Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 11 7月, 2009 5 次提交
  3. 10 7月, 2009 2 次提交
  5. 09 7月, 2009 2 次提交
  7. 08 7月, 2009 12 次提交
  9. 07 7月, 2009 9 次提交
    • M
      [S390] define KTIME_SCALAR for 32-bit s390 · 07606309
      由 Martin Schwidefsky 提交于 
      32-bit s390 has efficient support for 64/32-bit conversions, define
KTIME_SCALAR to enable the use of the plain scalar nanosecond based
representation of ktime.
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      07606309
    • H
      [S390] add generic atomic64 support for 31 bit · 25ca1251
      由 Heiko Carstens 提交于 
      Performance counters need 64 bit atomic operations.
To keep the patch small we use the simple generic atomic64_t implementation.
The native implementation follows with the next kernel.

Fixes this build bug:

In file included from kernel/sched.c:42:
include/linux/perf_counter.h:427: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'atomic64_t'
Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      25ca1251
    • M
      [S390] set SCHED_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER for s390 · fca3e357
      由 Martin Schwidefsky 提交于 
      The frame pointer is useless for s390 in the sched.c code.
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      fca3e357
    • H
      [S390] add __ucmpdi2() helper function · 5075baca
      由 Heiko Carstens 提交于 
      Provide __ucmpdi2() helper function on 31 bit so we don't run
again and again in compile errors like this one:

kernel/built-in.o: In function `T.689':
perf_counter.c:(.text+0x56c86): undefined reference to `__ucmpdi2'
Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      5075baca
    • H
      [S390] perf_counter build fix · 2651fa2b
      由 Heiko Carstens 提交于 
      Add PERF_COUNTER_INDEX_OFFSET define to fix this build bug:

kernel/perf_counter.c: In function 'perf_counter_index':
kernel/perf_counter.c:1889: error: 'PERF_COUNTER_INDEX_OFFSET' undeclared

Same fix as for FRV since s390 doesn't support hw counters.
Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      2651fa2b
    • F
      [S390] shutdown actions: save/return rc from init function · 81088819
      由 Frank Munzert 提交于 
      We always returned -EINVAL when setting of a shutdown action failed. This was
misleading, if for example the hardware did not support the shutdown action.
Now we save each shutdown action's init return code and return it when the
action is being set.
Signed-off-by: NFrank Munzert <munzert@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      81088819
    • H
      [S390] udelay: disable lockdep to avoid false positives · bb8c29ca
      由 Heiko Carstens 提交于 
      Our udelay implementation enables interrupts to receive a special timer
interrupt regardless of the context it is called from.
This might lead to false positive lockdep reports. Since lockdep isn't
aware of the fact that only a single interrupt source is enabled it
warns about possible deadlocks that in reality won't happen, like
the one below.
To fix this disable lockdep before enabling interrupts.

[ 254.040888] =================================
[ 254.040904] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
[ 254.040910] 2.6.30 #9
[ 254.040914] ---------------------------------
[ 254.040920] inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[ 254.040927] swapper/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
[ 254.040934] (sch->lock){?.-...}, at: [<00000000002e4778>] ccw_device_timeout+0x48/0x2f0
[ 254.040961] {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
[ 254.040969] [<0000000000096f74>] __lock_acquire+0x9d4/0x188c
[ 254.040985] [<0000000000097f68>] lock_acquire+0x13c/0x16c
[ 254.040998] [<00000000004527e0>] _spin_lock+0x74/0xb8
[ 254.041016] [<0000000000457eb2>] do_IRQ+0xde/0x208
[ 254.041031] [<000000000002d190>] io_return+0x0/0x8
[ 254.041049] [<0000000000029faa>] vtime_stop_cpu+0xbe/0x114
[ 254.041066] irq event stamp: 259629
[ 254.041076] hardirqs last enabled at (259628): [<000000000045238e>] _spin_unlock_irq+0x5e/0x9c
[ 254.041095] hardirqs last disabled at (259629): [<000000000045292e>] _spin_lock_irq+0x4a/0xc4
[ 254.041126] softirqs last enabled at (259614): [<000000000006500e>] __do_softirq+0x296/0x2b0
[ 254.041137] softirqs last disabled at (259619): [<0000000000024cf6>] do_softirq+0x102/0x108
[ 254.041147]
[ 254.041148] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 254.041153] 2 locks held by swapper/0:
[ 254.041157] #0: (&priv->timer){+.-...}, at: [<000000000006bf9a>] run_timer_softirq+0x19a/0x340
[ 254.041170] #1: (sch->lock){?.-...}, at: [<00000000002e4778>] ccw_device_timeout+0x48/0x2f0
[ 254.041182]
[ 254.041310] Call Trace:
[ 254.041313] ([<00000000000174fc>] show_trace+0x16c/0x170)
[ 254.041321] [<0000000000017578>] show_stack+0x78/0x104
[ 254.041327] [<000000000044d0ca>] dump_stack+0xc6/0xd4
[ 254.041342] [<00000000000949b4>] print_usage_bug+0x1c8/0x1fc
[ 254.041353] [<0000000000094e8a>] mark_lock+0x4a2/0x670
[ 254.041364] [<00000000000950e2>] mark_held_locks+0x8a/0xb4
[ 254.041375] [<0000000000095398>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x74/0x1ac
[ 254.041388] [<00000000000954fa>] trace_hardirqs_on+0x2a/0x38
[ 254.041402] [<000000000025f1ec>] __udelay_disabled+0xac/0xfc
[ 254.041419] [<000000000025f432>] __udelay+0x12a/0x148
[ 254.041433] [<00000000002d64d8>] cio_commit_config+0x170/0x290
[ 254.041451] [<00000000002d6978>] cio_disable_subchannel+0x120/0x1cc
[ 254.041468] [<00000000002e32a4>] ccw_device_recog_done+0x54/0x2f4
[ 254.041485] [<00000000002e3638>] ccw_device_sense_id_done+0x50/0x90
[ 254.041508] [<00000000002e615a>] snsid_callback+0xfa/0x3a8
[ 254.041515] [<00000000002dd96c>] ccwreq_stop+0x80/0x90
[ 254.041523] [<00000000002dda8e>] ccw_request_timeout+0xc2/0xd0
[ 254.041530] [<00000000002e2f70>] ccw_device_request_event+0x58/0x90
[ 254.041537] [<00000000002e47ae>] ccw_device_timeout+0x7e/0x2f0
[ 254.041555] [<000000000006c02a>] run_timer_softirq+0x22a/0x340
[ 254.041566] [<0000000000064eb0>] __do_softirq+0x138/0x2b0
[ 254.041578] [<0000000000024cf6>] do_softirq+0x102/0x108
[ 254.041590] [<00000000000647ce>] irq_exit+0xee/0x114
[ 254.041603] [<0000000000457d88>] do_extint+0x130/0x17c
[ 254.041617] [<000000000002d41e>] ext_no_vtime+0x1e/0x22
[ 254.041631] [<0000000000029faa>] vtime_stop_cpu+0xbe/0x114
[ 254.041646] ([<0000000000029f58>] vtime_stop_cpu+0x6c/0x114)
[ 254.041662] [<000000000001d842>] cpu_idle+0x122/0x1c0
[ 254.041679] [<00000000004482c6>] start_secondary+0xce/0xe0
[ 254.041696] [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[ 254.041715] [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[ 254.041745] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      bb8c29ca
    • M
      [CPUFREQ] Powernow-k8: support family 0xf with 2 low p-states · a2e1b4c3
      由 Mark Langsdorf 提交于 
      Provide support for family 0xf processors with 2 P-states
below the elevator voltage.  Remove the checks that prevent
this configuration from being supported and increase the
transition voltage to prevent errors during the transition.
Signed-off-by: NMark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      a2e1b4c3
    • P
      gcov: exclude code operating in userspace from profiling · f386c61f
      由 Peter Oberparleiter 提交于 
      Fix for this issue on x86_64:

rostedt@goodmis.org wrote:
> On bootup of the latest kernel my init segfaults. Debugging it,
> I found  that vread_tsc (a vsyscall) increments some strange
> kernel memory:
>
> 0000000000000000 <vread_tsc>:
>    0:   55                      push   %rbp
>    1:   48 ff 05 00 00 00 00    incq   0(%rip)
>                         # 8 <vread_tsc+0x8>
>                         4: R_X86_64_PC32        .bss+0x3c
>    8:   48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
>    b:   66 66 90                xchg   %ax,%ax
>    e:   48 ff 05 00 00 00 00    incq   0(%rip)
>                         # 15 <vread_tsc+0x15>
>                         11: R_X86_64_PC32       .bss+0x44
>   15:   66 66 90                xchg   %ax,%ax
>   18:   48 ff 05 00 00 00 00    incq   0(%rip)
>                         # 1f <vread_tsc+0x1f>
>                         1b: R_X86_64_PC32       .bss+0x4c
>   1f:   0f 31                   rdtsc
>
>
> Those "incq" is very bad to happen in vsyscall memory, since
> userspace can not modify it. You need to make something prevent
> profiling of vsyscall  memory (like I do with ftrace).
Signed-off-by: NPeter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Reported-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Tested-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      f386c61f
  11. 06 7月, 2009 7 次提交
  13. 05 7月, 2009 3 次提交