1. 28 7月, 2011 2 次提交
  2. 30 6月, 2011 1 次提交
    • K
      [SCSI] libfc:Fix for exchange/seq loopup failure when FCoE stack is used as... · e3e65c69
      Kiran Patil 提交于
      [SCSI] libfc:Fix for exchange/seq loopup failure when FCoE stack is used as target and connected to windows initaitor
      
      Problem: Linux based SW target (TCM) connected to windows initiator
      was unable to satisfy write request of size > 2K.
      
      Fix: Existing linux implememtation of FCoE stack is expecting sequence
      number to match w.r.t incoming framme. When DDP is used on target in
      response to write request from initiator, SW stack is notified only
      when last data frame arrives and only the pakcket header of last data
      frame is posted to NetRx queue of storage. When that last packet was
      processed in libfc:Exchange layer, implementation was expecting
      sequence number to match, but in this case sequence number which is
      embedded in FC Header is assigned by windows initaitor, hence due to
      sequence number mismatch post-processing which shall result into
      sending RSP is not done. Enhanced the code to utilize the sequence
      number of incoming last frame and process the packet so that, it will
      eventually complete the write request by sending write response (RSP)
      GOOD.
      
      Notes/Dependencies: This patch is validated using windows and linux
      initiator to make sure, it doesn't break anything.
      Signed-off-by: NKiran Patil <kiran.patil@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRobert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
      e3e65c69
  3. 25 5月, 2011 2 次提交
  4. 31 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  5. 01 3月, 2011 2 次提交
  6. 13 2月, 2011 4 次提交
  7. 22 12月, 2010 5 次提交
  8. 28 7月, 2010 3 次提交
  9. 20 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  10. 17 5月, 2010 2 次提交
  11. 12 4月, 2010 1 次提交
  12. 11 4月, 2010 4 次提交
  13. 30 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking... · 5a0e3ad6
      Tejun Heo 提交于
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h
      
      percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
      included when building most .c files.  percpu.h includes slab.h which
      in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
      universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.
      
      percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed.  Prepare for
      this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
      headers directly instead of assuming availability.  As this conversion
      needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
      used as the basis of conversion.
      
        http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py
      
      The script does the followings.
      
      * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
        only the necessary includes are there.  ie. if only gfp is used,
        gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.
      
      * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
        blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
        to its surrounding.  It's put in the include block which contains
        core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
        alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
        doesn't seem to be any matching order.
      
      * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
        because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
        an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
        file.
      
      The conversion was done in the following steps.
      
      1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
         over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
         and ~3000 slab.h inclusions.  The script emitted errors for ~400
         files.
      
      2. Each error was manually checked.  Some didn't need the inclusion,
         some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
         embedding .c file was more appropriate for others.  This step added
         inclusions to around 150 files.
      
      3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
         from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.
      
      4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
         e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
         APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.
      
      5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
         editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
         files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell.  Most gfp.h
         inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
         wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros.  Each
         slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
         necessary.
      
      6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.
      
      7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
         were fixed.  CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
         distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
         more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
         build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).
      
         * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
         * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
         * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
         * ia64 SMP allmodconfig
         * s390 SMP allmodconfig
         * alpha SMP allmodconfig
         * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig
      
      8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
         a separate patch and serve as bisection point.
      
      Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
      6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
      If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
      headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
      the specific arch.
      Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Guess-its-ok-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
      Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
      5a0e3ad6
  14. 18 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  15. 17 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  16. 05 12月, 2009 9 次提交