1. 08 8月, 2010 6 次提交
  2. 06 7月, 2010 3 次提交
    • C
      writeback: simplify the write back thread queue · 83ba7b07
      Christoph Hellwig 提交于
      First remove items from work_list as soon as we start working on them.  This
      means we don't have to track any pending or visited state and can get
      rid of all the RCU magic freeing the work items - we can simply free
      them once the operation has finished.  Second use a real completion for
      tracking synchronous requests - if the caller sets the completion pointer
      we complete it, otherwise use it as a boolean indicator that we can free
      the work item directly.  Third unify struct wb_writeback_args and struct
      bdi_work into a single data structure, wb_writeback_work.  Previous we
      set all parameters into a struct wb_writeback_args, copied it into
      struct bdi_work, copied it again on the stack to use it there.  Instead
      of just allocate one structure dynamically or on the stack and use it
      all the way through the stack.
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
      83ba7b07
    • C
      writeback: split writeback_inodes_wb · edadfb10
      Christoph Hellwig 提交于
      The case where we have a superblock doesn't require a loop here as we scan
      over all inodes in writeback_sb_inodes. Split it out into a separate helper
      to make the code simpler.  This also allows to get rid of the sb member in
      struct writeback_control, which was rather out of place there.
      
      Also update the comments in writeback_sb_inodes that explain the handling
      of inodes from wrong superblocks.
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
      edadfb10
    • C
      writeback: remove writeback_inodes_wbc · 9c3a8ee8
      Christoph Hellwig 提交于
      This was just an odd wrapper around writeback_inodes_wb.  Removing this
      also allows to get rid of the bdi member of struct writeback_control
      which was rather out of place there.
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
      9c3a8ee8
  3. 01 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  4. 11 6月, 2010 8 次提交
  5. 01 6月, 2010 2 次提交
  6. 25 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  7. 22 5月, 2010 3 次提交
  8. 17 5月, 2010 3 次提交
  9. 30 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking... · 5a0e3ad6
      Tejun Heo 提交于
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h
      
      percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
      included when building most .c files.  percpu.h includes slab.h which
      in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
      universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.
      
      percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed.  Prepare for
      this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
      headers directly instead of assuming availability.  As this conversion
      needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
      used as the basis of conversion.
      
        http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py
      
      The script does the followings.
      
      * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
        only the necessary includes are there.  ie. if only gfp is used,
        gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.
      
      * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
        blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
        to its surrounding.  It's put in the include block which contains
        core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
        alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
        doesn't seem to be any matching order.
      
      * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
        because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
        an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
        file.
      
      The conversion was done in the following steps.
      
      1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
         over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
         and ~3000 slab.h inclusions.  The script emitted errors for ~400
         files.
      
      2. Each error was manually checked.  Some didn't need the inclusion,
         some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
         embedding .c file was more appropriate for others.  This step added
         inclusions to around 150 files.
      
      3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
         from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.
      
      4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
         e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
         APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.
      
      5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
         editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
         files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell.  Most gfp.h
         inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
         wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros.  Each
         slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
         necessary.
      
      6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.
      
      7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
         were fixed.  CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
         distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
         more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
         build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).
      
         * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
         * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
         * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
         * ia64 SMP allmodconfig
         * s390 SMP allmodconfig
         * alpha SMP allmodconfig
         * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig
      
      8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
         a separate patch and serve as bisection point.
      
      Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
      6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
      If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
      headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
      the specific arch.
      Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Guess-its-ok-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
      Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
      5a0e3ad6
  10. 12 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  11. 06 3月, 2010 2 次提交
  12. 03 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  13. 23 12月, 2009 1 次提交
    • E
      fs-writeback: Add helper function to start writeback if idle · 17bd55d0
      Eric Sandeen 提交于
      ext4, at least, would like to start pushing on writeback if it starts
      to get close to ENOSPC when reserving worst-case blocks for delalloc
      writes.  Writing out delalloc data will convert those worst-case
      predictions into usually smaller actual usage, freeing up space
      before we hit ENOSPC based on this speculation.
      
      Thanks to Jens for the suggestion for the helper function,
      & the naming help.
      
      I've made the helper return status on whether writeback was
      started even though I don't plan to use it in the ext4 patch;
      it seems like it would be potentially useful to test this
      in some cases.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      17bd55d0
  14. 03 12月, 2009 3 次提交
  15. 26 9月, 2009 4 次提交