- 05 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sangtae Ha 提交于
We have updated CUBIC to fix some issues with slow increase in large BDP networks. We also improved its convergence speed. The fix is in fact very simple -- the window increase limit of smax during the window probing phase (i.e., convex growth phase) is removed. We found that this does not affect TCP friendliness, but only improves its scalability. We have run some tests in our lab and also over the Internet path from NCSU to Japan. These results can be seen from the following page: http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/wiki/index.php/Intra_protocol_fairness_testing_with_linux-2.6.23.9 http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/wiki/index.php/RTT_fairness_testing_with_linux-2.6.23.9 http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/wiki/index.php/TCP_friendliness_testing_with_linux-2.6.23.9Signed-off-by: NSangtae Ha <sha2@ncsu.edu> Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 1月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
There is no need for such check in pkts_acked because the callback is not invoked unless at least one segment got fully ACKed (i.e., the snd_una moved past skb's end_seq) by the cumulative ACK's snd_una advancement. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 31 7月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Remove use of received timestamp option value from RTT calculation in Cubic. A hostile receiver may be returning a larger timestamp option than the original value. This would cause the sender to believe the malevolent receiver had a larger RTT and because Cubic tries to provide some RTT friendliness, the sender would then favor the liar. Instead, use the jiffie resolutionRTT value already computed and passed back after ack. Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
This patch changes the API for the callback that is done after an ACK is received. It solves a couple of issues: * Some congestion controls want higher resolution value of RTT (controlled by TCP_CONG_RTT_SAMPLE flag). These don't really want a ktime, but all compute a RTT in microseconds. * Other congestion control could use RTT at jiffies resolution. To keep API consistent the units should be the same for both cases, just the resolution should change. Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 18 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
None of the existing TCP congestion controls use the rtt value pased in the ca_ops->cong_avoid interface. Which is lucky because seq_rtt could have been -1 when handling a duplicate ack. Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 13 6月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Because of the current default of 100, Cubic and BIC perform very poorly compared to standard Reno. In the worst case, this change makes Cubic and BIC as aggressive as Reno. So this change should be very safe. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 4月, 2007 5 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Do some simple changes to make congestion control API faster/cleaner. * use ktime_t rather than timeval * merge rtt sampling into existing ack callback this means one indirect call versus two per ack. * use flags bits to store options/settings Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
The following update received from Injong updates TCP cubic to the latest version. I am running more complete tests and will have results after 4/1. According to Injong: the new version improves on its scalability, fairness and stability. So in all properties, we confirmed it shows better performance. NCSU results (for 2.6.18 and 2.6.20) available: http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/wiki/index.php/TCP_Testing This version is described in a new Internet draft for CUBIC. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rhee-tcp-cubic-00.txtSigned-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Use willy's work in optimizing cube root by having table for small values. Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
The Newton-Raphson method is quadratically convergent so only a small fixed number of steps are necessary. Therefore it is faster to unroll the loop. Since div64_64 is no longer inline it won't cause code explosion. Also fixes a bug that can occur if x^2 was bigger than 32 bits. Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Here is the current version of the 64 bit divide common code. Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 13 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
These module parameters should be in the read mostly area to avoid cache pollution. Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki 提交于
Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 10月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Doug Leith observed a discrepancy between the version of CUBIC described in the papers and the version in 2.6.18. A math error related to scaling causes Cubic to grow too slowly. Patch is from "Sangtae Ha" <sha2@ncsu.edu>. I validated that it does fix the problems. See the following to show behavior over 500ms 100 Mbit link. Sender (2.6.19-rc3) --- Bridge (2.6.18-rt7) ------- Receiver (2.6.19-rc3) 1G [netem] 100M http://developer.osdl.org/shemminger/tcp/2.6.19-rc3/cubic-orig.png http://developer.osdl.org/shemminger/tcp/2.6.19-rc3/cubic-fix.pngSigned-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 23 9月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 7月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jörn Engel 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
-
- 18 6月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Many of the TCP congestion methods all just use ssthresh as the minimum congestion window on decrease. Rather than duplicating the code, just have that be the default if that handle in the ops structure is not set. Minor behaviour change to TCP compound. It probably wants to use this (ssthresh) as lower bound, rather than ssthresh/2 because the latter causes undershoot on loss. Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 04 1月, 2006 3 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Replace cube root algorithim with a faster version using Newton-Raphson. Surprisingly, doing the scaled div64_64 is faster than a true 64 bit division on 64 bit CPU's. Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Revised version of patch to pre-compute values for TCP cubic. * d32,d64 replaced with descriptive names * cube_factor replaces srtt[scaled by count] / HZ * ((1 << (10+2*BICTCP_HZ)) / bic_scale) * beta_scale replaces 8*(BICTCP_BETA_SCALE+beta)/3/(BICTCP_BETA_SCALE-beta); Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Replace existing BIC version 1.1 with new version 2.0. The main change is to replace the window growth function with a cubic function as described in: http://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/rhee/export/bitcp/cubic-paper.pdfSigned-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-