Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 18 6月, 2016 4 次提交
  3. 08 6月, 2016 3 次提交
  5. 06 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  7. 01 6月, 2016 1 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: Revert async unpin and nonblocking atomic commit · e42aeef1
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      This reverts the following patches:

d55dbd06 drm/i915: Allow nonblocking update of pageflips.
15c86bdb drm/i915: Check for unpin correctness.
95c2ccdc Reapply "drm/i915: Avoid stalling on pending flips for legacy cursor updates"
a6747b73 drm/i915: Make unpin async.
03f476e1 drm/i915: Prepare connectors for nonblocking checks.
2099deff drm/i915: Pass atomic states to fbc update functions.
ee7171af drm/i915: Remove reset_counter from intel_crtc.
2ee004f7 drm/i915: Remove queue_flip pointer.
b8d2afae drm/i915: Remove use_mmio_flip kernel parameter.
8dd634d9 drm/i915: Remove cs based page flip support.
143f73b3 drm/i915: Rework intel_crtc_page_flip to be almost atomic, v3.
84fc494b drm/i915: Add the exclusive fence to plane_state.
6885843a drm/i915: Convert flip_work to a list.
aa420ddd drm/i915: Allow mmio updates on all platforms, v2.
afee4d87 Revert "drm/i915: Avoid stalling on pending flips for legacy cursor updates"

"drm/i915: Allow nonblocking update of pageflips" should have been
split up, misses a proper commit message and seems to cause issues in
the legacy page_flip path as demonstrated by kms_flip.

"drm/i915: Make unpin async" doesn't handle the unthrottled cursor
updates correctly, leading to an apparent pin count leak. This is
caught by the WARN_ON in i915_gem_object_do_pin which screams if we
have more than DRM_I915_GEM_OBJECT_MAX_PIN_COUNT pins.

Unfortuantely we can't just revert these two because this patch series
came with a built-in bisect breakage in the form of temporarily
removing the unthrottled cursor update hack for legacy cursor ioctl.
Therefore there's no other option than to revert the entire pile :(

There's one tiny conflict in intel_drv.h due to other patches, nothing
serious.

Normally I'd wait a bit longer with doing a maintainer revert, but
since the minimal set of patches we need to revert (due to the bisect
breakage) is so big, time is running out fast. And very soon
(especially after a few attempts at fixing issues) it'll be really
hard to revert things cleanly.

Lessons learned:
- Not a good idea to rush the review (done by someone fairly new to
  the area) and not make sure domain experts had a chance to read it.

- Patches should be properly split up. I only looked at the two
  patches that should be reverted in detail, but both look like the
  mix up different things in one patch.

- Patches really should have proper commit messages. Especially when
  doing more than one thing, and especially when touching critical and
  tricky core code.

- Building a patch series and r-b stamping it when it has a built-in
  bisect breakage is not a good idea.

- I also think we need to stop building up technical debt by
  postponing atomic igt testcases even longer. I think it's clear that
  there's enough corner cases in this beast that we really need to
  have the testcases _before_ the next step lands.

(cherry picked from commit 5a21b665
from drm-intel-next-queeud)

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
      e42aeef1
  9. 25 5月, 2016 1 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: Revert async unpin and nonblocking atomic commit · 5a21b665
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      This reverts the following patches:

d55dbd06 drm/i915: Allow nonblocking update of pageflips.
15c86bdb drm/i915: Check for unpin correctness.
95c2ccdc Reapply "drm/i915: Avoid stalling on pending flips for legacy cursor updates"
a6747b73 drm/i915: Make unpin async.
03f476e1 drm/i915: Prepare connectors for nonblocking checks.
2099deff drm/i915: Pass atomic states to fbc update functions.
ee7171af drm/i915: Remove reset_counter from intel_crtc.
2ee004f7 drm/i915: Remove queue_flip pointer.
b8d2afae drm/i915: Remove use_mmio_flip kernel parameter.
8dd634d9 drm/i915: Remove cs based page flip support.
143f73b3 drm/i915: Rework intel_crtc_page_flip to be almost atomic, v3.
84fc494b drm/i915: Add the exclusive fence to plane_state.
6885843a drm/i915: Convert flip_work to a list.
aa420ddd drm/i915: Allow mmio updates on all platforms, v2.
afee4d87 Revert "drm/i915: Avoid stalling on pending flips for legacy cursor updates"

"drm/i915: Allow nonblocking update of pageflips" should have been
split up, misses a proper commit message and seems to cause issues in
the legacy page_flip path as demonstrated by kms_flip.

"drm/i915: Make unpin async" doesn't handle the unthrottled cursor
updates correctly, leading to an apparent pin count leak. This is
caught by the WARN_ON in i915_gem_object_do_pin which screams if we
have more than DRM_I915_GEM_OBJECT_MAX_PIN_COUNT pins.

Unfortuantely we can't just revert these two because this patch series
came with a built-in bisect breakage in the form of temporarily
removing the unthrottled cursor update hack for legacy cursor ioctl.
Therefore there's no other option than to revert the entire pile :(

There's one tiny conflict in intel_drv.h due to other patches, nothing
serious.

Normally I'd wait a bit longer with doing a maintainer revert, but
since the minimal set of patches we need to revert (due to the bisect
breakage) is so big, time is running out fast. And very soon
(especially after a few attempts at fixing issues) it'll be really
hard to revert things cleanly.

Lessons learned:
- Not a good idea to rush the review (done by someone fairly new to
  the area) and not make sure domain experts had a chance to read it.

- Patches should be properly split up. I only looked at the two
  patches that should be reverted in detail, but both look like the
  mix up different things in one patch.

- Patches really should have proper commit messages. Especially when
  doing more than one thing, and especially when touching critical and
  tricky core code.

- Building a patch series and r-b stamping it when it has a built-in
  bisect breakage is not a good idea.

- I also think we need to stop building up technical debt by
  postponing atomic igt testcases even longer. I think it's clear that
  there's enough corner cases in this beast that we really need to
  have the testcases _before_ the next step lands.

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
      5a21b665
  11. 24 5月, 2016 3 次提交
  13. 23 5月, 2016 2 次提交
  15. 19 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  17. 09 5月, 2016 2 次提交
  19. 29 4月, 2016 3 次提交
  21. 28 4月, 2016 12 次提交
  23. 25 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  25. 20 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  27. 18 4月, 2016 2 次提交
  29. 14 4月, 2016 3 次提交
    • P
      drm/i915/mocs: Program MOCS for all engines on init · 0ccdacf6
      由 Peter Antoine 提交于 
      Allow for the MOCS to be programmed for all engines.
Currently we program the MOCS when the first render batch
goes through. This works on most platforms but fails on
platforms that do not run a render batch early,
i.e. headless servers. The patch now programs all initialised engines
on init and the RCS is programmed again within the initial batch. This
is done for predictable consistency with regards to the hardware
context.

Hardware context loading sets the values of the MOCS for RCS
and L3CC. Programming them from within the batch makes sure that
the render context is valid, no matter what the previous state of
the saved-context was.

v2: posted correct version to the mailing list.
v3: moved programming to within engine->init_hw() (Chris Wilson)
v4: code formatting and white-space changes. (Chris Wilson)

Testcase: igt/gem_mocs_settings
Signed-off-by: NPeter Antoine <peter.antoine@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1460556205-6644-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      0ccdacf6
    • C
      drm/i915: Late request cancellations are harmful · aa9b7810
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Conceptually, each request is a record of a hardware transaction - we
build up a list of pending commands and then either commit them to
hardware, or cancel them. However, whilst building up the list of
pending commands, we may modify state outside of the request and make
references to the pending request. If we do so and then cancel that
request, external objects then point to the deleted request leading to
both graphical and memory corruption.

The easiest example is to consider object/VMA tracking. When we mark an
object as active in a request, we store a pointer to this, the most
recent request, in the object. Then we want to free that object, we wait
for the most recent request to be idle before proceeding (otherwise the
hardware will write to pages now owned by the system, or we will attempt
to read from those pages before the hardware is finished writing). If
the request was cancelled instead, that wait completes immediately. As a
result, all requests must be committed and not cancelled if the external
state is unknown.

All that remains of i915_gem_request_cancel() users are just a couple of
extremely unlikely allocation failures, so remove the API entirely.

A consequence of committing all incomplete requests is that we generate
excess breadcrumbs and fill the ring much more often with dummy work. We
have completely undone the outstanding_last_seqno optimisation.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93907Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1460565315-7748-16-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      aa9b7810
    • C
      drm/i915: Prevent leaking of -EIO from i915_wait_request() · f4457ae7
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Reporting -EIO from i915_wait_request() has proven very troublematic
over the years, with numerous hard-to-reproduce bugs cropping up in the
corner case of where a reset occurs and the code wasn't expecting such
an error.

If the we reset the GPU or have detected a hang and wish to reset the
GPU, the request is forcibly complete and the wait broken. Currently, we
report either -EAGAIN or -EIO in order for the caller to retreat and
restart the wait (if appropriate) after dropping and then reacquiring
the struct_mutex (essential to allow the GPU reset to proceed). However,
if we take the view that the request is complete (no further work will
be done on it by the GPU because it is dead and soon to be reset), then
we can proceed with the task at hand and then drop the struct_mutex
allowing the reset to occur. This transfers the burden of checking
whether it is safe to proceed to the caller, which in all but one
instance it is safe - completely eliminating the source of all spurious
-EIO.

Of note, we only have two API entry points where we expect that
userspace can observe an EIO. First is when submitting an execbuf, if
the GPU is terminally wedged, then the operation cannot succeed and an
-EIO is reported. Secondly, existing userspace uses the throttle ioctl
to detect an already wedged GPU before starting using HW acceleration
(or to confirm that the GPU is wedged after an error condition). So if
the GPU is wedged when the user calls throttle, also report -EIO.

v2: Split more carefully the change to i915_wait_request() and assorted
ABI from the reset handling.
v3: Add a couple of WARN_ON(EIO) to the interruptible modesetting code
so that we don't start to leak EIO there in future (and break our hang
resistant modesetting).
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1460565315-7748-9-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1460565315-7748-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      f4457ae7