- 25 7月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
The GT functions for enabling register access also need to occasionally write to and read from registers. To avoid the potential recursion as we modify the public interface to be stricter, introduce a private register access API for the GT functions. v2: Rebase v3: Rebase onto uncore v4: Use raw interfaces consistently so that we only use the low-level readN functions from a single location. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Currently, the register access code is split between i915_drv.c and intel_pm.c. It only bares a superficial resemblance to the reset of the powermanagement code, so move it all into its own file. This is to ease further patches to enforce serialised register access. v2: Scan for random abuse of I915_WRITE_NOTRACE v3: Take the opportunity to rename the GT functions as uncore. Uncore is the term used by the hardware design (and bspec) for all functions outside of the GPU (and CPU) cores in what is also known as the System Agent. v4: Rebase onto SNB rc6 fixes Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> [danvet: Wrestle patch into applying and inline intel_uncore_early_sanitize (plus move the old comment to the new function). Also keep the _santize postfix for intel_uncore_sanitize.] [danvet: Squash in fixup spotted by Chris on irc: We need to call intel_pm_init before intel_uncore_sanitize since the later will call cancel_work on the delayed rps setup work the former initializes.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-