1. 14 7月, 2012 3 次提交
    • A
      stop passing nameidata to ->lookup() · 00cd8dd3
      Al Viro 提交于
      Just the flags; only NFS cares even about that, but there are
      legitimate uses for such argument.  And getting rid of that
      completely would require splitting ->lookup() into a couple
      of methods (at least), so let's leave that alone for now...
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      00cd8dd3
    • A
      affs: get rid of affs_sync_super · 3dd84782
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      This patch makes affs stop using the VFS '->write_super()' method along with
      the 's_dirt' superblock flag, because they are on their way out.
      
      The whole "superblock write-out" VFS infrastructure is served by the
      'sync_supers()' kernel thread, which wakes up every 5 (by default) seconds and
      writes out all dirty superblocks using the '->write_super()' call-back.  But the
      problem with this thread is that it wastes power by waking up the system every
      5 seconds, even if there are no diry superblocks, or there are no client
      file-systems which would need this (e.g., btrfs does not use
      '->write_super()'). So we want to kill it completely and thus, we need to make
      file-systems to stop using the '->write_super()' VFS service, and then remove
      it together with the kernel thread.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      3dd84782
    • A
      affs: introduce VFS superblock object back-reference · a215fef7
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      Add an 'sb' VFS superblock back-reference to the 'struct affs_sb_info' data
      structure - we will need to find the VFS superblock from a 'struct
      affs_sb_info' object in the next patch, so this change is jut a preparation.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      a215fef7
  2. 30 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  3. 04 1月, 2012 3 次提交
  4. 21 7月, 2011 1 次提交
    • J
      fs: push i_mutex and filemap_write_and_wait down into ->fsync() handlers · 02c24a82
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Btrfs needs to be able to control how filemap_write_and_wait_range() is called
      in fsync to make it less of a painful operation, so push down taking i_mutex and
      the calling of filemap_write_and_wait() down into the ->fsync() handlers.  Some
      file systems can drop taking the i_mutex altogether it seems, like ext3 and
      ocfs2.  For correctness sake I just pushed everything down in all cases to make
      sure that we keep the current behavior the same for everybody, and then each
      individual fs maintainer can make up their mind about what to do from there.
      Thanks,
      Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      02c24a82
  5. 13 1月, 2011 1 次提交
  6. 10 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  7. 28 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  8. 06 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  9. 27 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  10. 12 6月, 2009 1 次提交
    • A
      sanitize ->fsync() for affs · c4758795
      Al Viro 提交于
      unfortunately, for affs (especially for affs directories) we have
      no real way to keep track of metadata ownership.  So we have to
      do more or less what file_fsync() does, but we do *not* need to
      call write_super() there.
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      c4758795
  11. 28 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  12. 27 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  13. 07 5月, 2008 1 次提交
  14. 08 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  15. 21 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  16. 13 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  17. 24 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  18. 29 6月, 2006 1 次提交
  19. 29 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  20. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4