1. 18 7月, 2008 1 次提交
    • S
      sparc: copy sparc64 specific files to asm-sparc · a00736e9
      Sam Ravnborg 提交于
      Used the following script to copy the files:
      cd include
      set -e
      SPARC64=`ls asm-sparc64`
      for FILE in ${SPARC64}; do
      	if [ -f asm-sparc/$FILE ]; then
      		echo $FILE exist in asm-sparc
      	else
      		git mv asm-sparc64/$FILE asm-sparc/$FILE
      		printf "#include <asm-sparc/$FILE>\n" > asm-sparc64/$FILE
      		git add asm-sparc64/$FILE
      	fi
      done
      Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
      a00736e9
  2. 22 3月, 2008 1 次提交
    • D
      [SPARC64]: Remove most limitations to kernel image size. · 64658743
      David S. Miller 提交于
      Currently kernel images are limited to 8MB in size, and this causes
      problems especially when enabling features that take up a lot of
      kernel image space such as lockdep.
      
      The code now will align the kernel image size up to 4MB and map that
      many locked TLB entries.  So, the only practical limitation is the
      number of available locked TLB entries which is 16 on Cheetah and 64
      on pre-Cheetah sparc64 cpus.  Niagara cpus don't actually have hw
      locked TLB entry support.  Rather, the hypervisor transparently
      provides support for "locked" TLB entries since it runs with physical
      addressing and does the initial TLB miss processing.
      
      Fully utilizing this change requires some help from SILO, a patch for
      which will be submitted to the maintainer.  Essentially, SILO will
      only currently map up to 8MB for the kernel image and that needs to be
      increased.
      
      Note that neither this patch nor the SILO bits will help with network
      booting.  The openfirmware code will only map up to a certain amount
      of kernel image during a network boot and there isn't much we can to
      about that other than to implemented a layered network booting
      facility.  Solaris has this, and calls it "wanboot" and we may
      implement something similar at some point.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      64658743
  3. 16 7月, 2007 1 次提交
    • D
      [SPARC64]: Initial LDOM cpu hotplug support. · 4f0234f4
      David S. Miller 提交于
      Only adding cpus is supports at the moment, removal
      will come next.
      
      When new cpus are configured, the machine description is
      updated.  When we get the configure request we pass in a
      cpu mask of to-be-added cpus to the mdesc CPU node parser
      so it only fetches information for those cpus.  That code
      also proceeds to update the SMT/multi-core scheduling bitmaps.
      
      cpu_up() does all the work and we return the status back
      over the DS channel.
      
      CPUs via dr-cpu need to be booted straight out of the
      hypervisor, and this requires:
      
      1) A new trampoline mechanism.  CPUs are booted straight
         out of the hypervisor with MMU disabled and running in
         physical addresses with no mappings installed in the TLB.
      
         The new hvtramp.S code sets up the critical cpu state,
         installs the locked TLB mappings for the kernel, and
         turns the MMU on.  It then proceeds to follow the logic
         of the existing trampoline.S SMP cpu bringup code.
      
      2) All calls into OBP have to be disallowed when domaining
         is enabled.  Since cpus boot straight into the kernel from
         the hypervisor, OBP has no state about that cpu and therefore
         cannot handle being invoked on that cpu.
      
         Luckily it's only a handful of interfaces which can be called
         after the OBP device tree is obtained.  For example, rebooting,
         halting, powering-off, and setting options node variables.
      
      CPU removal support will require some infrastructure changes
      here.  Namely we'll have to process the requests via a true
      kernel thread instead of in a workqueue.  workqueues run on
      a per-cpu thread, but when unconfiguring we might need to
      force the thread to execute on another cpu if the current cpu
      is the one being removed.  Removal of a cpu also causes the kernel
      to destroy that cpu's workqueue running thread.
      
      Another issue on removal is that we may have interrupts still
      pointing to the cpu-to-be-removed.  So new code will be needed
      to walk the active INO list and retarget those cpus as-needed.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4f0234f4