- 28 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 dingtianhong 提交于
The bond slave list may change when the monitor is running, the slave list is no longer protected by bond->lock, only protected by rtnl lock(), so we have 3 ways to modify it: 1.add bond_master_upper_dev_link() and bond_upper_dev_unlink() in bond->lock, but it is unsafe to call call_netdevice_notifiers() in write lock. 2.remove unused bond->lock for monitor function, only use the existing rtnl lock(). 3.use rcu_read_lock() to protect it, of course, it will transform bond_for_each_slave to bond_for_each_slave_rcu() and performance is better, but in slow path, it is ignored. so I remove the bond->lock and move the rtnl lock to protect the whole monitor function. Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
commit 991fb3f7 "dev: always advertise rx_flags changes via netlink" introduced rtnl notification from __dev_set_promiscuity(), which can be called in atomic context. Steps to reproduce: ip tuntap add dev tap1 mode tap ifconfig tap1 up tcpdump -nei tap1 & ip tuntap del dev tap1 mode tap [ 271.627994] device tap1 left promiscuous mode [ 271.639897] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:940 [ 271.664491] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 3394, name: ip [ 271.677525] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [ 271.690503] CPU: 0 PID: 3394 Comm: ip Tainted: G W 3.12.0-rc3+ #73 [ 271.703996] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/P8Z77 WS, BIOS 3007 07/26/2012 [ 271.731254] ffffffff81a58506 ffff8807f0d57a58 ffffffff817544e5 ffff88082fa0f428 [ 271.760261] ffff8808071f5f40 ffff8807f0d57a88 ffffffff8108bad1 ffffffff81110ff8 [ 271.790683] 0000000000000010 00000000000000d0 00000000000000d0 ffff8807f0d57af8 [ 271.822332] Call Trace: [ 271.838234] [<ffffffff817544e5>] dump_stack+0x55/0x76 [ 271.854446] [<ffffffff8108bad1>] __might_sleep+0x181/0x240 [ 271.870836] [<ffffffff81110ff8>] ? rcu_irq_exit+0x68/0xb0 [ 271.887076] [<ffffffff811a80be>] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x4e/0x2a0 [ 271.903368] [<ffffffff810b4ddc>] ? vprintk_emit+0x1dc/0x5a0 [ 271.919716] [<ffffffff81614d67>] ? __alloc_skb+0x57/0x2a0 [ 271.936088] [<ffffffff810b4de0>] ? vprintk_emit+0x1e0/0x5a0 [ 271.952504] [<ffffffff81614d67>] __alloc_skb+0x57/0x2a0 [ 271.968902] [<ffffffff8163a0b2>] rtmsg_ifinfo+0x52/0x100 [ 271.985302] [<ffffffff8162ac6d>] __dev_notify_flags+0xad/0xc0 [ 272.001642] [<ffffffff8162ad0c>] __dev_set_promiscuity+0x8c/0x1c0 [ 272.017917] [<ffffffff81731ea5>] ? packet_notifier+0x5/0x380 [ 272.033961] [<ffffffff8162b109>] dev_set_promiscuity+0x29/0x50 [ 272.049855] [<ffffffff8172e937>] packet_dev_mc+0x87/0xc0 [ 272.065494] [<ffffffff81732052>] packet_notifier+0x1b2/0x380 [ 272.080915] [<ffffffff81731ea5>] ? packet_notifier+0x5/0x380 [ 272.096009] [<ffffffff81761c66>] notifier_call_chain+0x66/0x150 [ 272.110803] [<ffffffff8108503e>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10 [ 272.125468] [<ffffffff81085056>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 [ 272.139984] [<ffffffff81620190>] call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x40/0x70 [ 272.154523] [<ffffffff816201d6>] call_netdevice_notifiers+0x16/0x20 [ 272.168552] [<ffffffff816224c5>] rollback_registered_many+0x145/0x240 [ 272.182263] [<ffffffff81622641>] rollback_registered+0x31/0x40 [ 272.195369] [<ffffffff816229c8>] unregister_netdevice_queue+0x58/0x90 [ 272.208230] [<ffffffff81547ca0>] __tun_detach+0x140/0x340 [ 272.220686] [<ffffffff81547ed6>] tun_chr_close+0x36/0x60 Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Acked-by: NNicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 23 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
As Jiri noted, currently we first do all bonding-specific initialization (specifically - bond_select_active_slave(bond)) before we actually attach the slave (so that it becomes visible through bond_for_each_slave() and friends). This might result in bond_select_active_slave() not seeing the first/new slave and, thus, not actually selecting an active slave. Fix this by moving all the bond-related init part after we've actually completely initialized and linked (via bond_master_upper_dev_link()) the new slave. Also, remove the bond_(de/a)ttach_slave(), it's useless to have functions to ++/-- one int. After this we have all the initialization of the new slave *before* linking, and all the stuff that needs to be done on bonding *after* it. It has also a bonus effect - we can remove the locking on the new slave init completely, and only use it for bond_select_active_slave(). Reported-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Acked-by: Ding Tianhong@huawei.com Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 10月, 2013 8 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
It can be called from the module init function, so it cannot be in the exit section. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
no longer needed since bond_option_active_slave_set() can be used instead. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Do a bit of refactoring on the way. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 18 10月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 dingtianhong 提交于
The bond_for_each_slave() will not be protected by read_lock(), only protected by rtnl_lock(), so need to replace read_lock() with rtnl_lock(). Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 dingtianhong 提交于
The commit 278b2083 (bonding: initial RCU conversion) has convert the roundrobin, active-backup, broadcast and xor xmit path to rcu protection, the performance will be better for these mode, so this time, convert xmit path for alb mode. Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 dingtianhong 提交于
The commit 278b2083 (bonding: initial RCU conversion) has convert the roundrobin, active-backup, broadcast and xor xmit path to rcu protection, the performance will be better for these mode, so this time, convert xmit path for 3ad mode. Suggested-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Suggested-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NWang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com> Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently, in TLB mode we change mac addresses only by memcpy-ing the to net_device->dev_addr, without actually setting them via dev_set_mac_address(). This permits us to receive all the traffic always on one mac address. However, in case the interface flips, some drivers might enforce the mac filtering for its FW/HW based on current ->dev_addr, and thus we won't be able to receive traffic on that interface, in case it will be selected as active in TLB mode. Fix it by setting the mac address forcefully on every new active slave that we select in TLB mode. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: Yuval Mintz <yuvalmin@broadcom.com> Reported-by: NYuval Mintz <yuvalmin@broadcom.com> Tested-by: NYuval Mintz <yuvalmin@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 04 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nikolay Aleksandrov 提交于
This patch adds two new hash policy modes which use skb_flow_dissect: 3 - Encapsulated layer 2+3 4 - Encapsulated layer 3+4 There should be a good improvement for tunnel users in those modes. It also changes the old hash functions to: hash ^= (__force u32)flow.dst ^ (__force u32)flow.src; hash ^= (hash >> 16); hash ^= (hash >> 8); Where hash will be initialized either to L2 hash, that is SRCMAC[5] XOR DSTMAC[5], or to flow->ports which should be extracted from the upper layer. Flow's dst and src are also extracted based on the xmit policy either directly from the buffer or by using skb_flow_dissect, but in both cases if the protocol is IPv6 then dst and src are obtained by ipv6_addr_hash() on the real addresses. In case of a non-dissectable packet, the algorithms fall back to L2 hashing. The bond_set_mode_ops() function is now obsolete and thus deleted because it was used only to set the proper hash policy. Also we trim a pointer from struct bonding because we no longer need to keep the hash function, now there's only a single hash function - bond_xmit_hash that works based on bond->params.xmit_policy. The hash function and skb_flow_dissect were suggested by Eric Dumazet. The layer names were suggested by Andy Gospodarek, because I suck at semantics. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Acked-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 10月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently we rely on rtnl locking in bond_set_rx_mode(), however it's not always the case: RTNL: assertion failed at drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c (3391) ... [<ffffffff81651ca5>] dump_stack+0x54/0x74 [<ffffffffa029e717>] bond_set_rx_mode+0xc7/0xd0 [bonding] [<ffffffff81553af7>] __dev_set_rx_mode+0x57/0xa0 [<ffffffff81557ff8>] __dev_mc_add+0x58/0x70 [<ffffffff81558020>] dev_mc_add+0x10/0x20 [<ffffffff8161e26e>] igmp6_group_added+0x18e/0x1d0 [<ffffffff81186f76>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x236/0x260 [<ffffffff8161f80f>] ipv6_dev_mc_inc+0x29f/0x320 [<ffffffff8161f9e7>] ipv6_sock_mc_join+0x157/0x260 ... Fix this by using RCU primitives. Reported-by: NJoe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com> Tested-by: NJoe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com> CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Neil Horman 提交于
Recently grabbed this report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005567 Of an issue in which the bonding driver, with an attached vlan encountered the following errors when bond0 was taken down and back up: dummy1: promiscuity touches roof, set promiscuity failed. promiscuity feature of device might be broken. The error occurs because, during __bond_release_one, if we release our last slave, we take on a random mac address and issue a NETDEV_CHANGEADDR notification. With an attached vlan, the vlan may see that the vlan and bond mac address were in sync, but no longer are. This triggers a call to dev_uc_add and dev_set_rx_mode, which enables IFF_PROMISC on the bond device. Then, when we complete __bond_release_one, we use the current state of the bond flags to determine if we should decrement the promiscuity of the releasing slave. But since the bond changed promiscuity state during the release operation, we incorrectly decrement the slave promisc count when it wasn't in promiscuous mode to begin with, causing the above error Fix is pretty simple, just cache the bonding flags at the start of the function and use those when determining the need to set promiscuity. This is also needed for the ALLMULTI flag CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: Mark Wu <wudxw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Reported-by: NMark Wu <wudxw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
It's a forgotten function declaration, which was removed some time ago already. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 9月, 2013 11 次提交
-
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
There are no users left, so it's safe to remove. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
We don't need the circular loop there and it's the only current user of bond_next_slave() - so just use the standard bond_for_each_slave(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
It has no users, so it's safe to remove it completely. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Convert all instances of for (agg = __get_first_agg(); agg; agg = __get_next_port) to the standard bond_for_each_slave(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Convert all instances of for (agg = __get_first_agg(); agg; agg = __get_next_port) to the standard bond_for_each_slave(). Also, remove the useless checks before calling bond_3ad_set_carrier() - if we have something NULL - it would fire long ago, in __get_first/next_port(), per example. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently we're relying on suboptimal construct for (; aggregator; aggregator = __get_next_agg(aggregator)) { where aggregator is an argument of __get_active_agg() which is _always_ the first slave's aggregator - judging by all the callers, comments in the ad_agg_selection_logic() and by logic. Convert it to use the standard bond_for_each_slave(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently, ad_port_selection_logic() uses for (aggregator = __get_first_agg(port); aggregator; aggregator = __get_next_agg(aggregator)) { construct, however it's suboptimal, difficult to read and understand. Change it to a standard bond_for_each_slave(), so that we won't need __get_first/next_agg() and have it more readable. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently we have only one user of it, so it's kind of useless and just obfusicates things. Remove it and move the logic to the only user - bond_3ad_state_machine_handler(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently this function is only used in constructs like for (port = __get_first_port(bond); port; port = __get_next_port(port)) which is basicly the same as bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) { port = &(SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).port); but a more time consuming. Remove the function and convert the users to bond_for_each_slave(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
After commit 1f718f0f ("bonding: populate neighbour's private on enslave"), we've moved the unlinking of the slave to the earliest position possible - so that nobody will see an half-uninited slave. However, bond_3ad_unbind_slave() relied that, even while removing the last slave, it is still accessible - via __get_first_agg() (and, eventually, bond_first_slave()). Fix that by verifying if the aggregator return is an actual aggregator, but not NULL. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
After commit 1f718f0f ("bonding: populate neighbour's private on enslave"), we've moved the actual 'linking' in the end of the function - so that, once linked, the slave is ready to be used, and is not still in the process of enslaving. However, 802.3ad verified if it's the first slave by looking at the if (bond_first_slave(bond) == new_slave) which, because we've moved the linking to the end, became broken - on the first slave bond_first_slave(bond) returns NULL. Fix this by verifying if the prev_slave, that equals bond_last_slave(), is actually populated - if it is - then it's not the first slave, and vice versa. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 27 9月, 2013 10 次提交
-
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Also, remove the same functionality from bonding - it will be already done for any device that links to its lower/upper neighbour. The links will be created for dev's kobject, and will look like lower_eth0 for lower device eth0 and upper_bridge0 for upper device bridge0. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently, we can have only one master upper neighbour, so it would be useful to create a symlink to it in the sysfs device directory, the way that bonding now does it, for every device. Lower devices from bridge/team/etc will automagically get it, so we could rely on it. Also, remove the same functionality from bonding. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
And all the initialization. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Use the new function __bond_next_slave(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Add a new function, __bond_next_slave(), which uses neighbours to find the next slave after the slave provided. It will be further used to gradually go start using neighbour netdev_adjacent infrastructure instead of bonding's own lists. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
We don't really need it, and it's really hard to RCUify the list->prev. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
For that, use netdev_adjacent_get_private(list_head) on bond's lower neighbour list members. Also, add a small macro - bond_slave_list(bond), which returns the bond list via neighbour list. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
The same way as it was used for its own slave_list. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently we verify if we have slaves by checking if bond->slave_list is empty. Create a define bond_has_slaves() and use it, a bit more readable and easier to change in the future. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
It has no users, so we can remove it. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-