- 28 7月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
fanotify is only interested in event types which contain enough information to open the original file in the context of the fanotify listener. Since fanotify may not want to send events if that data isn't present we pass the data type to the should_send_event function call so fanotify can express its lack of interest. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
- 14 5月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
inotify_new_group() receives a get_uid-ed user_struct and saves the reference on group->inotify_data.user. The problem is that free_uid() is never called on it. Issue seem to be introduced by 63c882a0 (inotify: reimplement inotify using fsnotify) after 2.6.30. Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
- 16 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
inotify will WARN() if it finds that the idr and the fsnotify internals somehow got out of sync. It was only supposed to do this once but due to this stupid bug it would warn every single time a problem was detected. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 27 8月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
If an inotify watch is left in the idr when an fsnotify group is destroyed this will lead to a BUG. This is not a dangerous situation and really indicates a programming bug and leak of memory. This patch changes it to use a WARN and a printk rather than killing people's boxes. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
- 18 8月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
inotify decides if private data it passed to get added to an event was used by checking list_empty(). But it's possible that the event may have been dequeued and the private event removed so it would look empty. The fix is to use the return code from fsnotify_add_notify_event rather than looking at the list. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 20 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
inotify_destroy_mark_entry could get called twice for the same mark since it is called directly in inotify_rm_watch and when the mark is being destroyed for another reason. As an example assume that the file being watched was just deleted so inotify_destroy_mark_entry would get called from the path fsnotify_inoderemove() -> fsnotify_destroy_marks_by_inode() -> fsnotify_destroy_mark_entry() -> inotify_destroy_mark_entry(). If this happened at the same time as userspace tried to remove a watch via inotify_rm_watch we could attempt to remove the mark from the idr twice and could thus double dec the ref cnt and potentially could be in a use after free/double free situation. The fix is to have inotify_rm_watch use the generic recursive safe fsnotify_destroy_mark_by_entry() so we are sure the inotify_destroy_mark_entry() function can only be called one. This patch also renames the function to inotify_ingored_remove_idr() so it is clear what is actually going on in the function. Hopefully this fixes: [ 20.342058] idr_remove called for id=20 which is not allocated. [ 20.348000] Pid: 1860, comm: udevd Not tainted 2.6.30-tip #1077 [ 20.353933] Call Trace: [ 20.356410] [<ffffffff811a82b7>] idr_remove+0x115/0x18f [ 20.361737] [<ffffffff8134259d>] ? _spin_lock+0x6d/0x75 [ 20.367061] [<ffffffff8111640a>] ? inotify_destroy_mark_entry+0xa3/0xcf [ 20.373771] [<ffffffff8111641e>] inotify_destroy_mark_entry+0xb7/0xcf [ 20.380306] [<ffffffff81115913>] inotify_freeing_mark+0xe/0x10 [ 20.386238] [<ffffffff8111410d>] fsnotify_destroy_mark_by_entry+0x143/0x170 [ 20.393293] [<ffffffff811163a3>] inotify_destroy_mark_entry+0x3c/0xcf [ 20.399829] [<ffffffff811164d1>] sys_inotify_rm_watch+0x9b/0xc6 [ 20.405850] [<ffffffff8100bcdb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Reported-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Tested-by: NPeter Ziljlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
-
- 12 6月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
inotify and dnotify will both indicate that they want any event which came from a child inode. The fix is to mask off FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD when deciding if inotify or dnotify is interested in a given event. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
Reimplement inotify_user using fsnotify. This should be feature for feature exactly the same as the original inotify_user. This does not make any changes to the in kernel inotify feature used by audit. Those patches (and the eventual removal of in kernel inotify) will come after the new inotify_user proves to be working correctly. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-