- 01 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
If we failed to find an ACPI device to correspond to an ANDD record, we would fail to increment our pointer and would just process the same record over and over again, with predictable results. Turn it from a while() loop into a for() loop to let the 'continue' in the error paths work correctly. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
- 28 3月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
If we hit this error condition then we want to return a NULL pointer and not a freed variable. Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
As pointed out by Jörg and fixed in commit 11f1a776 ("iommu/vt-d: Check for NULL pointer in dmar_acpi_dev_scope_init(), this code path can bizarrely get exercised even on AMD IOMMU systems with IRQ remapping enabled. In addition to the defensive check for NULL which Jörg added, let's also just avoid calling the function at all if there aren't an Intel IOMMU units in the system. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
- 26 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joerg Roedel 提交于
When ir_dev_scope_init() is called via a rootfs initcall it will check for irq_remapping_enabled before it calls (indirectly) into dmar_acpi_dev_scope_init() which uses the dmar_tbl pointer without any checks. The AMD IOMMU driver also sets the irq_remapping_enabled flag which causes the dmar_acpi_dev_scope_init() function to be called on systems with AMD IOMMU hardware too, causing a boot-time kernel crash. Signed-off-by: NJoerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
-
- 24 3月, 2014 30 次提交
-
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
It might not be... Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Mostly made redundant by using dev_name() instead of pci_name(), and one instance of using *dev->dma_mask instead of pdev->dma_mask. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Should hopefully never happen (RMRRs are an abomination) but while we're busy eliminating all the PCI assumptions, we might as well do it. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Pass the struct device to it, and also make it return the bus/devfn to use, since that is also stored in the DMAR table. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
It's accessible via info->iommu->segment so this is redundant. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
This was problematic because it works by domain/bus/devfn and we want to make device_to_iommu() use only a struct device * (for handling non-PCI devices). Now that the iommu pointer is reliably stored in the device_domain_info, we don't need to look it up. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Now we store the iommu in the device_domain_info, we don't need to do a lookup. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
By moving this into get_domain_for_dev() we can make dmar_insert_dev_info() suitable for use with "special" domains such as the si_domain, which currently use domain_add_dev_info(). Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
It's not only for PCI devices any more, and the scope information for an ACPI device provides the bus and devfn so that has to be stored here too. It is the device pointer itself which needs to be protected with RCU, so the __rcu annotation follows it into the definition of struct dmar_dev_scope, since we're no longer just passing arrays of device pointers around. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
- 20 3月, 2014 6 次提交
-
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
In commit 2e12bc29 ("intel-iommu: Default to non-coherent for domains unattached to iommus") we decided to err on the side of caution and always assume that it's possible that a device will be attached which is behind a non-coherent IOMMU. In some cases, however, that just *cannot* happen. If there *are* no IOMMUs in the system which are non-coherent, then we don't need to do it. And flushing the dcache is a *significant* performance hit. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
There is a race condition between the existing clear/free code and the hardware. The IOMMU is actually permitted to cache the intermediate levels of the page tables, and doesn't need to walk the table from the very top of the PGD each time. So the existing back-to-back calls to dma_pte_clear_range() and dma_pte_free_pagetable() can lead to a use-after-free where the IOMMU reads from a freed page table. When freeing page tables we actually need to do the IOTLB flush, with the 'invalidation hint' bit clear to indicate that it's not just a leaf-node flush, after unlinking each page table page from the next level up but before actually freeing it. So in the rewritten domain_unmap() we just return a list of pages (using pg->freelist to make a list of them), and then the caller is expected to do the appropriate IOTLB flush (or tear down the domain completely, whatever), before finally calling dma_free_pagelist() to free the pages. As an added bonus, we no longer need to flush the CPU's data cache for pages which are about to be *removed* from the page table hierarchy anyway, in the non-cache-coherent case. This drastically improves the performance of large unmaps. As a side-effect of all these changes, this also fixes the fact that intel_iommu_unmap() was neglecting to free the page tables for the range in question after clearing them. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-