Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

As the module uses rcu_call() we should make sure that all
rcu callback has been completed before removing the code.
Signed-off-by: NJesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk>
Acked-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This patch extends the new upcall with a "service" field that currently
can have 2 values: "*" or "nfs". These values specify matching rules for
principals in the keytab file. The "*" means that gssd is allowed to use
"root", "nfs", or "host" keytab entries while the other option requires
"nfs".

Restricting gssd to use the "nfs" principal is needed for when the
server performs a callback to the client.  The server in this case has
to authenticate itself as an "nfs" principal.

We also need "service" field to distiguish between two client-side cases
both currently using a uid of 0: the case of regular file access by the
root user, and the case of state-management calls (such as setclientid)
which should use a keytab for authentication.  (And the upcall should
fail if an appropriate principal can't be found.)

Signed-off: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

This patch extends the new upcall by adding a "target" field
communicating who we want to authenticate to (equivalently, the service
principal that we want to acquire a ticket for).

Signed-off: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Implement the new upcall.  We decide which version of the upcall gssd
will use (new or old), by creating both pipes (the new one named "gssd",
the old one named after the mechanism (e.g., "krb5")), and then waiting
to see which version gssd actually opens.

We don't permit pipes of the two different types to be opened at once.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Keep a pointer to the inode that the message is queued on in the struct
gss_upcall_msg.  This will be convenient, especially after we have a
choice of two pipes that an upcall could be queued on.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Introduce a global variable pipe_version which will eventually be used
to keep track of which version of the upcall gssd is using.

For now, though, it only keeps track of whether any pipe is open or not;
it is negative if not, zero if one is opened.  We use this to wait for
the first gssd to open a pipe.

(Minor digression: note this waits only for the very first open of any
pipe, not for the first open of a pipe for a given auth; thus we still
need the RPC_PIPE_WAIT_FOR_OPEN behavior to wait for gssd to open new
pipes that pop up on subsequent mounts.)
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Keep a count of the number of pipes open plus the number of messages on
a pipe.  This count isn't used yet.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

I want to add a little more code here, so it'll be convenient to have
this flatter.

Also, I'll want to add another error condition, so it'll be more
convenient to return -ENOMEM than NULL in the error case.  The only
caller is already converting NULL to -ENOMEM anyway.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

We'll want to call this from elsewhere soon.  And this is a bit nicer
anyway.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

We're just about to kfree() gss_auth, so there's no point to setting any
of its fields.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

There's a bit of a chicken and egg problem when it comes to destroying
auth_gss credentials. When we destroy the last instance of a GSSAPI RPC
credential, we should send a NULL RPC call with a GSS procedure of
RPCSEC_GSS_DESTROY to hint to the server that it can destroy those
creds.

This isn't happening because we're setting clearing the uptodate bit on
the credentials and then setting the operations to the gss_nullops. When
we go to do the RPC call, we try to refresh the creds. That fails with
-EACCES and the call fails.

Fix this by not clearing the UPTODATE bit for the credentials and adding
a new crdestroy op for gss_nullops that just tears down the cred without
trying to destroy the context.

The only difference between this patch and the first one is the removal
of some minor formatting deltas.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Somehow, this escaped the previous purge. There should be no need to keep
any extra locks in the XDR callbacks.

The NFS client XDR code only writes into private objects, whereas all reads
of shared objects are confined to fields that do not change, such as
filehandles...

Ditto for lockd, the NFSv2/v3 client mount code, and rpcbind.

The nfsd XDR code may require the BKL, but since it does a synchronous RPC
call from a thread that already holds the lock, that issue is moot.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

There used to be a print_hexl() function that used isprint(), now gone.
I don't know why NFS_NGROUPS and CA_RUN_AS_MACHINE were here.

I also don't know why another #define that's actually used was marked
"unused".
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Also, a minor comment grammar fix in the same file.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Since the credentials may be allocated during the call to rpc_new_task(),
which again may be called by a memory allocator...
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

This patch removes CVS keywords that weren't updated for a long time
from comments.
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

When a server rejects our credential with an AUTH_REJECTEDCRED or similar,
we need to refresh the credential and then retry the request.
However, we do want to allow any requests that are in flight to finish
executing, so that we can at least attempt to process the replies that
depend on this instance of the credential.

The solution is to ensure that gss_refresh() looks up an entirely new
RPCSEC_GSS credential instead of attempting to create a context for the
existing invalid credential.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

If the downcall completes before we get the spin_lock then we currently
fail to refresh the credential.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

We need to try to ensure that we always use the same credentials whenever
we re-establish the clientid on the server. If not, the server won't
recognise that we're the same client, and so may not allow us to recover
state.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

With the recent change to generic creds, we can no longer use
cred->cr_ops->cr_name to distinguish between RPCSEC_GSS principals and
AUTH_SYS/AUTH_NULL identities. Replace it with the rpc_authops->au_name
instead...
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

..and always destroy using a 'soft' RPC call. Destroying GSS credentials
isn't mandatory; the server can always cope with a few credentials not
getting destroyed in a timely fashion.

This actually fixes a hang situation. Basically, some servers will decide
that the client is crazy if it tries to destroy an RPC context for which
they have sent an RPCSEC_GSS_CREDPROBLEM, and so will refuse to talk to it
for a while.
The regression therefor probably was introduced by commit
0df7fb74.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

We need the ability to treat 'generic' creds specially, since they want to
bind instances of the auth cred instead of binding themselves.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

__FUNCTION__ is gcc-specific, use __func__
Signed-off-by: NHarvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

An audit of the current RPC timeout functions shows that they don't really
ever need to run in the softirq context. As long as the softirq is
able to signal that the wakeup is due to a timeout (which it can do by
setting task->tk_status to -ETIMEDOUT) then the callback functions can just
run as standard task->tk_callback functions (in the rpciod/process
context).

The only possible border-line case would be xprt_timer() for the case of
UDP, when the callback is used to reduce the size of the transport
congestion window. In testing, however, the effect of moving that update
to a callback would appear to be minor.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

The gss_pipe_upcall() function expects the copy_to_user() function to
return a negative error value if the call fails, but copy_to_user()
returns an unsigned long number of bytes that couldn't be copied.

Can rpc_pipefs actually retry a partially completed upcall read?  If
not, then gss_pipe_upcall() should punt any partial read, just like the
upcall logic in net/sunrpc/cache.c.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Add newline to kernel warning message in gss_create().
Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Instead of mapping all errors except EACCES to EAGAIN, map all errors
except EAGAIN to EACCES.

An example is user-land negotiating a Kerberos context with an encryption
type that is not supported by the kernel code.  (This can happen due to
mis-configuration or a bug in the Kerberos code that does not honor our
request to limit the encryption types negotiated.)  This failure is not
transient, and returning EAGAIN causes mount to continuously retry rather
than giving up.
Signed-off-by: NKevin Coffman <kwc@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Doing so may not be safe...
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Since every invocation of xdr encode or decode functions takes the BKL now,
there's a lot of redundant lock_kernel/unlock_kernel pairs that we can pull
out into a common function.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Recent breakage..

net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c:1002: warning: implicit declaration of function 'lock_kernel'
net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c:1004: warning: implicit declaration of function 'unlock_kernel'

Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

We don't need the BKL when wrapping and unwrapping; and experiments by Avishay
Traeger have found that permitting multiple encryption and decryption
operations to proceed in parallel can provide significant performance
improvements.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: Avishay Traeger <atraeger@cs.sunysb.edu>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Do so by set the gc_proc field to RPC_GSS_PROC_DESTROY, and then sending a
NULL RPC call.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Add a refcount in order to ensure that the gss_auth doesn't disappear from
underneath us while we're freeing up GSS contexts.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

We should almost always be deferencing the rpc_auth struct by means of the
credential's cr_auth field instead of the rpc_clnt->cl_auth anyway. Fix up
that historical mistake, and remove the macro that propagated it.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>