Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 24 12月, 2008 28 次提交
  3. 20 12月, 2008 3 次提交
  5. 18 12月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 17 12月, 2008 2 次提交
  9. 11 12月, 2008 5 次提交
    • H
      KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN fixes · 9c246247
      由 Hugh Dickins 提交于 
      Miles Lane tailing /sys files hit a BUG which Pekka Enberg has tracked
to my 966c8c12 sprint_symbol(): use
less stack exposing a bug in slub's list_locations() -
kallsyms_lookup() writes a 0 to namebuf[KSYM_NAME_LEN-1], but that was
beyond the end of page provided.

The 100 slop which list_locations() allows at end of page looks roughly
enough for all the other stuff it might print after the symbol before
it checks again: break out KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN earlier than before.

Latencytop and ftrace and are using KSYM_NAME_LEN buffers where they
need KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN buffers, and vmallocinfo a 2*KSYM_NAME_LEN buffer
where it wants a KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN buffer: fix those before anyone copies
them.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: ftrace.h needs module.h]
Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NPekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Acked-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      9c246247
    • D
      inotify: fix IN_ONESHOT unmount event watcher · 6ee5a399
      由 Dmitri Monakhov 提交于 
      On umount two event will be dispatched to watcher:

1: inotify_dev_queue_event(.., IN_UNMOUNT,..)
2: remove_watch(watch, dev)
    ->inotify_dev_queue_event(.., IN_IGNORED, ..)

But if watcher has IN_ONESHOT bit set then the watcher will be released
inside first event.  Which result in accessing invalid object later.  IMHO
it is not pure regression.  This bug wasn't triggered while initial
inotify interface testing phase because of another bug in IN_ONESHOT
handling logic :)

  commit ac74c00e
  Author: Ulisses Furquim <ulissesf@gmail.com>
  Date:   Fri Feb 8 04:18:16 2008 -0800
    inotify: fix check for one-shot watches before destroying them
    As the IN_ONESHOT bit is never set when an event is sent we must check it
    in the watch's mask and not in the event's mask.

TESTCASE:
mkdir mnt
mount -ttmpfs none mnt
mkdir mnt/d
./inotify mnt/d&
umount mnt ## << lockup or crash here

TESTSOURCE:
/* gcc -oinotify inotify.c */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/inotify.h>

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
        char buf[1024];
        struct inotify_event *ie;
        char *p;
        int i;
        ssize_t l;

        p = argv[1];
        i = inotify_init();
        inotify_add_watch(i, p, ~0);

        l = read(i, buf, sizeof(buf));
        printf("read %d bytes\n", l);
        ie = (struct inotify_event *) buf;
        printf("event mask: %d\n", ie->mask);
	return 0;
}
Signed-off-by: NDmitri Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Cc: John McCutchan <ttb@tentacle.dhs.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Robert Love <rlove@google.com>
Cc: Ulisses Furquim <ulissesf@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      6ee5a399
    • M
      pagemap: fix 32-bit pagemap regression · 49c50342
      由 Matt Mackall 提交于 
      The large pages fix from bcf8039e broke 32-bit pagemap by pulling the
pagemap entry code out into a function with the wrong return type.
Pagemap entries are 64 bits on all systems and unsigned long is only 32
bits on 32-bit systems.
Signed-off-by: NMatt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Reported-by: NDoug Graham <dgraham@nortel.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>		[2.6.26.x, 2.6.27.x]
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      49c50342
    • A
      revert "percpu_counter: new function percpu_counter_sum_and_set" · 02d21168
      由 Andrew Morton 提交于 
      Revert

    commit e8ced39d
    Author: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
    Date:   Fri Jul 11 19:27:31 2008 -0400

        percpu_counter: new function percpu_counter_sum_and_set

As described in

	revert "percpu counter: clean up percpu_counter_sum_and_set()"

the new percpu_counter_sum_and_set() is racy against updates to the
cpu-local accumulators on other CPUs.  Revert that change.

This means that ext4 will be slow again.  But correct.
Reported-by: NEric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>		[2.6.27.x]
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      02d21168
    • A
      revert "percpu counter: clean up percpu_counter_sum_and_set()" · 71c5576f
      由 Andrew Morton 提交于 
      Revert

    commit 1f7c14c6
    Author: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
    Date:   Thu Oct 9 12:50:59 2008 -0400

        percpu counter: clean up percpu_counter_sum_and_set()

Before this patch we had the following:

percpu_counter_sum(): return the percpu_counter's value

percpu_counter_sum_and_set(): return the percpu_counter's value, copying
that value into the central value and zeroing the per-cpu counters before
returning.

After this patch, percpu_counter_sum_and_set() has gone, and
percpu_counter_sum() gets the old percpu_counter_sum_and_set()
functionality.

Problem is, as Eric points out, the old percpu_counter_sum_and_set()
functionality was racy and wrong.  It zeroes out counters on "other" cpus,
without holding any locks which will prevent races agaist updates from
those other CPUS.

This patch reverts 1f7c14c6.  This means
that percpu_counter_sum_and_set() still has the race, but
percpu_counter_sum() does not.

Note that this is not a simple revert - ext4 has since started using
percpu_counter_sum() for its dirty_blocks counter as well.

Note that this revert patch changes percpu_counter_sum() semantics.

Before the patch, a call to percpu_counter_sum() will bring the counter's
central counter mostly up-to-date, so a following percpu_counter_read()
will return a close value.

After this patch, a call to percpu_counter_sum() will leave the counter's
central accumulator unaltered, so a subsequent call to
percpu_counter_read() can now return a significantly inaccurate result.

If there is any code in the tree which was introduced after
e8ced39d was merged, and which depends
upon the new percpu_counter_sum() semantics, that code will break.
Reported-by: NEric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      71c5576f
  11. 10 12月, 2008 1 次提交
    • R
      tracehook: exec double-reporting fix · 85f33466
      由 Roland McGrath 提交于 
      The patch 6341c393 "tracehook: exec" introduced a small regression in
2.6.27 regarding binfmt_misc exec event reporting.  Since the reporting
is now done in the common search_binary_handler() function, an exec
of a misc binary will result in two (or possibly multiple) exec events
being reported, instead of just a single one, because the misc handler
contains a recursive call to search_binary_handler.

To add to the confusion, if PTRACE_O_TRACEEXEC is not active, the multiple
SIGTRAP signals will in fact cause only a single ptrace intercept, as the
signals are not queued.  However, if PTRACE_O_TRACEEXEC is on, the debugger
will actually see multiple ptrace intercepts (PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC).

The test program included below demonstrates the problem.

This change fixes the bug by calling tracehook_report_exec() only in the
outermost search_binary_handler() call (bprm->recursion_depth == 0).

The additional change to restore bprm->recursion_depth after each binfmt
load_binary call is actually superfluous for this bug, since we test the
value saved on entry to search_binary_handler().  But it keeps the use of
of the depth count to its most obvious expected meaning.  Depending on what
binfmt handlers do in certain cases, there could have been false-positive
tests for recursion limits before this change.

    /* Test program using PTRACE_O_TRACEEXEC.
       This forks and exec's the first argument with the rest of the arguments,
       while ptrace'ing.  It expects to see one PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC stop and
       then a successful exit, with no other signals or events in between.

       Test for kernel doing two PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC stops for a binfmt_misc exec:

       $ gcc -g traceexec.c -o traceexec
       $ sudo sh -c 'echo :test:M::foobar::/bin/cat: > /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc/register'
       $ echo 'foobar test' > ./foobar
       $ chmod +x ./foobar
       $ ./traceexec ./foobar; echo $?
       ==> good <==
       foobar test
       0
       $
       ==> bad <==
       foobar test
       unexpected status 0x4057f != 0
       3
       $

    */

    #include <stdio.h>
    #include <sys/types.h>
    #include <sys/wait.h>
    #include <sys/ptrace.h>
    #include <unistd.h>
    #include <signal.h>
    #include <stdlib.h>

    static void
    wait_for (pid_t child, int expect)
    {
      int status;
      pid_t p = wait (&status);
      if (p != child)
	{
	  perror ("wait");
	  exit (2);
	}
      if (status != expect)
	{
	  fprintf (stderr, "unexpected status %#x != %#x\n", status, expect);
	  exit (3);
	}
    }

    int
    main (int argc, char **argv)
    {
      pid_t child = fork ();

      if (child < 0)
	{
	  perror ("fork");
	  return 127;
	}
      else if (child == 0)
	{
	  ptrace (PTRACE_TRACEME);
	  raise (SIGUSR1);
	  execv (argv[1], &argv[1]);
	  perror ("execve");
	  _exit (127);
	}

      wait_for (child, W_STOPCODE (SIGUSR1));

      if (ptrace (PTRACE_SETOPTIONS, child,
		  0L, (void *) (long) PTRACE_O_TRACEEXEC) != 0)
	{
	  perror ("PTRACE_SETOPTIONS");
	  return 4;
	}

      if (ptrace (PTRACE_CONT, child, 0L, 0L) != 0)
	{
	  perror ("PTRACE_CONT");
	  return 5;
	}

      wait_for (child, W_STOPCODE (SIGTRAP | (PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC << 8)));

      if (ptrace (PTRACE_CONT, child, 0L, 0L) != 0)
	{
	  perror ("PTRACE_CONT");
	  return 6;
	}

      wait_for (child, W_EXITCODE (0, 0));

      return 0;
    }
Reported-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
CC: Ulrich Weigand <ulrich.weigand@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRoland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
      85f33466