Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 22 2月, 2011 1 次提交
  3. 11 1月, 2011 2 次提交
  5. 28 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  7. 10 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  9. 12 6月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: Clean up s_dirt handling · a0375156
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      We don't need to set s_dirt in most of the ext4 code when journaling
is enabled.  In ext3/4 some of the summary statistics for # of free
inodes, blocks, and directories are calculated from the per-block
group statistics when the file system is mounted or unmounted.  As a
result the superblock doesn't have to be updated, either via the
journal or by setting s_dirt.  There are a few exceptions, most
notably when resizing the file system, where the superblock needs to
be modified --- and in that case it should be done as a journalled
operation if possible, and s_dirt set only in no-journal mode.

This patch will optimize out some unneeded disk writes when using ext4
with a journal.
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      a0375156
  11. 22 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  13. 17 5月, 2010 2 次提交
  15. 05 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • C
      dquot: cleanup space allocation / freeing routines · 5dd4056d
      由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 
      Get rid of the alloc_space, free_space, reserve_space, claim_space and
release_rsv dquot operations - they are always called from the filesystem
and if a filesystem really needs their own (which none currently does)
it can just call into it's own routine directly.

Move shared logic into the common __dquot_alloc_space,
dquot_claim_space_nodirty and __dquot_free_space low-level methods,
and rationalize the wrappers around it to move as much as possible
code into the common block for CONFIG_QUOTA vs not.  Also rename
all these helpers to be named dquot_* instead of vfs_dq_*.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      5dd4056d
  17. 16 2月, 2010 2 次提交
  19. 25 1月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: Use bitops to read/modify EXT4_I(inode)->i_state · 19f5fb7a
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      At several places we modify EXT4_I(inode)->i_state without holding
i_mutex (ext4_release_file, ext4_bmap, ext4_journalled_writepage,
ext4_do_update_inode, ...). These modifications are racy and we can
lose updates to i_state. So convert handling of i_state to use bitops
which are atomic.

Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      19f5fb7a
  21. 23 12月, 2009 1 次提交
    • J
      ext4: Eliminate potential double free on error path · d3533d72
      由 Julia Lawall 提交于 
      b_entry_name and buffer are initially NULL, are initialized within a loop
to the result of calling kmalloc, and are freed at the bottom of this loop.
The loop contains gotos to cleanup, which also frees b_entry_name and
buffer.  Some of these gotos are before the reinitializations of
b_entry_name and buffer.  To maintain the invariant that b_entry_name and
buffer are NULL at the top of the loop, and thus acceptable arguments to
kfree, these variables are now set to NULL after the kfrees.

This seems to be the simplest solution.  A more complicated solution
would be to introduce more labels in the error handling code at the end of
the function.

A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@r@
identifier E;
expression E1;
iterator I;
statement S;
@@

*kfree(E);
... when != E = E1
    when != I(E,...) S
    when != &E
*kfree(E);
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      d3533d72
  23. 17 12月, 2009 1 次提交
    • C
      sanitize xattr handler prototypes · 431547b3
      由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 
      Add a flags argument to struct xattr_handler and pass it to all xattr
handler methods.  This allows using the same methods for multiple
handlers, e.g. for the ACL methods which perform exactly the same action
for the access and default ACLs, just using a different underlying
attribute.  With a little more groundwork it'll also allow sharing the
methods for the regular user/trusted/secure handlers in extN, ocfs2 and
jffs2 like it's already done for xfs in this patch.

Also change the inode argument to the handlers to a dentry to allow
using the handlers mechnism for filesystems that require it later,
e.g. cifs.

[with GFS2 bits updated by Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>]
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Acked-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      431547b3
  25. 23 11月, 2009 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: call ext4_forget() from ext4_free_blocks() · e6362609
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      Add the facility for ext4_forget() to be called from
ext4_free_blocks().  This simplifies the code in a large number of
places, and centralizes most of the work of calling ext4_forget() into
a single place.

Also fix a bug in the extents migration code; it wasn't calling
ext4_forget() when releasing the indirect blocks during the
conversion.  As a result, if the system cashed during or shortly after
the extents migration, and the released indirect blocks get reused as
data blocks, the journal replay would corrupt the data blocks.  With
this new patch, fixing this bug was as simple as adding the
EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_FORGET flags to the call to ext4_free_blocks().
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      e6362609
  27. 16 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  29. 17 9月, 2009 1 次提交
    • E
      ext4: limit block allocations for indirect-block files to < 2^32 · fb0a387d
      由 Eric Sandeen 提交于 
      Today, the ext4 allocator will happily allocate blocks past
2^32 for indirect-block files, which results in the block
numbers getting truncated, and corruption ensues.

This patch limits such allocations to < 2^32, and adds
BUG_ONs if we do get blocks larger than that.

This should address RH Bug 519471, ext4 bitmap allocator 
must limit blocks to < 2^32

* ext4_find_goal() is modified to choose a goal < UINT_MAX,
  so that our starting point is in an acceptable range.

* ext4_xattr_block_set() is modified such that the goal block
  is < UINT_MAX, as above.

* ext4_mb_regular_allocator() is modified so that the group
  search does not continue into groups which are too high

* ext4_mb_use_preallocated() has a check that we don't use
  preallocated space which is too far out

* ext4_alloc_blocks() and ext4_xattr_block_set() add some BUG_ONs

No attempt has been made to limit inode locations to < 2^32,
so we may wind up with blocks far from their inodes.  Doing
this much already will lead to some odd ENOSPC issues when the
"lower 32" gets full, and further restricting inodes could
make that even weirder.

For high inodes, choosing a goal of the original, % UINT_MAX,
may be a bit odd, but then we're in an odd situation anyway,
and I don't know of a better heuristic.
Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      fb0a387d
  31. 26 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  33. 07 1月, 2009 1 次提交
    • F
      ext4: Allow ext4 to run without a journal · 0390131b
      由 Frank Mayhar 提交于 
      A few weeks ago I posted a patch for discussion that allowed ext4 to run
without a journal.  Since that time I've integrated the excellent
comments from Andreas and fixed several serious bugs.  We're currently
running with this patch and generating some performance numbers against
both ext2 (with backported reservations code) and ext4 with and without
a journal.  It just so happens that running without a journal is
slightly faster for most everything.

We did
	iozone -T -t 4 s 2g -r 256k -T -I -i0 -i1 -i2

which creates 4 threads, each of which create and do reads and writes on
a 2G file, with a buffer size of 256K, using O_DIRECT for all file opens
to bypass the page cache.  Results:

                     ext2        ext4, default   ext4, no journal
  initial writes   13.0 MB/s        15.4 MB/s          15.7 MB/s
  rewrites         13.1 MB/s        15.6 MB/s          15.9 MB/s
  reads            15.2 MB/s        16.9 MB/s          17.2 MB/s
  re-reads         15.3 MB/s        16.9 MB/s          17.2 MB/s
  random readers    5.6 MB/s         5.6 MB/s           5.7 MB/s
  random writers    5.1 MB/s         5.3 MB/s           5.4 MB/s 

So it seems that, so far, this was a useful exercise.
Signed-off-by: NFrank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      0390131b
  35. 13 12月, 2008 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: remove do_blk_alloc() · 97df5d15
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      The convenience function do_blk_alloc() is a static function with only
one caller, so fold it into ext4_new_meta_blocks() to simplify the
code and to make it easier to understand.

To save more stack space, if count is a null pointer in
ext4_new_meta_blocks() assume that caller wanted a single block (and
if there is an error, no blocks were allocated).
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      97df5d15
  37. 08 12月, 2008 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: remove ext4_new_meta_block() · cfe82c85
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      There were only two one callers of the function ext4_new_meta_block(),
which just a very simpler wrapper function around
ext4_new_meta_blocks().  Change those two functions to call
ext4_new_meta_blocks() directly, to save code and stack space usage.
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      cfe82c85
  39. 11 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  41. 09 10月, 2008 1 次提交
    • K
      ext4: fix xattr deadlock · 4d20c685
      由 Kalpak Shah 提交于 
      ext4_xattr_set_handle() eventually ends up calling
ext4_mark_inode_dirty() which tries to expand the inode by shifting
the EAs.  This leads to the xattr_sem being downed again and leading
to a deadlock.

This patch makes sure that if ext4_xattr_set_handle() is in the
call-chain, ext4_mark_inode_dirty() will not expand the inode.
Signed-off-by: NKalpak Shah <kalpak.shah@sun.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      4d20c685
  43. 27 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  45. 12 7月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      ext4: Use inode preallocation with -o noextents · 7061eba7
      由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于 
      When mballoc is enabled, block allocation for old block-based
files are allocated using mballoc allocator instead of old
block-based allocator. The old ext3 block reservation is turned
off when mballoc is turned on.

However, the in-core preallocation is not enabled for block-based/
non-extent based file block allocation. This result in performance
regression, as now we don't have "reservation" ore in-core preallocation
to prevent interleaved fragmentation in multiple writes workload.

This patch fix this by enable per inode in-core preallocation
for non extent files when mballoc is used.
Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      7061eba7
  47. 15 5月, 2008 1 次提交
  49. 30 4月, 2008 2 次提交
  51. 17 4月, 2008 4 次提交
  53. 16 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  55. 29 1月, 2008 1 次提交
  57. 18 10月, 2007 2 次提交
  59. 18 7月, 2007 2 次提交
    • K
      ext4: Expand extra_inodes space per the s_{want,min}_extra_isize fields · 6dd4ee7c
      由 Kalpak Shah 提交于 
      We need to make sure that existing ext3 filesystems can also avail the
new fields that have been added to the ext4 inode. We use
s_want_extra_isize and s_min_extra_isize to decide by how much we should
expand the inode. If EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE feature is set
then we expand the inode by max(s_want_extra_isize, s_min_extra_isize ,
sizeof(ext4_inode) - EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE) bytes. Actually it is
still an open question about whether users should be able to set
s_*_extra_isize smaller than the known fields or not.

This patch also adds the functionality to expand inodes to include the
newly added fields. We start by trying to expand by s_want_extra_isize
bytes and if its fails we try to expand by s_min_extra_isize bytes. This
is done by changing the i_extra_isize if enough space is available in
the inode and no EAs are present. If EAs are present and there is enough
space in the inode then the EAs in the inode are shifted to make space.
If enough space is not available in the inode due to the EAs then 1 or
more EAs are shifted to the external EA block. In the worst case when
even the external EA block does not have enough space we inform the user
that some EA would need to be deleted or s_min_extra_isize would have to
be reduced.
Signed-off-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
Signed-off-by: NKalpak Shah <kalpak@clusterfs.com>
Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      6dd4ee7c
    • K
      ext4: Add nanosecond timestamps · ef7f3835
      由 Kalpak Shah 提交于 
      This patch adds nanosecond timestamps for ext4. This involves adding
*time_extra fields to the ext4_inode to extend the timestamps to
64-bits.  Creation time is also added by this patch.

These extended fields will fit into an inode if the filesystem was
formatted with large inodes (-I 256 or larger) and there are currently
no EAs consuming all of the available space. For new inodes we always
reserve enough space for the kernel's known extended fields, but for
inodes created with an old kernel this might not have been the case. So
this patch also adds the EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE feature
flag(ro-compat so that older kernels can't create inodes with a smaller
extra_isize). which indicates if the fields fitting inside
s_min_extra_isize are available or not.  If the expansion of inodes if
unsuccessful then this feature will be disabled.  This feature is only
enabled if requested by the sysadmin.

None of the extended inode fields is critical for correct filesystem
operation.
Signed-off-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
Signed-off-by: NKalpak Shah <kalpak@clusterfs.com>
Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      ef7f3835
  61. 02 3月, 2007 1 次提交
    • M
      [PATCH] ext[34]: EA block reference count racing fix · 8a2bfdcb
      由 Mingming Cao 提交于 
      There are race issues around ext[34] xattr block release code.

ext[34]_xattr_release_block() checks the reference count of xattr block
(h_refcount) and frees that xattr block if it is the last one reference it.
 Unlike ext2, the check of this counter is unprotected by any lock.
ext[34]_xattr_release_block() will free the mb_cache entry before freeing
that xattr block.  There is a small window between the check for the re
h_refcount ==1 and the call to mb_cache_entry_free().  During this small
window another inode might find this xattr block from the mbcache and reuse
it, racing a refcount updates.  The xattr block will later be freed by the
first inode without notice other inode is still use it.  Later if that
block is reallocated as a datablock for other file, then more serious
problem might happen.

We need put a lock around places checking the refount as well to avoid
racing issue.  Another place need this kind of protection is in
ext3_xattr_block_set(), where it will modify the xattr block content in-
the-fly if the refcount is 1 (means it's the only inode reference it).

This will also fix another issue: the xattr block may not get freed at all
if no lock is to protect the refcount check at the release time.  It is
possible that the last two inodes could release the shared xattr block at
the same time.  But both of them think they are not the last one so only
decreased the h_refcount without freeing xattr block at all.

We need to call lock_buffer() after ext3_journal_get_write_access() to
avoid deadlock (because the later will call lock_buffer()/unlock_buffer
() as well).
Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      8a2bfdcb