None of these files are actually using any __init type directives and hence
don't need to include <linux/init.h>.   Most are just a left over from
__devinit and __cpuinit removal, or simply due to code getting copied from
one driver to the next.
Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Make the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) code use
pci_device_is_present() for checking if devices are present instead
of open coding the same thing.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

In order to avoid the need to register special ACPI dock
operations for SATA devices add a .uevent() callback pointer to
struct acpi_hotplug_context and make dock_hotplug_event() use that
callback if available.  Also rename the existing .event() callback
in struct acpi_hotplug_context to .notify() to avoid possible
confusion in the future.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Instead of requiring a set of special dock operations to be registered
via register_hotplug_dock_device() for each ACPI dock device, it is
much more straightforward to use callback pointers from the devices'
hotplug contexts if available.

For this reason, modify dock_hotplug_event() to use callback pointers
from the hotplug contexts of ACPI devices and fall back to using the
special dock operarions only if those callbacks are missing.  Also
make the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) subsystem set the .fixup
callback pointer in the hotplug contexts of devices handled by it to
a new function, acpiphp_post_dock_fixup(), so that the dock station
driver can use the callbacks from those contexts instead of special
dock operations registered via register_hotplug_dock_device().

Along with the above changes drop the ACPIPHP's dock operations that
are not necessary any more.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Rework the ACPI dock station driver to store ACPI device object
pointers instead of ACPI handles in its internal data structures.

The purpose is moslty to make subsequent simplifications possible,
but also this allows the overall code size to be reduced slightly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

In order for the ACPI dock station code to be able to use the
callbacks pointed to by the ACPI device objects' hotplug contexts
add a .fixup() callback pointer to struct acpi_hotplug_context.
That callback will be useful to handle PCI devices located in
dock stations.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

After recent changes adding dock station handling to the ACPI hotplug
core, it is not necessary to clear the .event() pointer in the
ACPIPHP device hotplug context for dock stations any more, so don't
do that.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Minor whitespace cleanup; no functional change.
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

In case a card is physically yanked out, it should immediately be removed,
regardless of the "surprise" capability bit. Thus:

  - Always handle the physical removal - regardless of the "surprise" bit.
  - Don't use "surprise" capability when making decisions about enabling
    presence detect notifications.
  - Reword the comments to indicate the intent.
Signed-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatjain@juniper.net>
Signed-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <groeck@juniper.net>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Currently, ACPIPHP does not add hotplug context to devices that
should be handled by the native PCI hotplug (PCIeHP) code.  The
reason why was because PCIeHP didn't know about the devices'
connections with ACPI and would not clean up things properly
during an eject of an ACPI-backed device, for example.

However, after recent changes that made the ACPI core create struct
acpi_device objects for all namespace nodes regardless of the
underlying devices' status and added PCI rescan-remove locking to
both ACPIPHP and PCIeHP, that concern is not valid any more.
Namely, after those changes PCIeHP need not care about the ACPI
side of things any more and it should be serialized with respect to
ACPIPHP and they won't be running concurrently with each other in
any case.

For this reason, make ACPIPHP to add its hotplug context to
all devices with ACPI companions, even the ones that should be
handled by PCIeHP in principle.  That may work around hotplug
issues on some systems where PCIeHP is supposed to work, but it
doesn't and the ACPI hotplug signaling works instead.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The name of register_slot() doesn't really reflect what the function
is does, so rename it to acpiphp_add_context() and add a proper
kerneldoc comment to it.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Replace list_for_each() + pci_bus_b() with list_for_each_entry().
Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>

If we found device already exists during hot add device, we should leave
it, not turn the slot off.
Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

This is a static checker fix and I can't test it, but from the context it
definitely looks like hexadecimal 0x20 was intended here instead of decimal
20.
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

The ACPI specification (ACPI 5.0A, Section 6.3.7) says:

 _STA may return bit 0 clear (not present) with bit 3 set (device is
 functional). This case is used to indicate a valid device for which
 no device driver should be loaded (for example, a bridge device.)
 Children of this device may be present and valid. OSPM should
 continue enumeration below a device whose _STA returns this bit
 combination.

Evidently, some BIOSes follow that and return 0x0A from _STA, which
causes problems to happen when they trigger bus check or device check
notifications for those devices too.  Namely, ACPIPHP thinks that they
are gone and may drop them, for example, if such a notification is
triggered during a resume from system suspend.

To fix that, modify ACPICA to regard devies as present and
functioning if _STA returns both the ACPI_STA_DEVICE_ENABLED
and ACPI_STA_DEVICE_FUNCTIONING bits set for them.
Reported-and-tested-by: NPeter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com>
Cc: 3.12+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.12+
[rjw: Subject and changelog, minor code modifications]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Today it is there is no protection around pciehp_enable_slot() and
pciehp_disable_slot() to ensure that they complete before another
hot-plug operation can be done on that particular slot.

This patch introduces the slot->hotplug_lock to ensure that any hotplug
operations (add / remove) complete before another hotplug event can begin
processing on that particular slot.
Signed-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatjain@juniper.net>
Signed-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <groeck@juniper.net>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Today, this is how all the hotplug and unplug events work:

Hotplug / Removal needs to be done
  => Set slot->state (protected by slot->lock) to either
    POWERON_STATE (for enabling) or POWEROFF_STATE (for disabling).
  => Submit the work item for pciehp_power_thread() to slot->wq.

Problem:
  There is a problem if the hotplug events can happen fast enough that
  they do not give SW enough time to add or remove the new devices.

  => Assume: Event for unplug comes (e.g. surprise removal). But
     before the pciehp_power_thread() work item was executed, the
     card was replaced by another card, causing surprise hotplug event.

  => What goes wrong:
    => The hot-removal event sets slot->state to POWEROFF_STATE, and
       schedules the pciehp_power_thread().
    => The hot-add event sets slot->state to POWERON_STATE, and
       schedules the pciehp_power_thread().
    => Now the pciehp_power_thread() is scheduled twice, and on both
       occasions it will find POWERON_STATE and will try to add the
       devices on the slot, and will fail complaining that the devices
       already exist.

  => Why this is a problem: If the device was replaced between the hot
     removal and hot-add, then we should unload the old driver and
     reload the new one. This does not happen today. The kernel or the
     driver is not even aware that the device was replaced.

     The problem is that the pciehp_power_thread() only looks at the
     slot->state which would only contain the *latest* state - not
     the actual event (add / remove) that was the intent of the IRQ
     handler who submitted the work.

What this patch does:

  => Hotplug events pass on an actual request (for addition or removal)
     to pciehp_power_thread() which is local to that work item
     submission.

  => pciehp_power_thread() does not need to look at slote->state and
     hence no locks needed in that.

  => Essentially this results in all the hotplug and unplug events
     "replayed" by pciehp_power_thread().
Signed-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatjain@juniper.net>
Signed-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <groeck@juniper.net>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Disable the link notification (in addition to presence detect
notifications) across the slot reset since the reset could flap the link,
and we don't want to treat it as hot unplug followed by a hotplug.
Signed-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatjain@juniper.net>
Signed-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <groeck@juniper.net>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

It does not make much sense to refuse to disable a slot if an adapter is
not present or the latch is open. If an adapter is not present, it provides
an even better reason to disable the device slot.

This is specially a problem for link state hot-plug, because some ports use
in band mechanism for presence detection. Thus when link goes down,
presence detect also goes down. We _want_ that the removal should take
place in such case.

Thus remove the checks for adapter and latch in pciehp_disable_slot()
Signed-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatjain@juniper.net>
Signed-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <groeck@juniper.net>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

We need future link up events for hot-add, thus don't disable the link
permanently during device removal. Also, remove the static functions that
are now left unused.

This reverts part of 2debd928 ("PCI: pciehp: Disable/enable link during
slot power off/on").  This was discussed at the URL below, where it was
revealed that it was done for a bug in a PCIe repeater chip on that
particular platform.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAErSpo72KZ-a2OSQLWoK71GCgwBt676XZdGt4tEYm-6UYnLmPw@mail.gmail.comSigned-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatjain@juniper.net>
Signed-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <groeck@juniper.net>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Enable the Link state notifications unconditionally. Enable the
presence detection notification only if attention button is absent.
This was discussed at this thread:
    https://lkml.kernel.org/r/529E5C0E.80903@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatjain@juniper.net>
Signed-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <groeck@juniper.net>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

A lot of systems do not have the fancy buttons and LEDs, and instead
want to rely only on the Link state change events to drive the hotplug
and removal state machinery.
(http://www.spinics.net/lists/hotplug/msg05802.html)

This patch adds support for that functionality. Here are the details
about the patch itself:

* Define and use interrupt events for linkup / linkdown.

* Make the pcie_isr() also look at link events, and direct control to
  corresponding (new) link state change handler function.

* Introduce the functions to handle link-up and link-down events and
  queue the add / removal work in the slot->wq to be processed by
  pciehp_power_thread()

As a side note, this patch also fixes the bug
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65521 "pciehp ignores Data Link
Layer State Changed bit."
Signed-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatjain@juniper.net>
Signed-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <groeck@juniper.net>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

check_link_active() functionality needs to be used by subsequent patches
(that introduce link state change based hotplug). Thus make the function
non-static, and rename it to pciehp_check_link_active() so as to be
consistent with other non-static functions.
Signed-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatjain@juniper.net>
Signed-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <groeck@juniper.net>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Since acpi_device_hotplug() assumes that ACPI handles of device
objects passed to it will not become invalid while acpi_scan_lock
is being held, make acpiphp_disable_slot() acquire acpi_scan_lock,
because it generally causes _EJ0 to be executed for one of the
devices in the slot and that may cause its ACPI handle to become
invalid.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since the only existing caller of acpiphp_check_host_bridge(),
which is acpi_pci_root_scan_dependent(), already has a struct
acpi_device pointer needed to obtain the ACPIPHP context, it
doesn't make sense to execute acpi_bus_get_device() on its
handle in acpiphp_handle_to_bridge() just in order to get that
pointer back.

For this reason, modify acpiphp_check_host_bridge() to take
a struct acpi_device pointer as its argument and rearrange the
code accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Since acpi_bus_notify() is executed on all notifications for all
devices anyway, make it execute acpi_device_hotplug() for all
hotplug events instead of installing notify handlers pointing to
the same function for all hotplug devices.

This change reduces both the size and complexity of ACPI-based device
hotplug code.  Moreover, since acpi_device_hotplug() only does
significant things for devices that have either an ACPI scan handler,
or a hotplug context with .eject() defined, and those devices
had notify handlers pointing to acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() installed
before anyway, this modification shouldn't change functionality.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() does not use its data argument any
more, the second argument of acpi_install_hotplug_notify_handler()
can be dropped, so do that and update its callers accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) code currently attaches its
hotplug context objects directly to ACPI namespace nodes representing
hotplug devices.  However, after recent changes causing struct
acpi_device to be created for every namespace node representing a
device (regardless of its status), that is not necessary any more.
Moreover, it's vulnerable to the theoretical issue that the ACPI
handle passed in the context between handle_hotplug_event() and
hotplug_event_work() may become invalid in the meantime (as a
result of a concurrent table unload).

In principle, this issue might be addressed by adding a non-empty
release handler for ACPIPHP hotplug context objects analogous to
acpi_scan_drop_device(), but that would duplicate the code in that
function and in acpi_device_del_work_fn().  For this reason, it's
better to modify ACPIPHP to attach its device hotplug contexts to
struct device objects representing hotplug devices and make it
use acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() as its notify handler.  At the same
time, acpi_device_hotplug() can be modified to dispatch the new
.hp.event() callback pointing to acpiphp_hotplug_event() from ACPI
device objects associated with PCI devices or use the generic
ACPI device hotplug code for device objects with matching scan
handlers.

This allows the existing code duplication between ACPIPHP and the
ACPI core to be reduced too and makes further ACPI-based device
hotplug consolidation possible.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Subsequent changes will require the ACPI core to acquire the lock
protecting the ACPIPHP hotplug contexts, so move the definition of
the lock to the core and change its name to be more generic.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Since hotplug_event() can get the ACPI handle needed for debug
printouts from its context argument, there's no need to pass the
handle to it.  Moreover, the second argument's type may be changed
to (struct acpiphp_context *), because that's what is always passed
to hotplug_event() as the second argument anyway.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Make hotplug_event() use acpi_handle_debug() instead of an open-coded
debug message printing and clean up the messages printed by it.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

A few lines of code can be cut from hotplug_event() by defining
and initializing the slot variable at the top of the function,
so do that.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

After recent PCI core changes related to the rescan/remove locking,
the code sections under crit_sect mutexes from ACPIPHP slot objects
are always executed under the general PCI rescan/remove lock.
For this reason, the crit_sect mutexes are simply redundant, so drop
them.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

acpiphp_bus_add() is only called from one place, so move the code out
of it into that place and drop it.  Also make that code use
func_to_acpi_device() to get the struct acpi_device pointer it needs
instead of calling acpi_bus_get_device() which may be costly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

After recent modifications of the ACPI core making it create a struct
acpi_device object for every namespace node representing a device
regardless of the current status of that device the ACPIPHP code
can store a struct acpi_device pointer instead of an ACPI handle
in struct acpiphp_context.  This immediately makes it possible to
avoid making potentially costly calls to acpi_bus_get_device() in
two places and allows some more simplifications to be made going
forward.

The reason why that is correct is because ACPIPHP only installs
hotify handlers for namespace nodes that exist when
acpiphp_enumerate_slots() is called for their parent bridge.
That only happens if the parent bridge has an ACPI companion
associated with it, which means that the ACPI namespace scope
in question has been scanned already at that point.  That, in
turn, means that struct acpi_device objects have been created
for all namespace nodes in that scope and pointers to those
objects can be stored directly instead of their ACPI handles.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

If a struct acpi_device pointer is passed to acpiphp_no_hotplug()
instead of an ACPI handle, the function won't need to call
acpi_bus_get_device(), which may be costly, any more.  Then,
trim_stale_devices() can call acpiphp_no_hotplug() passing
the struct acpi_device object it already has directly to that
function.

Make those changes and update slot_no_hotplug() accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

If trim_stale_devices() calls acpi_bus_trim() directly, we can
save a potentially costly acpi_bus_get_device() invocation.  After
making that change acpiphp_bus_trim() would only be called from one
place, so move the code from it to that place and drop it.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

The err label in register_slot() is only jumped to from one place,
so move the code under the label to that place and drop the label.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Add proper kerneldoc comments describing acpiphp_enumerate_slots()
and acpiphp_remove_slots().
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

After recent PCI core changes related to the rescan/remove locking,
the ACPIPHP's disable_slot() function is only called under the
general PCI rescan/remove lock, so it doesn't have to use
dev_in_slot() any more to avoid race conditions.  Make it simply
walk the devices on the bus and drop the ones in the slot being
disabled and drop dev_in_slot() which has no more users.

Moreover, to avoid problems described in the changelog of commit
29ed1f29 (PCI: pciehp: Fix null pointer deref when hot-removing
SR-IOV device), make disable_slot() carry out the list walk in
reverse order.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>