1. 13 10月, 2007 2 次提交
    • G
      PCI: use _CRS for PCI resource allocation · 62f420f8
      Gary Hade 提交于
      Use _CRS for PCI resource allocation
      
      This patch resolves an issue where incorrect PCI memory and i/o ranges
      are being assigned to hotplugged PCI devices on some IBM systems.  The
      resource mis-allocation not only makes the PCI device unuseable but
      often makes the entire system unuseable due to resulting machine checks.
      
      The hotplug capable PCI slots on the affected systems are not located
      under a standard P2P bridge but are instead located under PCI root
      bridges or subtractive decode P2P bridges.  For example, the IBM x3850
      contains 2 hotplug capable PCI-X slots and 4 hotplug capable PCIe slots
      with the PCI-X slots each located under a PCI root bridge and the PCIe
      slots each located under a subtractive decode P2P bridge.
      
      The current i386/x86_64 PCI resource allocation code does not use _CRS
      returned resource information.  No other resource information source is
      available for slots that are not below a standard P2P bridge so
      incorrect ranges are being allocated from e820 hole causing the bad
      result.
      
      This patch causes the kernel to use _CRS returned resource info.  It is
      roughly based on a change provided by Matthew Wilcox for the ia64 kernel
      in 2005.  Due to possible buggy BIOS factor and possible yet to be
      discovered kernel issues the function is disabled by default and can be
      enabled with pci=use_crs.
      Signed-off-by: NGary Hade <gary.hade@us.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      62f420f8
    • G
      PCI: skip ISA ioresource alignment on some systems · 036fff4c
      Gary Hade 提交于
      Skip ISA ioresource alignment on some systems
      
      To conserve limited PCI i/o resource on some IBM multi-node systems, the
      BIOS allocates (via _CRS) and expects the kernel to use addresses in
      ranges currently excluded by pcibios_align_resource() [i386/pci/i386.c].
      This change allows the kernel to use the currently excluded address
      ranges on the IBM x3800, x3850, and x3950.
      Signed-off-by: NGary Hade <gary.hade@us.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      036fff4c
  2. 11 10月, 2007 1 次提交
  3. 12 8月, 2007 1 次提交
  4. 13 2月, 2007 3 次提交
  5. 03 11月, 2006 1 次提交
  6. 19 10月, 2006 1 次提交
    • M
      PCI: optionally sort device lists breadth-first · 6b4b78fe
      Matt Domsch 提交于
      Problem:
      New Dell PowerEdge servers have 2 embedded ethernet ports, which are
      labeled NIC1 and NIC2 on the chassis, in the BIOS setup screens, and
      in the printed documentation.  Assuming no other add-in ethernet ports
      in the system, Linux 2.4 kernels name these eth0 and eth1
      respectively.  Many people have come to expect this naming.  Linux 2.6
      kernels name these eth1 and eth0 respectively (backwards from
      expectations).  I also have reports that various Sun and HP servers
      have similar behavior.
      
      
      Root cause:
      Linux 2.4 kernels walk the pci_devices list, which happens to be
      sorted in breadth-first order (or pcbios_find_device order on i386,
      which most often is breadth-first also).  2.6 kernels have both the
      pci_devices list and the pci_bus_type.klist_devices list, the latter
      is what is walked at driver load time to match the pci_id tables; this
      klist happens to be in depth-first order.
      
      On systems where, for physical routing reasons, NIC1 appears on a
      lower bus number than NIC2, but NIC2's bridge is discovered first in
      the depth-first ordering, NIC2 will be discovered before NIC1.  If the
      list were sorted breadth-first, NIC1 would be discovered before NIC2.
      
      A PowerEdge 1955 system has the following topology which easily
      exhibits the difference between depth-first and breadth-first device
      lists.
      
      -[0000:00]-+-00.0  Intel Corporation 5000P Chipset Memory Controller Hub
                 +-02.0-[0000:03-08]--+-00.0-[0000:04-07]--+-00.0-[0000:05-06]----00.0-[0000:06]----00.0  Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5708S Gigabit Ethernet (labeled NIC2, 2.4 kernel name eth1, 2.6 kernel name eth0)
                 +-1c.0-[0000:01-02]----00.0-[0000:02]----00.0  Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5708S Gigabit Ethernet (labeled NIC1, 2.4 kernel name eth0, 2.6 kernel name eth1)
      
      
      Other factors, such as device driver load order and the presence of
      PCI slots at various points in the bus hierarchy further complicate
      this problem; I'm not trying to solve those here, just restore the
      device order, and thus basic behavior, that 2.4 kernels had.
      
      
      Solution:
      
      The solution can come in multiple steps.
      
      Suggested fix #1: kernel
      Patch below optionally sorts the two device lists into breadth-first
      ordering to maintain compatibility with 2.4 kernels.  It adds two new
      command line options:
        pci=bfsort
        pci=nobfsort
      to force the sort order, or not, as you wish.  It also adds DMI checks
      for the specific Dell systems which exhibit "backwards" ordering, to
      make them "right".
      
      
      Suggested fix #2: udev rules from userland
      Many people also have the expectation that embedded NICs are always
      discovered before add-in NICs (which this patch does not try to do).
      Using the PCI IRQ Routing Table provided by system BIOS, it's easy to
      determine which PCI devices are embedded, or if add-in, which PCI slot
      they're in.  I'm working on a tool that would allow udev to name
      ethernet devices in ascending embedded, slot 1 .. slot N order,
      subsort by PCI bus/dev/fn breadth-first.  It'll be possible to use it
      independent of udev as well for those distributions that don't use
      udev in their installers.
      
      Suggested fix #3: system board routing rules
      One can constrain the system board layout to put NIC1 ahead of NIC2
      regardless of breadth-first or depth-first discovery order.  This adds
      a significant level of complexity to board routing, and may not be
      possible in all instances (witness the above systems from several
      major manufacturers).  I don't want to encourage this particular train
      of thought too far, at the expense of not doing #1 or #2 above.
      
      
      Feedback appreciated.  Patch tested on a Dell PowerEdge 1955 blade
      with 2.6.18.
      
      You'll also note I took some liberty and temporarily break the klist
      abstraction to simplify and speed up the sort algorithm.  I think
      that's both safe and appropriate in this instance.
      Signed-off-by: NMatt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      
      6b4b78fe
  7. 26 9月, 2006 2 次提交
  8. 19 9月, 2006 1 次提交
    • L
      Revert mmiocfg heuristics and blacklist changes · 79e453d4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      This reverts commits 11012d41 and
      40dd2d20, which allowed us to use the
      MMIO accesses for PCI config cycles even without the area being marked
      reserved in the e820 memory tables.
      
      Those changes were needed for EFI-environment Intel macs, but broke some
      newer Intel 965 boards, so for now it's better to revert to our old
      2.6.17 behaviour and at least avoid introducing any new breakage.
      
      Andi Kleen has a set of patches that work with both EFI and the broken
      Intel 965 boards, which will be applied once they get wider testing.
      
      Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
      Cc: Edgar Hucek <hostmaster@ed-soft.at>
      Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      79e453d4
  9. 31 8月, 2006 1 次提交
  10. 13 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  11. 22 6月, 2006 1 次提交
    • R
      [PATCH] PCI: i386/x86_84: disable PCI resource decode on device disable · 53e4d30d
      Rajesh Shah 提交于
      When a PCI device is disabled via pci_disable_device(), it's still
      left decoding its BAR resource ranges even though its driver
      will have likely released those regions (and may even have
      unloaded). pci_enable_device() already explicitly enables
      BAR resource decode for the device being enabled. This patch
      disables resource decode for the PCI device being disabled,
      making it symmetric with the enable call.
      
      I saw this while doing something else, not because of a
      problem report. Still, seems to be the correct thing to do.
      Signed-off-by: NRajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      53e4d30d
  12. 24 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  13. 13 12月, 2005 1 次提交
  14. 30 7月, 2005 1 次提交
  15. 28 6月, 2005 1 次提交
    • J
      [PATCH] PCI Allow OutOfRange PIRQ table address · 120bb424
      jayalk@intworks.biz 提交于
      I updated this to remove unnecessary variable initialization, make
      check_routing be inline only and not __init, switch to strtoul, and
      formatting fixes as per Randy Dunlap's recommendations.
      
      I updated this to change pirq_table_addr to a long, and to add a warning
      msg if the PIRQ table wasn't found at the specified address, as per thread
      with Matthew Wilcox.
      
      In our hardware situation, the BIOS is unable to store or generate it's PIRQ
      table in the F0000h-100000h standard range. This patch adds a pci kernel
      parameter, pirqaddr to allow the bootloader (or BIOS based loader) to inform
      the kernel where the PIRQ table got stored. A beneficial side-effect is that,
      if one's BIOS uses a static address each time for it's PIRQ table, then
      pirqaddr can be used to avoid the $pirq search through that address block each
      time at boot for normal PIRQ BIOSes.
      Signed-off-by: NJaya Kumar <jayalk@intworks.biz>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      120bb424
  16. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4