1. 14 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  2. 04 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 27 2月, 2014 2 次提交
  4. 19 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  5. 18 2月, 2014 4 次提交
  6. 15 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 14 2月, 2014 1 次提交
    • F
      net: ip, ipv6: handle gso skbs in forwarding path · fe6cc55f
      Florian Westphal 提交于
      Marcelo Ricardo Leitner reported problems when the forwarding link path
      has a lower mtu than the incoming one if the inbound interface supports GRO.
      
      Given:
      Host <mtu1500> R1 <mtu1200> R2
      
      Host sends tcp stream which is routed via R1 and R2.  R1 performs GRO.
      
      In this case, the kernel will fail to send ICMP fragmentation needed
      messages (or pkt too big for ipv6), as GSO packets currently bypass dstmtu
      checks in forward path. Instead, Linux tries to send out packets exceeding
      the mtu.
      
      When locking route MTU on Host (i.e., no ipv4 DF bit set), R1 does
      not fragment the packets when forwarding, and again tries to send out
      packets exceeding R1-R2 link mtu.
      
      This alters the forwarding dstmtu checks to take the individual gso
      segment lengths into account.
      
      For ipv6, we send out pkt too big error for gso if the individual
      segments are too big.
      
      For ipv4, we either send icmp fragmentation needed, or, if the DF bit
      is not set, perform software segmentation and let the output path
      create fragments when the packet is leaving the machine.
      It is not 100% correct as the error message will contain the headers of
      the GRO skb instead of the original/segmented one, but it seems to
      work fine in my (limited) tests.
      
      Eric Dumazet suggested to simply shrink mss via ->gso_size to avoid
      sofware segmentation.
      
      However it turns out that skb_segment() assumes skb nr_frags is related
      to mss size so we would BUG there.  I don't want to mess with it considering
      Herbert and Eric disagree on what the correct behavior should be.
      
      Hannes Frederic Sowa notes that when we would shrink gso_size
      skb_segment would then also need to deal with the case where
      SKB_MAX_FRAGS would be exceeded.
      
      This uses sofware segmentation in the forward path when we hit ipv4
      non-DF packets and the outgoing link mtu is too small.  Its not perfect,
      but given the lack of bug reports wrt. GRO fwd being broken this is a
      rare case anyway.  Also its not like this could not be improved later
      once the dust settles.
      Acked-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      Reported-by: NMarcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      fe6cc55f
  8. 12 2月, 2014 2 次提交
  9. 10 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  10. 06 2月, 2014 2 次提交
  11. 28 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • H
      net: Fix memory leak if TPROXY used with TCP early demux · a452ce34
      Holger Eitzenberger 提交于
      I see a memory leak when using a transparent HTTP proxy using TPROXY
      together with TCP early demux and Kernel v3.8.13.15 (Ubuntu stable):
      
      unreferenced object 0xffff88008cba4a40 (size 1696):
        comm "softirq", pid 0, jiffies 4294944115 (age 8907.520s)
        hex dump (first 32 bytes):
          0a e0 20 6a 40 04 1b 37 92 be 32 e2 e8 b4 00 00  .. j@..7..2.....
          02 00 07 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
        backtrace:
          [<ffffffff810b710a>] kmem_cache_alloc+0xad/0xb9
          [<ffffffff81270185>] sk_prot_alloc+0x29/0xc5
          [<ffffffff812702cf>] sk_clone_lock+0x14/0x283
          [<ffffffff812aaf3a>] inet_csk_clone_lock+0xf/0x7b
          [<ffffffff8129a893>] netlink_broadcast+0x14/0x16
          [<ffffffff812c1573>] tcp_create_openreq_child+0x1b/0x4c3
          [<ffffffff812c033e>] tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock+0x38/0x25d
          [<ffffffff812c13e4>] tcp_check_req+0x25c/0x3d0
          [<ffffffff812bf87a>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x287/0x40e
          [<ffffffff812a08a7>] ip_route_input_noref+0x843/0xa55
          [<ffffffff812bfeca>] tcp_v4_rcv+0x4c9/0x725
          [<ffffffff812a26f4>] ip_local_deliver_finish+0xe9/0x154
          [<ffffffff8127a927>] __netif_receive_skb+0x4b2/0x514
          [<ffffffff8127aa77>] process_backlog+0xee/0x1c5
          [<ffffffff8127c949>] net_rx_action+0xa7/0x200
          [<ffffffff81209d86>] add_interrupt_randomness+0x39/0x157
      
      But there are many more, resulting in the machine going OOM after some
      days.
      
      From looking at the TPROXY code, and with help from Florian, I see
      that the memory leak is introduced in tcp_v4_early_demux():
      
        void tcp_v4_early_demux(struct sk_buff *skb)
        {
          /* ... */
      
          iph = ip_hdr(skb);
          th = tcp_hdr(skb);
      
          if (th->doff < sizeof(struct tcphdr) / 4)
              return;
      
          sk = __inet_lookup_established(dev_net(skb->dev), &tcp_hashinfo,
                             iph->saddr, th->source,
                             iph->daddr, ntohs(th->dest),
                             skb->skb_iif);
          if (sk) {
              skb->sk = sk;
      
      where the socket is assigned unconditionally to skb->sk, also bumping
      the refcnt on it.  This is problematic, because in our case the skb
      has already a socket assigned in the TPROXY target.  This then results
      in the leak I see.
      
      The very same issue seems to be with IPv6, but haven't tested.
      Reviewed-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
      Signed-off-by: NHolger Eitzenberger <holger@eitzenberger.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a452ce34
  12. 25 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  13. 23 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  14. 22 1月, 2014 3 次提交
  15. 20 1月, 2014 5 次提交
  16. 19 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  17. 18 1月, 2014 3 次提交
  18. 16 1月, 2014 3 次提交
  19. 15 1月, 2014 5 次提交
  20. 14 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • H
      ipv6: introduce ip6_dst_mtu_forward and protect forwarding path with it · 0954cf9c
      Hannes Frederic Sowa 提交于
      In the IPv6 forwarding path we are only concerend about the outgoing
      interface MTU, but also respect locked MTUs on routes. Tunnel provider
      or IPSEC already have to recheck and if needed send PtB notifications
      to the sending host in case the data does not fit into the packet with
      added headers (we only know the final header sizes there, while also
      using path MTU information).
      
      The reason for this change is, that path MTU information can be injected
      into the kernel via e.g. icmp_err protocol handler without verification
      of local sockets. As such, this could cause the IPv6 forwarding path to
      wrongfully emit Packet-too-Big errors and drop IPv6 packets.
      
      Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
      Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      Cc: John Heffner <johnwheffner@gmail.com>
      Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
      Signed-off-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      0954cf9c