- 04 5月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Mosberger-Tang 提交于
Patch below fixes 3 trivial typos which are caught by the new assembler (v2.169.90). Please apply. [Note: fix to memcpy that was also part of this patch was separately applied from patches by H.J. and Andreas ... so the delta here only has the other two fixes. -Tony] Signed-off-by: NDavid Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
-
- 01 5月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Rothwell 提交于
Signed-off-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 26 4月, 2005 2 次提交
-
-
由 David Mosberger-Tang 提交于
Sadly, I goofed in this syscall-tuning patch: ChangeSet 1.1966.1.40 2005/01/22 13:31:05 davidm@hpl.hp.com [IA64] Improve ia64_leave_syscall() for McKinley-type cores. Optimize ia64_leave_syscall() a bit better for McKinley-type cores. The patch looks big, but that's mostly due to renaming r16/r17 to r2/r3. Good for a 13 cycle improvement. The problem is that the size of the physical stacked registers was loaded into the wrong register (r3 instead of r17). Since r17 by coincidence always had the value 1, this had the effect of turning rse_clear_invalid into a no-op. That poses the risk of leaking kernel state back to user-land and is hence not acceptable. The fix below is simple, but unfortunately it costs us about 28 cycles in syscall overhead. ;-( Unfortunately, there isn't much we can do about that since those registers have to be cleared one way or another. --david Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
-
由 David Mosberger-Tang 提交于
Recently I noticed that clearing ar.ssd/ar.csd right before srlz.d is causing significant stalling in the syscall path. The patch below fixes that by moving the register-writes after srlz.d. On a Madison, this drops break-based getpid() from 241 to 226 cycles (-15 cycles). Signed-off-by: NDavid Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com> Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-