Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 06 1月, 2012 1 次提交
    • E
      capabilities: reverse arguments to security_capable · b7e724d3
      由 Eric Paris 提交于 
      security_capable takes ns, cred, cap.  But the LSM capable() hook takes
cred, ns, cap.  The capability helper functions also take cred, ns, cap.
Rather than flip argument order just to flip it back, leave them alone.
Heck, this should be a little faster since argument will be in the right
place!
Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
      b7e724d3
  3. 24 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  5. 20 10月, 2011 3 次提交
  7. 19 10月, 2011 11 次提交
  9. 18 10月, 2011 4 次提交
  11. 15 10月, 2011 2 次提交
  13. 14 10月, 2011 3 次提交
  15. 13 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  17. 11 10月, 2011 4 次提交
    • R
      intel-iommu: Fix AB-BA lockdep report · 3e7abe25
      由 Roland Dreier 提交于 
      When unbinding a device so that I could pass it through to a KVM VM, I
got the lockdep report below.  It looks like a legitimate lock
ordering problem:

 - domain_context_mapping_one() takes iommu->lock and calls
   iommu_support_dev_iotlb(), which takes device_domain_lock (inside
   iommu->lock).

 - domain_remove_one_dev_info() starts by taking device_domain_lock
   then takes iommu->lock inside it (near the end of the function).

So this is the classic AB-BA deadlock.  It looks like a safe fix is to
simply release device_domain_lock a bit earlier, since as far as I can
tell, it doesn't protect any of the stuff accessed at the end of
domain_remove_one_dev_info() anyway.

BTW, the use of device_domain_lock looks a bit unsafe to me... it's
at least not obvious to me why we aren't vulnerable to the race below:

  iommu_support_dev_iotlb()
                                          domain_remove_dev_info()

  lock device_domain_lock
    find info
  unlock device_domain_lock

                                          lock device_domain_lock
                                            find same info
                                          unlock device_domain_lock

                                          free_devinfo_mem(info)

  do stuff with info after it's free

However I don't understand the locking here well enough to know if
this is a real problem, let alone what the best fix is.

Anyway here's the full lockdep output that prompted all of this:

     =======================================================
     [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
     2.6.39.1+ #1
     -------------------------------------------------------
     bash/13954 is trying to acquire lock:
      (&(&iommu->lock)->rlock){......}, at: [<ffffffff812f6421>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230

     but task is already holding lock:
      (device_domain_lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff812f6508>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x208/0x230

     which lock already depends on the new lock.

     the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

     -> #1 (device_domain_lock){-.-...}:
            [<ffffffff8109ca9d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x130
            [<ffffffff81571475>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x55/0xa0
            [<ffffffff812f8350>] domain_context_mapping_one+0x600/0x750
            [<ffffffff812f84df>] domain_context_mapping+0x3f/0x120
            [<ffffffff812f9175>] iommu_prepare_identity_map+0x1c5/0x1e0
            [<ffffffff81ccf1ca>] intel_iommu_init+0x88e/0xb5e
            [<ffffffff81cab204>] pci_iommu_init+0x16/0x41
            [<ffffffff81002165>] do_one_initcall+0x45/0x190
            [<ffffffff81ca3d3f>] kernel_init+0xe3/0x168
            [<ffffffff8157ac24>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10

     -> #0 (&(&iommu->lock)->rlock){......}:
            [<ffffffff8109bf3e>] __lock_acquire+0x195e/0x1e10
            [<ffffffff8109ca9d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x130
            [<ffffffff81571475>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x55/0xa0
            [<ffffffff812f6421>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230
            [<ffffffff812f8b42>] device_notifier+0x72/0x90
            [<ffffffff8157555c>] notifier_call_chain+0x8c/0xc0
            [<ffffffff81089768>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x78/0xb0
            [<ffffffff810897b6>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
            [<ffffffff81373a5c>] __device_release_driver+0xbc/0xe0
            [<ffffffff81373ccf>] device_release_driver+0x2f/0x50
            [<ffffffff81372ee3>] driver_unbind+0xa3/0xc0
            [<ffffffff813724ac>] drv_attr_store+0x2c/0x30
            [<ffffffff811e4506>] sysfs_write_file+0xe6/0x170
            [<ffffffff8117569e>] vfs_write+0xce/0x190
            [<ffffffff811759e4>] sys_write+0x54/0xa0
            [<ffffffff81579a82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

     other info that might help us debug this:

     6 locks held by bash/13954:
      #0:  (&buffer->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811e4464>] sysfs_write_file+0x44/0x170
      #1:  (s_active#3){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff811e44ed>] sysfs_write_file+0xcd/0x170
      #2:  (&__lockdep_no_validate__){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81372edb>] driver_unbind+0x9b/0xc0
      #3:  (&__lockdep_no_validate__){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81373cc7>] device_release_driver+0x27/0x50
      #4:  (&(&priv->bus_notifier)->rwsem){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8108974f>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x5f/0xb0
      #5:  (device_domain_lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff812f6508>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x208/0x230

     stack backtrace:
     Pid: 13954, comm: bash Not tainted 2.6.39.1+ #1
     Call Trace:
      [<ffffffff810993a7>] print_circular_bug+0xf7/0x100
      [<ffffffff8109bf3e>] __lock_acquire+0x195e/0x1e10
      [<ffffffff810972bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0x10
      [<ffffffff8109d57d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13d/0x180
      [<ffffffff8109ca9d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x130
      [<ffffffff812f6421>] ? domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230
      [<ffffffff81571475>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x55/0xa0
      [<ffffffff812f6421>] ? domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230
      [<ffffffff810972bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0x10
      [<ffffffff812f6421>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230
      [<ffffffff812f8b42>] device_notifier+0x72/0x90
      [<ffffffff8157555c>] notifier_call_chain+0x8c/0xc0
      [<ffffffff81089768>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x78/0xb0
      [<ffffffff810897b6>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
      [<ffffffff81373a5c>] __device_release_driver+0xbc/0xe0
      [<ffffffff81373ccf>] device_release_driver+0x2f/0x50
      [<ffffffff81372ee3>] driver_unbind+0xa3/0xc0
      [<ffffffff813724ac>] drv_attr_store+0x2c/0x30
      [<ffffffff811e4506>] sysfs_write_file+0xe6/0x170
      [<ffffffff8117569e>] vfs_write+0xce/0x190
      [<ffffffff811759e4>] sys_write+0x54/0xa0
      [<ffffffff81579a82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Signed-off-by: NRoland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
      3e7abe25
    • W
      mscan: too much data copied to CAN frame due to 16 bit accesses · a3a4bfde
      由 Wolfgang Grandegger 提交于 
      Due to the 16 bit access to mscan registers there's too much data copied to
the zero initialized CAN frame when having an odd number of bytes to copy.
This patch ensures that only the requested bytes are copied by using an
8 bit access for the remaining byte.
Reported-by: NAndre Naujoks <nautsch@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NOliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: NWolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a3a4bfde
    • D
      bnx2x: fix cl_id allocation for non-eth clients for NPAR mode · 134d0f97
      由 Dmitry Kravkov 提交于 
      There are some consolidations of NPAR configuration
when FCoE and iSCSI L2 clients will get the same id,
in this case FCoE ring will be non-functional.
Signed-off-by: NDmitry Kravkov <dmitry@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NEilon Greenstein <eilong@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      134d0f97
    • T
      mlx4_en: fix endianness with blue frame support · c5d6136e
      由 Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo 提交于 
      The doorbell register was being unconditionally swapped. In x86, that
meant it was being swapped to BE and written to the descriptor and to
memory, depending on the case of blue frame support or writing to
doorbell register. On PPC, this meant it was being swapped to LE and
then swapped back to BE while writing to the register. But in the blue
frame case, it was being written as LE to the descriptor.

The fix is not to swap doorbell unconditionally, write it to the
register as BE and convert it to BE when writing it to the descriptor.
Signed-off-by: NThadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reported-by: NRichard Hendrickson <richhend@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Eli Cohen <eli@dev.mellanox.co.il>
Cc: Yevgeny Petrilin <yevgenyp@mellanox.co.il>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      c5d6136e
  19. 06 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  21. 05 10月, 2011 9 次提交