1. 14 1月, 2017 16 次提交
    • D
      Merge branch 'tcp-RACK-fast-recovery' · 718e14bb
      David S. Miller 提交于
      Yuchung Cheng says:
      
      ====================
      tcp: RACK fast recovery
      
      The patch set enables RACK loss detection (draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-01)
      to trigger fast recovery with a reordering timer.
      
      Previously RACK has been running in auxiliary mode where it is
      used to detect packet losses once the recovery has triggered by
      other algorithms (e.g., FACK). By inspecting packet timestamps,
      RACK can start ACK-driven repairs timely. A few similar heuristics
      are no longer needed and are either removed or disabled to reduce
      the complexity of the Linux TCP loss recovery engine:
      
        1. FACK (Forward Acknowledgement)
        2. Early Retransmit (RFC5827)
        3. thin_dupack (fast recovery on single DUPACK for thin-streams)
        4. NCR (Non-Congestion Robustness RFC4653) (RFC4653)
        5. Forward Retransmit
      
      After this change, Linux's loss recovery algorithms consist of
        1. Conventional DUPACK threshold approach (RFC6675)
        2. RACK and Tail Loss Probe (draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-01)
        3. RTO plus F-RTO extension (RFC5682)
      
      The patch set has been tested on Google servers extensively and
      presented in several IETF meetings. The data suggests that RACK
      successfully improves recovery performance:
      https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides-97-tcpm-draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-01.pdf
      https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/slides/slides-96-tcpm-3.pdf
      ====================
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      718e14bb
    • Y
      tcp: disable fack by default · 94bdc978
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      This patch disables FACK by default as RACK is the successor of FACK
      (inspired by the insights behind FACK).
      
      FACK[1] in Linux works as follows: a packet P is deemed lost,
      if packet Q of higher sequence is s/acked and P and Q are distant
      by at least dupthresh number of packets in sequence space.
      
      FACK is more aggressive than the IETF recommened recovery for SACK
      (RFC3517 A Conservative Selective Acknowledgment (SACK)-based Loss
       Recovery Algorithm for TCP), because a single SACK may trigger
      fast recovery. This obviously won't work well with reordering so
      FACK is dynamically disabled upon detecting reordering.
      
      RACK supersedes FACK by using time distance instead of sequence
      distance. On reordering, RACK waits for a quarter of RTT receiving
      a single SACK before starting recovery. (the timer can be made more
      adaptive in the future by measuring reordering distance in time,
      but currently RTT/4 seem to work well.) Once the recovery starts,
      RACK behaves almost like FACK because it reduces the reodering
      window to 1ms, so it fast retransmits quickly. In addition RACK
      can detect loss retransmission as it does not care about the packet
      sequences (being repeated or not), which is extremely useful when
      the connection is going through a traffic policer.
      
      Google server experiments indicate that disabling FACK after enabling
      RACK has negligible impact on the overall loss recovery performance
      with more reordering events detected.  But we still keep the FACK
      implementation for backup if RACK has bugs that needs to be disabled.
      
      [1] M. Mathis, J. Mahdavi, "Forward Acknowledgment: Refining
      TCP Congestion Control," In Proceedings of SIGCOMM '96, August 1996.
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      94bdc978
    • Y
      tcp: remove thin_dupack feature · 4a7f6009
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      Thin stream DUPACK is to start fast recovery on only one DUPACK
      provided the connection is a thin stream (i.e., low inflight).  But
      this older feature is now subsumed with RACK. If a connection
      receives only a single DUPACK, RACK would arm a reordering timer
      and soon starts fast recovery instead of timeout if no further
      ACKs are received.
      
      The socket option (THIN_DUPACK) is kept as a nop for compatibility.
      Note that this patch does not change another thin-stream feature
      which enables linear RTO. Although it might be good to generalize
      that in the future (i.e., linear RTO for the first say 3 retries).
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4a7f6009
    • Y
      tcp: remove RFC4653 NCR · ac229dca
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      This patch removes the (partial) implementation of the aggressive
      limited transmit in RFC4653 TCP Non-Congestion Robustness (NCR).
      
      NCR is a mitigation to the problem created by the dynamic
      DUPACK threshold.  With the current adaptive DUPACK threshold
      (tp->reordering) could cause timeouts by preventing fast recovery.
      For example, if the last packet of a cwnd burst was reordered, the
      threshold will be set to the size of cwnd. But if next application
      burst is smaller than threshold and has drops instead of reorderings,
      the sender would not trigger fast recovery but instead resorts to a
      timeout recovery.
      
      NCR mitigates this issue by checking the number of DUPACKs against
      the current flight size additionally. The techniqueue is similar to
      the early retransmit RFC.
      
      With RACK loss detection, this mitigation is not needed, because RACK
      does not use DUPACK threshold to detect losses. RACK arms a reordering
      timer to fire at most a quarter RTT later to start fast recovery.
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      ac229dca
    • Y
      tcp: remove early retransmit · bec41a11
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      This patch removes the support of RFC5827 early retransmit (i.e.,
      fast recovery on small inflight with <3 dupacks) because it is
      subsumed by the new RACK loss detection. More specifically when
      RACK receives DUPACKs, it'll arm a reordering timer to start fast
      recovery after a quarter of (min)RTT, hence it covers the early
      retransmit except RACK does not limit itself to specific inflight
      or dupack numbers.
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      bec41a11
    • Y
      tcp: remove forward retransmit feature · 840a3cbe
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      Forward retransmit is an esoteric feature in RFC3517 (condition(3)
      in the NextSeg()). Basically if a packet is not considered lost by
      the current criteria (# of dupacks etc), but the congestion window
      has room for more packets, then retransmit this packet.
      
      However it actually conflicts with the rest of recovery design. For
      example, when reordering is detected we want to be conservative
      in retransmitting packets but forward-retransmit feature would
      break that to force more retransmission. Also the implementation is
      fairly complicated inside the retransmission logic inducing extra
      iterations in the write queue. With RACK losses are being detected
      timely and this heuristic is no longer necessary. There this patch
      removes the feature.
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      840a3cbe
    • Y
      tcp: extend F-RTO to catch more spurious timeouts · 89fe18e4
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      Current F-RTO reverts cwnd reset whenever a never-retransmitted
      packet was (s)acked. The timeout can be declared spurious because
      the packets acknoledged with this ACK was transmitted before the
      timeout, so clearly not all the packets are lost to reset the cwnd.
      
      This nice detection does not really depend F-RTO internals. This
      patch applies the detection universally. On Google servers this
      change detected 20% more spurious timeouts.
      Suggested-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      89fe18e4
    • Y
      tcp: enable RACK loss detection to trigger recovery · a0370b3f
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      This patch changes two things:
      
      1. Start fast recovery with RACK in addition to other heuristics
         (e.g., DUPACK threshold, FACK). Prior to this change RACK
         is enabled to detect losses only after the recovery has
         started by other algorithms.
      
      2. Disable TCP early retransmit. RACK subsumes the early retransmit
         with the new reordering timer feature. A latter patch in this
         series removes the early retransmit code.
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a0370b3f
    • Y
      tcp: check undo conditions before detecting losses · 98e36d44
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      Currently RACK would mark loss before the undo operations in TCP
      loss recovery. This could incorrectly identify real losses as
      spurious. For example a sender first experiences a delay spike and
      then eventually some packets were lost due to buffer overrun.
      In this case, the sender should perform fast recovery b/c not all
      the packets were lost.
      
      But the sender may first trigger a (spurious) RTO and reset
      cwnd to 1. The following ACKs may used to mark real losses by
      tcp_rack_mark_lost. Then in tcp_process_loss this ACK could trigger
      F-RTO undo condition and unmark real losses and revert the cwnd
      reduction. If there are no more ACKs coming back, eventually the
      sender would timeout again instead of performing fast recovery.
      
      The patch fixes this incorrect process by always performing
      the undo checks before detecting losses.
      
      Fixes: 4f41b1c5 ("tcp: use RACK to detect losses")
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      98e36d44
    • Y
      tcp: use sequence to break TS ties for RACK loss detection · 1d0833df
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      The packets inside a jumbo skb (e.g., TSO) share the same skb
      timestamp, even though they are sent sequentially on the wire. Since
      RACK is based on time, it can not detect some packets inside the
      same skb are lost.  However, we can leverage the packet sequence
      numbers as extended timestamps to detect losses. Therefore, when
      RACK timestamp is identical to skb's timestamp (i.e., one of the
      packets of the skb is acked or sacked), we use the sequence numbers
      of the acked and unacked packets to break ties.
      
      We can use the same sequence logic to advance RACK xmit time as
      well to detect more losses and avoid timeout.
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      1d0833df
    • Y
      tcp: add reordering timer in RACK loss detection · 57dde7f7
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      This patch makes RACK install a reordering timer when it suspects
      some packets might be lost, but wants to delay the decision
      a little bit to accomodate reordering.
      
      It does not create a new timer but instead repurposes the existing
      RTO timer, because both are meant to retransmit packets.
      Specifically it arms a timer ICSK_TIME_REO_TIMEOUT when
      the RACK timing check fails. The wait time is set to
      
        RACK.RTT + RACK.reo_wnd - (NOW - Packet.xmit_time) + fudge
      
      This translates to expecting a packet (Packet) should take
      (RACK.RTT + RACK.reo_wnd + fudge) to deliver after it was sent.
      
      When there are multiple packets that need a timer, we use one timer
      with the maximum timeout. Therefore the timer conservatively uses
      the maximum window to expire N packets by one timeout, instead of
      N timeouts to expire N packets sent at different times.
      
      The fudge factor is 2 jiffies to ensure when the timer fires, all
      the suspected packets would exceed the deadline and be marked lost
      by tcp_rack_detect_loss(). It has to be at least 1 jiffy because the
      clock may tick between calling icsk_reset_xmit_timer(timeout) and
      actually hang the timer. The next jiffy is to lower-bound the timeout
      to 2 jiffies when reo_wnd is < 1ms.
      
      When the reordering timer fires (tcp_rack_reo_timeout): If we aren't
      in Recovery we'll enter fast recovery and force fast retransmit.
      This is very similar to the early retransmit (RFC5827) except RACK
      is not constrained to only enter recovery for small outstanding
      flights.
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      57dde7f7
    • Y
      tcp: record most recent RTT in RACK loss detection · deed7be7
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      Record the most recent RTT in RACK. It is often identical to the
      "ca_rtt_us" values in tcp_clean_rtx_queue. But when the packet has
      been retransmitted, RACK choses to believe the ACK is for the
      (latest) retransmitted packet if the RTT is over minimum RTT.
      
      This requires passing the arrival time of the most recent ACK to
      RACK routines. The timestamp is now recorded in the "ack_time"
      in tcp_sacktag_state during the ACK processing.
      
      This patch does not change the RACK algorithm itself. It only adds
      the RTT variable to prepare the next main patch.
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      deed7be7
    • Y
      tcp: new helper for RACK to detect loss · e636f8b0
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      Create a new helper tcp_rack_detect_loss to prepare the upcoming
      RACK reordering timer patch.
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      e636f8b0
    • Y
      tcp: new helper function for RACK loss detection · db8da6bb
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      Create a new helper tcp_rack_mark_skb_lost to prepare the
      upcoming RACK reordering timer support.
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      db8da6bb
    • S
      liquidio: use fallback for selecting txq · 7410191a
      Satanand Burla 提交于
      Remove assignment to ndo_select_queue so that fallback is used for
      selecting txq.  Also remove the now-useless function that used to be
      assigned to ndo_select_queue.
      Signed-off-by: NSatanand Burla <satananda.burla@cavium.com>
      Signed-off-by: NFelix Manlunas <felix.manlunas@cavium.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDerek Chickles <derek.chickles@cavium.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      7410191a
    • V
      net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add EEPROM support to 6390 · 98fc3c6f
      Vivien Didelot 提交于
      The Marvell 6352 chip has a 8-bit address/16-bit data EEPROM access.
      The Marvell 6390 chip has a 16-bit address/8-bit data EEPROM access.
      
      This patch implements the 8-bit data EEPROM access in the mv88e6xxx
      driver and adds its support to chips of the 6390 family.
      Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      98fc3c6f
  2. 13 1月, 2017 11 次提交
  3. 12 1月, 2017 13 次提交