acpi_bus_trim() implementation is not really
straightforward and may be simplified significantly by using
acpi_walk_namespace() with acpi_bus_remove() as a post-order
callback.

Observe that acpi_bus_remove(), as called by acpi_bus_trim(), cannot
actually fail, because its first argument is guaranteed not to be
NULL thanks to the acpi_bus_get_device() check in acpi_bus_trim(),
so simply move the acpi_bus_get_device() check to acpi_bus_remove()
and use acpi_walk_namespace() to execute it for every device under
start->handle as a post-order callback.  The, run it directly for
start->handle itself.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>

All callers of acpi_bus_trim() pass 1 (true) as the second argument
of it, so remove that argument entirely and change acpi_bus_trim()
to always behave as though it were 1.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>

Drop the second argument of acpi_device_unregister(), type, which is
not used by that function.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>

Since device_attach() returns 1 on success (a driver has been bound
to the device), the check against its return value in
acpi_bus_device_attach() should modified to take that into accout.
Make it so.

[rjw: Subject and changelog.]
Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Commit 805d410f (ACPI: Separate adding ACPI device objects from
probing ACPI drivers) introduced an ACPI power resources management
regression, because it didn't ensure that the power resources
driver bind to the struct acpi_device objects corresponding
to power resources as soon as they were created.  As a result,
ACPI power management routines may attempt to access power resource
objects before they are ready to use.

To fix this problem, tell the acpi_add_single_object() in
acpi_bus_check_add() to probe the driver for objects of type
ACPI_BUS_TYPE_POWER.  This fix has been verified to work on
HP nx6325 where the problem was first observed.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

At one point acpi_device_set_id() checks if acpi_device_hid(device)
returns NULL, but that never happens, so system bus devices with an
empty list of PNP IDs are given the dummy HID ("device") instead of
the "system bus HID" ("LNXSYBUS").  Fix the code to use the right
check.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>

After commit 71fbad6c (PCI/ACPI: Notify PCI devices when their power
resource is turned on) made acpi_pci_bind() call
acpi_power_resource_register_device(), the debug message at the end
of the latter appears in the kernel log for every PCI device that
doesn't happen to have power resources assigned (which is the vast
majority of them).  However, this message is totally useless, because
it doesn't even say which device it is about.  Moreover, it is
misleading, because it only means that the given device has no power
resources, which isn't exceptional at all.

Remove that useless message altogether and simplify
acpi_power_resource_register_device() slightly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Currently these DBG statements are emitted at KERN_DEFAULT.
Change the macro to emit at KERN_DEBUG.

This can help avoid unexpected message interleaving.
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since the return value of acpi_bus_get_device() is not of type
acpi_status, ACPI_SUCCESS() should not be used for checking its
return value.  Fix that.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

When memory hotadd, acpi_memory_enable_device has already been done
at drv->ops.add (acpi_memory_device_add), no need to do it again
at notify callback.

At acpi_memory_enable_device, acpi_memory_get_device_resources
is also a redundant action, since it has been done at drv->ops.add.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

If the persistent store is empty initially, the function 'erst_dbg_read'
returns a nonzero value. The better way is to return a zero indicating the
read operation reaches EOF.

Tested on two different servers.
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Huang <adrian.huang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Drop the .bind() and .unbind() that have no more users from
struct acpi_device_ops and remove all of the code referring to
them from drivers/acpi/scan.c.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Move the code related to _PRT setup and removal and to power
resources from acpi_pci_bind() and acpi_pci_unbind() to the .setup()
and .cleanup() callbacks in acpi_pci_bus and remove acpi_pci_bind()
and acpi_pci_unbind() that have no purpose any more.  Accordingly,
remove the code related to device .bind() and .unbind() operations
from the ACPI PCI root bridge driver.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Currently, the ACPI wakeup capability of PCI devices is set up
in two different places, partially in acpi_pci_bind() where
runtime wakeup is initialized and partially in
platform_pci_wakeup_init(), where system wakeup is initialized.
The cleanup is only done in acpi_pci_unbind() and it only covers
runtime wakeup.

Use the new .setup() and .cleanup() callbacks in struct acpi_bus_type
to consolidate that code and do the setup and the cleanup each in one
place.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Add two new callbacks,.setup() and .cleanup(), struct acpi_bus_type
and modify acpi_platform_notify() to call .setup() after executing
acpi_bind_one() successfully and acpi_platform_notify_remove() to
call .cleanup() before running acpi_unbind_one().  This will allow
the users of struct acpi_bus_type, PCI in particular, to specify
operations to be executed right after the given device has been
associated with a companion struct acpi_device and right before
it's going to be detached from that companion, respectively.

The main motivation is to be able to get rid of acpi_pci_bind()
and acpi_pci_unbind(), which are horrible horrible stuff.  [In short,
there are three problems with them: The way they populate the .bind()
and .unbind() callbacks of ACPI devices is rather less than
straightforward, they require special hotplug-specific paths to be
present in the ACPI namespace scanning code and by the time
acpi_pci_unbind() is called the PCI device object in question may
not exist any more.]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

The callers of acpi_bus_add() usually assume that if it has
succeeded, then a struct acpi_device object has been attached to
the handle passed as the first argument.  Unfortunately, however,
this assumption is wrong, because acpi_bus_scan(), and acpi_bus_add()
too as a result, may return a pointer to a different struct
acpi_device object on success (it may be an object corresponding to
one of the descendant ACPI nodes in the namespace scope below that
handle).

For this reason, the callers of acpi_bus_add() who care about
whether or not a struct acpi_device object has been created for
its first argument need to check that using acpi_bus_get_device()
anyway, so the second argument of acpi_bus_add() is not really
useful for them.  The same observation applies to acpi_bus_scan()
executed directly from acpi_scan_init().

Therefore modify the relevant callers of acpi_bus_add() to check the
existence of the struct acpi_device in question with the help of
acpi_bus_get_device() and drop the no longer necessary second
argument of acpi_bus_add().  Accordingly, modify acpi_scan_init() to
use acpi_bus_get_device() to get acpi_root and drop the no longer
needed second argument of acpi_bus_scan().
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

After the removal of the second argument of acpi_bus_scan() there is
no difference between the ACPI_BUS_ADD_MATCH and ACPI_BUS_ADD_START
add types, so the add_type field in struct acpi_device may be
replaced with a single flag.  Do that calling the flag match_driver.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

After the removal of acpi_start_single_object() and acpi_bus_start()
the second argument of acpi_bus_scan() is not necessary any more,
so drop it and update acpi_bus_check_add() accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Notice that acpi_bus_add() uses only 2 of its 4 arguments and
redefine its header to match the body.  Update all of its callers as
necessary and observe that this leads to quite a number of removed
lines of code (Linus will like that).

Add a kerneldoc comment documenting acpi_bus_add() and wonder how
its callers make wrong assumptions about the second argument (make
note to self to take care of that later).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

The ACPI PCI root bridge driver was the only ACPI driver implementing
the .start() callback, which isn't used by any ACPI drivers any more
now.

For this reason, acpi_start_single_object() has no purpose any more,
so remove it and all references to it.  Also remove
acpi_bus_start_device(), whose only purpose was to call
acpi_start_single_object().

Moreover, since after the removal of acpi_bus_start_device() the
only purpose of acpi_bus_start() remains to call
acpi_update_all_gpes(), move that into acpi_bus_add() and drop
acpi_bus_start() too, remove its header from acpi_bus.h and
update all of its former users accordingly.

This change was previously proposed in a different from by
Yinghai Lu.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Move the code from the ACPI PCI root bridge's .start() callback
routine, acpi_pci_root_start(), directly into acpi_pci_root_add()
and drop acpi_pci_root_start().

It is safe to do that, because it is now always guaranteed that
when struct pci_dev objects are created, their companion struct
acpi_device objects are already present, so it is not necessary to
wait for them to be created before calling pci_bus_add_devices().

This change was previously proposed in a different form by
Yinghai Lu.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

If acpi_bus_check_add() is called for a handle already having an
existing struct acpi_device object attached, it is not necessary to
check the type and status of the device correspondig to it, so
change the ordering of acpi_bus_check_add() to avoid that.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Notice that one member of struct acpi_bus_ops, acpi_op_add, is not
used anywhere any more and the relationship between its remaining
members, acpi_op_match and acpi_op_start, is such that it doesn't
make sense to set the latter without setting the former at the same
time.  Therefore, replace struct acpi_bus_ops with new a enum type,
enum acpi_bus_add_type, with three values, ACPI_BUS_ADD_BASIC,
ACPI_BUS_ADD_MATCH, ACPI_BUS_ADD_START, corresponding to
both acpi_op_match and acpi_op_start unset, acpi_op_match set and
acpi_op_start unset, and both acpi_op_match and acpi_op_start set,
respectively.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Objects of type struct acpi_bus_ops are currently used to pass
information between different parts of the ACPI namespace scanning
code, sometimes in quite convoluted ways.  It turns out that that
is not necessary in some cases, so simplify the code by reducing
the utilization of struct acpi_bus_ops objects where clearly
possible.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

The current ACPI namespace scanning code suggests that acpi_bus_add()
and acpi_bus_start() share some code.  In fact, however, they are
completely different code paths (except for the initial checks), so
refactor the code to make that distinction visibly clear.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Instead of running acpi_pci_root_init() from a separate subsys
initcall, call it directly from acpi_scan_init() before scanning the
ACPI namespace for the first time, so that the PCI root bridge
driver's .add() routine, acpi_pci_root_start(), is always run
before binding ACPI drivers or attaching "companion" device objects
to struct acpi_device objects below the root bridge's device node in
the ACPI namespace.

The first, simpler reason for doing this is that it makes the
situation during boot more similar to the situation during hotplug,
in which the ACPI PCI root bridge driver is always present.

The second reason is that acpi_pci_root_init() causes struct pci_dev
objects to be created for all PCI devices below the bridge and
these objects may be necessary for whatever is done with the other
ACPI device nodes in that namespace scope.  For example, devices
created by acpi_create_platform_device() sometimes may need to be
added to the device hierarchy as children of PCI bridges.  For this
purpose, however, the struct pci_dev objects representing those
bridges need to exist before the platform devices in question are
registered.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Split the ACPI namespace scanning for devices into two passes, such
that struct acpi_device objects are registerd in the first pass
without probing ACPI drivers and the drivers are probed against them
directly in the second pass.

There are two main reasons for doing that.

First, the ACPI PCI root bridge driver's .add() routine,
acpi_pci_root_add(), causes struct pci_dev objects to be created for
all PCI devices under the given root bridge.  Usually, there are
corresponding ACPI device nodes in the ACPI namespace for some of
those devices and therefore there should be "companion" struct
acpi_device objects to attach those struct pci_dev objects to.  These
struct acpi_device objects should exist when the corresponding
struct pci_dev objects are created, but that is only guaranteed
during boot and not during hotplug.  This leads to a number of
functional differences between the boot and the hotplug cases which
are not strictly necessary and make the code more complicated.

For example, this forces the ACPI PCI root bridge driver to defer the
registration of the just created struct pci_dev objects and to use a
special .start() callback routine, acpi_pci_root_start(), to make
sure that all of the "companion" struct acpi_device objects will be
present at PCI devices registration time during hotplug.

If those differences can be eliminated, we will be able to
consolidate the boot and hotplug code paths for the enumeration and
registration of PCI devices and to reduce the complexity of that
code quite a bit.

The second reason is that, in general, it should be possible to
resolve conflicts of resources assigned by the BIOS to different
devices represented by ACPI namespace nodes before any drivers bind
to them and before they are attached to "companion" objects
representing physical devices (such as struct pci_dev).  However, for
this purpose we first need to enumerate all ACPI device nodes in the
given namespace scope.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

The mini-C library implementation is used by the embedded ACPICA users
other than Linux.  It was added to the kernel source to make it easier
to incorporate future ACPICA changes, but as it turns our we can avoid
carrying it thanks to some ACPICA release process tweaks, so remove
drivers/acpi/acpica/utclib.c from the kernel source tree.

[rjw: Modified the changelog slightly.]
Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

All devices behind Haswell LPSS (Low Power Subsystem) should be represented
as platform devices so add them to the acpi_platform_device_ids list.
Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>