Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 15 10月, 2007 22 次提交
  3. 02 10月, 2007 1 次提交
  5. 20 9月, 2007 1 次提交
    • I
      sched: add /proc/sys/kernel/sched_compat_yield · 1799e35d
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      add /proc/sys/kernel/sched_compat_yield to make sys_sched_yield()
more agressive, by moving the yielding task to the last position
in the rbtree.

with sched_compat_yield=0:

   PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
  2539 mingo     20   0  1576  252  204 R   50  0.0   0:02.03 loop_yield
  2541 mingo     20   0  1576  244  196 R   50  0.0   0:02.05 loop

with sched_compat_yield=1:

   PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
  2584 mingo     20   0  1576  248  196 R   99  0.0   0:52.45 loop
  2582 mingo     20   0  1576  256  204 R    0  0.0   0:00.00 loop_yield
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      1799e35d
  7. 05 9月, 2007 5 次提交
  9. 28 8月, 2007 6 次提交
    • I
      sched: clean up task_new_fair() · 9f508f82
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      cleanup: we have the 'se' and 'curr' entity-pointers already,
no need to use p->se and current->se.
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
      9f508f82
    • I
      sched: small schedstat fix · 213c8af6
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      small schedstat fix: the cfs_rq->wait_runtime 'sum of all runtimes'
statistics counters missed newly forked tasks and thus had a constant
negative skew. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
      213c8af6
    • I
      sched: fix wait_start_fair condition in update_stats_wait_end() · b77d69db
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      Peter Zijlstra noticed the following bug in SCHED_FEAT_SKIP_INITIAL (which
is disabled by default at the moment): it relies on se.wait_start_fair
being 0 while update_stats_wait_end() did not recognize a 0 value,
so instead of 'skipping' the initial interval we gave the new child
a maximum boost of +runtime-limit ...

(No impact on the default kernel, but nice to fix for completeness.)
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
      b77d69db
    • T
      sched: call update_curr() in task_tick_fair() · 7109c442
      由 Ting Yang 提交于 
      update the fair-clock before using it for the key value.

[ mingo@elte.hu: small cleanups. ]
Signed-off-by: NTing Yang <tingy@cs.umass.edu>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      7109c442
    • I
      sched: make the scheduler converge to the ideal latency · f6cf891c
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      de-HZ-ification of the granularity defaults unearthed a pre-existing
property of CFS: while it correctly converges to the granularity goal,
it does not prevent run-time fluctuations in the range of
[-gran ... 0 ... +gran].

With the increase of the granularity due to the removal of HZ
dependencies, this becomes visible in chew-max output (with 5 tasks
running):

 out:  28 . 27. 32 | flu:  0 .  0 | ran:    9 .   13 | per:   37 .   40
 out:  27 . 27. 32 | flu:  0 .  0 | ran:   17 .   13 | per:   44 .   40
 out:  27 . 27. 32 | flu:  0 .  0 | ran:    9 .   13 | per:   36 .   40
 out:  29 . 27. 32 | flu:  2 .  0 | ran:   17 .   13 | per:   46 .   40
 out:  28 . 27. 32 | flu:  0 .  0 | ran:    9 .   13 | per:   37 .   40
 out:  29 . 27. 32 | flu:  0 .  0 | ran:   18 .   13 | per:   47 .   40
 out:  28 . 27. 32 | flu:  0 .  0 | ran:    9 .   13 | per:   37 .   40

average slice is the ideal 13 msecs and the period is picture-perfect 40
msecs. But the 'ran' field fluctuates around 13.33 msecs and there's no
mechanism in CFS to keep that from happening: it's a perfectly valid
solution that CFS finds.

to fix this we add a granularity/preemption rule that knows about
the "target latency", which makes tasks that run longer than the ideal
latency run a bit less. The simplest approach is to simply decrease the
preemption granularity when a task overruns its ideal latency. For this
we have to track how much the task executed since its last preemption.

( this adds a new field to task_struct, but we can eliminate that
  overhead in 2.6.24 by putting all the scheduler timestamps into an
  anonymous union. )

with this change in place, chew-max output is fluctuation-less all
around:

 out:  28 . 27. 39 | flu:  0 .  2 | ran:   13 .   13 | per:   41 .   40
 out:  28 . 27. 39 | flu:  0 .  2 | ran:   13 .   13 | per:   41 .   40
 out:  28 . 27. 39 | flu:  0 .  2 | ran:   13 .   13 | per:   41 .   40
 out:  28 . 27. 39 | flu:  0 .  2 | ran:   13 .   13 | per:   41 .   40
 out:  28 . 27. 39 | flu:  0 .  1 | ran:   13 .   13 | per:   41 .   40
 out:  28 . 27. 39 | flu:  0 .  1 | ran:   13 .   13 | per:   41 .   40

this patch has no impact on any fastpath or on any globally observable
scheduling property. (unless you have sharp enough eyes to see
millisecond-level ruckles in glxgears smoothness :-)
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
      f6cf891c
    • M
      sched: fix sleeper bonus limit · 5f01d519
      由 Mike Galbraith 提交于 
      There is an Amarok song switch time increase (regression) under
hefty load.

What is happening is that sleeper_bonus is never consumed, and only
rarely goes below runtime_limit, so for the most part, Amarok isn't
getting any bonus at all.  We're keeping sleeper_bonus right at
runtime_limit (sched_latency == sched_runtime_limit == 40ms) forever, ie
we don't consume if we're lower that that, and don't add if we're above
it.  One Amarok thread waking (or anybody else) will push us past the
threshold, so the next thread waking gets nada, but will reap pain from
the previous thread waking until we drop back to runtime_limit.  It
looks to me like under load, some random task gets a bonus, and
everybody else pays, whether deserving or not.

This diff fixed the regression for me at any load rate.
Signed-off-by: NMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      5f01d519
  11. 26 8月, 2007 2 次提交
  13. 25 8月, 2007 3 次提交