Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 05 9月, 2009 6 次提交
    • B
      sctp: Sysctl configuration for IPv4 Address Scoping · 72388433
      由 Bhaskar Dutta 提交于 
      This patch introduces a new sysctl option to make IPv4 Address Scoping
configurable <draft-stewart-tsvwg-sctp-ipv4-00.txt>.

In networking environments where DNAT rules in iptables prerouting
chains convert destination IP's to link-local/private IP addresses,
SCTP connections fail to establish as the INIT chunk is dropped by the
kernel due to address scope match failure.
For example to support overlapping IP addresses (same IP address with
different vlan id) a Layer-5 application listens on link local IP's,
and there is a DNAT rule that maps the destination IP to a link local
IP. Such applications never get the SCTP INIT if the address-scoping
draft is strictly followed.

This sysctl configuration allows SCTP to function in such
unconventional networking environments.

Sysctl options:
0 - Disable IPv4 address scoping draft altogether
1 - Enable IPv4 address scoping (default, current behavior)
2 - Enable address scoping but allow IPv4 private addresses in init/init-ack
3 - Enable address scoping but allow IPv4 link local address in init/init-ack
Signed-off-by: NBhaskar Dutta <bhaskar.dutta@globallogic.com>
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
      72388433
    • V
      sctp: Turn flags in 'sctp_packet' into bit fields · a803c942
      由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于 
      This shrinks the size of sctp_packet a little.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
      a803c942
    • V
      sctp: Fix SCTP_MAXSEG socket option to comply to spec. · f68b2e05
      由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于 
      We had a bug that we never stored the user-defined value for
MAXSEG when setting the value on an association.  Thus future
PMTU events ended up re-writing the frag point and increasing
it past user limit.  Additionally, when setting the option on
the socket/endpoint, we effect all current associations, which
is against spec.

Now, we store the user 'maxseg' value along with the computed
'frag_point'.  We inherit 'maxseg' from the socket at association
creation and use it as an upper limit for 'frag_point' when its
set.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
      f68b2e05
    • V
      sctp: Don't do NAGLE delay on large writes that were fragmented small · cb95ea32
      由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于 
      SCTP will delay the last part of a large write due to NAGLE, if that
part is smaller then MTU.  Since we are doing large writes, we might
as well send the last portion now instead of waiting untill the next
large write happens.  The small portion will be sent as is regardless,
so it's better to not delay it.

This is a result of much discussions with Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
and Doug Graham <dgraham@nortel.com>.  Many thanks go out to them.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
      cb95ea32
    • V
      sctp: drop a_rwnd to 0 when receive buffer overflows. · 4d3c46e6
      由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于 
      SCTP has a problem that when small chunks are used, it is possible
to exhaust the receiver buffer without fully closing receive window.
This happens due to all overhead that we have account for with small
messages.  To fix this, when receive buffer is exceeded, we'll drop
the window to 0 and save the 'drop' portion.  When application starts
reading data and freeing up recevie buffer space, we'll wait until
we've reached the 'drop' window and then add back this 'drop' one
mtu at a time.  This worked well in testing and under stress produced
rather even recovery.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
      4d3c46e6
    • V
      sctp: Send user messages to the lower layer as one · 9c5c62be
      由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于 
      Currenlty, sctp breaks up user messages into fragments and
sends each fragment to the lower layer by itself.  This means
that for each fragment we go all the way down the stack
and back up.  This also discourages bundling of multiple
fragments when they can fit into a sigle packet (ex: due
to user setting a low fragmentation threashold).

We introduce a new command SCTP_CMD_SND_MSG and hand the
whole message down state machine.  The state machine and
the side-effect parser will cork the queue, add all chunks
from the message to the queue, and then un-cork the queue
thus causing the chunks to get transmitted.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
      9c5c62be
  3. 03 6月, 2009 1 次提交
    • W
      sctp: fix to choose alternate destination when retransmit ASCONF chunk · 9919b455
      由 Wei Yongjun 提交于 
      RFC 5061 Section 5.1 ASCONF Chunk Procedures said:

B4)  Re-transmit the ASCONF Chunk last sent and if possible choose an
     alternate destination address (please refer to [RFC4960],
     Section 6.4.1).  An endpoint MUST NOT add new parameters to this
     chunk; it MUST be the same (including its Sequence Number) as
     the last ASCONF sent.  An endpoint MAY, however, bundle an
     additional ASCONF with new ASCONF parameters with the next
     Sequence Number.  For details, see Section 5.5.

This patch fix to choose an alternate destination address when
re-transmit the ASCONF chunk, with some dup codes cleanup.
Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
      9919b455
  5. 16 2月, 2009 2 次提交
    • V
      sctp: Fix the RTO-doubling on idle-link heartbeats · faee47cd
      由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于 
      SCTP incorrectly doubles rto ever time a Hearbeat chunk
is generated.   However RFC 4960 states:

   On an idle destination address that is allowed to heartbeat, it is
   recommended that a HEARTBEAT chunk is sent once per RTO of that
   destination address plus the protocol parameter 'HB.interval', with
   jittering of +/- 50% of the RTO value, and exponential backoff of the
   RTO if the previous HEARTBEAT is unanswered.

Essentially, of if the heartbean is unacknowledged, do we double the RTO.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      faee47cd
    • L
      sctp: Allow to disable SCTP checksums via module parameter · 06e86806
      由 Lucas Nussbaum 提交于 
      This is a new version of my patch, now using a module parameter instead
of a sysctl, so that the option is harder to find. Please note that,
once the module is loaded, it is still possible to change the value of
the parameter in /sys/module/sctp/parameters/, which is useful if you
want to do performance comparisons without rebooting.

Computation of SCTP checksums significantly affects the performance of
SCTP. For example, using two dual-Opteron 246 connected using a Gbe
network, it was not possible to achieve more than ~730 Mbps, compared to
941 Mbps after disabling SCTP checksums.
Unfortunately, SCTP checksum offloading in NICs is not commonly
available (yet).

By default, checksums are still enabled, of course.
Signed-off-by: NLucas Nussbaum <lucas.nussbaum@ens-lyon.fr>
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      06e86806
  7. 09 10月, 2008 1 次提交
    • V
      sctp: Rework the tsn map to use generic bitmap. · 8e1ee18c
      由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于 
      The tsn map currently use is 4K large and is stuck inside
the sctp_association structure making memory references REALLY
expensive.  What we really need is at most 4K worth of bits
so the biggest map we would have is 512 bytes.   Also, the
map is only really usefull when we have gaps to store and
report.  As such, starting with minimal map of say 32 TSNs (bits)
should be enough for normal low-loss operations.  We can grow
the map by some multiple of 32 along with some extra room any
time we receive the TSN which would put us outside of the map
boundry.  As we close gaps, we can shift the map to rebase
it on the latest TSN we've seen.  This saves 4088 bytes per
association just in the map alone along savings from the now
unnecessary structure members.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      8e1ee18c
  9. 01 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  11. 04 8月, 2008 1 次提交
    • H
      sctp: Drop ipfargok in sctp_xmit function · f880374c
      由 Herbert Xu 提交于 
      The ipfragok flag controls whether the packet may be fragmented
either on the local host on beyond.  The latter is only valid on
IPv4.

In fact, we never want to do the latter even on IPv4 when PMTU is
enabled.  This is because even though we can't fragment packets
within SCTP due to the prtocol's inherent faults, we can still
fragment it at IP layer.  By setting the DF bit we will improve
the PMTU process.

RFC 2960 only says that we SHOULD clear the DF bit in this case,
so we're compliant even if we set the DF bit.  In fact RFC 4960
no longer has this statement.

Once we make this change, we only need to control the local
fragmentation.  There is already a bit in the skb which controls
that, local_df.  So this patch sets that instead of using the
ipfragok argument.

The only complication is that there isn't a struct sock object
per transport, so for IPv4 we have to resort to changing the
pmtudisc field for every packet.  This should be safe though
as the protocol is single-threaded.

Note that after this patch we can remove ipfragok from the rest
of the stack too.
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      f880374c
  13. 23 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  15. 19 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  17. 20 6月, 2008 1 次提交
    • V
      sctp: Follow security requirement of responding with 1 packet · 2e3216cd
      由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于 
      RFC 4960, Section 11.4. Protection of Non-SCTP-Capable Hosts

When an SCTP stack receives a packet containing multiple control or
DATA chunks and the processing of the packet requires the sending of
multiple chunks in response, the sender of the response chunk(s) MUST
NOT send more than one packet.  If bundling is supported, multiple
response chunks that fit into a single packet MAY be bundled together
into one single response packet.  If bundling is not supported, then
the sender MUST NOT send more than one response chunk and MUST
discard all other responses.  Note that this rule does NOT apply to a
SACK chunk, since a SACK chunk is, in itself, a response to DATA and
a SACK does not require a response of more DATA.

We implement this by not servicing our outqueue until we reach the end
of the packet.  This enables maximum bundling.  We also identify
'response' chunks and make sure that we only send 1 packet when sending
such chunks.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      2e3216cd
  19. 05 6月, 2008 4 次提交
  21. 10 5月, 2008 1 次提交
  23. 24 3月, 2008 1 次提交
  25. 01 3月, 2008 1 次提交
  27. 05 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  29. 29 1月, 2008 5 次提交
  31. 21 12月, 2007 1 次提交
  33. 07 12月, 2007 1 次提交
  35. 10 11月, 2007 1 次提交
  37. 08 11月, 2007 4 次提交
  39. 11 10月, 2007 4 次提交