filter_chain() was added into install_breakpoint/remove_breakpoint to
simplify the initial changes but this is sub-optimal.

This patch shifts the callsite to the callers, register_for_each_vma()
and uprobe_mmap(). This way:

- It will be easier to add the new arguments. This is the main reason,
  we can do more optimizations later.

- register_for_each_vma(is_register => true) can be optimized, we only
  need to consult the new consumer. The previous consumers were already
  asked when they called uprobe_register().

This patch also moves the MMF_HAS_UPROBES check from remove_breakpoint(),
this allows to avoid the potentionally costly filter_chain(). Note that
register_for_each_vma(is_register => false) doesn't really need to take
->consumer_rwsem, but I don't think it makes sense to optimize this and
introduce filter_chain_lockless().
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

uprobe_register() and uprobe_unregister() are the only users of
mutex_lock(uprobes_hash(inode)), and the only reason why we can't
simply remove it is that we need to ensure that delete_uprobe() is
not possible after alloc_uprobe() and before consumer_add().

IOW, we need to ensure that when we take uprobe->register_rwsem
this uprobe is still valid and we didn't race with _unregister()
which called delete_uprobe() in between.

With this patch uprobe_register() simply checks uprobe_is_active()
and retries if it hits this very unlikely race. uprobes_mutex[] is
no longer needed and can be removed.

There is another reason for this change, prepare_uprobe() should be
folded into alloc_uprobe() and we do not want to hold the extra locks
around read_mapping_page/etc.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NAnton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

The lifetime of uprobe->rb_node and uprobe->inode is not refcounted,
delete_uprobe() is called when we detect that uprobe has no consumers,
and it would be deadly wrong to do this twice.

Change delete_uprobe() to WARN() if it was already called. We use
RB_CLEAR_NODE() to mark uprobe "inactive", then RB_EMPTY_NODE() can
be used to detect this case.

RB_EMPTY_NODE() is not used directly, we add the trivial helper for
the next change.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NAnton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

uprobe_events counts the number of uprobes in uprobes_tree but
it is used as a boolean. We can use RB_EMPTY_ROOT() instead.

Probably no_uprobe_events() added by this patch can have more
callers, say, mmf_recalc_uprobes().
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NAnton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Now that ->register_rwsem is safe under ->mmap_sem we can kill
->copy_mutex and abuse down_write(&uprobe->consumer_rwsem).

This makes prepare_uprobe() even more ugly, but we should kill
it anyway.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Simply remove UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER and the corresponding code.

It can only help if uprobe has a single consumer, and in fact
it is no longer needed after handler_chain() was changed to use
->register_rwsem, we simply can not race with uprobe_register().
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Now that it safe to use ->consumer_rwsem under ->mmap_sem we can
almost finish the implementation of filter_chain(). It still lacks
the actual uc->filter(...) call but othewrwise it is ready, just
it pretends that ->filter() always returns true.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Introduce uprobe->register_rwsem. It is taken for writing around
__uprobe_register/unregister.

Change handler_chain() to use this sem rather than consumer_rwsem.

The main reason for this change is that we have the nasty problem
with mmap_sem/consumer_rwsem dependency. filter_chain() needs to
protect uprobe->consumers like handler_chain(), but they can not
use the same lock. filter_chain() can be called under ->mmap_sem
(currently this is always true), but we want to allow ->handler()
to play with the probed task's memory, and this needs ->mmap_sem.

Alternatively we could use srcu, but synchronize_srcu() is very
slow and ->register_rwsem allows us to do more. In particular, we
can teach handler_chain() to do remove_breakpoint() if this bp is
"nacked" by all consumers, we know that we can't race with the
new consumer which does uprobe_register().

See also the next patches. uprobes_mutex[] is almost ready to die.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

To support the filtering uprobe_register() should do
register_for_each_vma(true) every time the new consumer comes,
we need to install the previously nacked breakpoints.

Note:
	- uprobes_mutex[] should die, what it actually protects is
	  alloc_uprobe().

	- UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER should die too, obviously it can't work
	  unless uprobe has a single consumer. The consumer should
	  serialize with _register/_unregister itself. Or this flag
	  should live in uprobe_consumer->state.

	- Perhaps we can do some optimizations later. For example, if
	  filter_chain() never returns false uprobe can record this
	  fact and avoid the unnecessary register_for_each_vma().
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

uprobe_unregister() removes the breakpoints only if the last consumer
goes away. To support the filtering it should do this every time, we
want to remove the breakpoints which nobody else want to keep.

Note: given that filter_chain() is not actually implemented, this patch
itself doesn't change the behaviour yet, register_for_each_vma(false)
is a heavy "nop" unless there are no more consumers.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Add the new helper filter_chain(). Currently it is only placeholder,
the comment explains what is should do. We will change it later to
consult every consumer to decide whether we need to install the swbp.
Until then it works as if any consumer returns true, this matches the
current behavior.

Change install_breakpoint() to call filter_chain() instead of checking
uprobe->consumers != NULL. We obviously need this, and this equally
closes the race with _unregister().

Change remove_breakpoint() to call this helper too. Currently this is
pointless because remove_breakpoint() is only called when the last
consumer goes away, but we will change this.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

uprobe_consumer->filter() is pointless in its current form, kill it.

We will add it back, but with the different signature/semantics. Perhaps
we will even re-introduce the callsite in handler_chain(), but not to
just skip uc->handler().
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

register/unregister verifies that inode/uc != NULL. For what?
This really looks like "hide the potential problem", the caller
should pass the valid data.

register() also checks uc->next == NULL, probably to prevent the
double-register but the caller can do other stupid/wrong things.
If we do this check, then we should document that uc->next should
be cleared before register() and add BUG_ON().

Also add the small comment about the i_size_read() check.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Cosmetic. __set_bit(UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP) is the part of initialization,
it is not clear why it is set in insert_uprobe().
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

We checked for uprobe==NULL earlier, no need to redo that.
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1356030701-16284-22-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.comSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

This was always racy, but 26872090
"uprobes: Rework register_for_each_vma() to make it O(n)" should be
blamed anyway, it made everything worse and I didn't notice.

register/unregister call build_map_info() and then do install/remove
breakpoint for every mm which mmaps inode/offset. This can obviously
race with fork()->dup_mmap() in between and we can miss the child.

uprobe_register() could be easily fixed but unregister is much worse,
the new mm inherits "int3" from parent and there is no way to detect
this if uprobe goes away.

So this patch simply adds percpu_down_read/up_read around dup_mmap(),
and percpu_down_write/up_write into register_for_each_vma().

This adds 2 new hooks into dup_mmap() but we can kill uprobe_dup_mmap()
and fold it into uprobe_end_dup_mmap().
Reported-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>

Flush the cache so that the instructions written to the XOL area are
visible.
Signed-off-by: NRabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
Acked-by: NAnanth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>

Kill arch_uprobe_enable/disable_step() hooks, they do nothing and
nobody needs them.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

No functional changes.

powerpc is the only user of arch_uprobe_enable/disable_step() helpers,
but they should die. They can not be used correctly, every arch needs
its own implementation (like x86 does). And they do not really help
even as initial-and-almost-working code, arch_uprobe_*_xol() hooks can
easily use user_enable/disable_single_step() directly.

Change arch_uprobe_*_step() to do nothing, and convert powerpc to use
ptrace helpers. This is equally wrong, powerpc needs the arch-specific
fixes.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NAnanth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

In order to allow sleeping during invalidate_page mmu notifier calls, we
need to avoid calling when holding the PT lock.  In addition to its direct
calls, invalidate_page can also be called as a substitute for a change_pte
call, in case the notifier client hasn't implemented change_pte.

This patch drops the invalidate_page call from change_pte, and instead
wraps all calls to change_pte with invalidate_range_start and
invalidate_range_end calls.

Note that change_pte still cannot sleep after this patch, and that clients
implementing change_pte should not take action on it in case the number of
outstanding invalidate_range_start calls is larger than one, otherwise
they might miss a later invalidation.
Signed-off-by: NHaggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@qumranet.com>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
Cc: Haggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com>
Cc: Shachar Raindel <raindel@mellanox.com>
Cc: Liran Liss <liranl@mellanox.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Implement an interval tree as a replacement for the VMA prio_tree.  The
algorithms are similar to lib/interval_tree.c; however that code can't be
directly reused as the interval endpoints are not explicitly stored in the
VMA.  So instead, the common algorithm is moved into a template and the
details (node type, how to get interval endpoints from the node, etc) are
filled in using the C preprocessor.

Once the interval tree functions are available, using them as a
replacement to the VMA prio tree is a relatively simple, mechanical job.
Signed-off-by: NMichel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Multiple threads can manipulate uprobe->flags, this is obviously
unsafe. For example mmap can set UPROBE_COPY_INSN while register
tries to set UPROBE_RUN_HANDLER, the latter can also race with
can_skip_sstep() which clears UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP.

Change this code to use bitops.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

install_breakpoint() is called under mm->mmap_sem, this protects
set_swbp() but not prepare_uprobe(). Two or more different tasks
can call install_breakpoint()->prepare_uprobe() at the same time,
this leads to numerous problems if UPROBE_COPY_INSN is not set.

Just for example, the second copy_insn() can corrupt the already
analyzed/fixuped uprobe->arch.insn and race with handle_swbp().

This patch simply adds uprobe->copy_mutex to serialize this code.
We could probably reuse ->consumer_rwsem, but this would mean that
consumer->handler() can not use mm->mmap_sem, not good.

Note: this is another temporary ugly hack until we move this logic
into uprobe_register().
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Preparation. Extract the copy_insn/arch_uprobe_analyze_insn code
from install_breakpoint() into the new helper, prepare_uprobe().

And move uprobe->flags defines from uprobes.h to uprobes.c, nobody
else can use them anyway.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Strictly speaking this race was added by me in 56bb4cf6. However
I think that this bug is just another indication that we should
move copy_insn/uprobe_analyze_insn code from install_breakpoint()
to uprobe_register(), there are a lot of other reasons for that.
Until then, add a hack to close the race.

A task can hit uprobe U1, but before it calls find_uprobe() this
uprobe can be unregistered *AND* another uprobe U2 can be added to
uprobes_tree at the same inode/offset. In this case handle_swbp()
will use the not-fully-initialized U2, in particular its arch.insn
for xol.

Add the additional !UPROBE_COPY_INSN check into handle_swbp(),
if this flag is not set we simply restart as if the new uprobe was
not inserted yet. This is not very nice, we need barriers, but we
will remove this hack when we change uprobe_register().

Note: with or without this patch install_breakpoint() can race with
itself, yet another reson to kill UPROBE_COPY_INSN altogether. And
even the usage of uprobe->flags is not safe. See the next patches.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

delete_uprobe() must not be called if register_for_each_vma(false)
fails to remove all breakpoints, __uprobe_unregister() is correct.
The problem is that register_for_each_vma(false) always returns 0
and thus this logic does not work.

1. Change verify_opcode() to return 0 rather than -EINVAL when
   unregister detects the !is_swbp insn, we can treat this case
   as success and currently unregister paths ignore the error
   code anyway.

2. Change remove_breakpoint() to propagate the error code from
   write_opcode().

3. Change register_for_each_vma(is_register => false) to remove
   as much breakpoints as possible but return non-zero if
   remove_breakpoint() fails at least once.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

If alloc_uprobe() fails uprobe_register() should return ENOMEM, not 0.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

After the previous change is_swbp_at_addr() is always called with
current->mm. Remove this check and move it close to its single caller.

Also, remove the obsolete comment about is_swbp_at_addr() and
uprobe_state.count.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Unlike set_swbp(), set_orig_insn()->is_swbp_at_addr() makes sense,
although it can't prevent all confusions.

But the usage of is_swbp_at_addr() is equally confusing, and it adds
the extra get_user_pages() we can avoid.

This patch removes set_orig_insn()->is_swbp_at_addr() but changes
write_opcode() to do the necessary checks before replace_page().

Perhaps it also makes sense to ensure PAGE_MAPPING_ANON in unregister
case.

find_active_uprobe() becomes the only user of is_swbp_at_addr(),
we can change its semantics.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

No functional changes, preparations.

1. Extract the kmap-and-memcpy code from read_opcode() into the
   new trivial helper, copy_opcode(). The next patch will add
   another user.

2. read_opcode() becomes really trivial, fold it into its single
   caller, is_swbp_at_addr().

3. Remove "auprobe" argument from write_opcode(), it is not used
   since f403072c.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

A separate patch for better documentation.

set_swbp()->is_swbp_at_addr() is not needed for correctness, it is
harmless to do the unnecessary __replace_page(old_page, new_page)
when these 2 pages are identical.

And it can not be counted as optimization. mmap/register races are
very unlikely, while in the likely case is_swbp_at_addr() adds the
extra get_user_pages() even if the caller is uprobe_mmap(current->mm)
and returns false.

Note also that the semantics/usage of is_swbp_at_addr() in uprobe.c
is confusing. set_swbp() uses it to detect the case when this insn
was already modified by uprobes, that is why it should always compare
the opcode with UPROBE_SWBP_INSN even if the hardware (like powerpc)
has other trap insns. It doesn't matter if this breakpoint was in fact
installed by gdb or application itself, we are going to "steal" this
breakpoint anyway and execute the original insn from vm_file even if
it no longer matches the memory.

OTOH, handle_swbp()->find_active_uprobe() uses is_swbp_at_addr() to
figure out whether we need to send SIGTRAP or not if we can not find
uprobe, so in this case it should return true for all trap variants,
not only for UPROBE_SWBP_INSN.

This patch removes set_swbp()->is_swbp_at_addr(), the next patches
will remove it from set_orig_insn() which is similar to set_swbp()
in this respect. So the only caller will be handle_swbp() and we
can make its semantics clear.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

valid_vma(false) ignores ->vm_flags, this is not actually right.
We should never try to write into MAP_SHARED mapping, this can
confuse an apllication which actually writes to ->vm_file.

With this patch valid_vma(false) ignores VM_WRITE only but checks
other (immutable) bits checked by valid_vma(true). This can also
speedup uprobe_munmap() and uprobe_unregister().

Note: even after this patch _unregister can confuse the probed
application if it does mprotect(PROT_WRITE) after _register and
installs "int3", but this is hardly possible to avoid and this
doesn't differ from gdb case.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

uprobe_register() or uprobe_mmap() requires VM_READ | VM_EXEC, this
is not right. An apllication can do mprotect(PROT_EXEC) later and
execute this code.

Change valid_vma(is_register => true) to check VM_MAYEXEC instead.
No need to check VM_MAYREAD, it is always set.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

write_opcode()->get_user_pages() needs FOLL_FORCE to ensure we can
read the page even if the probed task did mprotect(PROT_NONE) after
uprobe_register(). Without FOLL_WRITE, FOLL_FORCE doesn't have any
side effect but allows to read the !VM_READ memory.

Otherwiese the subsequent uprobe_unregister()->set_orig_insn() fails
and we leak "int3". If that task does mprotect(PROT_READ | EXEC) and
execute the probed insn later it will be killed.

Note: in fact this is also needed for _register, see the next patch.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Move clear_thread_flag(TIF_UPROBE) from do_notify_resume() to
uprobe_notify_resume() for !CONFIG_UPROBES case.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Kill UTASK_BP_HIT state, it buys nothing but complicates the code.
It is only used in uprobe_notify_resume() to decide who should be
called, we can check utask->active_uprobe != NULL instead. And this
allows us to simplify handle_swbp(), no need to clear utask->state.

Likewise we could kill UTASK_SSTEP, but UTASK_BP_HIT is worse and
imho should die. The problem is, it creates the special case when
task->utask is NULL, we can't distinguish RUNNING and BP_HIT. With
this patch utask == NULL always means RUNNING.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

If handle_swbp()->add_utask() fails but UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP is set,
cleanup_ret: path do not restart the insn, this is wrong. Remove
this check and add the additional label for can_skip_sstep() = T
case.

Note also that UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP can be false positive, we simply
can not trust it unless arch_uprobe_skip_sstep() was already called.

Also, move another UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP check before can_skip_sstep()
into this helper, this looks more clean and understandable.

Note: probably we should rename "skip" to "emulate" and I think
that "clear UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP" should be moved to arch_can_skip.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

handle_swbp() sets utask->active_uprobe before handler_chain(),
and UTASK_SSTEP before pre_ssout(). This complicates the code
for no reason,  arch_ hooks or consumer->handler() should not
(and can't) use this info.

Change handle_swbp() to initialize them after pre_ssout(), and
remove the no longer needed cleanup-utask code.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
cked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

If handle_swbp()->find_active_uprobe() fails we return with
utask->state = UTASK_BP_HIT.

Change handle_swbp() to reset utask->state at the start. Note
that we do this unconditionally, see the next patch(es).
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

As Oleg pointed out in [0] uprobe should not use the ptrace interface
for enabling/disabling single stepping.

[0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120730141638.GA5306@redhat.com

Add the new "__weak arch" helpers which simply call user_*_single_step()
as a preparation. This is only needed to not break the powerpc port, we
will fold this logic into arch_uprobe_pre/post_xol() hooks later.

We should also change handle_singlestep(), _disable_step(&uprobe->arch)
should be called before put_uprobe().
Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>