- 22 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
There is a typo, it should be negative -errno instead. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 21 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Commit 46394fd0 (ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of the core) removed the generation of "online" uevents for containers, because "add" uevents are now generated for them automatically when container system devices are registered. However, there are user space tools that need to be notified when the container and all of its children have been enumerated, which doesn't happen any more. For this reason, add a mechanism allowing "online" uevents to be generated for ACPI containers after enumerating the container along with all of its children. Fixes: 46394fd0 (ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of the core) Reported-and-tested-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: 3.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 11 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zhang Rui 提交于
Newer laptops and tablets that use ACPI may have thermal sensors and other devices with thermal control capabilities outside the core CPU/SOC, for thermal safety reasons. They are exposed for the OS to use via 1) INT3400 ACPI device object as the master. 2) INT3401 ~ INT340B ACPI device objects as the slaves. This patch introduces a scan handler to enumerate the INT3400 ACPI device object to platform bus, and prevent its slaves from being enumerated before the controller driver being probed. Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
-
- 04 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yasuaki Ishimatsu 提交于
The _SUN device indentification object is not guaranteed to return the same value every time it is executed, so we should not cache its return value, but rather execute it every time as needed. If it is cached, an incorrect stale value may be used in some situations. This issue was exposed by commit 202317a5 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace). Fix it by avoiding to cache the return value of _SUN. Fixes: 202317a5 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace) Signed-off-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: 3.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+ [ rjw: Changelog ] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 26 8月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Lan Tianyu 提交于
Currently, notify callbacks for fixed button events are run from interrupt context. That is not necessary and after commit 0bf6368e (ACPI / button: Add ACPI Button event via netlink routine) it causes netlink routines to be called from interrupt context which is not correct. Also, that is different from non-fixed device events (including non-fixed button events) whose notify callbacks are all executed from process context. For the above reasons, make fixed button device notify callbacks run in process context which will avoid the deadlock when using netlink to report button events to user space. Fixes: 0bf6368e (ACPI / button: Add ACPI Button event via netlink routine) Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/21/606Reported-by: NBenjamin Block <bebl@mageta.org> Reported-by: NKnut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de> Signed-off-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> [rjw: Function names, subject and changelog.] Cc: 3.15+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.15+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
We generally don't allow ACPI drivers to bind to ACPI device objects that companion "physical" device objects are created for to avoid situations in which two different drivers may attempt to handle one device at the same time. Recent ACPI device enumeration rework extended that approach to ACPI PNP devices by starting to use a scan handler for enumerating them. However, we previously allowed ACPI drivers to bind to ACPI device objects with existing PNP device companions and changing that led to functional regressions on some systems. For this reason, add a special check for PNP devices in acpi_device_probe() so that ACPI drivers can bind to ACPI device objects having existing PNP device companions as before. Fixes: eec15edb (ACPI / PNP: use device ID list for PNPACPI device enumeration) Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81511 Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81971Reported-by: NGabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com> Reported-by: NDirk Griesbach <spamthis@freenet.de> Cc: 3.16+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.16+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 08 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tang Chen 提交于
When ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY is not configured, memory_device_handler.attach is not set. In acpi_scan_attach_handler(), the acpi_device->handler will not be initialized. In acpi_scan_hot_remove(), it doesn't check if acpi_device->handler is NULL. If we do memory hot-remove without ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY configured, the kernel will panic. BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000088 IP: [<ffffffff813e318f>] acpi_device_hotplug+0x1d7/0x4c4 PGD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: sd_mod(E) sr_mod(E) cdrom(E) crc_t10dif(E) crct10dif_common(E) ata_piix(E) libata(E) CPU: 0 PID: 41 Comm: kworker/u2:1 Tainted: G E 3.16.0-rc7--3.16-rc7-tangchen+ #20 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: kacpi_hotplug acpi_hotplug_work_fn task: ffff8800182436c0 ti: ffff880018254000 task.ti: ffff880018254000 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff813e318f>] [<ffffffff813e318f>] acpi_device_hotplug+0x1d7/0x4c4 RSP: 0000:ffff880018257da8 EFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88001cd8d800 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88001e40e6f8 RDI: 0000000000000246 RBP: ffff880018257df0 R08: 0000000000000096 R09: 00000000000011a0 R10: 63735f6970636120 R11: 725f746f685f6e61 R12: 0000000000000003 R13: ffff88001cc1c400 R14: ffff88001e062028 R15: 0000000000000040 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88001e400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b CR2: 0000000000000088 CR3: 000000001a9a2000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 0000000000000000 DR7: 0000000000000000 Stack: 00000000523cab58 ffff88001cd8d9f8 ffff88001852d480 00000000523cab58 ffff88001852d480 ffff880018221e40 ffff88001cc1c400 ffff88001cce2d00 0000000000000040 ffff880018257e08 ffffffff813dc31d ffff88001852d480 Call Trace: [<ffffffff813dc31d>] acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x1e/0x29 [<ffffffff8108eefb>] process_one_work+0x17b/0x460 [<ffffffff8108f69d>] worker_thread+0x11d/0x5b0 [<ffffffff8108f580>] ? rescuer_thread+0x3a0/0x3a0 [<ffffffff81096811>] kthread+0xe1/0x100 [<ffffffff81096730>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x1a0/0x1a0 [<ffffffff816cc6bc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [<ffffffff81096730>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x1a0/0x1a0 This patch fixes this problem by checking if acpi_device->handler is NULL in acpi_scan_hot_remove(). Fixes: d22ddcbc (ACPI / hotplug: Add demand_offline hotplug profile flag) Signed-off-by: NTang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: 3.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+ [rjw: Subject] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 24 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The ACPI device enumeration code in Linux assumes that buttons always are wakeup devices, so it calls acpi_setup_gpe_for_wake() for them which leads to undesirable side effects. Namely, that function sets up implicit device wake notification mechanism for a given GPE if there is no handler method in the ACPI namespace, which from the ACPICA's perspective means that there always is a way to handle that GPE if enabled. However, we don't handle wake notify events for buttons, so if there are no handler methods for their GPEs in the namespace, enabling a button GPE at run time leads to a GPE storm in some cases (the GPE triggers, ACPICA carries out the implicit wake notification for it which isn't handled, so the GPE triggers again and so on). To prevent that from happening use acpi_mark_gpe_for_wake() instead of acpi_setup_gpe_for_wake() for buttons which will cause ACPICA to only enable button GPEs if there are handler methods for the in the namespace. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 16 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since all of the acpi_set_hp_context() callers pass at least one NULL function pointer and one caller passes NULL function pointers only to it, drop function pointer arguments from acpi_set_hp_context() and make the callers initialize the function pointers in struct acpi_hotplug_context by themselves before passing it to acpi_set_hp_context(). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 30 5月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Zhang Rui 提交于
Because of the growing demand for enumerating ACPI devices to platform bus, change the code to enumerate ACPI device objects to platform bus by default. Namely, create platform devices for the ACPI device objects that 1. Have pnp.type.platform_id set (device objects with _HID currently). 2. Do not have a scan handler attached. 3. Are not SPI/I2C slave devices (that should be enumerated to the appropriate buses bus by their parent). Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> [rjw: Subject and changelog, rebase and code cleanup] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Currently, some scan handlers can be compiled out entirely, which leaves the device objects they normally attach to without a scan handler. This isn't a problem as long as we don't have any default enumeration mechanism that applies to all devices without a scan handler. However, if such a default enumeration is added, it still should not be applied to devices that are normally attached to by scan handlers, because that may result in creating "physical" device objects of a wrong type for them. Since we are going to create platform device objects for all ACPI device objects with pnp.type.platform_id set by default, clear pnp.type.platform_id where there is a matching scan handler without an .attach() callback and otherwise simply treat that scan handler as though the .attach() callback was present but always returned 0. This will allow us to compile out scan handler callbacks and leave the device ID lists used by them so as to prevent creating platform device objects for the matching ACPI devices. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Only certain types of ACPI device objects can be enumerated as platform devices, so in order to distinguish them from the others introduce a new ACPI device PNP type flag, platform_id, and set it for devices with a valid _HID to start with. This change is based on a Zhang Rui's prototype. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Zhang Rui 提交于
ACPI can be used to enumerate PNP devices, but the code does not handle this in the right way currently. Namely, if an ACPI device object 1. Has a _CRS method, 2. Has an identification of "three capital characters followed by four hex digits", 3. Is not in the excluded IDs list, it will be enumerated to PNP bus (that is, a PNP device object will be create for it). This means that, actually, the PNP bus type is used as the default bus type for enumerating _HID devices in ACPI. However, more and more _HID devices need to be enumerated to the platform bus instead (that is, platform device objects need to be created for them). As a result, the device ID list in acpi_platform.c is used to enforce creating platform device objects rather than PNP device objects for matching devices. That list has been continuously growing recently, unfortunately, and it is pretty much guaranteed to grow even more in the future. To address that problem it is better to enumerate _HID devices as platform devices by default. To this end, change the way of enumerating PNP devices by adding a PNP ACPI scan handler that will use a device ID list to create PNP devices for the ACPI device objects whose device IDs are present in that list. The initial device ID list in the PNP ACPI scan handler contains all of the pnp_device_id strings from all the existing PNP drivers, so this change should be transparent to the PNP core and all of the PNP drivers. Still, in the future it should be possible to reduce its size by converting PNP drivers that need not be PNP for any technical reasons into platform drivers. Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> [rjw: Rewrote the changelog, modified the PNP ACPI scan handler code] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Introduce a .match() callback for ACPI scan handlers to allow them to use more elaborate matching algorithms if necessary. That is needed for the upcoming PNP scan handler in particular. This change is based on a Zhang Rui's prototype. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 20 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Rework the ACPI PM domain's PM callbacks to avoid resuming devices during system suspend (in order to modify their wakeup settings etc.) if that isn't necessary. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 28 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aaron Lu 提交于
Fixed hardware does not exist on HW-reduced ACPI platforms since the programming interface for them is not implemented on them, so no need to scan that hardware on them. This patch avoids creating the fixed power button ACPI device and eliminates a probe error message from ACPI button driver on ASUS T100. Signed-off-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 05 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since the only function executed by acpi_hotplug_execute() is acpi_device_hotplug() and it only is called by the ACPI core, simplify its definition so that it only takes two arguments, the ACPI device object pointer and event code, rename it to acpi_hotplug_schedule() and move its header from acpi_bus.h to the ACPI core's internal header file internal.h. Modify the definition of acpi_device_hotplug() so that its first argument is an ACPI device object pointer and modify the definition of struct acpi_hp_work accordingly. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
- 22 2月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Replace acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() with acpi_evaluate_ost() everywhere and drop the ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST symbol so that hotplug _OST is supported unconditionally. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Modify the SATA subsystem to add hotplug contexts to ACPI companions of SATA devices and ports instead of registering special ACPI dock operations using register_hotplug_dock_device(). That change will allow the entire code handling those special ACPI dock operations to be dropped in the next commit. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
- 21 2月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
In order to avoid the need to register special ACPI dock operations for SATA devices add a .uevent() callback pointer to struct acpi_hotplug_context and make dock_hotplug_event() use that callback if available. Also rename the existing .event() callback in struct acpi_hotplug_context to .notify() to avoid possible confusion in the future. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Use device name "LNXSYBUS:xx" instead of "device.xx" for ACPI objects \_SB and \_TZ. BTW, the original check of "handle == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT" in statment "else if (list_empty(&pnp->ids) && handle == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT)" is always false because of the code at the begin of that block. if (handle == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT) { acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_SYSTEM_HID); break; } Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 16 2月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since we already know what the device's PNP IDs are when acpi_device_is_battery() is called, it is not necessary to run acpi_get_object_info() for the device in that function. Instead, if acpi_device_is_battery() is passed a pointer to a struct acpi_device object, it can use the list of PNP IDs from that object, so make that happen and modify the function's header accordingly Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The ACPI dock station code carries out an extra namespace scan before the main one in order to find and register all of the dock device objects. Then, it registers a notify handler for each of them for handling dock events. However, dock device objects need not be scanned for upfront. They very well can be enumerated and registered during the first phase of the main namespace scan, before attaching scan handlers and ACPI drivers to ACPI device objects. Then, the dependent devices can be added to the in the second phase. That makes it possible to drop the extra namespace scan, so do it. Moreover, it is not necessary to register notify handlers for all of the dock stations' namespace nodes, becuase notifications may be dispatched from the global notify handler for them. Do that and drop two functions used for dock notify handling, acpi_dock_deferred_cb() and dock_notify_handler(), that aren't necessary any more. Finally, some dock station objects have _HID objects matching the ACPI container scan handler which causes it to claim those objects and try to handle their hotplug, but that is not a good idea, because those objects have their own special hotplug handling anyway. For this reason, the hotplug_notify flag should not be set for ACPI device objects representing dock stations and the container scan handler should be made ignore those objects, so make that happen. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 11 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
In some cases it may be necessary to perform certain setup/cleanup operations on a device object representing a physical device after it has been associated with an ACPI companion by acpi_bind_one() or before disassociating it from that companion by acpi_unbind_one(), respectively. If there is a struct acpi_bus_type object for the given device's bus type, the .setup()/.cleanup() callbacks from there are executed for these purposes. However, an analogous mechanism will be necessary for devices whose bus types don't have corresponding struct acpi_bus_type objects and that have specific ACPI scan handlers. For those devices, add new .bind() and .unbind() callbacks to struct acpi_scan_handler that will be executed by acpi_platform_notify() right after the given device has been associated with an ACPI comapnion and by acpi_platform_notify_remove() right before calling acpi_unbind_one() for that device, respectively. To make that work for scan handlers registering new devices in their .attach() callbacks, modify acpi_scan_attach_handler() to set the ACPI device object's handler field before calling .attach() from the scan handler at hand. This changeset includes a fix from Mika Westerberg. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 07 2月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since acpi_bus_notify() is executed on all notifications for all devices anyway, make it execute acpi_device_hotplug() for all hotplug events instead of installing notify handlers pointing to the same function for all hotplug devices. This change reduces both the size and complexity of ACPI-based device hotplug code. Moreover, since acpi_device_hotplug() only does significant things for devices that have either an ACPI scan handler, or a hotplug context with .eject() defined, and those devices had notify handlers pointing to acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() installed before anyway, this modification shouldn't change functionality. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() does not use its data argument any more, the second argument of acpi_install_hotplug_notify_handler() can be dropped, so do that and update its callers accordingly. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
To avoid the need to install a hotplug notify handler for each ACPI namespace node representing a device and having a matching scan handler, move the check whether or not the ejection of the given device is enabled through its scan handler from acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() to acpi_generic_hotplug_event(). Also, move the execution of ACPI_OST_SC_EJECT_IN_PROGRESS _OST to acpi_generic_hotplug_event(), because in acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() or in acpi_eject_store() we really don't know whether or not the eject is going to be in progress (for example, acpi_hotplug_execute() may still fail without queuing up the work item). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) code currently attaches its hotplug context objects directly to ACPI namespace nodes representing hotplug devices. However, after recent changes causing struct acpi_device to be created for every namespace node representing a device (regardless of its status), that is not necessary any more. Moreover, it's vulnerable to the theoretical issue that the ACPI handle passed in the context between handle_hotplug_event() and hotplug_event_work() may become invalid in the meantime (as a result of a concurrent table unload). In principle, this issue might be addressed by adding a non-empty release handler for ACPIPHP hotplug context objects analogous to acpi_scan_drop_device(), but that would duplicate the code in that function and in acpi_device_del_work_fn(). For this reason, it's better to modify ACPIPHP to attach its device hotplug contexts to struct device objects representing hotplug devices and make it use acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() as its notify handler. At the same time, acpi_device_hotplug() can be modified to dispatch the new .hp.event() callback pointing to acpiphp_hotplug_event() from ACPI device objects associated with PCI devices or use the generic ACPI device hotplug code for device objects with matching scan handlers. This allows the existing code duplication between ACPIPHP and the ACPI core to be reduced too and makes further ACPI-based device hotplug consolidation possible. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 06 2月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Subsequent changes will require the ACPI core to acquire the lock protecting the ACPIPHP hotplug contexts, so move the definition of the lock to the core and change its name to be more generic. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There is a slight possibility for the ACPI device object pointed to by adev in acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() to become invalid between the acpi_bus_get_device() that it comes from and the subsequent dereference of that pointer under get_device(). Namely, if acpi_scan_drop_device() runs in parallel with acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(), acpi_device_del_work_fn() queued up by it may delete the device object in question right after a successful execution of acpi_bus_get_device() in acpi_bus_notify(). An analogous problem is present in acpi_bus_notify() where the device pointer coming from acpi_bus_get_device() may become invalid before it subsequent dereference in the "if" block. To prevent that from happening, introduce a new function, acpi_bus_get_acpi_device(), working analogously to acpi_bus_get_device() except that it will grab a reference to the ACPI device object returned by it and it will do that under the ACPICA's namespace mutex. Then, make both acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() and acpi_bus_notify() use acpi_bus_get_acpi_device() instead of acpi_bus_get_device() so as to ensure that the pointers used by them will not become stale at one point. In addition to that, introduce acpi_bus_put_acpi_device() as a wrapper around put_device() to be used along with acpi_bus_get_acpi_device() and make the (new) users of the latter use acpi_bus_put_acpi_device() too. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 05 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Toshi Kani 提交于
When an eject request is sent to an ejected ACPI device, the following panic occurs: ACPI: \_SB_.SCK3.CPU3: ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST event BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000070 IP: [<ffffffff813a7cfe>] acpi_device_hotplug+0x10b/0x33b : Call Trace: [<ffffffff813a24da>] acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x1c/0x27 [<ffffffff8109cbe5>] process_one_work+0x175/0x430 [<ffffffff8109d7db>] worker_thread+0x11b/0x3a0 This is becase device->handler is NULL in acpi_device_hotplug(). This case was used to fail in acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() as the target had no acpi_deivce. However, acpi_device now exists after ejection. Added a check to verify if acpi_device->handler is valid for an eject request in acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(). Note that handler passed from an argument is still valid while acpi_device->handler is NULL. Fixes: 202317a5 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace) Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 29 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Drivers should not bind to struct acpi_device objects that acpi_bus_trim() has been called for, so make that function clear flags.match_driver for those objects. If that is not done, an ACPI driver may theoretically try to operate a device that is not physically present. Fixes: 202317a5 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace) Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
- 17 1月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Zhang Rui 提交于
An ACPI enumerated device may have its compatible id strings. To support the compatible ACPI ids (acpi_device->pnp.ids), we introduced acpi_driver_match_device() to match the driver->acpi_match_table and acpi_device->pnp.ids. For those drivers, MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, xxx) is used to exports the driver module alias in the format of "acpi:device_compatible_ids". But in the mean time, the current code does not export the ACPI compatible strings as part of the module_alias for the ACPI enumerated devices, which will break the module autoloading. Take the following piece of code for example, static const struct acpi_device_id xxx_acpi_match[] = { { "INTABCD", 0 }, { } }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, xxx_acpi_match); If this piece of code is used in a platform driver for an ACPI enumerated platform device, the platform driver module_alias is "acpi:INTABCD", but the uevent attribute of its platform device node is "platform:INTABCD:00" (PREFIX:platform_device->name). If this piece of code is used in an i2c driver for an ACPI enumerated i2c device, the i2c driver module_alias is "acpi:INTABCD", but the uevent of its i2c device node is "i2c:INTABCD:00" (PREFIX:i2c_client->name). If this piece of code is used in an spi driver for an ACPI enumerated spi device, the spi driver module_alias is "acpi:INTABCD", but the uevent of its spi device node is "spi:INTABCD" (PREFIX:spi_device->modalias). The reason why the module autoloading is not broken for now is that the uevent file of the ACPI device node is "acpi:INTABCD". Thus it is the ACPI device node creation that loads the platform/i2c/spi driver. So this is a problem that will affect us the day when the ACPI bus is removed from device model. This patch introduces two new APIs, one for exporting ACPI ids in uevent MODALIAS field, and another for exporting ACPI ids in device' modalias sysfs attribute. For any bus that supports ACPI enumerated devices, it needs to invoke these two functions for their uevent and modalias attribute. Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Zhang Rui 提交于
Currently, create_modalias() handles the output truncated case in an improper way (return -EINVAL). Plus, acpi_device_uevent() and acpi_device_modalias_show() do improper check for the create_modalias() return value as well. This patch fixes create_modalias() to return -EINVAL if there is an output error, return -ENOMEM if the output is truncated, and also fixes both acpi_device_uevent() and acpi_device_modalias_show() to do proper return value check. Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 11 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Srinivas Pandruvada 提交于
This patch adds a "status" attribute for an ACPI device. This status attribute shows the value of the _STA object. The _STA object returns current status of an ACPI device: enabled, disabled, functioning, present. Signed-off-by: NSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> [rjw: Subject and changelog] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 29 12月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
ACPI container devices require special hotplug handling, at least on some systems, since generally user space needs to carry out system-specific cleanup before it makes sense to offline devices in the container. However, the current ACPI hotplug code for containers first attempts to offline devices in the container and only then it notifies user space of the container offline. Moreover, after commit 202317a5 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace), ACPI device objects representing containers are present as long as the ACPI namespace nodes corresponding to them are present, which may be forever, even if the container devices are physically detached from the system (the return values of the corresponding _STA methods change in those cases, but generally the namespace nodes themselves are still there). Thus it is useful to introduce entities representing containers that will go away during container hot-unplug. The goal of this change is to address both the above issues. The idea is to create a "companion" container system device for each of the ACPI container device objects during the initial namespace scan or on a hotplug event making the container present. That system device will be unregistered on container removal. A new bus type for container devices is added for this purpose, because device offline and online operations need to be defined for them. The online operation is a trivial function that is always successful and the offline uses a callback pointed to by the container device's offline member. For ACPI containers that callback simply walks the list of ACPI device objects right below the container object (its children) and checks if all of their physical companion devices are offline. If that's not the case, it returns -EBUSY and the container system devivce cannot be put offline. Consequently, to put the container system device offline, it is necessary to put all of the physical devices depending on its ACPI companion object offline beforehand. Container system devices created for ACPI container objects are initially online. They are created by the container ACPI scan handler whose hotplug.demand_offline flag is set. That causes acpi_scan_hot_remove() to check if the companion container system device is offline before attempting to remove an ACPI container or any devices below it. If the check fails, a KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is emitted for the container system device in question and user space is expected to offline all devices below the container and the container itself in response to it. Then, user space can finalize the removal of the container with the help of its ACPI device object's eject attribute in sysfs. Tested-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Add a new ACPI hotplug profile flag, demand_offline, such that if set for the given ACPI device object's scan handler, it will cause acpi_scan_hot_remove() to check if that device object's physical companions are offline upfront and fail the hot removal if that is not the case. That flag will be useful to overcome a problem with containers on some system where they can only be hot-removed after some cleanup operations carried out by user space, which needs to be notified of the container hot-removal before the kernel attempts to offline devices in the container. In those cases the current implementation of acpi_scan_hot_remove() is not sufficient, because it first tries to offline the devices in the container and only if that is suffcessful it tries to offline the container itself. As a result, the container hot-removal notification is not delivered to user space at the right time. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 07 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lv Zheng 提交于
Replace direct inclusions of <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>, which are incorrect, with <linux/acpi.h> inclusions and remove some inclusions of those files that aren't necessary. First of all, <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> should not be included directly from any files that are built for CONFIG_ACPI unset, because that generally leads to build warnings about undefined symbols in !CONFIG_ACPI builds. For CONFIG_ACPI set, <linux/acpi.h> includes those files and for CONFIG_ACPI unset it provides stub ACPI symbols to be used in that case. Second, there are ordering dependencies between those files that always have to be met. Namely, it is required that <acpi/acpi_bus.h> be included prior to <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> so that the acpi_pci_root declarations the latter depends on are always there. And <acpi/acpi.h> which provides basic ACPICA type declarations should always be included prior to any other ACPI headers in CONFIG_ACPI builds. That also is taken care of including <linux/acpi.h> as appropriate. Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> (drivers/pci stuff) Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> (Xen stuff) Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 25 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Rework acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_device_attach(), which is renamed as acpi_bus_attach(), to walk the list of each device object's children directly and call themselves recursively for each child instead of using acpi_walk_namespace(). This simplifies the code quite a bit and avoids the overhead of callbacks and the ACPICA's internal processing which are not really necessary for these two routines. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 23 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Introduce a static inline function for setting the status field of struct acpi_device on the basis of a supplied u32 number, acpi_set_device_status(), and use it instead of the horrible horrible STRUCT_TO_INT() macro wherever applicable. Having done that, drop STRUCT_TO_INT() (and pretend that it has never existed). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-