- 12 12月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Duyck 提交于
This patch is meant to cleanup the handling of read_barrier_depends and smp_read_barrier_depends. In multiple spots in the kernel headers read_barrier_depends is defined as "do {} while (0)", however we then go into the SMP vs non-SMP sections and have the SMP version reference read_barrier_depends, and the non-SMP define it as yet another empty do/while. With this commit I went through and cleaned out the duplicate definitions and reduced the number of definitions down to 2 per header. In addition I moved the 50 line comments for the macro from the x86 and mips headers that defined it as an empty do/while to those that were actually defining the macro, alpha and blackfin. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 18 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
MIPS is interesting and has hardware variants that reorder over ll/sc as well as those that do not. Implement the 2 new barrier functions as per the old barriers. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-9ph49jbae3hol9v721sbc2g6@git.kernel.org Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 12 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
A number of situations currently require the heavyweight smp_mb(), even though there is no need to order prior stores against later loads. Many architectures have much cheaper ways to handle these situations, but the Linux kernel currently has no portable way to make use of them. This commit therefore supplies smp_load_acquire() and smp_store_release() to remedy this situation. The new smp_load_acquire() primitive orders the specified load against any subsequent reads or writes, while the new smp_store_release() primitive orders the specifed store against any prior reads or writes. These primitives allow array-based circular FIFOs to be implemented without an smp_mb(), and also allow a theoretical hole in rcu_assign_pointer() to be closed at no additional expense on most architectures. In addition, the RCU experience transitioning from explicit smp_read_barrier_depends() and smp_wmb() to rcu_dereference() and rcu_assign_pointer(), respectively resulted in substantial improvements in readability. It therefore seems likely that replacing other explicit barriers with smp_load_acquire() and smp_store_release() will provide similar benefits. It appears that roughly half of the explicit barriers in core kernel code might be so replaced. [Changelog by PaulMck] Reviewed-by: N"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Cc: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Victor Kaplansky <VICTORK@il.ibm.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20131213150640.908486364@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 05 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Maciej W. Rozycki 提交于
Another whitespace clean-up, this removes tabs from between sentences in some comments. Signed-off-by: NMaciej W. Rozycki <macro@codesourcery.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/6103/Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-
- 01 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf Baechle 提交于
Having received another series of whitespace patches I decided to do this once and for all rather than dealing with this kind of patches trickling in forever. Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-
- 29 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Disintegrate asm/system.h for MIPS. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
-
- 27 2月, 2010 4 次提交
-
-
由 David Daney 提交于
The current locking mechanism uses a ll/sc sequence to release a spinlock. This is slower than a wmb() followed by a store to unlock. The branching forward to .subsection 2 on sc failure slows down the contended case. So we get rid of that part too. Since we are now working on naturally aligned u16 values, we can get rid of a masking operation as the LHU already does the right thing. The ANDI are reversed for better scheduling on multi-issue CPUs On a 12 CPU 750MHz Octeon cn5750 this patch improves ipv4 UDP packet forwarding rates from 3.58*10^6 PPS to 3.99*10^6 PPS, or about 11%. Signed-off-by: NDavid Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/937/Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-
由 David Daney 提交于
In order to achieve correct synchronization semantics, the Octeon port had defined CONFIG_WEAK_REORDERING_BEYOND_LLSC. This resulted in code that looks like: sync ll ... . . . sc ... . . sync The second SYNC was redundant, but harmless. Octeon has a SYNCW instruction that acts as a write-memory-barrier (due to an erratum in some parts two SYNCW are used). It is much faster than SYNC because it imposes ordering on the writes, but doesn't otherwise stall the execution pipeline. On Octeon, SYNC stalls execution until all preceeding writes are committed to the coherent memory system. Using: syncw;syncw ll . . . sc . . Has identical semantics to the first sequence, but is much faster. The SYNCW orders the writes, and the SC will not complete successfully until the write is committed to the coherent memory system. So at the end all preceeding writes have been committed. Since Octeon does not do speculative reads, this functions as a full barrier. The patch removes CONFIG_WEAK_REORDERING_BEYOND_LLSC, and substitutes SYNCW for SYNC in write-memory-barriers. Signed-off-by: NDavid Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/850/Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-
由 David Daney 提交于
Replace some instances of smp_llsc_mb() with a new macro smp_mb__before_llsc(). It is used before ll/sc sequences that are documented as needing write barrier semantics. The default implementation of smp_mb__before_llsc() is just smp_llsc_mb(), so there are no changes in semantics. Also simplify definition of smp_mb(), smp_rmb(), and smp_wmb() to be just barrier() in the non-SMP case. Signed-off-by: NDavid Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/851/Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-
由 David Daney 提交于
The smp_llsc_rmb() and smp_llsc_wmb() macros are not used in the tree, remove them. Signed-off-by: NDavid Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/848/Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-
- 11 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf Baechle 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-
- 16 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Bogendoerfer 提交于
SGI-IP28 is running in so called slow mode, when kernel is started from the PROM. PROM calls must be done in slow mode otherwise the PROM will issue an error. To get better memory performance we now switch to normal mode, when the PROM is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: NThomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-
- 21 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf Baechle 提交于
None of weakly ordered processor supported in tree need this but it seems like this could change ... Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-
- 05 12月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf Baechle 提交于
Also the R4000 / R4600 LL/SC instructions imply a sync so no explicit sync needed. Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-