- 19 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mikulas Patocka 提交于
Simple microoptimizations for sparc64 atomic functions: Save one instruction by using a delay slot. Use %g1 instead of %g7, because %g1 is written earlier. Signed-off-by: NMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 12月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
o Renamed files in sparc64 to <name>_64.S when identical to sparc32 files. o iomap.c were equal for sparc32 and sparc64 o adjusted sparc/Makefile now we have only one lib/ Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
The kernel always executes in the TSO memory model now, so none of this stuff is necessary any more. With helpful feedback from Nick Piggin. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 18 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
When the cpu count is high and contention hits an atomic object, the processors can synchronize such that some cpus continually get knocked out and cannot complete the atomic update. So implement an exponential backoff when SMP. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 7月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jörn Engel 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
-
- 28 6月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay slot of a jmpl instruction. UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51 The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions. If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer. We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-