Since dev_pm_qos_add_request(), dev_pm_qos_update_request() and
dev_pm_qos_remove_request() for PM QoS flags should not be invoked
when device in RPM_SUSPENDED, add pm_runtime_get_sync() and pm_runtime_put()
around these functions in dev_pm_qos_expose_flags() and
dev_pm_qos_hide_flags().

[rjw: Modified the subject and changelog to better reflect the code
 changes made.]
Signed-off-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

In fact, the callers of dev_pm_qos_add_request(),
dev_pm_qos_update_request() and dev_pm_qos_remove_request() for
requests of type DEV_PM_QOS_FLAGS need to ensure that the target
device is not RPM_SUSPENDED before using any of these functions (or
be prepared for the new PM QoS flags to take effect after the device
has been resumed).  Document this in their kerneldoc comments.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Free a wrong point to struct dev_pm_qos->latency which suppose to
be the point to struct dev_pm_qos. The patch is to fix the issue.
Signed-off-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Commit e39473d0 (PM / QoS: Make it possible to expose PM QoS device
flags to user space) introduced __dev_pm_qos_update_request() to be
called internally by dev_pm_qos_update_request(), but forgot to make
the latter actually use the return value of the former.  Fix this
mistake.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Define two device PM QoS flags, PM_QOS_FLAG_NO_POWER_OFF
and PM_QOS_FLAG_REMOTE_WAKEUP, and introduce routines
dev_pm_qos_expose_flags() and dev_pm_qos_hide_flags() allowing the
caller to expose those two flags to user space or to hide them
from it, respectively.

After the flags have been exposed, user space will see two
additional sysfs attributes, pm_qos_no_power_off and
pm_qos_remote_wakeup, under the device's /sys/devices/.../power/
directory.  Then, writing 1 to one of them will update the
PM QoS flags request owned by user space so that the corresponding
flag is requested to be set.  In turn, writing 0 to one of them
will cause the corresponding flag in the user space's request to
be cleared (however, the owners of the other PM QoS flags requests
for the same device may still request the flag to be set and it
may be effectively set even if user space doesn't request that).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Acked-by: Nmark gross <markgross@thegnar.org>

Modify the device PM QoS core code to support PM QoS flags requests.

First, add a new field of type struct pm_qos_flags called "flags"
to struct dev_pm_qos for representing the list of PM QoS flags
requests for the given device.  Accordingly, add a new "type" field
to struct dev_pm_qos_request (along with an enum for representing
request types) and a new member called "flr" to its data union for
representig flags requests.

Second, modify dev_pm_qos_add_request(), dev_pm_qos_update_request(),
the internal routine apply_constraint() used by them and their
existing callers to cover flags requests as well as latency
requests.  In particular, dev_pm_qos_add_request() gets a new
argument called "type" for specifying the type of a request to be
added.

Finally, introduce two routines, __dev_pm_qos_flags() and
dev_pm_qos_flags(), allowing their callers to check which PM QoS
flags have been requested for the given device (the caller is
supposed to pass the mask of flags to check as the routine's
second argument and examine its return value for the result).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Nmark gross <markgross@thegnar.org>

The subsequent patches will use struct dev_pm_qos_request for
representing both latency requests and flags requests.  To make that
easier, put the node member of struct dev_pm_qos_request (under the
name "pnode") into a union called "data" that will represent the
request's  value and list node depending on its type.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Nmark gross <markgross@thegnar.org>

Currently struct dev_pm_info contains only one PM QoS constraints
pointer reserved for latency requirements.  Since one more device
constraints type (i.e. flags) will be necessary, introduce a new
structure, struct dev_pm_qos, that eventually will contain all of
the available device PM QoS constraints and replace the "constraints"
pointer in struct dev_pm_info with a pointer to the new structure
called "qos".
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>

This reverts commit fc2fb3a0.

The problem with the above commit is that it makes the device PM QoS
core code hold a spinlock around blocking_notifier_call_chain()
invocations.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

The per-device PM QoS locking requires a spinlock to be used. The reasons
are:
 - an alignement with the PM QoS core code, which is used by the per-device
   PM QoS code for the constraints lists management. The PM QoS core code
   uses spinlocks to protect the constraints lists,
 - some drivers need to use the per-device PM QoS functionality from
   interrupt context or spinlock protected context.
   An example of such a driver is the OMAP HSI (high-speed synchronous serial
   interface) driver which needs to control the IP block idle state
   depending on the FIFO empty state, from interrupt context.
Reported-by: NDjamil Elaidi <d-elaidi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NJean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

Fix the following sparse warning:
drivers/base/power/qos.c:465:29: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
Signed-off-by: NSachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

The current behavior of dev_pm_qos_add_notifier() makes device PM QoS
notifiers less than useful.  Namely, it silently returns success when
called before any PM QoS constraints are added for the device, so the
caller will assume that the notifier has been registered, but when
someone actually adds some nontrivial constraints for the device
eventually, the previous callers of dev_pm_qos_add_notifier()
will not know about that and their notifier routines will not be
executed (contrary to their expectations).

To address this problem make dev_pm_qos_add_notifier() create the
constraints object for the device if it is not present when the
routine is called.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by : markgross <markgross@thegnar.org>

A runtime suspend of a device (e.g. an MMC controller) belonging to
a power domain or, in a more complicated scenario, a runtime suspend
of another device in the same power domain, may cause power to be
removed from the entire domain.  In that case, the amount of time
necessary to runtime-resume the given device (e.g. the MMC
controller) is often substantially greater than the time needed to
run its driver's runtime resume callback.  That may hurt performance
in some situations, because user data may need to wait for the
device to become operational, so we should make it possible to
prevent that from happening.

For this reason, introduce a new sysfs attribute for devices,
power/pm_qos_resume_latency_us, allowing user space to specify the
upper bound of the time necessary to bring the (runtime-suspended)
device up after the resume of it has been requested.  However, make
that attribute appear only for the devices whose drivers declare
support for it by calling the (new) dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_limit()
helper function with the appropriate initial value of the attribute.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Reviewed-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Some devices, like the I2C controller on SH7372, are not
necessary for providing power to their children or forwarding
wakeup signals (and generally interrupts) from them.  They are
only needed by their children when there's some data to transfer,
so they may be suspended for the majority of time and resumed
on demand, when the children have data to send or receive.  For this
purpose, however, their power.ignore_children flags have to be set,
or the PM core wouldn't allow them to be suspended while their
children were active.

Unfortunately, in some situations it may take too much time to
resume such devices so that they can assist their children in
transferring data.  For example, if such a device belongs to a PM
domain which goes to the "power off" state when that device is
suspended, it may take too much time to restore power to the
domain in response to the request from one of the device's
children.  In that case, if the parent's resume time is critical,
the domain should stay in the "power on" state, although it still may
be desirable to power manage the parent itself (e.g. by manipulating
its clock).

In general, device PM QoS may be used to address this problem.
Namely, if the device's children added PM QoS latency constraints
for it, they would be able to prevent it from being put into an
overly deep low-power state.  However, in some cases the devices
needing to be serviced are not the immediate children of a
"children-ignoring" device, but its grandchildren or even less
direct descendants.  In those cases, the entity wanting to add a
PM QoS request for a given device's ancestor that ignores its
children will have to find it in the first place, so introduce a new
helper function that may be used to achieve that.  This function,
dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request(), will search for the first
ancestor of the given device whose power.ignore_children flag is
set and will add a device PM QoS latency request for that ancestor
on behalf of the caller.  The request added this way may be removed
with the help of dev_pm_qos_remove_request() in the future, like
any other device PM QoS latency request.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

Make the runtime PM core use device PM QoS constraints to check if
it is allowed to suspend a given device, so that an error code is
returned if the device's own PM QoS constraint is negative or one of
its children has already been suspended for too long.  If this is
not the case, the maximum estimated time the device is allowed to be
suspended, computed as the minimum of the device's PM QoS constraint
and the PM QoS constraints of its children (reduced by the difference
between the current time and their suspend times) is stored in a new
device's PM field power.max_time_suspended_ns that can be used by
the device's subsystem or PM domain to decide whether or not to put
the device into lower-power (and presumably higher-latency) states
later (if the constraint is 0, which means "no constraint", the
power.max_time_suspended_ns is set to -1).

Additionally, the time of execution of the subsystem-level
.runtime_suspend() callback for the device is recorded in the new
power.suspend_time field for later use by the device's subsystem or
PM domain along with power.max_time_suspended_ns (it also is used
by the core code when the device's parent is suspended).

Introduce a new helper function,
pm_runtime_update_max_time_suspended(), allowing subsystems and PM
domains (or device drivers) to update the power.max_time_suspended_ns
field, for example after changing the power state of a suspended
device.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

Make dev_pm_qos_add_request() use WARN() in a better way and do not hardcode
the function's name into the message (use __func__ instead).
Signed-off-by: NGuennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

Most of these files were implicitly getting EXPORT_SYMBOL via
device.h which was including module.h, but that path will be broken
soon.

[ with input from Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> ]
Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

To read the current PM QoS value for a given device we need to
make sure that the device's power.constraints object won't be
removed while we're doing that.  For this reason, put the
operation under dev->power.lock and acquire the lock
around the initialization and removal of power.constraints.

Moreover, since we're using the value of power.constraints to
determine whether or not the object is present, the
power.constraints_state field isn't necessary any more and may be
removed.  However, dev_pm_qos_add_request() needs to check if the
device is being removed from the system before allocating a new
PM QoS constraints object for it, so make it use the
power.power_state field of struct device for this purpose.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

Add a global notification chain that gets called upon changes to the
aggregated constraint value for any device.
The notification callbacks are passing the full constraint request data
in order for the callees to have access to it. The current use is for the
platform low-level code to access the target device of the constraint.
Signed-off-by: NJean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

Implement the per-device PM QoS constraints by creating a device
PM QoS API, which calls the PM QoS constraints management core code.

The per-device latency constraints data strctures are stored
in the device dev_pm_info struct.

The device PM code calls the init and destroy of the per-device constraints
data struct in order to support the dynamic insertion and removal of the
devices in the system.

To minimize the data usage by the per-device constraints, the data struct
is only allocated at the first call to dev_pm_qos_add_request.
The data is later free'd when the device is removed from the system.
A global mutex protects the constraints users from the data being
allocated and free'd.
Signed-off-by: NJean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>