Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 21 12月, 2016 3 次提交
    • L
      ACPI / osl: Remove acpi_get_table_with_size()/early_acpi_os_unmap_memory() users · 6b11d1d6
      由 Lv Zheng 提交于 
      This patch removes the users of the deprectated APIs:
 acpi_get_table_with_size()
 early_acpi_os_unmap_memory()
The following APIs should be used instead of:
 acpi_get_table()
 acpi_put_table()

The deprecated APIs are invented to be a replacement of acpi_get_table()
during the early stage so that the early mapped pointer will not be stored
in ACPICA core and thus the late stage acpi_get_table() won't return a
wrong pointer. The mapping size is returned just because it is required by
early_acpi_os_unmap_memory() to unmap the pointer during early stage.

But as the mapping size equals to the acpi_table_header.length
(see acpi_tb_init_table_descriptor() and acpi_tb_validate_table()), when
such a convenient result is returned, driver code will start to use it
instead of accessing acpi_table_header to obtain the length.

Thus this patch cleans up the drivers by replacing returned table size with
acpi_table_header.length, and should be a no-op.
Reported-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      6b11d1d6
    • L
      ACPICA: Tables: Allow FADT to be customized with virtual address · 66360faa
      由 Lv Zheng 提交于 
      ACPICA commit d98de9ca14891130efc5dcdc871b97eb27b4b0f5

FADT parsing code requires FADT to be installed as
ACPI_TABLE_ORIGIN_INTERNAL_PHYSICAL, using new
acpi_tb_get_table()/acpi_tb_put_table(), other address types can also be allowed,
thus facilitates FADT customization with virtual address. Lv Zheng.

Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/d98de9caSigned-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      66360faa
    • L
      ACPICA: Tables: Back port acpi_get_table_with_size() and... · 174cc718
      由 Lv Zheng 提交于 
      ACPICA: Tables: Back port acpi_get_table_with_size() and early_acpi_os_unmap_memory() from Linux kernel

ACPICA commit cac6790954d4d752a083e6122220b8a22febcd07

This patch back ports Linux acpi_get_table_with_size() and
early_acpi_os_unmap_memory() into ACPICA upstream to reduce divergences.

The 2 APIs are used by Linux as table management APIs for long time, it
contains a hidden logic that during the early stage, the mapped tables
should be unmapped before the early stage ends.

During the early stage, tables are handled by the following sequence:
 acpi_get_table_with_size();
 parse the table
 early_acpi_os_unmap_memory();
During the late stage, tables are handled by the following sequence:
 acpi_get_table();
 parse the table
Linux uses acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap to distinguish the early stage and the
late stage.

The reasoning of introducing acpi_get_table_with_size() is: ACPICA will
remember the early mapped pointer in acpi_get_table() and Linux isn't able to
prevent ACPICA from using the wrong early mapped pointer during the late
stage as there is no API provided from ACPICA to be an inverse of
acpi_get_table() to forget the early mapped pointer.

But how ACPICA can work with the early/late stage requirement? Inside of
ACPICA, tables are ensured to be remained in "INSTALLED" state during the
early stage, and they are carefully not transitioned to "VALIDATED" state
until the late stage. So the same logic is in fact implemented inside of
ACPICA in a different way. The gap is only that the feature is not provided
to the OSPMs in an accessible external API style.

It then is possible to fix the gap by providing an inverse of
acpi_get_table() from ACPICA, so that the two Linux sequences can be
combined:
 acpi_get_table();
 parse the table
 acpi_put_table();
In order to work easier with the current Linux code, acpi_get_table() and
acpi_put_table() is implemented in a usage counting based style:
 1. When the usage count of the table is increased from 0 to 1, table is
    mapped and .Pointer is set with the mapping address (VALIDATED);
 2. When the usage count of the table is decreased from 1 to 0, .Pointer
    is unset and the mapping address is unmapped (INVALIDATED).
So that we can deploy the new APIs to Linux with minimal effort by just
invoking acpi_get_table() in acpi_get_table_with_size() and invoking
acpi_put_table() in early_acpi_os_unmap_memory(). Lv Zheng.

Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/cac67909Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      174cc718
  3. 09 12月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 01 12月, 2016 6 次提交
  7. 15 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 10 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 29 10月, 2016 3 次提交
  13. 24 10月, 2016 4 次提交
  15. 21 10月, 2016 4 次提交
  17. 13 10月, 2016 2 次提交
  19. 12 10月, 2016 1 次提交
    • M
      ACPI / property: Allow holes in reference properties · b60e4ea4
      由 Mika Westerberg 提交于 
      DT allows holes or empty phandles for references. This is used for example
in SPI subsystem where some chip selects are native and others are regular
GPIOs. In ACPI _DSD we currently do not support this but instead the
preceding reference consumes all following integer arguments.

For example we would like to support something like the below ASL fragment
for SPI:

  Package () {
      "cs-gpios",
      Package () {
          ^GPIO, 19, 0, 0, // GPIO CS0
          0,               // Native CS
          ^GPIO, 20, 0, 0, // GPIO CS1
      }
  }

The zero in the middle means "no entry" or NULL reference. To support this
we change acpi_data_get_property_reference() to take firmware node and
num_args as argument and rename it to __acpi_node_get_property_reference().
The function returns -ENOENT if the given index resolves to "no entry"
reference and -ENODATA when there are no more entries in the property.

We then add static inline wrapper acpi_node_get_property_reference() that
passes MAX_ACPI_REFERENCE_ARGS as num_args to support the existing
behaviour which some drivers have been relying on.
Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      b60e4ea4
  21. 10 10月, 2016 2 次提交
  23. 08 10月, 2016 1 次提交
  25. 01 10月, 2016 2 次提交
  27. 28 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  29. 27 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  31. 26 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  33. 24 9月, 2016 4 次提交
  35. 22 9月, 2016 2 次提交
    • D
      acpi: Validate processor id when mapping the processor · fd74da21
      由 Dou Liyang 提交于 
      When we want to identify whether the proc_id is unreasonable or not, we
can call the "acpi_processor_validate_proc_id" function. It will search
in the duplicate IDs. If we find the proc_id in the IDs, we return true
to the call function. Conversely, the false represents available.

When we establish all possible cpuid <-> nodeid mapping to handle the
cpu hotplugs, we will use the proc_id from ACPI table.

We do validation when we get the proc_id. If the result is true, we
will stop the mapping.

[ tglx: Mark the new function __init ]
Signed-off-by: NDou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: mika.j.penttila@gmail.com
Cc: len.brown@intel.com
Cc: rafael@kernel.org
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: yasu.isimatu@gmail.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: gongzhaogang@inspur.com
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: cl@linux.com
Cc: chen.tang@easystack.cn
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: lenb@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472114120-3281-8-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      fd74da21
    • D
      acpi: Provide mechanism to validate processors in the ACPI tables · 8e089eaa
      由 Dou Liyang 提交于 
      [Problem]

When we set cpuid <-> nodeid mapping to be persistent, it will use the DSDT
As we know, the ACPI tables are just like user's input in that respect, and
we don't crash if user's input is unreasonable.

Such as, the mapping of the proc_id and pxm in some machine's ACPI table is
like this:

proc_id   |    pxm
--------------------
0       <->     0
1       <->     0
2       <->     1
3       <->     1
89      <->     0
89      <->     0
89      <->     0
89      <->     1
89      <->     1
89      <->     2
89      <->     3
.....

We can't be sure which one is correct to the proc_id 89. We may map a wrong
node to a cpu. When pages are allocated, this may cause a kernal panic.

So, we should provide mechanisms to validate the ACPI tables, just like we
do validation to check user's input in web project.

The mechanism is that the processor objects which have the duplicate IDs
are not valid.

[Solution]

We add a validation function, like this:

foreach Processor in DSDT
	proc_id = get_ACPI_Processor_number(Processor)
	if (proc_id exists )
		mark both of them as being unreasonable;

The function will record the unique or duplicate processor IDs.

The duplicate processor IDs such as 89 are regarded as the unreasonable IDs
which mean that the processor objects in question are not valid.

[ tglx: Add __init[data] annotations ]
Signed-off-by: NDou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: mika.j.penttila@gmail.com
Cc: len.brown@intel.com
Cc: rafael@kernel.org
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: yasu.isimatu@gmail.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: gongzhaogang@inspur.com
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: cl@linux.com
Cc: chen.tang@easystack.cn
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: lenb@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472114120-3281-7-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      8e089eaa