1. 03 12月, 2015 3 次提交
    • P
      drm/i915: pass the crtc as an argument to intel_fbc_update() · 754d1133
      Paulo Zanoni 提交于
      There's no need to reevaluate the status of every single crtc when a
      single crtc changes its state.
      
      With this, we're cutting the case where due to a change in pipe B,
      intel_fbc_update() is called, then intel_fbc_find_crtc() concludes FBC
      should be enabled on pipe A, then it completely rechecks the state of
      pipe A only to conclude FBC should remain enabled on pipe A. If any
      change on pipe A triggers a need to recompute whether FBC is valid on
      pipe A, then at some point someone is going to call
      intel_fbc_update(PIPE_A).
      
      The addition of intel_fbc_deactivate() is necessary so we keep track
      of the previously selected CRTC when we do invalidate/flush. We're
      also going to continue the enable/disable/activate/deactivate concept
      in the next patches.
      
      v2: Rebase.
      v3: Rebase after changing the patch order.
      Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
      754d1133
    • P
      drm/i915: set dev_priv->fbc.crtc before scheduling the enable work · e9c5fd26
      Paulo Zanoni 提交于
      This thing where we need to get the crtc either from the work
      structure or the fbc structure itself is confusing and unnecessary.
      Set fbc.crtc right when scheduling the enable work so we can always
      use it.
      
      The problem is not what gets passed and how to retrieve it. The
      problem is that when we're in the other parts of the code we always
      have to keep in mind that if FBC is already enabled we have to get the
      CRTC from place A, if FBC is scheduled we have to get the CRTC from
      place B, and if it's disabled there's no CRTC. Having a single place
      to retrieve the CRTC from allows us to treat the "is enabled" and "is
      scheduled" cases as the same case, reducing the mistake surface. I
      guess I should add this to the commit message.
      
      Besides the immediate advantages, this is also going to make one of
      the next commits much simpler. And even later, when we introduce
      enable/disable + activate/deactivate, this will be even simpler as
      we'll set the CRTC at enable time. So all the
      activate/deactivate/update code can just look at the single CRTC
      variable regardless of the current state.
      
      v2: Improve commit message (Chris).
      v3: Rebase after changing the patch order.
      Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
      e9c5fd26
    • P
      drm/i915: fix the CFB size check · 90d5234f
      Paulo Zanoni 提交于
      In function find_compression_threshold() we try to over-allocate CFB
      space in order to reduce reallocations and fragmentation, and we're
      not considering that at the CFB size check. Consider it.
      
      There is also a longer-term plan to kill
      dev_priv->fbc.uncompressed_size, but this will come later.
      
      v2: Use drm_mm_node_allocated() (Chris).
      Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
      90d5234f
  2. 02 12月, 2015 16 次提交
  3. 01 12月, 2015 3 次提交
  4. 30 11月, 2015 4 次提交
  5. 27 11月, 2015 4 次提交
  6. 26 11月, 2015 3 次提交
  7. 25 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  8. 24 11月, 2015 6 次提交