- 30 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
Since call to function sctp_sf_abort_violation() need paramter 'arg' with 'struct sctp_chunk' type, it will read the chunk type and chunk length from the chunk_hdr member of chunk. But call to sctp_sf_violation_paramlen() always with 'struct sctp_paramhdr' type's parameter, it will be passed to sctp_sf_abort_violation(). This may cause kernel panic. sctp_sf_violation_paramlen() |-- sctp_sf_abort_violation() |-- sctp_make_abort_violation() This patch fixed this problem. This patch also fix two place which called sctp_sf_violation_paramlen() with wrong paramter type. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 19 9月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
If INIT-ACK is received with SupportedExtensions parameter which indicates that the peer does not support AUTH, the packet will be silently ignore, and sctp_process_init() do cleanup all of the transports in the association. When T1-Init timer is expires, OOPS happen while we try to choose a different init transport. The solution is to only clean up the non-active transports, i.e the ones that the peer added. However, that introduces a problem with sctp_connectx(), because we don't mark the proper state for the transports provided by the user. So, we'll simply mark user-provided transports as ACTIVE. That will allow INIT retransmissions to work properly in the sctp_connectx() context and prevent the crash. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Do not enable peer features like addip and auth, if they are administratively disabled localy. If the peer resports that he supports something that we don't, neither end can use it so enabling it is pointless. This solves a problem when talking to a peer that has auth and addip enabled while we do not. Found by Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul <andrei@iptel.org>. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 19 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 14 5月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Patrick McHardy 提交于
Introduced by c4492586 (sctp: Add address type check while process paramaters of ASCONF chunk): net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c: In function 'sctp_process_asconf': net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:2828: warning: 'addr_param' may be used uninitialized in this function net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:2828: note: 'addr_param' was declared here Signed-off-by: NPatrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 12 5月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
If socket is create by AF_INET type, add IPv6 address to asoc will cause kernel panic while packet is transmitted on that transport. This patch add address type check before process paramaters of ASCONF chunk. If peer is not support this address type, return with error invald parameter. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
If socket is create by PF_INET type, it can not used IPv6 address to send/recv DATA, So we can not used IPv6 address even if peer tell us it support IPv6 address. This patch fix to only enabled peer IPv6 address support on PF_INET6 socket. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 13 4月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Robert P. J. Day 提交于
Replacing (almost) all invocations of list_for_each() with list_for_each_entry() tightens up the code and allows for the deletion of numerous list iterator variables that are no longer necessary. Signed-off-by: NRobert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
RFC 4890 has the following text: The HMAC algorithm based on SHA-1 MUST be supported and included in the HMAC-ALGO parameter. As a result, we need to check in sctp_verify_param() that HMAC_SHA1 is present in the list. If not, we should probably treat this as a protocol violation. It should also be a protocol violation if the HMAC parameter is empty. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 24 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Florian Westphal 提交于
133886 2004 220 136110 213ae sctp.new/sctp.o 134018 2004 220 136242 21432 sctp.old/sctp.o Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 06 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gui Jianfeng 提交于
If an address family is not listed in "Supported Address Types" parameter(INIT Chunk), but the packet is sent by that family, this address family should be considered as supported by peer. Otherwise, an error condition will occur. For instance, if kernel receives an IPV6 SCTP INIT chunk with "Support Address Types" parameter which indicates just supporting IPV4 Address family. Kernel will reply an IPV6 SCTP INIT ACK packet, but the source ipv6 address in ipv6 header will be vacant. This is not correct. refer to RFC4460 as following: IMPLEMENTATION NOTE: If an SCTP endpoint lists in the 'Supported Address Types' parameter either IPv4 or IPv6, but uses the other family for sending the packet containing the INIT chunk, or if it also lists addresses of the other family in the INIT chunk, then the address family that is not listed in the 'Supported Address Types' parameter SHOULD also be considered as supported by the receiver of the INIT chunk. The receiver of the INIT chunk SHOULD NOT respond with any kind of error indication. Here is a fix to comply to RFC. Signed-off-by: NGui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 07 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
In a few instances, we need to remove the chunk from the transmitted list prior to freeing it. This is because the free code doesn't do that any more and so we need to do it manually. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 05 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
I was notified by Randy Stewart that lksctp claims to be "the reference implementation". First of all, "the refrence implementation" was the original implementation of SCTP in usersapce written ty Randy and a few others. Second, after looking at the definiton of 'reference implementation', we don't really meet the requirements. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 01 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
This patch fix miss of check for report unrecognized HMAC Algorithm parameter. When AUTH is disabled, goto fall through path to report unrecognized parameter, else, just break Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 1月, 2008 5 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The Security Considerations section of RFC 5061 has the following text: If an SCTP endpoint that supports this extension receives an INIT that indicates that the peer supports the ASCONF extension but does NOT support the [RFC4895] extension, the receiver of such an INIT MUST send an ABORT in response. Note that an implementation is allowed to silently discard such an INIT as an option as well, but under NO circumstance is an implementation allowed to proceed with the association setup by sending an INIT-ACK in response. An implementation that receives an INIT-ACK that indicates that the peer does not support the [RFC4895] extension MUST NOT send the COOKIE-ECHO to establish the association. Instead, the implementation MUST discard the INIT-ACK and report to the upper- layer user that an association cannot be established destroying the Transmission Control Block (TCB). Follow the recomendations. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The processing of the ASCONF chunks has changed a lot in the spec. New items are: 1. A list of ASCONF-ACK chunks is now cached 2. The source of the packet is used in response. 3. New handling for unexpect ASCONF chunks. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The ADD-IP "Set Primary IP Address" parameter is allowed in the INIT/INIT-ACK exchange. Allow processing of this parameter during the INIT/INIT-ACK. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The Address Parameter in the parameter list of the ASCONF chunk may be a wildcard address. In this case special processing is required. For the 'add' case, the source IP of the packet is added. In the 'del' case, all addresses except the source IP of packet are removed. In the "mark primary" case, the source address is marked as primary. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 1月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Some recent changes completely removed accounting for the FORWARD_TSN parameter length in the INIT and INIT-ACK chunk. This is wrong and should be restored. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 12月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 11月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Supported extensions parameter was not coded right and ended up over-writing memory or causing skb overflows. First, remove the FWD_TSN support from as it shouldn't be there and also fix the paramter encoding. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
There was a typo that cleared the HMACS parameters when no authenticated chunks were specified. We whould be clearing the chunks pointer instead of the hmacs. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 10 11月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
SCTP-AUTH and future ADD-IP updates have a requirement to do additional verification of parameters and an ability to ABORT the association if verification fails. So, introduce additional return code so that we can clear signal a required action. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 08 11月, 2007 4 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
This patch adds a tunable that will allow ADD_IP to work without AUTH for backward compatibility. The default value is off since the default value for ADD_IP is off as well. People who need to use ADD-IP with older implementations take risks of connection hijacking and should consider upgrading or turning this tunable on. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
After learning more about rcu, it looks like the ADD-IP hadling doesn't need to call call_rcu_bh. All the rcu critical sections use rcu_read_lock, so using call_rcu_bh is wrong here. Now, restore the local_bh_disable() code blocks and use normal call_rcu() calls. Also restore the missing return statement. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
If ASCONF chunk is bundled with other chunks as the first chunk, when process the ASCONF parameters, full packet data will be process as the parameters of the ASCONF chunk, not only the real parameters. So if you send a ASCONF chunk bundled with other chunks, you will get an unexpect result. This problem also exists when ASCONF-ACK chunk is bundled with other chunks. This patch fix this problem. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 27 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
This patch fixes the errors made in the users of the crypto layer during the sg_init_table conversion. It also adds a few conversions that were missing altogether. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 24 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Most drivers need to set length and offset as well, so may as well fold those three lines into one. Add sg_assign_page() for those two locations that only needed to set the page, where the offset/length is set outside of the function context. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
- 23 10月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Christian Borntraeger 提交于
sctp fails to compile with net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c: In function 'sctp_pack_cookie': net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:1516: error: implicit declaration of function 'sg_init_table' net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:1517: error: implicit declaration of function 'sg_set_page' use the proper include file. SCTP maintainers Vlad Yasevich and Sridhar Samudrala are CCed. Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
- 11 10月, 2007 5 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
ADD-IP spec requires AUTH. It is, in fact, dangerous without AUTH. So, disable ADD-IP functionality if the peer claims to support ADD-IP, but not AUTH. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
SCTP-AUTH, Section 6.2: Endpoints MUST send all requested chunks authenticated where this has been requested by the peer. The other chunks MAY be sent authenticated or not. If endpoint pair shared keys are used, one of them MUST be selected for authentication. To send chunks in an authenticated way, the sender MUST include these chunks after an AUTH chunk. This means that a sender MUST bundle chunks in order to authenticate them. If the endpoint has no endpoint pair shared key for the peer, it MUST use Shared Key Identifier 0 with an empty endpoint pair shared key. If there are multiple endpoint shared keys the sender selects one and uses the corresponding Shared Key Identifier Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Implement processing for the CHUNKS, RANDOM, and HMAC parameters and deal with how this parameters are effected by association restarts. In particular, during unexpeted INIT processing, we need to reply with parameters from the original INIT chunk. Also, after restart, we need to update the old association with new peer parameters and change the association shared keys. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
SCTP Supported Extenions parameter is specified in Section 4.2.7 of the ADD-IP draft (soon to be RFC). The parameter is encoded as: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Parameter Type = 0x8008 | Parameter Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | CHUNK TYPE 1 | CHUNK TYPE 2 | CHUNK TYPE 3 | CHUNK TYPE 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | .... | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | CHUNK TYPE N | PAD | PAD | PAD | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ It contains a list of chunks that a particular SCTP extension uses. Current extensions supported are Partial Reliability (FWD-TSN) and ADD-IP (ASCONF and ASCONF-ACK). When implementing new extensions (AUTH, PKT-DROP, etc..), new chunks need to be added to this parameter. Parameter processing would be modified to negotiate support for these new features. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Adrian Bunk 提交于
sctp_addto_param() can become static. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 9月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
If ADDIP is enabled, when an ASCONF chunk is received with ASCONF paramter length set to zero, this will cause infinite loop. By the way, if an malformed ASCONF chunk is received, will cause processing to access memory without verifying. This is because of not check the validity of parameters in ASCONF chunk. This patch fixed this. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 17 9月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Since the sctp_sockaddr_entry is now RCU enabled as part of the patch to synchronize sctp_localaddr_list, it makes sense to change all handling of these entries to RCU. This includes the sctp_bind_addrs structure and it's list of bound addresses. This list is currently protected by an external rw_lock and that looks like an overkill. There are only 2 writers to the list: bind()/bindx() calls, and BH processing of ASCONF-ACK chunks. These are already seriealized via the socket lock, so they will not step on each other. These are also relatively rare, so we should be good with RCU. The readers are varied and they are easily converted to RCU. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Acked-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NSridhar Samdurala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 31 8月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
If an INIT with invalid parameter length look like this: Parameter Type : 1 Parameter Length: 800 and not contain any payload, SCTP will ignore this parameter and send back a INIT-ACK. This patch is fix to handle this invalid parameter length correctly. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-