open/release operations require userspace transitions to keep track
of the open count and to perform any FS-specific setup.  However,
for some purely read-only FSs which don't need to perform any setup
at open/release time, we can avoid the performance overhead of
calling into userspace for open/release calls.

This patch adds the necessary support to the fuse kernel modules to prevent
open/release operations from hitting in userspace. When the client returns
ENOSYS, we avoid sending the subsequent release to userspace, and also
remember this so that future opens also don't trigger a userspace
operation.
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

Various read operations (e.g. readlink, readdir) invalidate the cached
attrs for atime changes.  This patch adds a new function
'fuse_invalidate_atime', which checks for a read-only super block and
avoids the attr invalidation in that case.
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Gallagher <andrewjcg@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

As noticed by Coverity the "num != 0" condition never triggers.  Instead it
should check for a complete page.
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

Having this struct in module memory could Oops when if the module is
unloaded while the buffer still persists in a pipe.

Since sock_pipe_buf_ops is essentially the same as fuse_dev_pipe_buf_steal
merge them into nosteal_pipe_buf_ops (this is the same as
default_pipe_buf_ops except stealing the page from the buffer is not
allowed).
Reported-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

All async fuse requests must be supplied with extra reference to a fuse
file.  This is necessary to ensure that the fuse file is not released until
all in-flight requests are completed.  Fuse secondary writeback requests
must obey this rule as well.
Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

BDI_WRITTEN counter is used to estimate bdi bandwidth.  It must be
incremented every time as bdi ends page writeback.  No matter whether it
was fulfilled by actual write or by discarding the request (e.g. due to
shrunk i_size).

Note that even before writepages patches, the case "Got truncated off
completely" was handled in fuse_send_writepage() by calling
fuse_writepage_finish() which updated BDI_WRITTEN unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

If writeback happens while fuse is in FUSE_NOWRITE condition, the request
will be queued but not processed immediately (see fuse_flush_writepages()).
Until FUSE_NOWRITE becomes relaxed, more writebacks can happen.  They will
be queued as "secondary" requests to that first ("primary") request.

Existing implementation crops only primary request.  This is not correct
because a subsequent extending write(2) may increase i_size and then
secondary requests won't be cropped properly.  The result would be stale
data written to the server to a file offset where zeros must be.

Similar problem may happen if secondary requests are attached to an
in-flight request that was already cropped.

The patch solves the issue by cropping all secondary requests in
fuse_writepage_end().  Thanks to Miklos for idea.
Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

fuse_writepage_in_flight() returns false if it fails to find request with
given index in fi->writepages.  Then the caller proceeds with populating
data->orig_pages[] and incrementing req->num_pages.  Hence,
fuse_writepage_in_flight() must revert changes it made in request before
returning false.
Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

makes ->permission() and ->d_revalidate() safety in RCU mode independent
from vfsmount_lock.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

...which just returns -EBUSY if a directory alias would be created.

This is to be used by fuse mkdir to make sure that a buggy or malicious
userspace filesystem doesn't do anything nasty.  Previously fuse used a
private mutex for this purpose, which can now go away.
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

This allows udev (or more recently systemd-tmpfiles) to create /dev/cuse on
boot, in the same way as /dev/fuse is currently created, and the corresponding
module to be loaded on first access.

The corresponding functionalty was introduced for fuse in commit 578454ff.
Signed-off-by: NTom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

If ->writepage() tries to write back a page whose copy is still in flight,
then just skip by calling redirty_page_for_writepage().

This is OK, since now ->writepage() should never be called for data
integrity sync.
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

As Maxim Patlasov pointed out, it's possible to get a dirty page while it's
copy is still under writeback, despite fuse_page_mkwrite() doing its thing
(direct IO).

This could result in two concurrent write request for the same offset, with
data corruption if they get mixed up.

To prevent this, fuse needs to check and delay such writes.  This
implementation does this by:

 1. check if page is still under writeout, if so create a new, single page
    secondary request for it

 2. chain this secondary request onto the in-flight request

 2/a. if a seconday request for the same offset was already chained to the
    in-flight request, then just copy the contents of the page and discard
    the new secondary request.  This makes sure that for each page will
    have at most two requests associated with it

 3. when the in-flight request finished, send off all secondary requests
    chained onto it
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

Checking against tmp-page indexes is not very useful, and results in one
(or rarely two) page requests.  Which is not much of an improvement...
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

The patch fixes a race between ftruncate(2), mmap-ed write and write(2):

1) An user makes a page dirty via mmap-ed write.
2) The user performs shrinking truncate(2) intended to purge the page.
3) Before fuse_do_setattr calls truncate_pagecache, the page goes to
   writeback. fuse_writepages_fill attaches a new page to FUSE_WRITE request,
   then releases the original page by end_page_writeback and unlock it.
4) fuse_do_setattr completes and successfully returns. Since now, i_mutex
   is free.
5) Ordinary write(2) extends i_size back to cover the page. Note that
   fuse_send_write_pages do wait for fuse writeback, but for another
   page->index.
6) fuse_writepages_fill attaches more pages to the request (if any), then
   fuse_writepages_send is eventually called. It is supposed to crop
   inarg->size of the request, but it doesn't because i_size has already been
   extended back.

Moving end_page_writeback behind fuse_writepages_send guarantees that
__fuse_release_nowrite (called from fuse_do_setattr) will crop inarg->size
of the request before write(2) gets the chance to extend i_size.
Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

The .writepages one is required to make each writeback request carry more than
one page on it. The patch enables optimized behaviour unconditionally,
i.e. mmap-ed writes will benefit from the patch even if fc->writeback_cache=0.

[SzM: simplify, add comments]
Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

Don't bug if there's no writable files found for page writeback.  If ever
this is triggered, a WARN_ON helps debugging it much better then a BUG_ON.
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

Lock the page in fuse_page_mkwrite() to protect against a race with
fuse_writepage() where the page is redirtied before the actual writeback
begins.
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

The .writepages callback will issue writeback requests with more than one
page aboard. Make existing end/check code be aware of this.
Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

There will be a .writepageS callback implementation which will need to
get a fuse_file out of a fuse_inode, thus make a helper for this.
Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

fuse_access() is never called in RCU walk, only on the final component of
access(2) and chdir(2)...
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

Doing dput(parent) is not valid in RCU walk mode.  In RCU mode it would
probably be okay to update the parent flags, but it's actually not
necessary most of the time...

So only set the FUSE_I_ADVISE_RDPLUS flag on the parent when the entry was
recently initialized by READDIRPLUS.

This is achieved by setting FUSE_I_INIT_RDPLUS on entries added by
READDIRPLUS and only dropping out of RCU mode if this flag is set.
FUSE_I_INIT_RDPLUS is cleared once the FUSE_I_ADVISE_RDPLUS flag is set in
the parent.
Reported-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

If revalidate finds an invalid dentry in RCU walk mode, let the VFS deal
with it instead of calling check_submounts_and_drop() which is not prepared
for being called from RCU walk.
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

A former patch introducing FUSE_I_SIZE_UNSTABLE flag provided detailed
description of races between ftruncate and anyone who can extend i_size:

> 1. As in the previous scenario fuse_dentry_revalidate() discovered that i_size
> changed (due to our own fuse_do_setattr()) and is going to call
> truncate_pagecache() for some  'new_size' it believes valid right now. But by
> the time that particular truncate_pagecache() is called ...
> 2. fuse_do_setattr() returns (either having called truncate_pagecache() or
> not -- it doesn't matter).
> 3. The file is extended either by write(2) or ftruncate(2) or fallocate(2).
> 4. mmap-ed write makes a page in the extended region dirty.

This patch adds necessary bits to fuse_file_fallocate() to protect from that
race.
Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

The patch fixes a race between mmap-ed write and fallocate(PUNCH_HOLE):

1) An user makes a page dirty via mmap-ed write.
2) The user performs fallocate(2) with mode == PUNCH_HOLE|KEEP_SIZE
   and <offset, size> covering the page.
3) Before truncate_pagecache_range call from fuse_file_fallocate,
   the page goes to write-back. The page is fully processed by fuse_writepage
   (including end_page_writeback on the page), but fuse_flush_writepages did
   nothing because fi->writectr < 0.
4) truncate_pagecache_range is called and fuse_file_fallocate is finishing
   by calling fuse_release_nowrite. The latter triggers processing queued
   write-back request which will write stale data to the hole soon.

Changed in v2 (thanks to Brian for suggestion):
 - Do not truncate page cache until FUSE_FALLOCATE succeeded. Otherwise,
   we can end up in returning -ENOTSUPP while user data is already punched
   from page cache. Use filemap_write_and_wait_range() instead.
Changed in v3 (thanks to Miklos for suggestion):
 - fuse_wait_on_writeback() is prone to livelocks; use fuse_set_nowrite()
   instead. So far as we need a dirty-page barrier only, fuse_sync_writes()
   should be enough.
 - rebased to for-linus branch of fuse.git
Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

truncate_pagecache() doesn't care about old size since commit
cedabed4 ("vfs: Fix vmtruncate() regression").  Let's drop it.
Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The feature prevents mistrusted filesystems (ie: FUSE mounts created by
unprivileged users) to grow a large number of dirty pages before
throttling.  For such filesystems balance_dirty_pages always check bdi
counters against bdi limits.  I.e.  even if global "nr_dirty" is under
"freerun", it's not allowed to skip bdi checks.  The only use case for now
is fuse: it sets bdi max_ratio to 1% by default and system administrators
are supposed to expect that this limit won't be exceeded.

The feature is on if a BDI is marked by BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT flag.  A
filesystem may set the flag when it initializes its BDI.

The problematic scenario comes from the fact that nobody pays attention to
the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter (i.e.  number of pages under fuse
writeback).  The implementation of fuse writeback releases original page
(by calling end_page_writeback) almost immediately.  A fuse request queued
for real processing bears a copy of original page.  Hence, if userspace
fuse daemon doesn't finalize write requests in timely manner, an
aggressive mmap writer can pollute virtually all memory by those temporary
fuse page copies.  They are carefully accounted in NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP, but
nobody cares.

To make further explanations shorter, let me use "NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP
problem" as a shortcut for "a possibility of uncontrolled grow of amount
of RAM consumed by temporary pages allocated by kernel fuse to process
writeback".

The problem was very easy to reproduce.  There is a trivial example
filesystem implementation in fuse userspace distribution: fusexmp_fh.c.  I
added "sleep(1);" to the write methods, then recompiled and mounted it.
Then created a huge file on the mount point and run a simple program which
mmap-ed the file to a memory region, then wrote a data to the region.  An
hour later I observed almost all RAM consumed by fuse writeback.  Since
then some unrelated changes in kernel fuse made it more difficult to
reproduce, but it is still possible now.

Putting this theoretical happens-in-the-lab thing aside, there is another
thing that really hurts real world (FUSE) users.  This is write-through
page cache policy FUSE currently uses.  I.e.  handling write(2), kernel
fuse populates page cache and flushes user data to the server
synchronously.  This is excessively suboptimal.  Pavel Emelyanov's patches
("writeback cache policy") solve the problem, but they also make resolving
NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP problem absolutely necessary.  Otherwise, simply copying
a huge file to a fuse mount would result in memory starvation.  Miklos,
the maintainer of FUSE, believes strictlimit feature the way to go.

And eventually putting FUSE topics aside, there is one more use-case for
strictlimit feature.  Using a slow USB stick (mass storage) in a machine
with huge amount of RAM installed is a well-known pain.  Let's make simple
computations.  Assuming 64GB of RAM installed, existing implementation of
balance_dirty_pages will start throttling only after 9.6GB of RAM becomes
dirty (freerun == 15% of total RAM).  So, the command "cp 9GB_file
/media/my-usb-storage/" may return in a few seconds, but subsequent
"umount /media/my-usb-storage/" will take more than two hours if effective
throughput of the storage is, to say, 1MB/sec.

After inclusion of strictlimit feature, it will be trivial to add a knob
(e.g.  /sys/devices/virtual/bdi/x:y/strictlimit) to enable it on demand.
Manually or via udev rule.  May be I'm wrong, but it seems to be quite a
natural desire to limit the amount of dirty memory for some devices we are
not fully trust (in the sense of sustainable throughput).

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warning in page-writeback.c]
Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Drop a subtree when we find that it has moved or been delated.  This can be
done as long as there are no submounts under this location.

If the directory was moved and we come across the same directory in a
future lookup it will be reconnected by d_materialise_unique().
Signed-off-by: NAnand Avati <avati@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

On errors unrelated to the filesystem's state (ENOMEM, ENOTCONN) return the
error itself from ->d_revalidate() insted of returning zero (invalid).

Also make a common label for invalidating the dentry.  This will be used by
the next patch.
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Use d_materialise_unique() instead of d_splice_alias().  This allows dentry
subtrees to be moved to a new place if there moved, even if something is
referencing a dentry in the subtree (open fd, cwd, etc..).

This will also allow us to drop a subtree if it is found to be replaced by
something else.  In this case the disconnected subtree can later be
reconnected to its new location.

d_materialise_unique() ensures that a directory entry only ever has one
alias.  We keep fc->inst_mutex around the calls for d_materialise_unique()
on directories to prevent a race with mkdir "stealing" the inode.
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

Userspace can add names containing a slash character to the directory
listing.  Don't allow this as it could cause all sorts of trouble.
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

The way how fuse calls truncate_pagecache() from fuse_change_attributes()
is completely wrong. Because, w/o i_mutex held, we never sure whether
'oldsize' and 'attr->size' are valid by the time of execution of
truncate_pagecache(inode, oldsize, attr->size). In fact, as soon as we
released fc->lock in the middle of fuse_change_attributes(), we completely
loose control of actions which may happen with given inode until we reach
truncate_pagecache. The list of potentially dangerous actions includes
mmap-ed reads and writes, ftruncate(2) and write(2) extending file size.

The typical outcome of doing truncate_pagecache() with outdated arguments
is data corruption from user point of view. This is (in some sense)
acceptable in cases when the issue is triggered by a change of the file on
the server (i.e. externally wrt fuse operation), but it is absolutely
intolerable in scenarios when a single fuse client modifies a file without
any external intervention. A real life case I discovered by fsx-linux
looked like this:

1. Shrinking ftruncate(2) comes to fuse_do_setattr(). The latter sends
FUSE_SETATTR to the server synchronously, but before getting fc->lock ...
2. fuse_dentry_revalidate() is asynchronously called. It sends FUSE_LOOKUP
to the server synchronously, then calls fuse_change_attributes(). The
latter updates i_size, releases fc->lock, but before comparing oldsize vs
attr->size..
3. fuse_do_setattr() from the first step proceeds by acquiring fc->lock and
updating attributes and i_size, but now oldsize is equal to
outarg.attr.size because i_size has just been updated (step 2). Hence,
fuse_do_setattr() returns w/o calling truncate_pagecache().
4. As soon as ftruncate(2) completes, the user extends file size by
write(2) making a hole in the middle of file, then reads data from the hole
either by read(2) or mmap-ed read. The user expects to get zero data from
the hole, but gets stale data because truncate_pagecache() is not executed
yet.

The scenario above illustrates one side of the problem: not truncating the
page cache even though we should. Another side corresponds to truncating
page cache too late, when the state of inode changed significantly.
Theoretically, the following is possible:

1. As in the previous scenario fuse_dentry_revalidate() discovered that
i_size changed (due to our own fuse_do_setattr()) and is going to call
truncate_pagecache() for some 'new_size' it believes valid right now. But
by the time that particular truncate_pagecache() is called ...
2. fuse_do_setattr() returns (either having called truncate_pagecache() or
not -- it doesn't matter).
3. The file is extended either by write(2) or ftruncate(2) or fallocate(2).
4. mmap-ed write makes a page in the extended region dirty.

The result will be the lost of data user wrote on the fourth step.

The patch is a hotfix resolving the issue in a simplistic way: let's skip
dangerous i_size update and truncate_pagecache if an operation changing
file size is in progress. This simplistic approach looks correct for the
cases w/o external changes. And to handle them properly, more sophisticated
and intrusive techniques (e.g. NFS-like one) would be required. I'd like to
postpone it until the issue is well discussed on the mailing list(s).

Changed in v2:
 - improved patch description to cover both sides of the issue.
Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Calls like setxattr and removexattr result in updation of ctime.
Therefore invalidate inode attributes to force a refresh.
Signed-off-by: NAnand Avati <avati@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

The patch fixes a race between ftruncate(2), mmap-ed write and write(2):

1) An user makes a page dirty via mmap-ed write.
2) The user performs shrinking truncate(2) intended to purge the page.
3) Before fuse_do_setattr calls truncate_pagecache, the page goes to
   writeback. fuse_writepage_locked fills FUSE_WRITE request and releases
   the original page by end_page_writeback.
4) fuse_do_setattr() completes and successfully returns. Since now, i_mutex
   is free.
5) Ordinary write(2) extends i_size back to cover the page. Note that
   fuse_send_write_pages do wait for fuse writeback, but for another
   page->index.
6) fuse_writepage_locked proceeds by queueing FUSE_WRITE request.
   fuse_send_writepage is supposed to crop inarg->size of the request,
   but it doesn't because i_size has already been extended back.

Moving end_page_writeback to the end of fuse_writepage_locked fixes the
race because now the fact that truncate_pagecache is successfully returned
infers that fuse_writepage_locked has already called end_page_writeback.
And this, in turn, infers that fuse_flush_writepages has already called
fuse_send_writepage, and the latter used valid (shrunk) i_size. write(2)
could not extend it because of i_mutex held by ftruncate(2).
Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

The dev_attrs field of struct class is going away soon, dev_groups
should be used instead.  This converts the cuse class code to use the
correct field.
Acked-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Niels noted that we don't need the 'dentry = NULL' line.
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
CC: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>

If we got the inode through fuse_iget() then the attributes are already
up-to-date.
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

Fuse does instantiation slightly differently from NFS/CIFS which use
d_materialise_unique().
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org

Add sanity checks before adding or updating an entry with data received
from readdirplus.
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org