Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 24 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  3. 20 11月, 2008 2 次提交
  5. 17 11月, 2008 3 次提交
  7. 10 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • M
      net: unix: fix inflight counting bug in garbage collector · 6209344f
      由 Miklos Szeredi 提交于 
      Previously I assumed that the receive queues of candidates don't
change during the GC.  This is only half true, nothing can be received
from the queues (see comment in unix_gc()), but buffers could be added
through the other half of the socket pair, which may still have file
descriptors referring to it.

This can result in inc_inflight_move_tail() erronously increasing the
"inflight" counter for a unix socket for which dec_inflight() wasn't
previously called.  This in turn can trigger the "BUG_ON(total_refs <
inflight_refs)" in a later garbage collection run.

Fix this by only manipulating the "inflight" counter for sockets which
are candidates themselves.  Duplicating the file references in
unix_attach_fds() is also needed to prevent a socket becoming a
candidate for GC while the skb that contains it is not yet queued.
Reported-by: NAndrea Bittau <a.bittau@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
CC: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      6209344f
  9. 04 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      net: '&' redux · 6d9f239a
      由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于 
      I want to compile out proc_* and sysctl_* handlers totally and
stub them to NULL depending on config options, however usage of &
will prevent this, since taking adress of NULL pointer will break
compilation.

So, drop & in front of every ->proc_handler and every ->strategy
handler, it was never needed in fact.
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6d9f239a
  11. 02 11月, 2008 2 次提交
  13. 23 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  15. 14 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  17. 27 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  19. 26 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  21. 28 6月, 2008 1 次提交
    • R
      af_unix: fix 'poll for write'/connected DGRAM sockets · ec0d215f
      由 Rainer Weikusat 提交于 
      For n:1 'datagram connections' (eg /dev/log), the unix_dgram_sendmsg
routine implements a form of receiver-imposed flow control by
comparing the length of the receive queue of the 'peer socket' with
the max_ack_backlog value stored in the corresponding sock structure,
either blocking the thread which caused the send-routine to be called
or returning EAGAIN. This routine is used by both SOCK_DGRAM and
SOCK_SEQPACKET sockets. The poll-implementation for these socket types
is datagram_poll from core/datagram.c. A socket is deemed to be
writeable by this routine when the memory presently consumed by
datagrams owned by it is less than the configured socket send buffer
size. This is always wrong for PF_UNIX non-stream sockets connected to
server sockets dealing with (potentially) multiple clients if the
abovementioned receive queue is currently considered to be full.
'poll' will then return, indicating that the socket is writeable, but
a subsequent write result in EAGAIN, effectively causing an (usual)
application to 'poll for writeability by repeated send request with
O_NONBLOCK set' until it has consumed its time quantum.

The change below uses a suitably modified variant of the datagram_poll
routines for both type of PF_UNIX sockets, which tests if the
recv-queue of the peer a socket is connected to is presently
considered to be 'full' as part of the 'is this socket
writeable'-checking code. The socket being polled is additionally
put onto the peer_wait wait queue associated with its peer, because the
unix_dgram_recvmsg routine does a wake up on this queue after a
datagram was received and the 'other wakeup call' is done implicitly
as part of skb destruction, meaning, a process blocked in poll
because of a full peer receive queue could otherwise sleep forever
if no datagram owned by its socket was already sitting on this queue.
Among this change is a small (inline) helper routine named
'unix_recvq_full', which consolidates the actual testing code (in three
different places) into a single location.
Signed-off-by: NRainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      ec0d215f
  23. 18 6月, 2008 1 次提交
    • R
      af_unix: fix 'poll for write'/ connected DGRAM sockets · 3c73419c
      由 Rainer Weikusat 提交于 
      The unix_dgram_sendmsg routine implements a (somewhat crude)
form of receiver-imposed flow control by comparing the length of the
receive queue of the 'peer socket' with the max_ack_backlog value
stored in the corresponding sock structure, either blocking
the thread which caused the send-routine to be called or returning
EAGAIN. This routine is used by both SOCK_DGRAM and SOCK_SEQPACKET
sockets. The poll-implementation for these socket types is
datagram_poll from core/datagram.c. A socket is deemed to be writeable
by this routine when the memory presently consumed by datagrams
owned by it is less than the configured socket send buffer size. This
is always wrong for connected PF_UNIX non-stream sockets when the
abovementioned receive queue is currently considered to be full.
'poll' will then return, indicating that the socket is writeable, but
a subsequent write result in EAGAIN, effectively causing an
(usual) application to 'poll for writeability by repeated send request
with O_NONBLOCK set' until it has consumed its time quantum.

The change below uses a suitably modified variant of the datagram_poll
routines for both type of PF_UNIX sockets, which tests if the
recv-queue of the peer a socket is connected to is presently
considered to be 'full' as part of the 'is this socket
writeable'-checking code. The socket being polled is additionally
put onto the peer_wait wait queue associated with its peer, because the
unix_dgram_sendmsg routine does a wake up on this queue after a
datagram was received and the 'other wakeup call' is done implicitly
as part of skb destruction, meaning, a process blocked in poll
because of a full peer receive queue could otherwise sleep forever
if no datagram owned by its socket was already sitting on this queue.
Among this change is a small (inline) helper routine named
'unix_recvq_full', which consolidates the actual testing code (in three
different places) into a single location.
Signed-off-by: NRainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      3c73419c
  25. 12 6月, 2008 1 次提交
  27. 24 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  29. 19 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  31. 13 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  33. 26 3月, 2008 3 次提交
  35. 06 3月, 2008 1 次提交
  37. 15 2月, 2008 2 次提交
  39. 29 1月, 2008 10 次提交
  41. 29 11月, 2007 1 次提交
    • F
      [UNIX]: EOF on non-blocking SOCK_SEQPACKET · 0a112258
      由 Florian Zumbiehl 提交于 
      I am not absolutely sure whether this actually is a bug (as in: I've got
no clue what the standards say or what other implementations do), but at
least I was pretty surprised when I noticed that a recv() on a
non-blocking unix domain socket of type SOCK_SEQPACKET (which is connection
oriented, after all) where the remote end has closed the connection
returned -1 (EAGAIN) rather than 0 to indicate end of file.

This is a test case:

| #include <sys/types.h>
| #include <unistd.h>
| #include <sys/socket.h>
| #include <sys/un.h>
| #include <fcntl.h>
| #include <string.h>
| #include <stdlib.h>
| 
| int main(){
| 	int sock;
| 	struct sockaddr_un addr;
| 	char buf[4096];
| 	int pfds[2];
| 
| 	pipe(pfds);
| 	sock=socket(PF_UNIX,SOCK_SEQPACKET,0);
| 	addr.sun_family=AF_UNIX;
| 	strcpy(addr.sun_path,"/tmp/foobar_testsock");
| 	bind(sock,(struct sockaddr *)&addr,sizeof(addr));
| 	listen(sock,1);
| 	if(fork()){
| 		close(sock);
| 		sock=socket(PF_UNIX,SOCK_SEQPACKET,0);
| 		connect(sock,(struct sockaddr *)&addr,sizeof(addr));
| 		fcntl(sock,F_SETFL,fcntl(sock,F_GETFL)|O_NONBLOCK);
| 		close(pfds[1]);
| 		read(pfds[0],buf,sizeof(buf));
| 		recv(sock,buf,sizeof(buf),0); // <-- this one
| 	}else accept(sock,NULL,NULL);
| 	exit(0);
| }

If you try it, make sure /tmp/foobar_testsock doesn't exist.

The marked recv() returns -1 (EAGAIN) on 2.6.23.9. Below you find a
patch that fixes that.
Signed-off-by: NFlorian Zumbiehl <florz@florz.de>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      0a112258
  43. 11 11月, 2007 3 次提交