Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 29 11月, 2010 2 次提交
    • L
      Un-inline get_pipe_info() helper function · 72083646
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      This avoids some include-file hell, and the function isn't really
important enough to be inlined anyway.
Reported-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      72083646
    • L
      Export 'get_pipe_info()' to other users · c66fb347
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      And in particular, use it in 'pipe_fcntl()'.

The other pipe functions do not need to use the 'careful' version, since
they are only ever called for things that are already known to be pipes.

The normal read/write/ioctl functions are called through the file
operations structures, so if a file isn't a pipe, they'd never get
called.  But pipe_fcntl() is special, and called directly from the
generic fcntl code, and needs to use the same careful function that the
splice code is using.

Cc: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      c66fb347
  3. 29 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  5. 26 10月, 2010 1 次提交
    • C
      fs: do not assign default i_ino in new_inode · 85fe4025
      由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 
      Instead of always assigning an increasing inode number in new_inode
move the call to assign it into those callers that actually need it.
For now callers that need it is estimated conservatively, that is
the call is added to all filesystems that do not assign an i_ino
by themselves.  For a few more filesystems we can avoid assigning
any inode number given that they aren't user visible, and for others
it could be done lazily when an inode number is actually needed,
but that's left for later patches.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      85fe4025
  7. 21 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  9. 11 6月, 2010 2 次提交
  11. 03 6月, 2010 3 次提交
  13. 28 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  15. 26 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  17. 25 5月, 2010 2 次提交
  19. 22 5月, 2010 2 次提交
  21. 17 12月, 2009 3 次提交
  23. 22 10月, 2009 1 次提交
    • E
      fs: pipe.c null pointer dereference · ad396024
      由 Earl Chew 提交于 
      This patch fixes a null pointer exception in pipe_rdwr_open() which
generates the stack trace:

> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000028 RIP:
>  [<ffffffff802899a5>] pipe_rdwr_open+0x35/0x70
>  [<ffffffff8028125c>] __dentry_open+0x13c/0x230
>  [<ffffffff8028143d>] do_filp_open+0x2d/0x40
>  [<ffffffff802814aa>] do_sys_open+0x5a/0x100
>  [<ffffffff8021faf3>] sysenter_do_call+0x1b/0x67

The failure mode is triggered by an attempt to open an anonymous
pipe via /proc/pid/fd/* as exemplified by this script:

=============================================================
while : ; do
   { echo y ; sleep 1 ; } | { while read ; do echo z$REPLY; done ; } &
   PID=$!
   OUT=$(ps -efl | grep 'sleep 1' | grep -v grep |
        { read PID REST ; echo $PID; } )
   OUT="${OUT%% *}"
   DELAY=$((RANDOM * 1000 / 32768))
   usleep $((DELAY * 1000 + RANDOM % 1000 ))
   echo n > /proc/$OUT/fd/1                 # Trigger defect
done
=============================================================

Note that the failure window is quite small and I could only
reliably reproduce the defect by inserting a small delay
in pipe_rdwr_open(). For example:

 static int
 pipe_rdwr_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 {
       msleep(100);
       mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);

Although the defect was observed in pipe_rdwr_open(), I think it
makes sense to replicate the change through all the pipe_*_open()
functions.

The core of the change is to verify that inode->i_pipe has not
been released before attempting to manipulate it. If inode->i_pipe
is no longer present, return ENOENT to indicate so.

The comment about potentially using atomic_t for i_pipe->readers
and i_pipe->writers has also been removed because it is no longer
relevant in this context. The inode->i_mutex lock must be used so
that inode->i_pipe can be dealt with correctly.
Signed-off-by: NEarl Chew <earl_chew@agilent.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      ad396024
  25. 23 7月, 2009 1 次提交
  27. 11 5月, 2009 1 次提交
  29. 15 4月, 2009 1 次提交
    • M
      splice: add helpers for locking pipe inode · 61e0d47c
      由 Miklos Szeredi 提交于 
      There are lots of sequences like this, especially in splice code:

	if (pipe->inode)
		mutex_lock(&pipe->inode->i_mutex);
	/* do something */
	if (pipe->inode)
		mutex_unlock(&pipe->inode->i_mutex);

so introduce helpers which do the conditional locking and unlocking.
Also replace the inode_double_lock() call with a pipe_double_lock()
helper to avoid spreading the use of this functionality beyond the
pipe code.

This patch is just a cleanup, and should cause no behavioral changes.
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
      61e0d47c
  31. 28 3月, 2009 2 次提交
  33. 16 3月, 2009 1 次提交
    • J
      Rationalize fasync return values · 60aa4924
      由 Jonathan Corbet 提交于 
      Most fasync implementations do something like:

     return fasync_helper(...);

But fasync_helper() will return a positive value at times - a feature used
in at least one place.  Thus, a number of other drivers do:

     err = fasync_helper(...);
     if (err < 0)
             return err;
     return 0;

In the interests of consistency and more concise code, it makes sense to
map positive return values onto zero where ->fasync() is called.

Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
      60aa4924
  35. 13 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  37. 14 1月, 2009 3 次提交
  39. 05 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  41. 14 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  43. 02 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      saner FASYNC handling on file close · 233e70f4
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      As it is, all instances of ->release() for files that have ->fasync()
need to remember to evict file from fasync lists; forgetting that
creates a hole and we actually have a bunch that *does* forget.

So let's keep our lives simple - let __fput() check FASYNC in
file->f_flags and call ->fasync() there if it's been set.  And lose that
crap in ->release() instances - leaving it there is still valid, but we
don't have to bother anymore.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      233e70f4
  45. 27 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  47. 25 7月, 2008 2 次提交
    • U
      flag parameters: NONBLOCK in pipe · be61a86d
      由 Ulrich Drepper 提交于 
      This patch adds O_NONBLOCK support to pipe2.  It is minimally more involved
than the patches for eventfd et.al but still trivial.  The interfaces of the
create_write_pipe and create_read_pipe helper functions were changed and the
one other caller as well.

The following test must be adjusted for architectures other than x86 and
x86-64 and in case the syscall numbers changed.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>

#ifndef __NR_pipe2
# ifdef __x86_64__
#  define __NR_pipe2 293
# elif defined __i386__
#  define __NR_pipe2 331
# else
#  error "need __NR_pipe2"
# endif
#endif

int
main (void)
{
  int fds[2];
  if (syscall (__NR_pipe2, fds, 0) == -1)
    {
      puts ("pipe2(0) failed");
      return 1;
    }
  for (int i = 0; i < 2; ++i)
    {
      int fl = fcntl (fds[i], F_GETFL);
      if (fl == -1)
        {
          puts ("fcntl failed");
          return 1;
        }
      if (fl & O_NONBLOCK)
        {
          printf ("pipe2(0) set non-blocking mode for fds[%d]\n", i);
          return 1;
        }
      close (fds[i]);
    }

  if (syscall (__NR_pipe2, fds, O_NONBLOCK) == -1)
    {
      puts ("pipe2(O_NONBLOCK) failed");
      return 1;
    }
  for (int i = 0; i < 2; ++i)
    {
      int fl = fcntl (fds[i], F_GETFL);
      if (fl == -1)
        {
          puts ("fcntl failed");
          return 1;
        }
      if ((fl & O_NONBLOCK) == 0)
        {
          printf ("pipe2(O_NONBLOCK) does not set non-blocking mode for fds[%d]\n", i);
          return 1;
        }
      close (fds[i]);
    }

  puts ("OK");

  return 0;
}
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: NUlrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      be61a86d
    • U
      flag parameters: pipe · ed8cae8b
      由 Ulrich Drepper 提交于 
      This patch introduces the new syscall pipe2 which is like pipe but it also
takes an additional parameter which takes a flag value.  This patch implements
the handling of O_CLOEXEC for the flag.  I did not add support for the new
syscall for the architectures which have a special sys_pipe implementation.  I
think the maintainers of those archs have the chance to go with the unified
implementation but that's up to them.

The implementation introduces do_pipe_flags.  I did that instead of changing
all callers of do_pipe because some of the callers are written in assembler.
I would probably screw up changing the assembly code.  To avoid breaking code
do_pipe is now a small wrapper around do_pipe_flags.  Once all callers are
changed over to do_pipe_flags the old do_pipe function can be removed.

The following test must be adjusted for architectures other than x86 and
x86-64 and in case the syscall numbers changed.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>

#ifndef __NR_pipe2
# ifdef __x86_64__
#  define __NR_pipe2 293
# elif defined __i386__
#  define __NR_pipe2 331
# else
#  error "need __NR_pipe2"
# endif
#endif

int
main (void)
{
  int fd[2];
  if (syscall (__NR_pipe2, fd, 0) != 0)
    {
      puts ("pipe2(0) failed");
      return 1;
    }
  for (int i = 0; i < 2; ++i)
    {
      int coe = fcntl (fd[i], F_GETFD);
      if (coe == -1)
        {
          puts ("fcntl failed");
          return 1;
        }
      if (coe & FD_CLOEXEC)
        {
          printf ("pipe2(0) set close-on-exit for fd[%d]\n", i);
          return 1;
        }
    }
  close (fd[0]);
  close (fd[1]);

  if (syscall (__NR_pipe2, fd, O_CLOEXEC) != 0)
    {
      puts ("pipe2(O_CLOEXEC) failed");
      return 1;
    }
  for (int i = 0; i < 2; ++i)
    {
      int coe = fcntl (fd[i], F_GETFD);
      if (coe == -1)
        {
          puts ("fcntl failed");
          return 1;
        }
      if ((coe & FD_CLOEXEC) == 0)
        {
          printf ("pipe2(O_CLOEXEC) does not set close-on-exit for fd[%d]\n", i);
          return 1;
        }
    }
  close (fd[0]);
  close (fd[1]);

  puts ("OK");

  return 0;
}
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: NUlrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com>
Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      ed8cae8b
  49. 23 6月, 2008 1 次提交
  51. 09 5月, 2008 1 次提交
  53. 04 5月, 2008 1 次提交
    • U
      unified (weak) sys_pipe implementation · d35c7b0e
      由 Ulrich Drepper 提交于 
      This replaces the duplicated arch-specific versions of "sys_pipe()" with
one unified implementation.  This removes almost 250 lines of duplicated
code.

It's marked __weak, so that *if* an architecture wants to override the
default implementation it can do so by simply having its own replacement
version, since many architectures use alternate calling conventions for
the 'pipe()' system call for legacy reasons (ie traditional UNIX
implementations often return the two file descriptors in registers)

I still haven't changed the cris version even though Linus says the BKL
isn't needed.  The arch maintainer can easily do it if there are really
no obstacles.
Signed-off-by: NUlrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      d35c7b0e
  55. 23 4月, 2008 1 次提交