- 11 4月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
NFSd makes sure there is enough space to hold the maximum possible reply before accepting a request. The units for this maximum is (4byte) words. However in three places, particularly for read request, the number given is a number of bytes. This means too much space is reserved which is slightly wasteful. This is the sort of patch that could uncover a deeper bug, and it is not critical, so it would be best for it to spend a while in -mm before going in to mainline. (akpm: target 2.6.17-rc2, 2.6.16.3 (approx)) Discovered-by: N"Eivind Sarto" <ivan@kasenna.com> Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 19 1月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Shaw 提交于
A recent patch which checked the return status of vfs_getattr in nfsd, completely missed the nfsproc.c (NFSv2) part. Here is it. This patch moved the call to vfs_getattr from the xdr encoding (at which point it is too late to return an error) to the call handling. This means several calls to vfs_getattr are needed in nfsproc.c. Many are encapsulated in nfsd_return_attrs and nfsd_return_dirop. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 23 6月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andreas Gruenbacher 提交于
Add the missing NFS3ERR_NOTSUPP error code (defined in NFSv3) to the system-to-protocol-error table in nfsd. The nfsacl extension uses this error code. Signed-off-by: NAndreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NOlaf Kirch <okir@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-