Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 15 7月, 2008 2 次提交
    • M
      [Bluetooth] Enforce security for outgoing RFCOMM connections · 77db1980
      由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于 
      Recent tests with various Bluetooth headsets have shown that some of
them don't enforce authentication and encryption when connecting. All
of them leave it up to the host stack to enforce it. Non of them should
allow unencrypted connections, but that is how it is. So in case the
link mode settings require authentication and/or encryption it will now
also be enforced on outgoing RFCOMM connections. Previously this was
only done for incoming connections.

This support has a small drawback from a protocol level point of view
since the host stack can't really tell with 100% certainty if a remote
side is already authenticated or not. So if both sides are configured
to enforce authentication it will be requested twice. Most Bluetooth
chips are caching this information and thus no extra authentication
procedure has to be triggered over-the-air, but it can happen.
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      77db1980
    • M
      [Bluetooth] Change retrieval of L2CAP features mask · 79d554a6
      由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于 
      Getting the remote L2CAP features mask is really important, but doing
this as less intrusive as possible is tricky. To play nice with older
systems and Bluetooth qualification testing, the features mask is now
only retrieved in two specific cases and only once per lifetime of an
ACL link.

When trying to establish a L2CAP connection and the remote features mask
is unknown, the L2CAP information request is sent when the ACL link goes
into connected state. This applies only to outgoing connections and also
only for the connection oriented channels.

The second case is when a connection request has been received. In this
case a connection response with the result pending and the information
request will be send. After receiving an information response or if the
timeout gets triggered, the normal connection setup process with security
setup will be initiated.
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      79d554a6
  3. 04 6月, 2008 1 次提交
    • D
      bluetooth: rfcomm_dev_state_change deadlock fix · 537d59af
      由 Dave Young 提交于 
      There's logic in __rfcomm_dlc_close:
	rfcomm_dlc_lock(d);
	d->state = BT_CLOSED;
	d->state_changed(d, err);
	rfcomm_dlc_unlock(d);

In rfcomm_dev_state_change, it's possible that rfcomm_dev_put try to
take the dlc lock, then we will deadlock.

Here fixed it by unlock dlc before rfcomm_dev_get in
rfcomm_dev_state_change.

why not unlock just before rfcomm_dev_put? it's because there's
another problem.  rfcomm_dev_get/rfcomm_dev_del will take
rfcomm_dev_lock, but in rfcomm_dev_add the lock order is :
rfcomm_dev_lock --> dlc lock

so I unlock dlc before the taken of rfcomm_dev_lock.

Actually it's a regression caused by commit
1905f6c7 ("bluetooth :
__rfcomm_dlc_close lock fix"), the dlc state_change could be two
callbacks : rfcomm_sk_state_change and rfcomm_dev_state_change. I
missed the rfcomm_sk_state_change that time.

Thanks Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> for the effort in
commit 4c8411f8 ("bluetooth: fix
locking bug in the rfcomm socket cleanup handling") but he missed the
rfcomm_dev_state_change lock issue.
Signed-off-by: NDave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      537d59af
  5. 29 5月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      bluetooth: fix locking bug in the rfcomm socket cleanup handling · 4c8411f8
      由 Arjan van de Ven 提交于 
      in net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c, rfcomm_sk_state_change() does the
following operation:

        if (parent && sock_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED)) {
                /* We have to drop DLC lock here, otherwise
                 * rfcomm_sock_destruct() will dead lock. */
                rfcomm_dlc_unlock(d);
                rfcomm_sock_kill(sk);
                rfcomm_dlc_lock(d);
        }
}

which is fine, since rfcomm_sock_kill() will call sk_free() which will call
rfcomm_sock_destruct() which takes the rfcomm_dlc_lock()... so far so good.

HOWEVER, this assumes that the rfcomm_sk_state_change() function always gets
called with the rfcomm_dlc_lock() taken. This is the case for all but one
case, and in that case where we don't have the lock, we do a double unlock
followed by an attempt to take the lock, which due to underflow isn't
going anywhere fast.

This patch fixes this by moving the stragling case inside the lock, like
the other usages of the same call are doing in this code.

This was found with the help of the www.kerneloops.org project, where this
deadlock was observed 51 times at this point in time:
http://www.kerneloops.org/search.php?search=rfcomm_sock_destructSigned-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4c8411f8
  7. 03 5月, 2008 1 次提交
  9. 02 4月, 2008 2 次提交
    • D
      bluetooth : __rfcomm_dlc_close lock fix · 1905f6c7
      由 Dave Young 提交于 
      Lockdep warning will be trigged while rfcomm connection closing.

The locks taken in rfcomm_dev_add:
rfcomm_dev_lock --> d->lock

In __rfcomm_dlc_close:
d->lock --> rfcomm_dev_lock (in rfcomm_dev_state_change)

There's two way to fix it, one is in rfcomm_dev_add we first locking
d->lock then the rfcomm_dev_lock

The other (in this patch), remove the locking of d->lock for
rfcomm_dev_state_change because just locking "d->state = BT_CLOSED;"
is enough.

[  295.002046] =======================================================
[  295.002046] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[  295.002046] 2.6.25-rc7 #1
[  295.002046] -------------------------------------------------------
[  295.002046] krfcommd/2705 is trying to acquire lock:
[  295.002046]  (rfcomm_dev_lock){-.--}, at: [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] but task is already holding lock:
[  295.002046]  (&d->lock){--..}, at: [<f899c533>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x43/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] -> #1 (&d->lock){--..}:
[  295.002046]        [<c0149b23>] check_prev_add+0xd3/0x200
[  295.002046]        [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0
[  295.002046]        [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320
[  295.002046]        [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760
[  295.002046]        [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0
[  295.002046]        [<c03d6b99>] _spin_lock+0x39/0x80
[  295.002046]        [<f89a01c0>] rfcomm_dev_add+0x240/0x360 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<f89a047e>] rfcomm_create_dev+0x6e/0xe0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<f89a0823>] rfcomm_dev_ioctl+0x33/0x60 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<f899facc>] rfcomm_sock_ioctl+0x2c/0x50 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<c0363d38>] sock_ioctl+0x118/0x240
[  295.002046]        [<c0194196>] vfs_ioctl+0x76/0x90
[  295.002046]        [<c0194446>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x56/0x140
[  295.002046]        [<c0194569>] sys_ioctl+0x39/0x60
[  295.002046]        [<c0104faa>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
[  295.002046]        [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] -> #0 (rfcomm_dev_lock){-.--}:
[  295.002046]        [<c0149a84>] check_prev_add+0x34/0x200
[  295.002046]        [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0
[  295.002046]        [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320
[  295.002046]        [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760
[  295.002046]        [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0
[  295.002046]        [<c03d6639>] _read_lock+0x39/0x80
[  295.002046]        [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<f899c548>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x58/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<f899d44f>] rfcomm_recv_ua+0x6f/0x120 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<f899e061>] rfcomm_recv_frame+0x171/0x1e0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<f899e357>] rfcomm_run+0xe7/0x550 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<c013c18c>] kthread+0x5c/0xa0
[  295.002046]        [<c0105c07>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
[  295.002046]        [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] other info that might help us debug this:
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] 2 locks held by krfcommd/2705:
[  295.002046]  #0:  (rfcomm_mutex){--..}, at: [<f899e2eb>] rfcomm_run+0x7b/0x550 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  #1:  (&d->lock){--..}, at: [<f899c533>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x43/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] stack backtrace:
[  295.002046] Pid: 2705, comm: krfcommd Not tainted 2.6.25-rc7 #1
[  295.002046]  [<c0128a38>] ? printk+0x18/0x20
[  295.002046]  [<c014927f>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x6f/0x80
[  295.002046]  [<c0149a84>] check_prev_add+0x34/0x200
[  295.002046]  [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0
[  295.002046]  [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320
[  295.002046]  [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760
[  295.002046]  [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0
[  295.002046]  [<f89a090a>] ? rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<c03d6639>] _read_lock+0x39/0x80
[  295.002046]  [<f89a090a>] ? rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<f899c548>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x58/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<f899d44f>] rfcomm_recv_ua+0x6f/0x120 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<f899e061>] rfcomm_recv_frame+0x171/0x1e0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<c014abd9>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb9/0x130
[  295.002046]  [<c03d6e89>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x39/0x70
[  295.002046]  [<f899e357>] rfcomm_run+0xe7/0x550 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<c03d4559>] ? __sched_text_start+0x229/0x4c0
[  295.002046]  [<c0120000>] ? cpu_avg_load_per_task+0x20/0x30
[  295.002046]  [<f899e270>] ? rfcomm_run+0x0/0x550 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<c013c18c>] kthread+0x5c/0xa0
[  295.002046]  [<c013c130>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
[  295.002046]  [<c0105c07>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
[  295.002046]  =======================
Signed-off-by: NDave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      1905f6c7
    • D
      bluetooth : use lockdep sub-classes for diffrent bluetooth protocol · 68845cb2
      由 Dave Young 提交于 
      'rfcomm connect' will trigger lockdep warnings which is caused by
locking diffrent kinds of bluetooth sockets at the same time.

So using sub-classes per AF_BLUETOOTH sub-type for lockdep.

Thanks for the hints from dave jones.

---
> From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:21:56 -0400
>
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: Pid: 3611, comm: obex-data-serve Not tainted 2.6.25-0.121.rc5.git4.fc9 #1
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [__lock_acquire+2287/3089] __lock_acquire+0x8ef/0xc11
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [sched_clock+8/11] ? sched_clock+0x8/0xb
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [lock_acquire+106/144] lock_acquire+0x6a/0x90
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [<f8bd9321>] ? l2cap_sock_bind+0x29/0x108 [l2cap]
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [lock_sock_nested+182/198] lock_sock_nested+0xb6/0xc6
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [<f8bd9321>] ? l2cap_sock_bind+0x29/0x108 [l2cap]
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [security_socket_post_create+22/27] ? security_socket_post_create+0x16/0x1b
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [__sock_create+388/472] ? __sock_create+0x184/0x1d8
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [<f8bd9321>] l2cap_sock_bind+0x29/0x108 [l2cap]
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [kernel_bind+10/13] kernel_bind+0xa/0xd
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [<f8dad3d7>] rfcomm_dlc_open+0xc8/0x294 [rfcomm]
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [lock_sock_nested+187/198] ? lock_sock_nested+0xbb/0xc6
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [<f8dae18c>] rfcomm_sock_connect+0x8b/0xc2 [rfcomm]
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [sys_connect+96/125] sys_connect+0x60/0x7d
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [__lock_acquire+1370/3089] ? __lock_acquire+0x55a/0xc11
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [sys_socketcall+140/392] sys_socketcall+0x8c/0x188
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [syscall_call+7/11] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
---
Signed-off-by: NDave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      68845cb2
  11. 29 3月, 2008 1 次提交
  13. 26 3月, 2008 1 次提交
  15. 06 3月, 2008 3 次提交
    • T
      bluetooth: make bnep_sock_cleanup() return void · a4e2acf0
      由 Tobias Klauser 提交于 
      bnep_sock_cleanup() always returns 0 and its return value isn't used
anywhere in the code.
Signed-off-by: NTobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a4e2acf0
    • T
      bluetooth: Make hci_sock_cleanup() return void · 04005dd9
      由 Tobias Klauser 提交于 
      hci_sock_cleanup() always returns 0 and its return value isn't used
anywhere in the code.

Compile-tested with 'make allyesconfig && make net/bluetooth/bluetooth.ko'
Signed-off-by: NTobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      04005dd9
    • D
      bluetooth: hci_core: defer hci_unregister_sysfs() · 147e2d59
      由 Dave Young 提交于 
      Alon Bar-Lev reports:

 Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 usb 3-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer  
dereference at virtual address 00000008
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 printing eip: c01b2db6 *pde = 00000000
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 Modules linked in: ppp_deflate zlib_deflate  
zlib_inflate bsd_comp ppp_async rfcomm l2cap hci_usb vmnet(P)  
vmmon(P) tun radeon drm autofs4 ipv6 aes_generic crypto_algapi  
ieee80211_crypt_ccmp nf_nat_irc nf_nat_ftp nf_conntrack_irc  
nf_conntrack_ftp ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat nf_nat ipt_REJECT  
xt_tcpudp ipt_LOG xt_limit xt_state nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack  
iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss  
snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_seq_device  
bluetooth ppp_generic slhc ioatdma dca cfq_iosched cpufreq_powersave  
cpufreq_ondemand cpufreq_conservative acpi_cpufreq freq_table uinput  
fan af_packet nls_cp1255 nls_iso8859_1 nls_utf8 nls_base pcmcia  
snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus snd_pcm nsc_ircc snd_timer  
ipw2200 thinkpad_acpi irda snd ehci_hcd yenta_socket uhci_hcd  
psmouse ieee80211 soundcore intel_agp hwmon rsrc_nonstatic pcspkr  
e1000 crc_ccitt snd_page_alloc i2c_i801 ieee80211_crypt pcmcia_core  
agpgart thermal bat!
tery nvram rtc sr_mod ac sg firmware_class button processor cdrom  
unix usbcore evdev ext3 jbd ext2 mbcache loop ata_piix libata sd_mod  
scsi_mod
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 Pid: 4, comm: events/0 Tainted: P         
(2.6.24-gentoo-r2 #1)
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 EIP: 0060:[<c01b2db6>] EFLAGS: 00010282 CPU: 0
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 EIP is at sysfs_get_dentry+0x26/0x80
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX:  
f48a2210
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 ESI: f72eb900 EDI: f4803ae0 EBP: f4803ae0 ESP:  
f7c49efc
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 hcid[7004]: HCI dev 0 registered
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0000 SS: 0068
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 Process events/0 (pid: 4, ti=f7c48000  
task=f7c3efc0 task.ti=f7c48000)
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 Stack: f7cb6140 f4822668 f7e71e10 c01b304d  
ffffffff ffffffff fffffffe c030ba9c
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 f7cb6140 f4822668 f6da6720 f7cb6140 f4822668  
f6da6720 c030ba8e c01ce20b
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 f6e9dd00 c030ba8e f6da6720 f6e9dd00 f6e9dd00  
00000000 f4822600 00000000
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 Call Trace:
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 [<c01b304d>] sysfs_move_dir+0x3d/0x1f0
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 [<c01ce20b>] kobject_move+0x9b/0x120
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 [<c0241711>] device_move+0x51/0x110
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 [<f9aaed80>] del_conn+0x0/0x70 [bluetooth]
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 [<f9aaed99>] del_conn+0x19/0x70 [bluetooth]
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 [<c012c1a1>] run_workqueue+0x81/0x140
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 [<c02c0c88>] schedule+0x168/0x2e0
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 [<c012fc70>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 [<c012c9cb>] worker_thread+0x9b/0xf0
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 [<c012fc70>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 [<c012c930>] worker_thread+0x0/0xf0
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 [<c012f962>] kthread+0x42/0x70
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 [<c012f920>] kthread+0x0/0x70
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 [<c0104c2f>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x18
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 =======================
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 Code: 26 00 00 00 00 57 89 c7 a1 50 1b 3a c0  
56 53 8b 70 38 85 f6 74 08 8b 0e 85 c9 74 58 ff 06 8b 56 50 39 fa 74  
47 89 fb eb 02 89 c3 <8b> 43 08 39 c2 75 f7 8b 46 08 83 c0 68 e8 98  
e7 10 00 8b 43 10
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 EIP: [<c01b2db6>] sysfs_get_dentry+0x26/0x80  
SS:ESP 0068:f7c49efc
Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 ---[ end trace aae864e9592acc1d ]---

Defer hci_unregister_sysfs because hci device could be destructed
while hci conn devices still there.
Signed-off-by: NDave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NStefan Seyfried <seife@suse.de>
Acked-by: NAlon Bar-Lev <alon.barlev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      147e2d59
  17. 04 3月, 2008 1 次提交
  19. 27 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  21. 19 2月, 2008 2 次提交
  23. 18 2月, 2008 2 次提交
  25. 14 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  27. 05 2月, 2008 3 次提交
  29. 01 2月, 2008 2 次提交
  31. 29 1月, 2008 2 次提交
  33. 23 1月, 2008 1 次提交
  35. 11 1月, 2008 1 次提交
  37. 30 12月, 2007 1 次提交
  39. 01 11月, 2007 1 次提交
  41. 22 10月, 2007 10 次提交