Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 20 10月, 2013 6 次提交
    • D
      Merge branch 'ufo_fixes' · 77d4015b
      由 David S. Miller 提交于 
      Jiri Pirko says:

====================
UFO fixes

Couple of patches fixing UFO functionality in different situations.

v1->v2:
- minor if{}else{} coding style adjustment suggested by Sergei Shtylyov
====================
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      77d4015b
    • J
      ip_output: do skb ufo init for peeked non ufo skb as well · e93b7d74
      由 Jiri Pirko 提交于 
      Now, if user application does:
sendto len<mtu flag MSG_MORE
sendto len>mtu flag 0
The skb is not treated as fragmented one because it is not initialized
that way. So move the initialization to fix this.

introduced by:
commit e89e9cf5 "[IPv4/IPv6]: UFO Scatter-gather approach"
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Acked-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      e93b7d74
    • J
      ip6_output: do skb ufo init for peeked non ufo skb as well · c547dbf5
      由 Jiri Pirko 提交于 
      Now, if user application does:
sendto len<mtu flag MSG_MORE
sendto len>mtu flag 0
The skb is not treated as fragmented one because it is not initialized
that way. So move the initialization to fix this.

introduced by:
commit e89e9cf5 "[IPv4/IPv6]: UFO Scatter-gather approach"
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Acked-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      c547dbf5
    • J
      udp6: respect IPV6_DONTFRAG sockopt in case there are pending frames · e36d3ff9
      由 Jiri Pirko 提交于 
      if up->pending != 0 dontfrag is left with default value -1. That
causes that application that do:
sendto len>mtu flag MSG_MORE
sendto len>mtu flag 0
will receive EMSGSIZE errno as the result of the second sendto.

This patch fixes it by respecting IPV6_DONTFRAG socket option.

introduced by:
commit 4b340ae2 "IPv6: Complete IPV6_DONTFRAG support"
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Acked-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      e36d3ff9
    • S
      net: fix cipso packet validation when !NETLABEL · f2e5ddcc
      由 Seif Mazareeb 提交于 
      When CONFIG_NETLABEL is disabled, the cipso_v4_validate() function could loop
forever in the main loop if opt[opt_iter +1] == 0, this will causing a kernel
crash in an SMP system, since the CPU executing this function will
stall /not respond to IPIs.

This problem can be reproduced by running the IP Stack Integrity Checker
(http://isic.sourceforge.net) using the following command on a Linux machine
connected to DUT:

"icmpsic -s rand -d <DUT IP address> -r 123456"
wait (1-2 min)
Signed-off-by: NSeif Mazareeb <seif@marvell.com>
Acked-by: NPaul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      f2e5ddcc
    • D
      net: unix: inherit SOCK_PASS{CRED, SEC} flags from socket to fix race · 90c6bd34
      由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于 
      In the case of credentials passing in unix stream sockets (dgram
sockets seem not affected), we get a rather sparse race after
commit 16e57262 ("af_unix: dont send SCM_CREDENTIALS by default").

We have a stream server on receiver side that requests credential
passing from senders (e.g. nc -U). Since we need to set SO_PASSCRED
on each spawned/accepted socket on server side to 1 first (as it's
not inherited), it can happen that in the time between accept() and
setsockopt() we get interrupted, the sender is being scheduled and
continues with passing data to our receiver. At that time SO_PASSCRED
is neither set on sender nor receiver side, hence in cmsg's
SCM_CREDENTIALS we get eventually pid:0, uid:65534, gid:65534
(== overflow{u,g}id) instead of what we actually would like to see.

On the sender side, here nc -U, the tests in maybe_add_creds()
invoked through unix_stream_sendmsg() would fail, as at that exact
time, as mentioned, the sender has neither SO_PASSCRED on his side
nor sees it on the server side, and we have a valid 'other' socket
in place. Thus, sender believes it would just look like a normal
connection, not needing/requesting SO_PASSCRED at that time.

As reverting 16e57262 would not be an option due to the significant
performance regression reported when having creds always passed,
one way/trade-off to prevent that would be to set SO_PASSCRED on
the listener socket and allow inheriting these flags to the spawned
socket on server side in accept(). It seems also logical to do so
if we'd tell the listener socket to pass those flags onwards, and
would fix the race.

Before, strace:

recvmsg(4, {msg_name(0)=NULL, msg_iov(1)=[{"blub\n", 4096}],
        msg_controllen=32, {cmsg_len=28, cmsg_level=SOL_SOCKET,
        cmsg_type=SCM_CREDENTIALS{pid=0, uid=65534, gid=65534}},
        msg_flags=0}, 0) = 5

After, strace:

recvmsg(4, {msg_name(0)=NULL, msg_iov(1)=[{"blub\n", 4096}],
        msg_controllen=32, {cmsg_len=28, cmsg_level=SOL_SOCKET,
        cmsg_type=SCM_CREDENTIALS{pid=11580, uid=1000, gid=1000}},
        msg_flags=0}, 0) = 5
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      90c6bd34
  3. 19 10月, 2013 8 次提交
    • H
      qlcnic: Validate Tx queue only for 82xx adapters. · 66c562ef
      由 Himanshu Madhani 提交于 
      o validate Tx queue only in case of adapters which supports
  multi Tx queue.

  This patch is to fix regression introduced in commit
  aa4a1f7d
  "qlcnic: Enable Tx queue changes using ethtool for 82xx Series adapter"
Signed-off-by: NHimanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@qlogic.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      66c562ef
    • V
      be2net: pass if_id for v1 and V2 versions of TX_CREATE cmd · 0fb88d61
      由 Vasundhara Volam 提交于 
      It is a required field for all TX_CREATE cmd versions > 0.
This fixes a driver initialization failure, caused by recent SH-R Firmwares
(versions > 10.0.639.0) failing the TX_CREATE cmd when if_id field is
not passed.
Signed-off-by: NSathya Perla <sathya.perla@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      0fb88d61
    • S
      wanxl: fix info leak in ioctl · 2b13d06c
      由 Salva Peiró 提交于 
      The wanxl_ioctl() code fails to initialize the two padding bytes of
struct sync_serial_settings after the ->loopback member. Add an explicit
memset(0) before filling the structure to avoid the info leak.
Signed-off-by: NSalva Peiró <speiro@ai2.upv.es>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      2b13d06c
    • D
      Merge branch 'bridge_pvid' · b8bde1c4
      由 David S. Miller 提交于 
      Toshiaki Makita says:

====================
bridge: Fix problems around the PVID

There seem to be some undesirable behaviors related with PVID.
1. It has no effect assigning PVID to a port. PVID cannot be applied
to any frame regardless of whether we set it or not.
2. FDB entries learned via frames applied PVID are registered with
VID 0 rather than VID value of PVID.
3. We can set 0 or 4095 as a PVID that are not allowed in IEEE 802.1Q.
This leads interoperational problems such as sending frames with VID
4095, which is not allowed in IEEE 802.1Q, and treating frames with VID
0 as they belong to VLAN 0, which is expected to be handled as they have
no VID according to IEEE 802.1Q.

Note: 2nd and 3rd problems are potential and not exposed unless 1st problem
is fixed, because we cannot activate PVID due to it.

This is my analysis for each behavior.
1. We are using VLAN_TAG_PRESENT bit when getting PVID, and not when
adding/deleting PVID.
It can be fixed in either way using or not using VLAN_TAG_PRESENT,
but I think the latter is slightly more efficient.

2. We are setting skb->vlan_tci with the value of PVID but the variable
vid, which is used in FDB later, is set to 0 at br_allowed_ingress()
when untagged frames arrive at a port with PVID valid. I'm afraid that
vid should be updated to the value of PVID if PVID is valid.

3. According to IEEE 802.1Q-2011 (6.9.1 and Table 9-2), we cannot use
VID 0 or 4095 as a PVID.
It looks like that there are more stuff to consider.

- VID 0:
VID 0 shall not be configured in any FDB entry and used in a tag header
to indicate it is a 802.1p priority-tagged frame.
Priority-tagged frames should be applied PVID (from IEEE 802.1Q 6.9.1).
In my opinion, since we can filter incomming priority-tagged frames by
deleting PVID, we don't need to filter them by vlan_bitmap.
In other words, priority-tagged frames don't have VID 0 but have no VID,
which is the same as untagged frames, and should be filtered by unsetting
PVID.
So, not only we cannot set PVID as 0, but also we don't need to add 0 to
vlan_bitmap, which enables us to simply forbid to add vlan 0.

- VID 4095:
VID 4095 shall not be transmitted in a tag header. This VID value may be
used to indicate a wildcard match for the VID in management operations or
FDB entries (from IEEE 802.1Q Table 9-2).
In current implementation, we can create a static FDB entry with all
existing VIDs by not specifying any VID when creating it.
I don't think this way to add wildcard-like entries needs to change,
and VID 4095 looks no use and can be unacceptable to add.

Consequently, I believe what we should do for 3rd problem is below:
- Not allowing VID 0 and 4095 to be added.
- Applying PVID to priority-tagged (VID 0) frames.

Note: It has been descovered that another problem related to priority-tags
remains. If we use vlan 0 interface such as eth0.0, we cannot communicate
with another end station via a linux bridge.
This problem exists regardless of whether this patch set is applied or not
because we might receive untagged frames from another end station even if we
are sending priority-tagged frames.
This issue will be addressed by another patch set introducing an additional
egress policy, on which Vlad Yasevich is working.
See http://marc.info/?t=137880893800001&r=1&w=2 for detailed discussion.

Patch set follows this mail.
The order of patches is not the same as described above, because the way
to fix 1st problem is based on the assumption that we don't use VID 0 as
a PVID, which is realized by fixing 3rd problem.
(1/4)(2/4): Fix 3rd problem.
(3/4): Fix 1st problem.
(4/4): Fix 2nd probelm.

v2:
- Add descriptions about the problem related to priority-tags in cover letter.
- Revise patch comments to reference the newest spec.
====================
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      b8bde1c4
    • T
      bridge: Fix updating FDB entries when the PVID is applied · dfb5fa32
      由 Toshiaki Makita 提交于 
      We currently set the value that variable vid is pointing, which will be
used in FDB later, to 0 at br_allowed_ingress() when we receive untagged
or priority-tagged frames, even though the PVID is valid.
This leads to FDB updates in such a wrong way that they are learned with
VID 0.
Update the value to that of PVID if the PVID is applied.
Signed-off-by: NToshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: NVlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      dfb5fa32
    • T
      bridge: Fix the way the PVID is referenced · d1c6c708
      由 Toshiaki Makita 提交于 
      We are using the VLAN_TAG_PRESENT bit to detect whether the PVID is
set or not at br_get_pvid(), while we don't care about the bit in
adding/deleting the PVID, which makes it impossible to forward any
incomming untagged frame with vlan_filtering enabled.

Since vid 0 cannot be used for the PVID, we can use vid 0 to indicate
that the PVID is not set, which is slightly more efficient than using
the VLAN_TAG_PRESENT.

Fix the problem by getting rid of using the VLAN_TAG_PRESENT.
Signed-off-by: NToshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: NVlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      d1c6c708
    • T
      bridge: Apply the PVID to priority-tagged frames · b90356ce
      由 Toshiaki Makita 提交于 
      IEEE 802.1Q says that when we receive priority-tagged (VID 0) frames
use the PVID for the port as its VID.
(See IEEE 802.1Q-2011 6.9.1 and Table 9-2)

Apply the PVID to not only untagged frames but also priority-tagged frames.
Signed-off-by: NToshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: NVlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      b90356ce
    • T
      bridge: Don't use VID 0 and 4095 in vlan filtering · 8adff41c
      由 Toshiaki Makita 提交于 
      IEEE 802.1Q says that:
- VID 0 shall not be configured as a PVID, or configured in any Filtering
Database entry.
- VID 4095 shall not be configured as a PVID, or transmitted in a tag
header. This VID value may be used to indicate a wildcard match for the VID
in management operations or Filtering Database entries.
(See IEEE 802.1Q-2011 6.9.1 and Table 9-2)

Don't accept adding these VIDs in the vlan_filtering implementation.
Signed-off-by: NToshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: NVlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NStephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      8adff41c
  5. 18 10月, 2013 22 次提交
  7. 16 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 15 10月, 2013 3 次提交