Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 24 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  3. 23 5月, 2013 13 次提交
  5. 22 5月, 2013 23 次提交
  7. 21 5月, 2013 3 次提交
    • W
      TTY: Fix tty miss restart after we turn off flow-control · dab73b4e
      由 Wang YanQing 提交于 
      I meet emacs hang in start if I do the operation below:
  1: echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
  2: emacs BigFile
  3: Press CTRL-S follow 2 immediately

Then emacs hang on, CTRL-Q can't resume, the terminal
hang on, you can do nothing with this terminal except
close it.

The reason is before emacs takeover control the tty,
we use CTRL-S to XOFF it. Then when emacs takeover the
control, it may don't use the flow-control, so emacs hang.
This patch fix it.

This patch will fix a kind of strange tty relation hang problem,
I believe I meet it with vim in ssh, and also see below bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=465823Signed-off-by: NWang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      dab73b4e
    • P
      tty/vt: Fix vc_deallocate() lock order · 421b40a6
      由 Peter Hurley 提交于 
      Now that the tty port owns the flip buffers and i/o is allowed
from the driver even when no tty is attached, the destruction
of the tty port (and the flip buffers) must ensure that no
outstanding work is pending.

Unfortunately, this creates a lock order problem with the
console_lock (see attached lockdep report [1] below).

For single console deallocation, drop the console_lock prior
to port destruction. When multiple console deallocation,
defer port destruction until the consoles have been
deallocated.

tty_port_destroy() is not required if the port has not
been used; remove from vc_allocate() failure path.

[1] lockdep report from Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

 ======================================================
 [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
 3.9.0+ #16 Not tainted
 -------------------------------------------------------
 (agetty)/26163 is trying to acquire lock:
 blocked:  ((&buf->work)){+.+...}, instance: ffff88011c8b0020, at: [<ffffffff81062065>] flush_work+0x5/0x2e0

 but task is already holding lock:
 blocked:  (console_lock){+.+.+.}, instance: ffffffff81c2fde0, at: [<ffffffff813bc201>] vt_ioctl+0xb61/0x1230

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #1 (console_lock){+.+.+.}:
        [<ffffffff810b3f74>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x210
        [<ffffffff810416c7>] console_lock+0x77/0x80
        [<ffffffff813c3dcd>] con_flush_chars+0x2d/0x50
        [<ffffffff813b32b2>] n_tty_receive_buf+0x122/0x14d0
        [<ffffffff813b7709>] flush_to_ldisc+0x119/0x170
        [<ffffffff81064381>] process_one_work+0x211/0x700
        [<ffffffff8106498b>] worker_thread+0x11b/0x3a0
        [<ffffffff8106ce5d>] kthread+0xed/0x100
        [<ffffffff81601cac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0

 -> #0 ((&buf->work)){+.+...}:
        [<ffffffff810b349a>] __lock_acquire+0x193a/0x1c00
        [<ffffffff810b3f74>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x210
        [<ffffffff810620ae>] flush_work+0x4e/0x2e0
        [<ffffffff81065305>] __cancel_work_timer+0x95/0x130
        [<ffffffff810653b0>] cancel_work_sync+0x10/0x20
        [<ffffffff813b8212>] tty_port_destroy+0x12/0x20
        [<ffffffff813c65e8>] vc_deallocate+0xf8/0x110
        [<ffffffff813bc20c>] vt_ioctl+0xb6c/0x1230
        [<ffffffff813b01a5>] tty_ioctl+0x285/0xd50
        [<ffffffff811ba825>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x305/0x530
        [<ffffffff811baad1>] sys_ioctl+0x81/0xa0
        [<ffffffff81601d59>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

 other info that might help us debug this:

 [ 6760.076175]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(console_lock);
                                lock((&buf->work));
                                lock(console_lock);
   lock((&buf->work));

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 1 lock on stack by (agetty)/26163:
  #0: blocked:  (console_lock){+.+.+.}, instance: ffffffff81c2fde0, at: [<ffffffff813bc201>] vt_ioctl+0xb61/0x1230
 stack backtrace:
 Pid: 26163, comm: (agetty) Not tainted 3.9.0+ #16
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff815edb14>] print_circular_bug+0x200/0x20e
  [<ffffffff810b349a>] __lock_acquire+0x193a/0x1c00
  [<ffffffff8100a269>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
  [<ffffffff8100a269>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
  [<ffffffff8100a200>] ? native_sched_clock+0x20/0x80
  [<ffffffff810b3f74>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x210
  [<ffffffff81062065>] ? flush_work+0x5/0x2e0
  [<ffffffff810620ae>] flush_work+0x4e/0x2e0
  [<ffffffff81062065>] ? flush_work+0x5/0x2e0
  [<ffffffff810b15db>] ? mark_held_locks+0xbb/0x140
  [<ffffffff8113c8a3>] ? __free_pages_ok.part.57+0x93/0xc0
  [<ffffffff810b15db>] ? mark_held_locks+0xbb/0x140
  [<ffffffff810652f2>] ? __cancel_work_timer+0x82/0x130
  [<ffffffff81065305>] __cancel_work_timer+0x95/0x130
  [<ffffffff810653b0>] cancel_work_sync+0x10/0x20
  [<ffffffff813b8212>] tty_port_destroy+0x12/0x20
  [<ffffffff813c65e8>] vc_deallocate+0xf8/0x110
  [<ffffffff813bc20c>] vt_ioctl+0xb6c/0x1230
  [<ffffffff810aec41>] ? lock_release_holdtime.part.30+0xa1/0x170
  [<ffffffff813b01a5>] tty_ioctl+0x285/0xd50
  [<ffffffff812b00f6>] ? inode_has_perm.isra.46.constprop.61+0x56/0x80
  [<ffffffff811ba825>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x305/0x530
  [<ffffffff812b04db>] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x5b/0x110
  [<ffffffff811baad1>] sys_ioctl+0x81/0xa0
  [<ffffffff81601d59>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      421b40a6
    • W
      TTY: ehv_bytechan: add missing platform_driver_unregister() when module exit · df957d2b
      由 Wei Yongjun 提交于 
      We have registered platform driver when module init, and
need unregister it when module exit.
Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      df957d2b