Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 27 8月, 2016 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Add GEN7_PCODE_MIN_FREQ_TABLE_GT_RATIO_OUT_OF_RANGE to SNB · 7850d1c3
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      According to the CI test machines, SNB also uses the
GEN7_PCODE_MIN_FREQ_TABLE_GT_RATIO_OUT_OF_RANGE value to report a bad
GEN6_PCODE_MIN_FREQ_TABLE request.

[  157.744641] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 9238 at
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:7760 sandybridge_pcode_write+0x141/0x200 [i915]
[  157.744642] Missing switch case (16) in gen6_check_mailbox_status
[  157.744642] Modules linked in: snd_hda_intel i915 ax88179_178a usbnet mii x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_hda_core mei_me lpc_ich snd_pcm mei broadcom bcm_phy_lib tg3 ptp pps_core [last unloaded: vgem]
[  157.744658] CPU: 5 PID: 9238 Comm: drv_hangman Tainted: G     U  W 4.8.0-rc3-CI-CI_DRM_1589+ #1
[  157.744658] Hardware name: Dell Inc. XPS 8300  /0Y2MRG, BIOS A06 10/17/2011
[  157.744659]  0000000000000000 ffff88011f093a98 ffffffff81426415 ffff88011f093ae8
[  157.744662]  0000000000000000 ffff88011f093ad8 ffffffff8107d2a6 00001e50810d3c9f
[  157.744663]  ffff880128680000 0000000000000008 0000000000000000 ffff88012868a650
[  157.744665] Call Trace:
[  157.744669]  [<ffffffff81426415>] dump_stack+0x67/0x92
[  157.744672]  [<ffffffff8107d2a6>] __warn+0xc6/0xe0
[  157.744673]  [<ffffffff8107d30a>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4a/0x50
[  157.744685]  [<ffffffffa0029831>] sandybridge_pcode_write+0x141/0x200 [i915]
[  157.744697]  [<ffffffffa002a88a>] intel_enable_gt_powersave+0x64a/0x1330 [i915]
[  157.744712]  [<ffffffffa006b4cb>] ? i9xx_emit_request+0x1b/0x80 [i915]
[  157.744725]  [<ffffffffa0055ed3>] __i915_add_request+0x1e3/0x370 [i915]
[  157.744738]  [<ffffffffa00428bd>] i915_gem_do_execbuffer.isra.16+0xced/0x1b80 [i915]
[  157.744740]  [<ffffffff811a232e>] ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
[  157.744752]  [<ffffffffa0043b72>] i915_gem_execbuffer2+0xc2/0x2a0 [i915]
[  157.744753]  [<ffffffff815485b7>] drm_ioctl+0x207/0x4c0
[  157.744765]  [<ffffffffa0043ab0>] ? i915_gem_execbuffer+0x360/0x360 [i915]
[  157.744767]  [<ffffffff810ea4ad>] ?  debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled+0x1d/0x20
[  157.744769]  [<ffffffff811fe09e>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x8e/0x680
[  157.744770]  [<ffffffff811a2377>] ? __might_fault+0x87/0x90
[  157.744771]  [<ffffffff811a232e>] ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
[  157.744773]  [<ffffffff810d3df2>] ?  trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x122/0x1b0
[  157.744774]  [<ffffffff811fe6cc>] SyS_ioctl+0x3c/0x70
[  157.744776]  [<ffffffff8180fe69>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xac

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97491
Fixes: 87660502 ("drm/i915/gen6+: Interpret mailbox error flags")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Lyude <cpaul@redhat.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160826105926.3413-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukAcked-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
      7850d1c3
  3. 26 8月, 2016 2 次提交
  5. 25 8月, 2016 6 次提交
  7. 24 8月, 2016 8 次提交
  9. 23 8月, 2016 18 次提交
  11. 22 8月, 2016 5 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Fix nesting of filelist_mutex vs struct_mutex in i915_ppgtt_info · 637ee29e
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      An unlikely ABBA deadlock in debugfs that no one has reported.

[  284.922349] ======================================================
[  284.922355] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[  284.922361] 4.8.0-rc2+ #430 Tainted: G        W
[  284.922366] -------------------------------------------------------
[  284.922371] cat/1197 is trying to acquire lock:
[  284.922376]  (&dev->filelist_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0055ba2>] i915_ppgtt_info+0x82/0x390 [i915]
[  284.922423]
[  284.922423] but task is already holding lock:
[  284.922429]  (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0055b55>] i915_ppgtt_info+0x35/0x390 [i915]
[  284.922465]
[  284.922465] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[  284.922465]
[  284.922471]
[  284.922471] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[  284.922477]
-> #1 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}:
[  284.922493]        [<ffffffff81087710>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
[  284.922505]        [<ffffffff8143e96f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5f/0x360
[  284.922520]        [<ffffffffa004f877>] print_context_stats+0x37/0xf0 [i915]
[  284.922549]        [<ffffffffa00535f5>] i915_gem_object_info+0x265/0x490 [i915]
[  284.922581]        [<ffffffff81144491>] seq_read+0xe1/0x3b0
[  284.922592]        [<ffffffff811f77b3>] full_proxy_read+0x83/0xb0
[  284.922604]        [<ffffffff8111ba03>] __vfs_read+0x23/0x110
[  284.922616]        [<ffffffff8111c9b9>] vfs_read+0x89/0x110
[  284.922626]        [<ffffffff8111dbf4>] SyS_read+0x44/0xa0
[  284.922636]        [<ffffffff81442be9>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xac
[  284.922648]
-> #0 (&dev->filelist_mutex){+.+...}:
[  284.922667]        [<ffffffff810871fc>] __lock_acquire+0x10fc/0x1270
[  284.922678]        [<ffffffff81087710>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
[  284.922689]        [<ffffffff8143e96f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5f/0x360
[  284.922701]        [<ffffffffa0055ba2>] i915_ppgtt_info+0x82/0x390 [i915]
[  284.922729]        [<ffffffff81144491>] seq_read+0xe1/0x3b0
[  284.922739]        [<ffffffff811f77b3>] full_proxy_read+0x83/0xb0
[  284.922750]        [<ffffffff8111ba03>] __vfs_read+0x23/0x110
[  284.922761]        [<ffffffff8111c9b9>] vfs_read+0x89/0x110
[  284.922771]        [<ffffffff8111dbf4>] SyS_read+0x44/0xa0
[  284.922781]        [<ffffffff81442be9>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xac
[  284.922793]
[  284.922793] other info that might help us debug this:
[  284.922793]
[  284.922809]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  284.922809]
[  284.922818]        CPU0                    CPU1
[  284.922825]        ----                    ----
[  284.922831]   lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
[  284.922842]                                lock(&dev->filelist_mutex);
[  284.922854]                                lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
[  284.922865]   lock(&dev->filelist_mutex);
[  284.922875]
[  284.922875]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[  284.922875]
[  284.922888] 3 locks held by cat/1197:
[  284.922895]  #0:  (debugfs_srcu){......}, at: [<ffffffff811f7730>] full_proxy_read+0x0/0xb0
[  284.922919]  #1:  (&p->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811443e8>] seq_read+0x38/0x3b0
[  284.922942]  #2:  (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0055b55>] i915_ppgtt_info+0x35/0x390 [i915]
[  284.922983]

Fixes: 1d2ac403 ("drm: Protect dev->filelist with its own mutex")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160822132820.21725-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      637ee29e
    • C
      drm/i915: Ignore stuck requests when considering hangs · 34730fed
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      If the engine isn't being retired (worker starvation?) then it is
possible for us to repeatedly observe that between consecutive
hangchecks the seqno on the ring to be the same and there remain
unretired requests. Ignore these completely and only regard the engine
as busy for the purpose of hang detection (not stall detection) if there
are outstanding breadcrumbs.

In recent history we have looked at using both the request and seqno as
indication of activity on the engine, but that was reduced to just
inspecting seqno in commit cffa781e ("drm/i915: Simplify check for
idleness in hangcheck"). However, in commit dcff85c8 ("drm/i915:
Enable i915_gem_wait_for_idle() without holding struct_mutex"), I made
the decision to use the new common lockless function, under the
assumption that request retirement was more frequent than hangcheck and
so we would not have a stuck busy check. The flaw there was in
forgetting that we accumulate the hang score, and so successive checks
seeing a stuck request, albeit with the GPU advancing elsewhere and so
not necessary the same stuck request, would eventually trigger the hang.

Fixes: dcff85c8 ("drm/i915: Enable i915_gem_wait_for_idle()...")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160820145408.32180-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
      34730fed
    • C
      drm/i915: Allow DMA pagetables to use highmem · bb8f9cff
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      As we never need to directly access the pages we allocate for scratch and
the pagetables, and always remap them into the GTT through the dma
remapper, we do not need to limit the allocations to lowmem i.e. we can
pass in the __GFP_HIGHMEM flag to the page allocation.

For backwards compatibility, e.g. certain old GPUs not liking highmem
for certain functions that may be accidentally mapped to the scratch
page by userspace, keep the GMCH probe as only allocating from DMA32.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160822074431.26872-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
      bb8f9cff
    • C
      drm/i915: Embed the scratch page struct into each VM · 8bcdd0f7
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      As the scratch page is no longer shared between all VM, and each has
their own, forgo the small allocation and simply embed the scratch page
struct into the i915_address_space.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160822074431.26872-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
      8bcdd0f7
    • D
      drm/i915: debugfs spring cleaning · 36cdd013
      由 David Weinehall 提交于 
      Just like with sysfs, we do some major overhaul.

Pass dev_priv instead of dev to all feature macros (IS_, HAS_,
INTEL_, etc.). This has the side effect that a bunch of functions
now get dev_priv passed instead of dev.

All calls to INTEL_INFO()->gen have been replaced with
INTEL_GEN().

We want access to to_i915(node->minor->dev) in a lot of places,
so add the node_to_i915() helper to accommodate for this.

Finally, we have quite a few cases where we get a void * pointer,
and need to cast it to drm_device *, only to run to_i915() on it.
Add cast_to_i915() to do this.

v2: Don't introduce extra dev (Chris)

v3: Make pipe_crc_info have a pointer to drm_i915_private instead of
    drm_device. This saves a bit of space, since we never use
    drm_device anywhere in these functions.

    Also some minor fixup that I missed in the previous version.

v4: Changed the code a bit so that dev_priv is passed directly
    to various functions, thus removing the need for the
    cast_to_i915() helper. Also did some additional cleanup.

v5: Additional cleanup of newly introduced changes.

v6: Rebase again because of conflict.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160822105931.pcbe2lpsgzckzboa@boomReviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      36cdd013