- 20 11月, 2009 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
This adds support for starting slow work with a delay, similar to the functionality we have for workqueues. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Add support for cancellation of queued slow work and delayed slow work items. The cancellation functions will wait for items that are pending or undergoing execution to be discarded by the slow work facility. Attempting to enqueue work that is in the process of being cancelled will result in ECANCELED. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Make the ability for the slow-work facility to take references on a work item optional as not everyone requires this. Even the internal slow-work stubs them out, so those can be got rid of too. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Wait for outstanding slow work items belonging to a module to clear when unregistering that module as a user of the facility. This prevents the put_ref code of a work item from being taken away before it returns. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 24 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
It's unused. It isn't needed -- read or write flag is already passed and sysctl shouldn't care about the rest. It _was_ used in two places at arch/frv for some reason. Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 17 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Peterson 提交于
Round the slow work queue's cull and OOM timeouts to whole second boundary with round_jiffies(). The slow work queue uses a pair of timers to cull idle threads and, after OOM, to delay new thread creation. This patch also extracts the mod_timer() logic for the cull timer into a separate helper function. By rounding non-time-critical timers such as these to whole seconds, they will be batched up to fire at the same time rather than being spread out. This allows the CPU wake up less, which saves power. Signed-off-by: NChris Peterson <cpeterso@cpeterso.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 12 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
slow_work_thread() sleeps on slow_work_thread_wq without WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE, this means that slow_work_enqueue()->__wake_up(nr_exclusive => 1) wakes up all kslowd threads. This is not what we want, so we change slow_work_thread() to use prepare_to_wait_exclusive() instead. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 24 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jonathan Corbet 提交于
Slow-work appears to delete its timer as soon as the first user unregisters, even though other users could be active. At the same time, it never seems to delete slow_work_oom_timer. Arrange for both to happen in the shutdown path. Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 03 4月, 2009 4 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Document the slow work thread pool. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSteve Dickson <steved@redhat.com> Acked-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Acked-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NDaire Byrne <Daire.Byrne@framestore.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Make the slow work pool configurable through /proc/sys/kernel/slow-work. (*) /proc/sys/kernel/slow-work/min-threads The minimum number of threads that should be in the pool as long as it is in use. This may be anywhere between 2 and max-threads. (*) /proc/sys/kernel/slow-work/max-threads The maximum number of threads that should in the pool. This may be anywhere between min-threads and 255 or NR_CPUS * 2, whichever is greater. (*) /proc/sys/kernel/slow-work/vslow-percentage The percentage of active threads in the pool that may be used to execute very slow work items. This may be between 1 and 99. The resultant number is bounded to between 1 and one fewer than the number of active threads. This ensures there is always at least one thread that can process very slow work items, and always at least one thread that won't. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Acked-by: NSteve Dickson <steved@redhat.com> Acked-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Acked-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NDaire Byrne <Daire.Byrne@framestore.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Make the slow-work thread pool actually dynamic in the number of threads it contains. With this patch, it will both create additional threads when it has extra work to do, and cull excess threads that aren't doing anything. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Acked-by: NSteve Dickson <steved@redhat.com> Acked-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Acked-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NDaire Byrne <Daire.Byrne@framestore.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Create a dynamically sized pool of threads for doing very slow work items, such as invoking mkdir() or rmdir() - things that may take a long time and may sleep, holding mutexes/semaphores and hogging a thread, and are thus unsuitable for workqueues. The number of threads is always at least a settable minimum, but more are started when there's more work to do, up to a limit. Because of the nature of the load, it's not suitable for a 1-thread-per-CPU type pool. A system with one CPU may well want several threads. This is used by FS-Cache to do slow caching operations in the background, such as looking up, creating or deleting cache objects. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Acked-by: NSteve Dickson <steved@redhat.com> Acked-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Acked-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NDaire Byrne <Daire.Byrne@framestore.com>
-