Similar to what Linus suggested for rwsem_spin_on_owner(), in
mutex_spin_on_owner() instead of having while (true) and
breaking out of the spin loop on lock->owner != owner, we can
have the loop directly check for while (lock->owner == owner) to
improve the readability of the code.

It also shrinks the code a bit:

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
   3721       0       0    3721     e89 mutex.o.before
   3705       0       0    3705     e79 mutex.o.after
Signed-off-by: NJason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1428521960-5268-2-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.com
[ Added code generation info. ]
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Unlike most (all?) other copies from user space, kernel module loading
is almost unlimited in size.  So we do a potentially huge
"copy_from_user()" when we copy the module data from user space to the
kernel buffer, which can be a latency concern when preemption is
disabled (or voluntary).

Also, because 'copy_from_user()' clears the tail of the kernel buffer on
failures, even a *failed* copy can end up wasting a lot of time.

Normally neither of these are concerns in real life, but they do trigger
when doing stress-testing with trinity.  Running in a VM seems to add
its own overheadm causing trinity module load testing to even trigger
the watchdog.

The simple fix is to just chunk up the module loading, so that it never
tries to copy insanely big areas in one go.  That bounds the latency,
and also the amount of (unnecessarily, in this case) cleared memory for
the failure case.
Reported-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Currently when a process accesses a hugetlb range protected with
PROTNONE, unexpected COWs are triggered, which finally puts the hugetlb
subsystem into a broken/uncontrollable state, where for example
h->resv_huge_pages is subtracted too much and wraps around to a very
large number, and the free hugepage pool is no longer maintainable.

This patch simply stops changing protection for vma(VM_HUGETLB) to fix
the problem.  And this also allows us to avoid useless overhead of minor
faults.
Signed-off-by: NNaoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Suggested-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Commit 84c91b7a (PM / hibernate: avoid unsafe pages in e820 reserved
regions) is reported to make resume from hibernation on Lenovo x230
unreliable, so revert it.

We will revisit the issue the commit in question was supposed to fix
in the future.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96111Reported-by: Nrhn <kebuac.rhn@porcupinefactory.org>
Cc: 3.17+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.17+
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Some braces in tick_freeze() are not necessary, so drop them.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1534128.H5hN3KBFB4@vostro.rjw.lanSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

A recent conflict resolution has left tick_resume() in
tick_unfreeze() which leads to an unbalanced execution of
tick_resume_broadcast() every time that function runs.

Fix that by replacing the tick_resume() in tick_unfreeze()
with tick_resume_local() as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Cc: david.vrabel@citrix.com
Cc: konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8099075.V0LvN3pQAV@vostro.rjw.lanSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Commit:

  3c18d447 ("sched/core: Check for available DL bandwidth in cpuset_cpu_inactive()")

forgot a trace_printk() debugging piece in and Steve's banner screamed
in dmesg. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1428050570-21041-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Arch specific management of xtime/jiffies/wall_to_monotonic is
gone for quite a while. Zap the stale comment.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2422730.dmO29q661S@vostro.rjw.lanSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

clockevents_notify() is a leftover from the early design of the
clockevents facility. It's really not a notification mechanism,
it's a multiplex call. We are way better off to have explicit
calls instead of this monstrosity.

Split out the cleanup function for a dead cpu and invoke it
directly from the cpu down code. Make it conditional on
CPU_HOTPLUG as well.

Temporary change, will be refined in the future.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ Rebased, added clockevents_notify() removal ]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1735025.raBZdQHM3m@vostro.rjw.lanSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

clockevents_notify() is a leftover from the early design of the
clockevents facility. It's really not a notification mechanism,
it's a multiplex call. We are way better off to have explicit
calls instead of this monstrosity.

Split out the tick_handover call and invoke it explicitely from
the hotplug code. Temporary solution will be cleaned up in later
patches.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ Rebase ]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1658173.RkEEILFiQZ@vostro.rjw.lanSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Now that all users are converted over to explicit calls into the
clockevents state machine, remove the notification chain leftovers.

Original-from: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/14018863.NQUzkFuafr@vostro.rjw.lanSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Replace the clockevents_notify() call with an explicit function call.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6422336.RMm7oUHcXh@vostro.rjw.lanSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

clockevents_notify() is a leftover from the early design of the
clockevents facility. It's really not a notification mechanism,
it's a multiplex call. We are way better off to have explicit
calls instead of this monstrosity.

Split out the broadcast oneshot control into a separate function
and provide inline helpers. Switch clockevents_notify() over.
This will go away once all callers are converted.

This also gets rid of the nested locking of clockevents_lock and
broadcast_lock. The broadcast oneshot control functions do not
require clockevents_lock. Only the managing functions
(setup/shutdown/suspend/resume of the broadcast device require
clockevents_lock.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/13000649.8qZuEDV0OA@vostro.rjw.lanSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

All users converted. Remove the notify leftovers.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2076318.76XJZ8QYP3@vostro.rjw.lanSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

clockevents_notify() is a leftover from the early design of the
clockevents facility. It's really not a notification mechanism,
it's a multiplex call. We are way better off to have explicit
calls instead of this monstrosity.

Split out the broadcast control into a separate function and
provide inline helpers. Switch clockevents_notify() over. This
will go away once all callers are converted.

This also gets rid of the nested locking of clockevents_lock and
broadcast_lock. The broadcast control functions do not require
clockevents_lock. Only the managing functions
(setup/shutdown/suspend/resume of the broadcast device require
clockevents_lock.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8086559.ttsuS0n1Xr@vostro.rjw.lanSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Ingo noted that the description of clocks_calc_max_nsecs()'s
50% safety margin was somewhat circular. So this patch tries
to improve the comment to better explain what we mean by the
50% safety margin and why we need it.
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427945681-29972-20-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

If a system does not provide a persistent_clock(), the time
will be updated on resume by rtc_resume(). With the addition
of the non-stop clocksources for suspend timing, those systems
set the time on resume in timekeeping_resume(), but may not
provide a valid persistent_clock().

This results in the rtc_resume() logic thinking no one has set
the time and it then will over-write the suspend time again,
which is not necessary and only increases clock error.

So, fix this for rtc_resume().

This patch also improves the name of persistent_clock_exist to
make it more grammatical.
Signed-off-by: NXunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427945681-29972-19-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

When there's no persistent clock, normally
timekeeping_suspend_time should always be zero, but this can
break in timekeeping_suspend().

At T1, there was a system suspend, so old_delta was assigned T1.
After some time, one time adjustment happened, and xtime got the
value of T1-dt(0s<dt<2s). Then, there comes another system
suspend soon after this adjustment, obviously we will get a
small negative delta_delta, resulting in a negative
timekeeping_suspend_time.

This is problematic, when doing timekeeping_resume() if there is
no nonstop clocksource for example, it will hit the else leg and
inject the improper sleeptime which is the wrong logic.

So, we can solve this problem by only doing delta related code
when the persistent clock is existent. Actually the code only
makes sense for persistent clock cases.
Signed-off-by: NXunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427945681-29972-18-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

timekeeping_inject_sleeptime64() is only used by RTC
suspend/resume, so add build dependencies on the necessary RTC
related macros.
Signed-off-by: NXunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
[ Improve commit message clarity. ]
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427945681-29972-16-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

As part of addressing in-kernel y2038 issues, this patch adds
update_persistent_clock64() and replaces all the call sites of
update_persistent_clock() with this function. This is a __weak
implementation, which simply calls the existing y2038 unsafe
update_persistent_clock().

This allows architecture specific implementations to be
converted independently, and eventually y2038-unsafe
update_persistent_clock() can be removed after all its
architecture specific implementations have been converted to
update_persistent_clock64().
Suggested-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NXunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427945681-29972-4-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

As part of addressing in-kernel y2038 issues, this patch adds
read_persistent_clock64() and replaces all the call sites of
read_persistent_clock() with this function. This is a __weak
implementation, which simply calls the existing y2038 unsafe
read_persistent_clock().

This allows architecture specific implementations to be
converted independently, and eventually the y2038 unsafe
read_persistent_clock() can be removed after all its
architecture specific implementations have been converted to
read_persistent_clock64().
Suggested-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NXunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427945681-29972-3-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

As part of addressing in-kernel y2038 issues, this patch adds
read_boot_clock64() and replaces all the call sites of
read_boot_clock() with this function. This is a __weak
implementation, which simply calls the existing y2038 unsafe
read_boot_clock().

This allows architecture specific implementations to be
converted independently, and eventually the y2038 unsafe
read_boot_clock() can be removed after all its architecture
specific implementations have been converted to
read_boot_clock64().
Suggested-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NXunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427945681-29972-2-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Remove one CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU #ifdef in trade for introducing one
CONFIG_SMP #ifdef.

The CONFIG_SMP ifdef avoids declaring the per-CPU __tvec_bases storage
on UP systems since they already have boot_tvec_bases.

Also (re)add a runtime check on the base alignment -- for the paranoid
amongst us :-)
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/fdd2d35e169bdc554ffa3fe77f77716298c75ada.1427814611.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

There is no need to call init_timers_cpu() on every CPU hotplug event,
there is not much we need to reset.

 - Timer-lists are already empty at the end of migrate_timers().
 - timer_jiffies will be refreshed while adding a new timer, after the
   CPU is online again.
 - active_timers and all_timers can be reset from migrate_timers().
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/54a1c30ea7b805af55beb220cadf5a07a21b0a4d.1427814611.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Memory for the 'tvec_base' array is allocated separately for the boot CPU (statically)
and non-boot CPUs (dynamically).

The reason is because __TIMER_INITIALIZER() needs to set ->base to a
valid pointer (because we've made NULL special, hint: lock_timer_base())
and we cannot get a compile time pointer to per-cpu entries because we
don't know where we'll map the section, even for the boot cpu.

This can be simplified a bit by statically allocating per-cpu memory.
The only disadvantage is that memory for one of the structures will stay
unused, i.e. for the boot CPU, which uses boot_tvec_bases.

This will also guarantee that tvec_base is cacheline aligned. Even
though tvec_base has ____cacheline_aligned stuck on, kzalloc_node() does
not actually respect that (but guarantees a minimum u64 alignment).
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/17cdf560f2727f687ab159707d0aa591f8a2f82d.1427814611.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

I observed that DL tasks can't be migrated to other CPUs during CPU
hotplug, in addition, task may/may not be running again if CPU is
added back.

The root cause which I found is that DL tasks will be throtted and
removed from the DL rq after comsuming all their budget, which
leads to the situation that stop task can't pick them up from the
DL rq and migrate them to other CPUs during hotplug.

The method to reproduce:

  schedtool -E -t 50000:100000 -e ./test

Actually './test' is just a simple for loop. Then observe which CPU the
test task is on and offline it:

  echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/online

This patch adds the DL task migration during CPU hotplug by finding a
most suitable later deadline rq after DL timer fires if current rq is
offline.

If it fails to find a suitable later deadline rq then it falls back to
any eligible online CPU in so that the deadline task will come back
to us, and the push/pull mechanism should then move it around properly.
Suggested-and-Acked-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427411315-4298-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Hotplug operations are destructive w.r.t. cpusets. In case such an
operation is performed on a CPU belonging to an exlusive cpuset, the
DL bandwidth information associated with the corresponding root
domain is gone even if the operation fails (in sched_cpu_inactive()).

For this reason we need to move the check we currently have in
sched_cpu_inactive() to cpuset_cpu_inactive() to prevent useless
cpusets reconfiguration in the CPU_DOWN_FAILED path.
Signed-off-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427792017-7356-2-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

dl_task_timer() may fire on a different rq from where a task was removed
after throttling. Since the call path is:

  dl_task_timer() ->
    enqueue_task_dl() ->
      enqueue_dl_entity() ->
        replenish_dl_entity()

and replenish_dl_entity() uses dl_se's rq, we can't use current's rq
in dl_task_timer(), but we need to lock the task's previous one.
Tested-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Fixes: 3960c8c0 ("sched: Make dl_task_time() use task_rq_lock()")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427792017-7356-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Obviously, 'rq' is not used in these two functions, therefore,
there is no reason for it to be passed as an argument.
Signed-off-by: NAbel Vesa <abelvesa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1425383427-26244-1-git-send-email-abelvesa@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

It was found when doing a hotplug stress test on POWER, that the
machine either hit softlockups or rcu_sched stall warnings.  The
issue was traced to commit:

  7cba160a ("powernv/cpuidle: Redesign idle states management")

which exposed the cpu_down() race with hrtimer based broadcast mode:

  5d1638ac ("tick: Introduce hrtimer based broadcast")

The race is the following:

Assume CPU1 is the CPU which holds the hrtimer broadcasting duty
before it is taken down.

	CPU0					CPU1

	cpu_down()				take_cpu_down()
						disable_interrupts()

	cpu_die()

	while (CPU1 != CPU_DEAD) {
		msleep(100);
		switch_to_idle();
		stop_cpu_timer();
		schedule_broadcast();
	}

	tick_cleanup_cpu_dead()
		take_over_broadcast()

So after CPU1 disabled interrupts it cannot handle the broadcast
hrtimer anymore, so CPU0 will be stuck forever.

Fix this by explicitly taking over broadcast duty before cpu_die().

This is a temporary workaround. What we really want is a callback
in the clockevent device which allows us to do that from the dying
CPU by pushing the hrtimer onto a different cpu. That might involve
an IPI and is definitely more complex than this immediate fix.

Changelog was picked up from:

    https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/16/213Suggested-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NPreeti U. Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: nicolas.pitre@linaro.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Fixes: http://linuxppc.10917.n7.nabble.com/offlining-cpus-breakage-td88619.html
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150330092410.24979.59887.stgit@preeti.in.ibm.com
[ Merged it to the latest timer tree, renamed the callback, tidied up the changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Move the broadcasting related section to the GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS=y
section - this also solves build failures on architectures that
don't use generic clockevents yet.

Also standardize include file style to make it easier to read, and
use nesting depth aware preprocessor directives to make future merges
easier.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Use the new tick_suspend/resume_local() and get rid of the
homebrewn implementation of these in the ARM bL switcher.  The
check for the cpumask is completely pointless.  There is no harm
to suspend a per cpu tick device unconditionally.  If that's a
real issue then we fix it proper at the core level and not with
some completely undocumented hacks in some random core code.

Move the tick internals to the core code, now that this nuisance
is gone.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ rjw: Rebase, changelog ]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1655112.Ws17YsMfN7@vostro.rjw.lanSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Xen calls on every cpu into tick_resume() which is just wrong.
tick_resume() is for the syscore global suspend/resume
invocation. What XEN really wants is a per cpu local resume
function.

Provide a tick_resume_local() function and use it in XEN.

Also provide a complementary tick_suspend_local() and modify
tick_unfreeze() and tick_freeze(), respectively, to use the
new local tick resume/suspend functions.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ Combined two patches, rebased, modified subject/changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1698741.eezk9tnXtG@vostro.rjw.lan
[ Merged to latest timers/core. ]
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Solely used in tick-broadcast.c and the return value is
hardcoded 0. Make it static and void.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1689058.QkHYDJSRKu@vostro.rjw.lanSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

clockevents_notify() is a leftover from the early design of the
clockevents facility. It's really not a notification mechanism,
it's a multiplex call.

We are way better off to have explicit calls instead of this
monstrosity. Split out the suspend/resume() calls and invoke
them directly from the call sites.

No locking required at this point because these calls happen
with interrupts disabled and a single cpu online.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ Rebased on top of 4.0-rc5. ]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/713674030.jVm1qaHuPf@vostro.rjw.lan
[ Rebased on top of latest timers/core. ]
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Called with 'clockevents_lock' held and interrupts disabled
already.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/51005827.yXt5tjZMBs@vostro.rjw.lanSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

No point to expose everything to the world. People just believe
such functions can be abused for whatever purposes. Sigh.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ Rebased on top of 4.0-rc5 ]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/28017337.VbCUc39Gme@vostro.rjw.lan
[ Merged to latest timers/core ]
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

tick-internal.h is pretty confusing as a lot of the stub inlines
are there several times.

Distangle the maze and make clear functional sections.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ rjw: Subject ]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/16068264.vcNp79HLaT@vostro.rjw.lanSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Move clocksource related stuff to timekeeping.h and remove the
pointless include from ntp.c
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ rjw: Subject ]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2714218.nM5AEfAHj0@vostro.rjw.lanSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

This option was for simpler migration to the clock events code.
Most architectures have been converted and the option has been
disfunctional as a standalone option for quite some time. Remove
it.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5021859.jl9OC1medj@vostro.rjw.lanSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>