- 01 3月, 2010 40 次提交
-
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Assume that if the guest executes clts, it knows what it's doing, and load the guest fpu to prevent an #NM exception. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Not used anymore. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
This allows accessing the guest fpu from the instruction emulator, as well as being symmetric with kvm_put_guest_fpu(). Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Gleb Natapov 提交于
Move to/from Control Registers chapter of Intel SDM says. "Reserved bits in CR0 remain clear after any load of those registers; attempts to set them have no impact". Control Register chapter says "Bits 63:32 of CR0 are reserved and must be written with zeros. Writing a nonzero value to any of the upper 32 bits results in a general-protection exception, #GP(0)." This patch tries to implement this twisted logic. Signed-off-by: NGleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Reported-by: NLorenzo Martignoni <martignlo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Sheng Yang 提交于
The commit 0953ca73 "KVM: Simplify coalesced mmio initialization" allocate kvm_coalesced_mmio_ring in the kvm_coalesced_mmio_init(), but didn't discard the original allocation... Signed-off-by: NSheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Jan Kiszka 提交于
To enable proper debug register emulation under all conditions, trap access to all DR0..7. This may be optimized later on. Signed-off-by: NJan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Jan Kiszka 提交于
Enhance mov dr instruction emulation used by SVM so that it properly handles dr4/5: alias to dr6/7 if cr4.de is cleared. Otherwise return EMULATE_FAIL which will let our only possible caller in that scenario, ud_interception, re-inject UD. We do not need to inject faults, SVM does this for us (exceptions take precedence over instruction interceptions). For the same reason, the value overflow checks can be removed. Signed-off-by: NJan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Jan Kiszka 提交于
As we trap all debug register accesses, we do not need to switch real DR6 at all. Clean up update_exception_bitmap at this chance, too. Signed-off-by: NJan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Jan Kiszka 提交于
Make sure DR4 and DR5 are aliased to DR6 and DR7, respectively, if CR4.DE is not set. Signed-off-by: NJan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Jan Kiszka 提交于
Injecting GP without an error code is a bad idea (causes unhandled guest exits). Moreover, we must not skip the instruction if we injected an exception. Signed-off-by: NJan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Takuya Yoshikawa 提交于
The return values from x86_emulate_ops are defined in kvm_emulate.h as macros X86EMUL_*. But in emulate.c, we are comparing the return values from these ops with 0 to check if they're X86EMUL_CONTINUE or not: X86EMUL_CONTINUE is defined as 0 now. To avoid possible mistakes in the future, this patch substitutes "X86EMUL_CONTINUE" for "0" that are being compared with the return values from x86_emulate_ops. We think that there are more places we should use these macros, but the meanings of rc values in x86_emulate_insn() were not so clear at a glance. If we use proper macros in this function, we would be able to follow the flow of each emulation more easily and, maybe, more securely. Signed-off-by: NTakuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Marcelo Tosatti 提交于
cleanup_srcu_struct on VM destruction remains broken: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffffffffff IP: [<ffffffff802533d2>] srcu_read_lock+0x16/0x21 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff802533d2>] [<ffffffff802533d2>] srcu_read_lock+0x16/0x21 Call Trace: [<ffffffffa05354c4>] kvm_arch_vcpu_uninit+0x1b/0x48 [kvm] [<ffffffffa05339c6>] kvm_vcpu_uninit+0x9/0x15 [kvm] [<ffffffffa0569f7d>] vmx_free_vcpu+0x7f/0x8f [kvm_intel] [<ffffffffa05357b5>] kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x78/0x111 [kvm] [<ffffffffa053315b>] kvm_put_kvm+0xd4/0xfe [kvm] Move it to kvm_arch_destroy_vm. Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Reported-by: NJan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
-
由 Gleb Natapov 提交于
Fix compilation warnings and wrong mask value. Signed-off-by: NGleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Sheng Yang 提交于
As Avi noted: >There are two problems with the kernel failure report. First, it >doesn't report enough data - registers, surrounding instructions, etc. >that are needed to explain what is going on. Second, it can flood >dmesg, which is a pretty bad thing to do. So we remove the emulation failure report in handle_invalid_guest_state(), and would inspected the guest using userspace tool in the future. Signed-off-by: NSheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Needed by <asm/kvm_para.h>. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Takuya Yoshikawa 提交于
There are two spellings of "writable" in arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c and paging_tmpl.h . This patch renames is_writeble_pte() to is_writable_pte() and makes grepping easy. New name is consistent with the definition of itself: return pte & PT_WRITABLE_MASK; Signed-off-by: NTakuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Gleb Natapov 提交于
Windows issues this hypercall after guest was spinning on a spinlock for too many iterations. Signed-off-by: NGleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NVadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Gleb Natapov 提交于
Implement HYPER-V apic MSRs. Spec defines three MSRs that speed-up access to EOI/TPR/ICR apic registers for PV guests. Signed-off-by: NGleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NVadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Gleb Natapov 提交于
Minimum HYPER-V implementation should have GUEST_OS_ID, HYPERCALL and VP_INDEX MSRs. [avi: fix build on i386] Signed-off-by: NGleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NVadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Gleb Natapov 提交于
Provide HYPER-V related defines that will be used by following patches. Signed-off-by: NGleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NVadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
We keep a copy of the MSR around that we use when we go into the guest context. That copy is basically the normal process MSR flags OR some allowed guest specified MSR flags. We also AND the external providers into this, so we get traps on FPU usage when we haven't activated it on the host yet. Currently this calculation is part of the set_msr function that we use whenever we set the guest MSR value. With the external providers, we also have the case that we don't modify the guest's MSR, but only want to update the shadow MSR. So let's move the shadow MSR parts to a separate function that we then use whenever we only need to update it. That way we don't accidently kvm_vcpu_block within a preempt notifier context. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
SRR1 stores more information that just the MSR value. It also stores valuable information about the type of interrupt we received, for example whether the storage interrupt we just got was because of a missing htab entry or not. We use that information to speed up the exit path. Now if we get preempted before we can interpret the shadow_msr values, we get into vcpu_put which then calls the MSR handler, which then sets all the SRR1 information bits in shadow_msr to 0. Great. So let's preserve the SRR1 specific bits in shadow_msr whenever we set the MSR. They don't hurt. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
Commit 7d01b4c3ed2bb33ceaf2d270cb4831a67a76b51b introduced PACA backed vcpu values. With this patch, when a userspace app was setting GPRs before it was actually first loaded, the set values get discarded. This is because vcpu_load loads them from the vcpu backing store that we use whenever we're not owning the PACA. That behavior is not really a major problem, because we don't need it for qemu. Other users (like kvmctl) do have problems with it though, so let's better do it right. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
When our guest starts using either the FPU, Altivec or VSX we need to make sure Linux knows about it and sneak into its process switching code accordingly. This patch makes accesses to the above parts of the system work inside the VM. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
Linux contains quite some bits of code to load FPU, Altivec and VSX lazily for a task. It calls those bits in real mode, coming from an interrupt handler. For KVM we better reuse those, so let's wrap a bit of trampoline magic around them and then we can call them from normal module code. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
We need to explicitly only giveup VSX in KVM, so let's export that specific function to module space. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Roel Kluin 提交于
kvm_get_exit_data() cannot return a NULL pointer. Signed-off-by: NRoel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Now that we can allow the guest to play with cr0 when the fpu is loaded, we can enable lazy fpu when npt is in use. Acked-by: NJoerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
If two conditions apply: - no bits outside TS and EM differ between the host and guest cr0 - the fpu is active then we can activate the selective cr0 write intercept and drop the unconditional cr0 read and write intercept, and allow the guest to run with the host fpu state. This reduces cr0 exits due to guest fpu management while the guest fpu is loaded. Acked-by: NJoerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Currently we don't intercept cr0 at all when npt is enabled. This improves performance but requires us to activate the fpu at all times. Remove this behaviour in preparation for adding selective cr0 intercepts. Acked-by: NJoerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
init_vmcb() sets up the intercepts as if the fpu is active, so initialize it there. This avoids an INIT from setting up intercepts inconsistent with fpu_active. Acked-by: NJoerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Instead of selecting TS and MP as the comments say, the macro included TS and PE. Luckily the macro is unused now, but fix in order to save a few hours of debugging from anyone who attempts to use it. Acked-by: NJoerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Follow the hardware. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
If the guest fpu is loaded, there is nothing interesing about cr0.ts; let the guest play with it as it will. This makes context switches between fpu intensive guest processes faster, as we won't trap the clts and cr0 write instructions. [marcelo: fix cr0 read shadow update on fpu deactivation; kills F8 install] Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Defer fpu deactivation as much as possible - if the guest fpu is loaded, keep it loaded until the next heavyweight exit (where we are forced to unload it). This reduces unnecessary exits. We also defer fpu activation on clts; while clts signals the intent to use the fpu, we can't be sure the guest will actually use it. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
We will use this later to give the guest ownership of cr0.ts. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Since we'd like to allow the guest to own a few bits of cr0 at times, we need to know when we access those bits. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
clts writes cr0.ts; lmsw writes cr0[0:15] - record that in ftrace. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
An SLB entry contains two pieces of information related to size: 1) PTE size 2) SLB size The L bit defines the PTE be "large" (usually means 16MB), SLB_VSID_B_1T defines that the SLB should span 1 GB instead of the default 256MB. Apparently I messed things up and just put those two in one box, shaked it heavily and came up with the current code which handles large pages incorrectly, because it also treats large page SLB entries as "1TB" segment entries. This patch splits those two features apart, making Linux guests boot even when they have > 256MB. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
When we get a program interrupt in guest kernel mode, we try to emulate the instruction. If that doesn't fail, we report to the user and try again - at the exact same instruction pointer. So if the guest kernel really does trigger an invalid instruction, we loop forever. So let's better go and forward program exceptions to the guest when we don't know the instruction we're supposed to emulate. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-