Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 13 11月, 2013 27 次提交
  3. 02 11月, 2013 1 次提交
    • G
      memcg: remove incorrect underflow check · 6920a1bd
      由 Greg Thelen 提交于 
      When a memcg is deleted mem_cgroup_reparent_charges() moves charged
memory to the parent memcg.  As of v3.11-9444-g3ea67d06 "memcg: add per
cgroup writeback pages accounting" there's bad pointer read.  The goal
was to check for counter underflow.  The counter is a per cpu counter
and there are two problems with the code:

 (1) per cpu access function isn't used, instead a naked pointer is used
     which easily causes oops.
 (2) the check doesn't sum all cpus

Test:
  $ cd /sys/fs/cgroup/memory
  $ mkdir x
  $ echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
  $ (echo $BASHPID >> x/tasks && exec cat) &
  [1] 7154
  $ grep ^mapped x/memory.stat
  mapped_file 53248
  $ echo 7154 > tasks
  $ rmdir x
  <OOPS>

The fix is to remove the check.  It's currently dangerous and isn't
worth fixing it to use something expensive, such as
percpu_counter_sum(), for each reparented page.  __this_cpu_read() isn't
enough to fix this because there's no guarantees of the current cpus
count.  The only guarantees is that the sum of all per-cpu counter is >=
nr_pages.

Fixes: 3ea67d06 ("memcg: add per cgroup writeback pages accounting")
Reported-and-tested-by: NFlavio Leitner <fbl@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NSha Zhengju <handai.szj@taobao.com>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      6920a1bd
  5. 01 11月, 2013 3 次提交
  7. 31 10月, 2013 3 次提交
    • G
      memcg: use __this_cpu_sub() to dec stats to avoid incorrect subtrahend casting · 5e8cfc3c
      由 Greg Thelen 提交于 
      As of commit 3ea67d06 ("memcg: add per cgroup writeback pages
accounting") memcg counter errors are possible when moving charged
memory to a different memcg.  Charge movement occurs when processing
writes to memory.force_empty, moving tasks to a memcg with
memcg.move_charge_at_immigrate=1, or memcg deletion.

An example showing error after memory.force_empty:

  $ cd /sys/fs/cgroup/memory
  $ mkdir x
  $ rm /data/tmp/file
  $ (echo $BASHPID >> x/tasks && exec mmap_writer /data/tmp/file 1M) &
  [1] 13600
  $ grep ^mapped x/memory.stat
  mapped_file 1048576
  $ echo 13600 > tasks
  $ echo 1 > x/memory.force_empty
  $ grep ^mapped x/memory.stat
  mapped_file 4503599627370496

mapped_file should end with 0.
  4503599627370496 == 0x10,0000,0000,0000 == 0x100,0000,0000 pages
  1048576          == 0x10,0000           == 0x100 pages

This issue only affects the source memcg on 64 bit machines; the
destination memcg counters are correct.  So the rmdir case is not too
important because such counters are soon disappearing with the entire
memcg.  But the memcg.force_empty and memory.move_charge_at_immigrate=1
cases are larger problems as the bogus counters are visible for the
(possibly long) remaining life of the source memcg.

The problem is due to memcg use of __this_cpu_from(.., -nr_pages), which
is subtly wrong because it subtracts the unsigned int nr_pages (either
-1 or -512 for THP) from a signed long percpu counter.  When
nr_pages=-1, -nr_pages=0xffffffff.  On 64 bit machines stat->count[idx]
is signed 64 bit.  So memcg's attempt to simply decrement a count (e.g.
from 1 to 0) boils down to:

  long count = 1
  unsigned int nr_pages = 1
  count += -nr_pages  /* -nr_pages == 0xffff,ffff */
  count is now 0x1,0000,0000 instead of 0

The fix is to subtract the unsigned page count rather than adding its
negation.  This only works once "percpu: fix this_cpu_sub() subtrahend
casting for unsigneds" is applied to fix this_cpu_sub().
Signed-off-by: NGreg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      5e8cfc3c
    • C
      mm/pagewalk.c: fix walk_page_range() access of wrong PTEs · 3017f079
      由 Chen LinX 提交于 
      When walk_page_range walk a memory map's page tables, it'll skip
VM_PFNMAP area, then variable 'next' will to assign to vma->vm_end, it
maybe larger than 'end'.  In next loop, 'addr' will be larger than
'next'.  Then in /proc/XXXX/pagemap file reading procedure, the 'addr'
will growing forever in pagemap_pte_range, pte_to_pagemap_entry will
access the wrong pte.

  BUG: Bad page map in process procrank  pte:8437526f pmd:785de067
  addr:9108d000 vm_flags:00200073 anon_vma:f0d99020 mapping:  (null) index:9108d
  CPU: 1 PID: 4974 Comm: procrank Tainted: G    B   W  O 3.10.1+ #1
  Call Trace:
    dump_stack+0x16/0x18
    print_bad_pte+0x114/0x1b0
    vm_normal_page+0x56/0x60
    pagemap_pte_range+0x17a/0x1d0
    walk_page_range+0x19e/0x2c0
    pagemap_read+0x16e/0x200
    vfs_read+0x84/0x150
    SyS_read+0x4a/0x80
    syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Signed-off-by: NLiu ShuoX <shuox.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChen LinX <linx.z.chen@intel.com>
Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NNaoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[3.10.x+]
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      3017f079
    • R
      mm: list_lru: fix almost infinite loop causing effective livelock · c56b097a
      由 Russell King 提交于 
      I've seen a fair number of issues with kswapd and other processes
appearing to get stuck in v3.12-rc.  Using sysrq-p many times seems to
indicate that it gets stuck somewhere in list_lru_walk_node(), called
from prune_icache_sb() and super_cache_scan().

I never seem to be able to trigger a calltrace for functions above that
point.

So I decided to add the following to super_cache_scan():

    @@ -81,10 +81,14 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
            inodes = list_lru_count_node(&sb->s_inode_lru, sc->nid);
            dentries = list_lru_count_node(&sb->s_dentry_lru, sc->nid);
            total_objects = dentries + inodes + fs_objects + 1;
    +printk("%s:%u: %s: dentries %lu inodes %lu total %lu\n", current->comm, current->pid, __func__, dentries, inodes, total_objects);

            /* proportion the scan between the caches */
            dentries = mult_frac(sc->nr_to_scan, dentries, total_objects);
            inodes = mult_frac(sc->nr_to_scan, inodes, total_objects);
    +printk("%s:%u: %s: dentries %lu inodes %lu\n", current->comm, current->pid, __func__, dentries, inodes);
    +BUG_ON(dentries == 0);
    +BUG_ON(inodes == 0);

            /*
             * prune the dcache first as the icache is pinned by it, then
    @@ -99,7 +103,7 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
                    freed += sb->s_op->free_cached_objects(sb, fs_objects,
                                                           sc->nid);
            }
    -
    +printk("%s:%u: %s: dentries %lu inodes %lu freed %lu\n", current->comm, current->pid, __func__, dentries, inodes, freed);
            drop_super(sb);
            return freed;
     }

and shortly thereafter, having applied some pressure, I got this:

    update-apt-xapi:1616: super_cache_scan: dentries 25632 inodes 2 total 25635
    update-apt-xapi:1616: super_cache_scan: dentries 1023 inodes 0
    ------------[ cut here ]------------
    Kernel BUG at c0101994 [verbose debug info unavailable]
    Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#3] SMP ARM
    Modules linked in: fuse rfcomm bnep bluetooth hid_cypress
    CPU: 0 PID: 1616 Comm: update-apt-xapi Tainted: G      D      3.12.0-rc7+ #154
    task: daea1200 ti: c3bf8000 task.ti: c3bf8000
    PC is at super_cache_scan+0x1c0/0x278
    LR is at trace_hardirqs_on+0x14/0x18
    Process update-apt-xapi (pid: 1616, stack limit = 0xc3bf8240)
    ...
    Backtrace:
      (super_cache_scan) from [<c00cd69c>] (shrink_slab+0x254/0x4c8)
      (shrink_slab) from [<c00d09a0>] (try_to_free_pages+0x3a0/0x5e0)
      (try_to_free_pages) from [<c00c59cc>] (__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x5)
      (__alloc_pages_nodemask) from [<c00e07c0>] (__pte_alloc+0x2c/0x13)
      (__pte_alloc) from [<c00e3a70>] (handle_mm_fault+0x84c/0x914)
      (handle_mm_fault) from [<c001a4cc>] (do_page_fault+0x1f0/0x3bc)
      (do_page_fault) from [<c001a7b0>] (do_translation_fault+0xac/0xb8)
      (do_translation_fault) from [<c000840c>] (do_DataAbort+0x38/0xa0)
      (do_DataAbort) from [<c00133f8>] (__dabt_usr+0x38/0x40)

Notice that we had a very low number of inodes, which were reduced to
zero my mult_frac().

Now, prune_icache_sb() calls list_lru_walk_node() passing that number of
inodes (0) into that as the number of objects to scan:

    long prune_icache_sb(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long nr_to_scan,
                         int nid)
    {
            LIST_HEAD(freeable);
            long freed;

            freed = list_lru_walk_node(&sb->s_inode_lru, nid, inode_lru_isolate,
                                           &freeable, &nr_to_scan);

which does:

    unsigned long
    list_lru_walk_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, list_lru_walk_cb isolate,
                       void *cb_arg, unsigned long *nr_to_walk)
    {

            struct list_lru_node    *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
            struct list_head *item, *n;
            unsigned long isolated = 0;

            spin_lock(&nlru->lock);
    restart:
            list_for_each_safe(item, n, &nlru->list) {
                    enum lru_status ret;

                    /*
                     * decrement nr_to_walk first so that we don't livelock if we
                     * get stuck on large numbesr of LRU_RETRY items
                     */
                    if (--(*nr_to_walk) == 0)
                            break;

So, if *nr_to_walk was zero when this function was entered, that means
we're wanting to operate on (~0UL)+1 objects - which might as well be
infinite.

Clearly this is not correct behaviour.  If we think about the behaviour
of this function when *nr_to_walk is 1, then clearly it's wrong - we
decrement first and then test for zero - which results in us doing
nothing at all.  A post-decrement would give the desired behaviour -
we'd try to walk one object and one object only if *nr_to_walk were one.

It also gives the correct behaviour for zero - we exit at this point.

Fixes: 5cedf721 ("list_lru: fix broken LRU_RETRY behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[ Modified to make sure we never underflow the count: this function gets
  called in a loop, so the 0 -> ~0ul transition is dangerous  - Linus ]
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      c56b097a
  9. 29 10月, 2013 6 次提交