- 15 7月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Commit 27dd4385 ("ext4: introduce reserved space") reserves 2% of the file system space to make sure metadata allocations will always succeed. Given that, tracking the reservation of metadata blocks is no longer necessary. Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The EXT4FS_DEBUG is a *very* developer specific #ifdef designed for ext4 developers only. (You have to modify fs/ext4/ext4.h to enable it.) Rearrange how we initialize data structures to avoid calling ext4_count_free_clusters() until the multiblock allocator has been initialized. This also allows us to only call ext4_count_free_clusters() once, and simplifies the code somewhat. (Thanks to Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com> for pointing out a !CONFIG_SMP compile breakage in the original patch.) Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
-
- 13 7月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Namjae Jeon 提交于
Fix potential null pointer dereferencing problem caused by e43bb4e6 ("ext4: decrement free clusters/inodes counters when block group declared bad") Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NNamjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NAshish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This fixes the following lockdep complaint: [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 3.16.0-rc2-mm1+ #7 Tainted: G O ------------------------------------------------------- kworker/u24:0/4356 is trying to acquire lock: (&(&sbi->s_es_lru_lock)->rlock){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffff81285fff>] __ext4_es_shrink+0x4f/0x2e0 but task is already holding lock: (&ei->i_es_lock){++++-.}, at: [<ffffffff81286961>] ext4_es_insert_extent+0x71/0x180 which lock already depends on the new lock. Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&ei->i_es_lock); lock(&(&sbi->s_es_lru_lock)->rlock); lock(&ei->i_es_lock); lock(&(&sbi->s_es_lru_lock)->rlock); *** DEADLOCK *** 6 locks held by kworker/u24:0/4356: #0: ("writeback"){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81071d00>] process_one_work+0x180/0x560 #1: ((&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81071d00>] process_one_work+0x180/0x560 #2: (&type->s_umount_key#22){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff811a9c74>] grab_super_passive+0x44/0x90 #3: (jbd2_handle){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff812979f9>] start_this_handle+0x189/0x5f0 #4: (&ei->i_data_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff81247062>] ext4_map_blocks+0x132/0x550 #5: (&ei->i_es_lock){++++-.}, at: [<ffffffff81286961>] ext4_es_insert_extent+0x71/0x180 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 4356 Comm: kworker/u24:0 Tainted: G O 3.16.0-rc2-mm1+ #7 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Workqueue: writeback bdi_writeback_workfn (flush-253:0) ffffffff8213dce0 ffff880014b07538 ffffffff815df0bb 0000000000000007 ffffffff8213e040 ffff880014b07588 ffffffff815db3dd ffff880014b07568 ffff880014b07610 ffff88003b868930 ffff88003b868908 ffff88003b868930 Call Trace: [<ffffffff815df0bb>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [<ffffffff815db3dd>] print_circular_bug+0x1fb/0x20c [<ffffffff810a7a3e>] __lock_acquire+0x163e/0x1d00 [<ffffffff815e89dc>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [<ffffffff815ddc7b>] ? __slab_alloc+0x4a8/0x4ce [<ffffffff81285fff>] ? __ext4_es_shrink+0x4f/0x2e0 [<ffffffff810a8707>] lock_acquire+0x87/0x120 [<ffffffff81285fff>] ? __ext4_es_shrink+0x4f/0x2e0 [<ffffffff8128592d>] ? ext4_es_free_extent+0x5d/0x70 [<ffffffff815e6f09>] _raw_spin_lock+0x39/0x50 [<ffffffff81285fff>] ? __ext4_es_shrink+0x4f/0x2e0 [<ffffffff8119760b>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x18b/0x1a0 [<ffffffff81285fff>] __ext4_es_shrink+0x4f/0x2e0 [<ffffffff812869b8>] ext4_es_insert_extent+0xc8/0x180 [<ffffffff812470f4>] ext4_map_blocks+0x1c4/0x550 [<ffffffff8124c4c4>] ext4_writepages+0x6d4/0xd00 ... Reported-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reported-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
-
- 12 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Commit 00764937 ("ext4: initialize multi-block allocator before checking block descriptors") causes the block group descriptor's count of the number of free blocks to become inconsistent with the number of free blocks in the allocation bitmap. This is a harmless form of fs corruption, but it causes the kernel to potentially remount the file system read-only, or to panic, depending on the file systems's error behavior. Thanks to Eric Whitney for his tireless work to reproduce and to find the guilty commit. Fixes: 00764937 ("ext4: initialize multi-block allocator before checking block descriptors" Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.15 Reported-by: NDavid Jander <david@protonic.nl> Reported-by: NMatteo Croce <technoboy85@gmail.com> Tested-by: NEric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com> Suggested-by: NEric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 06 7月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
The mount manpage says of the max_batch_time option, This optimization can be turned off entirely by setting max_batch_time to 0. But the code doesn't do that. So fix the code to do that. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
We are spending a lot of time explaining to users what this error means. Let's try to improve the message to avoid this problem. Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Make it clear that values printed are times, and that it is error since last fsck. Also add note about fsck version required. Signed-off-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The first time that we allocate from an uninitialized inode allocation bitmap, if the block allocation bitmap is also uninitalized, we need to get write access to the block group descriptor before we start modifying the block group descriptor flags and updating the free block count, etc. Otherwise, there is the potential of a bad journal checksum (if journal checksums are enabled), and of the file system becoming inconsistent if we crash at exactly the wrong time. Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 27 6月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Hole punching code for files with indirect blocks wrongly computed number of blocks which need to be cleared when traversing the indirect block tree. That could result in punching more blocks than actually requested and thus effectively cause a data loss. For example: fallocate -n -p 10240000 4096 will punch the range 10240000 - 12632064 instead of the range 1024000 - 10244096. Fix the calculation. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 8bad6fc8Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
free_holes_block() passed local variable as a block pointer to ext4_clear_blocks(). Thus ext4_clear_blocks() zeroed out this local variable instead of proper place in inode / indirect block. We later zero out proper place in inode / indirect block but don't dirty the inode / buffer again which can lead to subtle issues (some changes e.g. to inode can be lost). Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 26 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Namjae Jeon 提交于
We should decrement free clusters counter when block bitmap is marked as corrupt and free inodes counter when the allocation bitmap is marked as corrupt to avoid misunderstanding due to incorrect available size in statfs result. User can get immediately ENOSPC error from write begin without reaching for the writepages. Cc: Darrick J. Wong<darrick.wong@oracle.com> Reported-by: NAmit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNamjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NAshish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
-
- 16 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Error recovery in ext4_alloc_branch() calls ext4_forget() even for buffer corresponding to indirect block it did not allocate. This leads to brelse() being called twice for that buffer (once from ext4_forget() and once from cleanup in ext4_ind_map_blocks()) leading to buffer use count misaccounting. Eventually (but often much later because there are other users of the buffer) we will see messages like: VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer Another manifestation of this problem is an error: JBD2 unexpected failure: jbd2_journal_revoke: !buffer_revoked(bh); inconsistent data on disk The fix is easy - don't forget buffer we did not allocate. Also add an explanatory comment because the indexing at ext4_alloc_branch() is somewhat subtle. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 12 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
iter_file_splice_write() - a ->splice_write() instance that gathers the pipe buffers, builds a bio_vec-based iov_iter covering those and feeds it to ->write_iter(). A bunch of simple cases coverted to that... [AV: fixed the braino spotted by Cyrill] Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 05 6月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mel Gorman 提交于
aops->write_begin may allocate a new page and make it visible only to have mark_page_accessed called almost immediately after. Once the page is visible the atomic operations are necessary which is noticable overhead when writing to an in-memory filesystem like tmpfs but should also be noticable with fast storage. The objective of the patch is to initialse the accessed information with non-atomic operations before the page is visible. The bulk of filesystems directly or indirectly use grab_cache_page_write_begin or find_or_create_page for the initial allocation of a page cache page. This patch adds an init_page_accessed() helper which behaves like the first call to mark_page_accessed() but may called before the page is visible and can be done non-atomically. The primary APIs of concern in this care are the following and are used by most filesystems. find_get_page find_lock_page find_or_create_page grab_cache_page_nowait grab_cache_page_write_begin All of them are very similar in detail to the patch creates a core helper pagecache_get_page() which takes a flags parameter that affects its behavior such as whether the page should be marked accessed or not. Then old API is preserved but is basically a thin wrapper around this core function. Each of the filesystems are then updated to avoid calling mark_page_accessed when it is known that the VM interfaces have already done the job. There is a slight snag in that the timing of the mark_page_accessed() has now changed so in rare cases it's possible a page gets to the end of the LRU as PageReferenced where as previously it might have been repromoted. This is expected to be rare but it's worth the filesystem people thinking about it in case they see a problem with the timing change. It is also the case that some filesystems may be marking pages accessed that previously did not but it makes sense that filesystems have consistent behaviour in this regard. The test case used to evaulate this is a simple dd of a large file done multiple times with the file deleted on each iterations. The size of the file is 1/10th physical memory to avoid dirty page balancing. In the async case it will be possible that the workload completes without even hitting the disk and will have variable results but highlight the impact of mark_page_accessed for async IO. The sync results are expected to be more stable. The exception is tmpfs where the normal case is for the "IO" to not hit the disk. The test machine was single socket and UMA to avoid any scheduling or NUMA artifacts. Throughput and wall times are presented for sync IO, only wall times are shown for async as the granularity reported by dd and the variability is unsuitable for comparison. As async results were variable do to writback timings, I'm only reporting the maximum figures. The sync results were stable enough to make the mean and stddev uninteresting. The performance results are reported based on a run with no profiling. Profile data is based on a separate run with oprofile running. async dd 3.15.0-rc3 3.15.0-rc3 vanilla accessed-v2 ext3 Max elapsed 13.9900 ( 0.00%) 11.5900 ( 17.16%) tmpfs Max elapsed 0.5100 ( 0.00%) 0.4900 ( 3.92%) btrfs Max elapsed 12.8100 ( 0.00%) 12.7800 ( 0.23%) ext4 Max elapsed 18.6000 ( 0.00%) 13.3400 ( 28.28%) xfs Max elapsed 12.5600 ( 0.00%) 2.0900 ( 83.36%) The XFS figure is a bit strange as it managed to avoid a worst case by sheer luck but the average figures looked reasonable. samples percentage ext3 86107 0.9783 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-vanilla mark_page_accessed ext3 23833 0.2710 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 mark_page_accessed ext3 5036 0.0573 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 init_page_accessed ext4 64566 0.8961 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-vanilla mark_page_accessed ext4 5322 0.0713 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 mark_page_accessed ext4 2869 0.0384 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 init_page_accessed xfs 62126 1.7675 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-vanilla mark_page_accessed xfs 1904 0.0554 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 init_page_accessed xfs 103 0.0030 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 mark_page_accessed btrfs 10655 0.1338 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-vanilla mark_page_accessed btrfs 2020 0.0273 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 init_page_accessed btrfs 587 0.0079 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 mark_page_accessed tmpfs 59562 3.2628 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-vanilla mark_page_accessed tmpfs 1210 0.0696 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 init_page_accessed tmpfs 94 0.0054 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 mark_page_accessed [akpm@linux-foundation.org: don't run init_page_accessed() against an uninitialised pointer] Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: NPrabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
The last in-tree caller of block_write_full_page_endio() was removed in January 2013. It's time to remove the EXPORT_SYMBOL, which leaves block_write_full_page() as the only caller of block_write_full_page_endio(), so inline block_write_full_page_endio() into block_write_full_page(). Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Dheeraj Reddy <dheeraj.reddy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 02 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zheng Liu 提交于
This commit tries to fix a bug that we can't read symlink properly with inline data feature when the length of symlink is greater than 60 bytes but less than extra space. The key issue is in ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink() that it doesn't check whether or not an inode has inline data. When the user creates a new symlink, an inode will be allocated with MAY_INLINE_DATA flag. Then symlink will be stored in ->i_block and extended attribute space. In the mean time, this inode is with inline data flag. After remounting it, ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink() function thinks that this inode is a fast symlink so that the data in ->i_block is copied to the user, and the data in extra space is trimmed. In fact this inode should be as a normal symlink. The following script can hit this bug. #!/bin/bash cd ${MNT} filename=ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789 rm -rf test mkdir test cd test echo "hello" >$filename ln -s $filename symlinkfile cd sudo umount /mnt/sda1 sudo mount -t ext4 /dev/sda1 /mnt/sda1 readlink /mnt/sda1/test/symlinkfile After applying this patch, it will break the assumption in e2fsck because the original implementation doesn't want to support symlink with inline data. Reported-by: N"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Reported-by: NIan Nartowicz <claws@nartowicz.co.uk> Cc: Ian Nartowicz <claws@nartowicz.co.uk> Cc: Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma> Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca> Signed-off-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 28 5月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Maurizio Lombardi 提交于
The variable "size" is expressed as number of blocks and not as number of clusters, this could trigger a kernel panic when using ext4 with the size of a cluster different from the size of a block. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NMaurizio Lombardi <mlombard@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Tail of a page straddling inode size must be zeroed when being written out due to POSIX requirement that modifications of mmaped page beyond inode size must not be written to the file. ext4_bio_write_page() did this only for blocks fully beyond inode size but didn't properly zero blocks partially beyond inode size. Fix this. The problem has been uncovered by mmap_11-4 test in openposix test suite (part of LTP). Reported-by: NXiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Fixes: 5a0dc736 Fixes: bd2d0210 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Giedrius Rekasius 提交于
Remove local variable "stored" from ext4_readdir(...). This variable gets initialized but is never used inside the function. Signed-off-by: NGiedrius Rekasius <giedrius.rekasius@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Namjae Jeon 提交于
xfstests generic/091 is failing when mounting ext4 with data=journal. I think that this regression is same problem that occurred prior to collapse range issue. So ZERO RANGE also need to call ext4_force_commit as collapse range. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NNamjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NAshish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 26 5月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Shuffle code around in ext4_orphan_add() and ext4_orphan_del() so that we avoid taking global s_orphan_lock in some cases and hold it for shorter time in other cases. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Use sbi pointer consistently in ext4_orphan_del() instead of opencoding it sometimes. Also ext4_orphan_add() uses EXT4_SB(sb) often so create sbi variable for it as well and use it. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 13 5月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
In ext4_es_can_be_merged() when checking whether we can merge two extents we should use EXT_MAX_BLOCKS instead of defining it manually. Also if it is really the case we should notify userspace because clearly there is a bug in extent status tree implementation since this should never happen. Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
-
由 liang xie 提交于
Make them more consistently Signed-off-by: Nxieliang <xieliang@xiaomi.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Andrey Tsyvarev 提交于
Caches from 'ext4_groupinfo_caches' may be in use by other mounts, which have already existed. So, it is incorrect to destroy them when newly requested mount fails. Found by Linux File System Verification project (linuxtesting.org). Signed-off-by: NAndrey Tsyvarev <tsyvarev@ispras.ru> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
-
- 12 5月, 2014 6 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
I have been running make namespacecheck to look for unneeded globals, and found these in ext4. Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
On a bigalloc,^flex_bg filesystem, the ext4_valid_block_bitmap function fails to convert from blocks to clusters when spot-checking the validity of the bitmap block that we've just read from disk. This causes ext4 to think that the bitmap is garbage, which results in the block group being taken offline when it's not necessary. Add in the necessary EXT4_B2C() calls to perform the conversions. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
The ext4_bg_has_super() function doesn't know about the new rules for where backup superblocks go on a sparse_super2 filesystem. Therefore, block bitmap initialization doesn't know that it shouldn't reserve space for backups in groups that are never going to contain backups. The result of this is e2fsck complaining about the block bitmap being incorrect (fortunately not in a way that results in cross-linked files), so fix the whole thing. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
On a filesystem with a 1k block size, the group descriptors live in block 2, not block 1. If the filesystem has bigalloc,meta_bg set, however, the calculation of the group descriptor table location does not take this into account and returns the wrong block number. Fix the calculation to return the correct value for this case. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Zhang Zhen 提交于
In ext4_xattr_set_handle() we have checked the xattr name's length. So we should also check it in ext4_xattr_get() to avoid unneeded lookup caused by invalid name. Signed-off-by: NZhang Zhen <zhenzhang.zhang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Namjae Jeon 提交于
When we perform a data integrity sync we tag all the dirty pages with PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE at start of ext4_da_writepages. Later we check for this tag in write_cache_pages_da and creates a struct mpage_da_data containing contiguously indexed pages tagged with this tag and sync these pages with a call to mpage_da_map_and_submit. This process is done in while loop until all the PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE pages are synced. We also do journal start and stop in each iteration. journal_stop could initiate journal commit which would call ext4_writepage which in turn will call ext4_bio_write_page even for delayed OR unwritten buffers. When ext4_bio_write_page is called for such buffers, even though it does not sync them but it clears the PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE of the corresponding page and hence these pages are also not synced by the currently running data integrity sync. We will end up with dirty pages although sync is completed. This could cause a potential data loss when the sync call is followed by a truncate_pagecache call, which is exactly the case in collapse_range. (It will cause generic/127 failure in xfstests) To avoid this issue, we can use set_page_writeback_keepwrite instead of set_page_writeback, which doesn't clear TOWRITE tag. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NNamjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NAshish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 07 5月, 2014 6 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
unfortunately, Ted's changes to ext4_file_write() are *still* an incomplete fix - playing with rlimits can let you smuggle an unaligned request past the checks. So there almost certainly will be more merge PITA around that place... [fix from Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> folded] Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
all callers have iov_length(iter->iov, iter->nr_segs) == iov_iter_count(iter) Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
unmodified, for now Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 22 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
BH can not be NULL at this point, ext4_read_dirblock() always return non null value, and we already have done all necessery checks. Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-