One of my last patches contained a broken line
from splitting out some other changes, this
restores a working version.
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arndb@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>

This patch reduces lock complexity of SPU scheduler, particularly
for involuntary preemptive switches.  As a result the new code
does a better job of mapping the highest priority tasks to SPUs.

Lock complexity is reduced by using the system default workqueue
to perform involuntary saves.  In this way we avoid nasty lock
ordering problems that the previous code had.  A "minimum timeslice"
for SPU contexts is also introduced.  The intent here is to avoid
thrashing.

While the new scheduler does a better job at prioritization it
still does nothing for fairness.

From: Mark Nutter <mnutter@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arndb@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>

This patch makes it easier to preempt an SPU context by
having the scheduler hold ctx->state_sema for much shorter
periods of time.

As part of this restructuring, the control logic for the "run"
operation is moved from arch/ppc64/kernel/spu_base.c to
fs/spufs/file.c.  Of course the base retains "bottom half"
handlers for class{0,1} irqs.  The new run loop will re-acquire
an SPU if preempted.

From: Mark Nutter <mnutter@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arndb@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>

spufs is rather noisy when debugging is enabled, this
turns off the messages for production use.
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arndb@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>

This adds a scheduler for SPUs to make it possible to use
more logical SPUs than physical ones are present in the
system.

Currently, there is no support for preempting a running
SPU thread, they have to leave the SPU by either triggering
an event on the SPU that causes it to return to the
owning thread or by sending a signal to it.

This patch also adds operations that enable accessing an SPU
in either runnable or saved state. We use an RW semaphore
to protect the state of the SPU from changing underneath
us, while we are holding it readable. In order to change
the state, it is acquired writeable and a context save
or restore is executed before downgrading the semaphore
to read-only.

From: Mark Nutter <mnutter@us.ibm.com>,
      Uli Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arndb@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>