- 30 5月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Two files in the different subvolumes may have the same inode id, so The rb-tree which is used to manage the defragment object must take it into account. This patch fix this problem. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Miao pointed this out while I was working on an orphan problem that messing with a bitfield where different ranges are protected by different locks doesn't work out right. Turns out we've been doing this forever where we have different parts of the bit field protected by either no lock at all or different locks which could cause all sorts of weird problems including the issue I was hitting. So instead make a runtime_flags thing that we use the normal bit operations on that are all atomic so we can keep having our no/different locking for the different flags and then make force_compress it's own thing so it can be treated normally. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We already do the btrfs_wait_ordered_range which will do this for us, so just remove this call so we don't call it twice. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We've been keeping around the inode sequence number in hopes that somebody would use it, but nobody uses it and people actually use i_version which serves the same purpose, so use i_version where we used the incore inode's sequence number and that way the sequence is updated properly across the board, and not just in file write. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 28 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
We're spending huge amounts of time on lock contention during end_io processing because we unconditionally assume we are overwriting an existing extent in the file for each IO. This checks to see if we are outside i_size, and if so, it uses a less expensive readonly search of the btree to look for existing extents. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 22 3月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
btrfs currently handles most errors with BUG_ON. This patch is a work-in- progress but aims to handle most errors other than internal logic errors and ENOMEM more gracefully. This iteration prevents most crashes but can run into lockups with the page lock on occasion when the timing "works out." Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
lock_extent and unlock_extent are always called with GFP_NOFS, drop the argument and use GFP_NOFS consistently. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
-
- 15 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Liu 提交于
Btrfs: return the internal error unchanged if btrfs_get_extent_fiemap() call failed for SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE inquiry Given that ENXIO only means "offset beyond EOF" for either SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE inquiry in a desired file range, so we should return the internal error unchanged if btrfs_get_extent_fiemap() call failed, rather than ENXIO. Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
-
- 01 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
btrfs_fallocate tries to allocate space only if ranges in the file don't already exist. But the enospc checks it does are not allowed with extents locked. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 17 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Btrfs_throttle will make us wait if there is a currently committing transaction until we can open new transactions, which is ridiculous since we don't actually start any transactions within the file write path anyway, so all this does is introduce big latencies if we have a sync/fsync heavy workload going on while somebody else is trying to do work. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 11 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Weiner 提交于
Tell the page allocator that pages allocated for a buffered write are expected to become dirty soon. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 22 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arne Jansen 提交于
Add a for_cow parameter to add_delayed_*_ref and pass the appropriate value from every call site. The for_cow parameter will later on be used to determine if a ref will change anything with respect to qgroups. Delayed refs coming from relocation are always counted as for_cow, as they don't change subvol quota. Also pass in the fs_info for later use. btrfs_find_all_roots() will use this as an optimization, as changes that are for_cow will not change anything with respect to which root points to a certain leaf. Thus, we don't need to add the current sequence number to those delayed refs. Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 18 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
When doing 1KB sequential writes to the same page, balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr() should be called once instead of 4 times, the latter makes the dirtier tasks be throttled much too heavy. Fix it with proper de-accounting on clear_page_dirty_for_io(). CC: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
-
- 17 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
Tests show that the original large intervals can easily make the dirty limit exceeded on 100 concurrent dd's. So adapt to as large as the next check point selected by the dirty throttling algorithm. Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 16 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Now that we're properly keeping track of delayed inode space we've been getting a lot of warnings out of btrfs_dirty_inode() when running xfstest 83. This is because a bunch of people call mark_inode_dirty, which is void so we can't return ENOSPC. This needs to be fixed in a few areas 1) file_update_time - this updates the mtime and such when writing to a file, which will call mark_inode_dirty. So copy file_update_time into btrfs so we can call btrfs_dirty_inode directly and return an error if we get one appropriately. 2) fix symlinks to use btrfs_setattr for ->setattr. For some reason we weren't setting ->setattr for symlinks, even though we should have been. This catches one of the cases where we were getting errors in mark_inode_dirty. 3) Fix btrfs_setattr and btrfs_setsize to call btrfs_dirty_inode directly instead of mark_inode_dirty. This lets us return errors properly for truncate and chown/anything related to setattr. 4) Add a new btrfs_fs_dirty_inode which will just call btrfs_dirty_inode and print an error if we have one. The only remaining user we can't control for this is touch_atime(), but we don't really want to keep people from walking down the tree if we don't have space to save the atime update, so just complain but don't worry about it. With this patch xfstests 83 complains a handful of times instead of hundreds of times. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 28 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
The i_mutex lock use of generic _file_llseek hurts. Independent processes accessing the same file synchronize over a single lock, even though they have no need for synchronization at all. Under high utilization this can cause llseek to scale very poorly on larger systems. This patch does some rethinking of the llseek locking model: First the 64bit f_pos is not necessarily atomic without locks on 32bit systems. This can already cause races with read() today. This was discussed on linux-kernel in the past and deemed acceptable. The patch does not change that. Let's look at the different seek variants: SEEK_SET: Doesn't really need any locking. If there's a race one writer wins, the other loses. For 32bit the non atomic update races against read() stay the same. Without a lock they can also happen against write() now. The read() race was deemed acceptable in past discussions, and I think if it's ok for read it's ok for write too. => Don't need a lock. SEEK_END: This behaves like SEEK_SET plus it reads the maximum size too. Reading the maximum size would have the 32bit atomic problem. But luckily we already have a way to read the maximum size without locking (i_size_read), so we can just use that instead. Without i_mutex there is no synchronization with write() anymore, however since the write() update is atomic on 64bit it just behaves like another racy SEEK_SET. On non atomic 32bit it's the same as SEEK_SET. => Don't need a lock, but need to use i_size_read() SEEK_CUR: This has a read-modify-write race window on the same file. One could argue that any application doing unsynchronized seeks on the same file is already broken. But for the sake of not adding a regression here I'm using the file->f_lock to synchronize this. Using this lock is much better than the inode mutex because it doesn't synchronize between processes. => So still need a lock, but can use a f_lock. This patch implements this new scheme in generic_file_llseek. I dropped generic_file_llseek_unlocked and changed all callers. Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
- 20 10月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Johannes pointed out we were allocating only kernel pages for doing writes, which is kind of a big deal if you are on 32bit and have more than a gig of ram. So fix our allocations to use the mapping's gfp but still clear __GFP_FS so we don't re-enter. Thanks, Reported-by: NJohannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Lukas found a problem where if he tries to fallocate over the same region twice and the first fallocate took up all the space we would fail with ENOSPC. This is because we reserve the total space we want to use for fallocate, regardless of wether or not we will have to actually preallocate. So instead move the check into the loop where we actually have to do the preallocate. Thanks, Tested-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 01 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
A user reported a problem where ceph was getting into 100% cpu usage while doing some writing. It turns out it's because we were doing a short write on a not uptodate page, which means we'd fall back at one page at a time and fault the page in. The problem is our position is on the page boundary, so our fault in logic wasn't actually reading the page, so we'd just spin forever or until the page got read in by somebody else. This will force a readpage if we end up doing a short copy. Alexandre could reproduce this easily with ceph and reports it fixes his problem. I also wrote a reproducer that no longer hangs my box with this patch. Thanks, Reported-and-tested-by: NAlexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 18 9月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Liu 提交于
The recent reworking of btrfs' lseek lead to incorrect values being returned. This adds checks for seeking beyond EOF in SEEK_HOLE and makes sure the error values come back correct. Andi Kleen also sent in similar patches. Signed-off-by: NJie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com> Reported-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 11 9月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
When we write some data to the place that is beyond the end of the file in direct I/O mode, a data hole will be created. And Btrfs should insert a file extent item that point to this hole into the fs tree. But unfortunately Btrfs forgets doing it. The following is a simple way to reproduce it: # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdc2 # mount /dev/sdc2 /test4 # touch /test4/a # dd if=/dev/zero of=/test4/a seek=8 count=1 bs=4K oflag=direct conv=nocreat,notrunc # umount /test4 # btrfsck /dev/sdc2 root 5 inode 257 errors 100 Reported-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 18 8月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
xfstests exposed a problem with preallocate when it fallocates a range that already has an extent. We don't set the new i_size properly because we see that we already have an extent. This isn't right and we should update i_size if the space already exists. With this patch we now pass xfstests 075. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
There were some unlocks on error missing in a recent patch to btrfs_file_llseek(). Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 17 8月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
We don't use the defrag struct on this path. Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 02 8月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mitch Harder 提交于
The variable 'last_index' is calculated in the __btrfs_buffered_write function and passed as a parameter to the prepare_pages function, but is not used anywhere in the prepare_pages function. Remove instances of 'last_index' in these functions. Signed-off-by: NMitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Wanlong Gao 提交于
Don't need to check the return value of __btrfs_add_inode_defrag(), since it will always return 0. Signed-off-by: NWanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 28 7月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
So I had this brilliant idea to use atomic counters for outstanding and reserved extents, but this turned out to be a bad idea. Consider this where we have 1 outstanding extent and 1 reserved extent Reserver Releaser atomic_dec(outstanding) now 0 atomic_read(outstanding)+1 get 1 atomic_read(reserved) get 1 don't actually reserve anything because they are the same atomic_cmpxchg(reserved, 1, 0) atomic_inc(outstanding) atomic_add(0, reserved) free reserved space for 1 extent Then the reserver now has no actual space reserved for it, and when it goes to finish the ordered IO it won't have enough space to do it's allocation and you get those lovely warnings. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
grab_cache_page will use mapping_gfp_mask(), which for all inodes is set to GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE. So instead use find_or_create_page in all cases where we need GFP_NOFS so we don't deadlock. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 21 7月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Btrfs needs to be able to control how filemap_write_and_wait_range() is called in fsync to make it less of a painful operation, so push down taking i_mutex and the calling of filemap_write_and_wait() down into the ->fsync() handlers. Some file systems can drop taking the i_mutex altogether it seems, like ext3 and ocfs2. For correctness sake I just pushed everything down in all cases to make sure that we keep the current behavior the same for everybody, and then each individual fs maintainer can make up their mind about what to do from there. Thanks, Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
In order to handle SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA we need to implement our own llseek. Basically for the normal SEEK_*'s we will just defer to the generic helper, and for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA we will use our fiemap helper to figure out the nearest hole or data. Currently this helper doesn't check for delalloc bytes for prealloc space, so for now treat prealloc as data until that is fixed. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 15 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
This patch fixes many callers of btrfs_alloc_path() which BUG_ON allocation failure. All the sites that are fixed in this patch were checked by me to be fairly trivial to fix because of at least one of two criteria: - Callers of the function catch errors from it already so bubbling the error up will be handled. - Callers of the function might BUG_ON any nonzero return code in which case there is no behavior changed (but we still got to remove a BUG_ON) The following functions were updated: btrfs_lookup_extent, alloc_reserved_tree_block, btrfs_remove_block_group, btrfs_lookup_csums_range, btrfs_csum_file_blocks, btrfs_mark_extent_written, btrfs_inode_by_name, btrfs_new_inode, btrfs_symlink, insert_reserved_file_extent, and run_delalloc_nocow Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
- 04 6月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
wrap checking of filesystem 'closing' flag and fix a few missing memory barriers. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
commit 4cb5300b ("Btrfs: add mount -o auto_defrag") accesses inode number directly while it should use the helper with the new inode number allocator. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 27 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
This will detect small random writes into files and queue the up for an auto defrag process. It isn't well suited to database workloads yet, but works for smaller files such as rpm, sqlite or bdb databases. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 24 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We use trans_mutex for lots of things, here's a basic list 1) To serialize trans_handles joining the currently running transaction 2) To make sure that no new trans handles are started while we are committing 3) To protect the dead_roots list and the transaction lists Really the serializing trans_handles joining is not too hard, and can really get bogged down in acquiring a reference to the transaction. So replace the trans_mutex with a trans_lock spinlock and use it to do the following 1) Protect fs_info->running_transaction. All trans handles have to do is check this, and then take a reference of the transaction and keep on going. 2) Protect the fs_info->trans_list. This doesn't get used too much, basically it just holds the current transactions, which will usually just be the currently committing transaction and the currently running transaction at most. 3) Protect the dead roots list. This is only ever processed by splicing the list so this is relatively simple. 4) Protect the fs_info->reloc_ctl stuff. This is very lightweight and was using the trans_mutex before, so this is a pretty straightforward change. 5) Protect fs_info->no_trans_join. Because we don't hold the trans_lock over the entirety of the commit we need to have a way to block new people from creating a new transaction while we're doing our work. So we set no_trans_join and in join_transaction we test to see if that is set, and if it is we do a wait_on_commit. 6) Make the transaction use count atomic so we don't need to take locks to modify it when we're dropping references. 7) Add a commit_lock to the transaction to make sure multiple people trying to commit the same transaction don't race and commit at the same time. 8) Make open_ioctl_trans an atomic so we don't have to take any locks for ioctl trans. I have tested this with xfstests, but obviously it is a pretty hairy change so lots of testing is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 02 5月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
parameter tree root it's not used since commit 5f39d397 ("Btrfs: Create extent_buffer interface for large blocksizes") Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
pass GFP_NOFS directly to kmem_cache_alloc Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
use IS_ERR_OR_NULL when possible, done by this coccinelle script: @ match @ identifier id; @@ ( - BUG_ON(IS_ERR(id) || !id); + BUG_ON(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(id)); | - IS_ERR(id) || !id + IS_ERR_OR_NULL(id) | - !id || IS_ERR(id) + IS_ERR_OR_NULL(id) ) Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 25 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
There's a potential problem in 32bit system when we exhaust 32bit inode numbers and start to allocate big inode numbers, because btrfs uses inode->i_ino in many places. So here we always use BTRFS_I(inode)->location.objectid, which is an u64 variable. There are 2 exceptions that BTRFS_I(inode)->location.objectid != inode->i_ino: the btree inode (0 vs 1) and empty subvol dirs (256 vs 2), and inode->i_ino will be used in those cases. Another reason to make this change is I'm going to use a special inode to save free ino cache, and the inode number must be > (u64)-256. Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
- 09 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Currently we don't handle running out of space in the cache, so to fix this we keep track of how far in the cache we are. Then we only dirty the pages if we successfully modify all of them, otherwise if we have an error or run out of space we can just drop them and not worry about the vm writing them out. Thanks, Tested-by Johannes Hirte <johannes.hirte@fem.tu-ilmenau.de> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-