And get rid of the duplicate mode structures. This patch was generated
with the following semantic patch:

@@ @@
struct intel_crtc_state {
+struct drm_crtc_state base;
+
...
-struct drm_display_mode requested_mode;
-struct drm_display_mode adjusted_mode;
...
}
@@ struct intel_crtc_state *state; @@
-state->adjusted_mode
+state->base.adjusted_mode
@@ struct intel_crtc_state *state; @@
-state->requested_mode
+state->base.mode
@@ struct intel_crtc_state state; @@
-state.adjusted_mode
+state.base.adjusted_mode
@@ struct intel_crtc_state state; @@
-state.requested_mode
+state.base.mode
@@ struct drm_crtc *crtc; @@
-to_intel_crtc(crtc)->config.adjusted_mode
+to_intel_crtc(crtc)->config.base.adjusted_mode
@@ identifier member; expression E; @@
-PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(adjusted_mode.member, E);
+PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(base.adjusted_mode.member, E);
@@ identifier member; @@
-PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(adjusted_mode.member);
+PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.member);
@@ identifier member; @@
-PIPE_CONF_CHECK_CLOCK_FUZZY(adjusted_mode.member);
+PIPE_CONF_CHECK_CLOCK_FUZZY(base.adjusted_mode.member);

v2: Completely generate the patch with cocci. (Ander)
Signed-off-by: NAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The objective is to make this structure usable with the atomic helpers,
so let's start with the rename. Patch generated with coccinelle:

@@ @@
-struct intel_crtc_config {
+struct intel_crtc_state {
...
}
@@ @@
-struct intel_crtc_config
+struct intel_crtc_state

v2: Completely generate the patch with cocci. (Ander)
Signed-off-by: NAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Earlier, DRRS structures were specific to eDP (used only in intel_dp).
Since DRRS can be extended to other internal display types
(if the panel supports multiple RR), modifying structures
to be part of drm_i915_private and have a provision to add display related
structs like intel_dp.
Also, aligning with frontbuffer tracking mechanism, the new structure
contains data for busy frontbuffer bits.
Signed-off-by: NVandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Instead of pushing each byte via stack the specifier allows to supply the
pointer and length to dump buffers up to 64 bytes long.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Many distro's have mechanism in place to collect and automatically file
bugs for failed WARN()s.  And since i915 has a lot of hw state sanity
checks which result in WARN(), it generates quite a lot of noise which
is somewhat disconcerting to the end user.

Separate out the internal hw-is-in-the-state-I-expected checks into
I915_STATE_WARN()s and allow configuration via i915.verbose_checks module
param about whether this will generate a full blown stacktrace or just
DRM_ERROR().  The new moduleparam defaults to true, so by default there
is no change in behavior.  And even when disabled, you will still get
an error message logged.

v2: paint the macro names blue, clarify that the default behavior
    remains the same as before
Signed-off-by: NRob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

After

commit a18c0af1
uthor: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Date:   Wed Dec 10 11:38:49 2014 +0100

    drm: Zero out DRM object memory upon cleanup

we will use the eDP encoder during destroying it. Fix this by calling
drm_encoder_cleanup() at a point when the encoder is not used any more.
This caused a NULL pointer dereference in pps_lock(), I can't see that
it caused any other problem.

All the other encoders seem to call drm_encoder_cleanup() at a safe
place.
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

I've checked that TRANS_DDI_MODE, DP_TP_CTL MST bits are identical to
HSW/BDW on SKL, as well as the long vs short HPD bits. So we have a good
chance to be working as well as prevous platforms.
Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

This patch is the last in series of VLV/CHV PSR,
that finally enable PSR by adding it to HAS_PSR
and calling the proper enable and disable
functions on the right places.

Although it is still disabled by default.

v2: Rebase over intel_psr and merge Durgadoss's fixes.
v3: Fix typo.
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDurgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

This function was in use to check if PSR feature got enabled.
However on HSW and BDW we currently force psr exit by disabling
EDP_PSR_ENABLE bit at EDP_PSR_CTL(dev). So this function was actually
returning the active/inactive state that is different from the enable/disable
meaning and had the risk of false negative.

But anyway this check with DRRS was dangerous, since DRRS could try to get enabled
before PSR gets there. So let's just remove it for now.
A proper synchronization mechanism must be implemented later probably
using pipe config.

Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: NDurgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Before testing if the panel VDD is enabled on eDP cancel any pending
disable worker. This makes sure the worker will be triggered with a
delay from the last time edp_panel_vdd_schedule_off() is called, not
the first time. This avoids unnecessary overhead.

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86201

v2: use cancel_delayed_work() instead of cancel_delayed_work_sync()
as the pps_mutexes will provide the required serialization with
edp_panel_vdd_work() while the sync variant may deadlock. Suggested
by Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>.
Made commit message a bit clearer.
Signed-off-by: NEgbert Eich <eich@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Currently we just make sure vdd is off before suspending, but we don't
cancel the vdd off work. The work wil not touch vdd if
want_panel_vdd==false so in theory this is fine.

In the past that was perfectly fine since the vdd off work didn't do
anything when want_panel_vdd==false, so even if the work would have been
run during system resume before i915 has resumed, nothing would happen.

However since pps_lock() will now grab the power domain references before
it can check want_panel_vdd, we may end up toggling the power wells on/off
already before the driver has resumed. That is not really acceptable, so
cancel the vdd off work when suspending the encoder.

The problem appeared when pps_lock() was introduced in:
 commit 773538e8
 Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
 Date:   Thu Sep 4 14:54:56 2014 +0300

    drm/i915: Reset power sequencer pipe tracking when disp2d is off
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

For whatever reasons this can happen. For real testcases the test will
notice the -EIO and fall over, but we also have some testcases that
just read all debugfs files. And that shouldn't cause dmesg spam.

So tune it down a bit so that we still have the information for
debugging. And change the errno so that real testcases can easily
differentiate.

Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84890Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>

On SKL DPLL0 is used to derive CDCLK but can also be used to drive an
eDP port (as long as we don't want SSC). DPLL0 is special enough to not
be handled by the shared DPLL framework (drives CDCLK, not supposed to
enable the HDMI mode), So we need to compute the configuration
separately from the other DPLLs.

Note that we don't need to reprogram DPLL0 (which would mean bringing
down CDCLK) to support the various eDP 1.3 link rates as they all share
the same VCO (8100).
Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

No functional changes. Just cleaning and reorganizing it.

v2: Rebase it puting it to begin of psr rework. This helps to blame easily
at least latest changes.
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

No functional change. Just making it public for use outside intel_dp.c
Allowing split psr functions.
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

On VLV/CHV both pipes A and B have their own backlight control
registers. In order to correctly read out the current hardware state at
init we need to know which pipe is driving the eDP port. Pass that
information down from the eDP init code into the backlight code.

To determine the correct pipe we first look at which pipe is currently
configured in the port control register, if that look invalid we look
at which pipe's PPS is currently controlling the port, and if that
too looks invalid we just assume pipe A.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

As per spec, and similar to DDI.
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Add support for disabling the audio codec on vlv/chv/gen5-7, similar to
hsw/bdw.
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

On pre-ddi platforms we don't shut down the link when changing link
training parameters. Except when clock recovery fails too hard and we
restart with channel eq training. Which doesn't make a lot of sense
really, since just stopping/restarting the DP port at this point
violates the modeset sequence documented in the Bspec.

So let's tempt fate and try this.

This patch is motivated by a WARN_ON triggered by

commit bc76e320
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date:   Tue May 20 22:46:50 2014 +0200

    drm/i915: Drop now misleading DDI comment from dp_link_down

References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85670Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

When we suspend we turn everything off so the pps should be idle, and we
also (or at least should) disable all power wells which will reset the
power sequencer port assignment. So when we resume all power sequencers
should be in their reset state. However it's at least theoretically
possible that the BIOS would touch the power seuqencer(s), so to be safe
we ought to read out the current port assignment like we do at driver
init time.

To do that we can simply call vlv_initial_power_sequencer_setup() from
the encoder ->reset() hook before calling intel_edp_panel_vdd_sanitize().
There's no danger or clobbering the pps delays since we now have those
stored within intel_dp and we don't change them once initialized.

This will make sure that the vdd state gets correctly tracked post-resume
in case the BIOS enabled it.

We need to shuffle things around a bit to get the locking right, and
while at it, make intel_edp_panel_vdd_sanitize() static and move it
around a bit to avoid a forward declaration.

Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The pps timestamp initialization was accidentally lost on vlv/chv in

 commit a4a5d2f8
 Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
 Date:   Thu Sep 4 14:54:20 2014 +0300

    drm/i915: Track which port is using which pipe's power sequencer

Restore it so that we avoid introducing random delays into the pps operations
during/after driver init time.

Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reported-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Introduce functions to enable/disable the audio codec, incorporating the
ELD setup within enable. The disable is initially limited to HSW,
covering exactly what was done previously.

The only functional difference is that ELD valid is no longer set if
there is no connector with ELD, which should be the right thing to do
anyway. Otherwise the sequence remains the same, with warts and all, in
preparation for applying more sanity.

v2: add kernel doc.
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The power seqeuencer kick procedure requires the DPLL to be running
in order to complete successfully. In case the DPLL isn't currently
running when we need to kick the power seqeuncer enable it
temporarily. This can happen eg. during ->detect() when the pipe is
not already active.

To avoid needlessly duplicating the DPLL programming re-use the already
existing functions by passing a temporary pipe config to them instead
of having them consult the current pipe config at crtc->config.

v2: Introduce vlv_force_pll_{on,off}() (Daniel)
v3: Rebase due to drm_crtc vs. intel_crtc changes
    Fix a typo in commit msg (checkpatch)
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> (v1)
[danvet: Appease checkpatch.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

eDP ports need the power seqeuncer whenever the port is active. Warn if
we accidentally steal the power sequener from an active eDP port. This
should not happen unless there's a bug somewhere else, but it's best to
scream loudly if it happens to help with debugging.

Note that this only checks for active pipes and not for enabled pipes
which are turned off with dpms. Which means we might run the risk that
the pps might get stolen and we can't reacquire one when enabling the
pipe again with dpms on. But on current platforms that's impossible
since we only support two edp ports with just two panel power
sequencers. So a more elaborate scheme which reserves the pps even
when the pipe is inactive isn't required.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
[danvet: Summarize my discussion with Ville about dpms on/off issues.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We should never enable the panel power twice. That would indicate a bug
somewhere else as we would need to enable the port twice without
disabling it in between. Also print the port name.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Print the port name in the VDD/PPS debugs messages.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

In case we fumble something and end up picking an already used power
seqeuencer in vlv_power_sequencer_pipe() at least try to steal it
gracefully. In theory this should never happen though.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

There's no power sequencer on pipe C on VLV/CHV so scream a bit if we
try to steal one from pipes other than A and B.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

VLV gets confused if two power sequencers have the same port selected.
It would seem the port doesn't start up properly in the is case and
vlv_wait_port_ready() will fail as will the link training. Clearing the
port select in the PP_ON_DELAYS register fixes this problem.

CHV doesn't seem to need this, but it doesn't seem to hurt either so
let's just do it for both to keep the code between the platforms as
uniform as possible.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

If there's no power sequencer assigned to the port currently we can't
very well have vdd or panel power enabled either. If we would try to
check that from the pps registers we'd need to pick a power seqeuncer
and kick it. So let's skip the register read and the kick.

Note that there's still a bit an issue about correctly recovering pps
state from resume if the bios is nasty: With this check we'll always
assume that the pps is off. But that's better done in a follow-up
patch and it shouldn't be too harmful - at most we waste time enabling
the pps if it's on already.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
[danvet: Add note about resume issues Imre spotted.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

When we pick a new power sequencer for the port but we're not doing a
full modeset, the power sequencer may have locked on to another port (or
no port). So kick it a bit to make sure it controls the port we want.

Again just like when we attempt to actually enable the DP port, we
must first write the port register with the approriate value except
the enable bit, and then we must enable the port to make the power
sequencer happy. In this case since we don't want the port actually
enabled we just toggle it on and immediately back off. Going forward
the power sequencer will keep working on that specific port until again
moved to another port.

v2: Refine the kick procedure
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

When switching from one pipe to another, the power sequencer of the new
pipe seems to need a bit of kicking to lock into the port. Even the vdd
force bit doesn't work before the power sequencer has been sufficiently
kicked, so this must be done before any AUX transactions are attempted.

After extensive experimentation I've determined that it's sufficient
to first write the port register with the correct values except the
port must remain disabled, then we can do a second write to enable the
port, after which the power sequencer is operational and allows the port
to start up properly.

Contrary to my earlier theories we don't need to enable the port with
the idle pattern, so let's just use training pattern 1 as that's what
other platforms use here.

v2: Refine the kick procedure
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

There's no point in checking if the data lanes came out of reset after
link training. If the data lanes aren't ready link training will fail
anyway.
Suggested-by: NTodd Previte <tprevite@gmail.com>
Cc: Todd Previte <tprevite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Acked-by: NTodd Previte <tprevite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Just grab the pps_mutex once and do all the pps panel startup operations
while holding the mutex instead of grabbing the mutex separately for
each individual step.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We'll be needing to the call the power seqeuencer functions while
already holding pps_mutex, so split the locking out to small wrapper
functions.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Since we read the current power seqeuncer delays from the registers
(as well as looking at the vbt and spec values) we may end up
corrupting delays we already initialized when we switch to another
pipe and the power seqeuncer there has different values currently
in the registers.

So make sure we only initialize the delays once even if
intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer() gets called multiple times.

There was some discussion in the review about when exactly we need to
unlock the pps. Quoting Bspec:

"If this bit is not a zero, it activates the register write protect
 and writes to those registers will be ignored unless the write
 protect key value is set in the panel sequencing control register."
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
[danvet: Add Bspec quote per review discussion between Imre and
Ville.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The power seqeuncer delays are fixed for a given panel, so we can keep
them around once computed.

Not that on VLV/CHV we still re-compute them every time we initialize
the power seqeuncer registers, but that will change soon enough.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

want_panel_vdd is a bool so it can't cope with interleaving on/off calls
from multiple threads. If we want to make that possible we'd need to
convert want_panel_vdd into a proper ref count. But an easier fix is to
remove the high level vdd on/off calls from detect/hpd code paths and
just rely on the delayed vdd off to avoid needless vdd on<->off ping
pong.

After this change only the encoder enable/disable paths use the high
level functions, which is fine since both the on and off low level edp
vdd calls from intel_dp_aux_ch() happen without dropping pps_mutex in
between and so want_panel_vdd can't change in between.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Only ports B and C have the power sequencer and backlight controls,
so complain if we ever try to register an eDP connector on some other
port.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Everything else can be derived from that. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>