- 03 10月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
raid10d has toooo many nested block, so take the fix_read_error functionality out into a separate function. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 11 7月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
This is generally useful, but particularly helps see if it is the same sector that always needs correcting, or different ones. [akpm@osdl.org: fix printk warnings] Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 27 6月, 2006 4 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
The size calculation made assumtion which the new offset mode didn't follow. This gets the size right in all cases. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
The "industry standard" DDF format allows for a stripe/offset layout where data is duplicated on different stripes. e.g. A B C D D A B C E F G H H E F G (columns are drives, rows are stripes, LETTERS are chunks of data). This is similar to raid10's 'far' mode, but not quite the same. So enhance 'far' mode with a 'far/offset' option which follows the layout of DDFs stripe/offset. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
For a while we have had checkpointing of resync. The version-1 superblock allows recovery to be checkpointed as well, and this patch implements that. Due to early carelessness we need to add a feature flag to signal that the recovery_offset field is in use, otherwise older kernels would assume that a partially recovered array is in fact fully recovered. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
The largest chunk size the code can support without substantial surgery is 2^30 bytes, so make that the limit instead of an arbitrary 4Meg. Some day, the 'chunksize' should change to a sector-shift instead of a byte-count. Then no limit would be needed. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 02 5月, 2006 2 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
We need to hold a reference to rdevs while reading and writing to attempt to correct read errors. This reference must be taken under an rcu lock. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
We should add to the counter for the rdev *after* checking if the rdev is NULL!!! Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 02 4月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sesterhenn 提交于
this changes if() BUG(); constructs to BUG_ON() which is cleaner and can better optimized away Signed-off-by: NEric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
-
- 04 2月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
- version-1 superblock + The default_bitmap_offset is in sectors, not bytes. + the 'size' field in the superblock is in sectors, not KB - raid0_run should return a negative number on error, not '1' - raid10_read_balance should not return a valid 'disk' number if ->rdev turned out to be NULL - kmem_cache_destroy doesn't like being passed a NULL. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 15 1月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arjan van de Ven 提交于
Remove the "inline" keyword from a bunch of big functions in the kernel with the goal of shrinking it by 30kb to 40kb Signed-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Acked-by: NJeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 07 1月, 2006 14 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Store this total in superblock (As appropriate), and make it available to userspace via sysfs. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Acked-by: NGreg KH <greg@kroah.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Acked-by: NGreg KH <greg@kroah.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
md sometimes call put_page on NULL pointers (treating it like kfree). This is not safe, so define and use a 'safe_put_page' which checks for NULL. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
The code to overwrite/reread for addressing read errors in raid1/raid10 currently assumes that the read will not alter the buffer which could be used to write to the next device. This is not a safe assumption to make. So we split the loops into a overwrite loop and a separate re-read loop, so that the writing is complete before reading is attempted. Cc: Paul Clements <paul.clements@steeleye.com> Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
md supports multiple different RAID level, each being implemented by a 'personality' (which is often in a separate module). These personalities have fairly artificial 'numbers'. The numbers are use to: 1- provide an index into an array where the various personalities are recorded 2- identify the module (via an alias) which implements are particular personality. Neither of these uses really justify the existence of personality numbers. The array can be replaced by a linked list which is searched (array lookup only happens very rarely). Module identification can be done using an alias based on level rather than 'personality' number. The current 'raid5' modules support two level (4 and 5) but only one personality. This slight awkwardness (which was handled in the mapping from level to personality) can be better handled by allowing raid5 to register 2 personalities. With this change in place, the core md module does not need to have an exhaustive list of all possible personalities, so other personalities can be added independently. This patch also moves the check for chunksize being non-zero into the ->run routines for the personalities that need it, rather than having it in core-md. This has a side effect of allowing 'faulty' and 'linear' not to have a chunk-size set. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Replace multiple kmalloc/memset pairs with kzalloc calls. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Substitute: page_cache_get -> get_page page_cache_release -> put_page PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT -> PAGE_SHIFT PAGE_CACHE_SIZE -> PAGE_SIZE PAGE_CACHE_MASK -> PAGE_MASK __free_page -> put_page because we aren't using the page cache, we are just using pages. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Add in correct read-error handling for resync and read-only situations. When read-only, we don't over-write, so we need to mark the failed drive in the r10_bio so we don't re-try it. During resync, we always read all blocks, so if there is a read error, we simply over-write it with the good block that we found (assuming we found one). Note that the recovery case still isn't handled in an interesting way. There is nothing useful to do for the 2-copies case. If there are 3 or more copies, then we could try reading from one of the non-missing copies, but this is a bit complicated and very rarely would be used, so I'm leaving it for now. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Largely just a cross-port from raid1. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Also keep count on the number of errors found. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
raid10 needs to put up a barrier to new requests while it does resync or other background recovery. The code for this is currently open-coded, slighty obscure by its use of two waitqueues, and not documented. This patch gathers all the related code into 4 functions, and includes a comment which (hopefully) explains what is happening. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 29 11月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
raid10 has two different layouts. One uses near-copies (so multiple copies of a block are at the same or similar offsets of different devices) and the other uses far-copies (so multiple copies of a block are stored a greatly different offsets on different devices). The point of far-copies is that it allows the first section (normally first half) to be layed out in normal raid0 style, and thus provide raid0 sequential read performance. Unfortunately, the read balancing in raid10 makes some poor decisions for far-copies arrays and you don't get the desired performance. So turn off that bad bit of read_balance for far-copies arrays. With this patch, read speed of an 'f2' array is comparable with a raid0 with the same number of devices, though write speed is ofcourse still very slow. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 09 11月, 2005 2 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
This has the advantage of removing the confusion caused by 'rdev_t' and 'mddev_t' both having 'in_sync' fields. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Suzanne Wood 提交于
Acked-by: <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NSuzanne Wood <suzannew@cs.pdx.edu> Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 01 11月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Instead of having ->read_sectors and ->write_sectors, combine the two into ->sectors[2] and similar for the other fields. This saves a branch several places in the io path, since we don't have to care for what the actual io direction is. On my x86-64 box, that's 200 bytes less text in just the core (not counting the various drivers). Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
-
- 09 10月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
- added typedef unsigned int __nocast gfp_t; - replaced __nocast uses for gfp flags with gfp_t - it gives exactly the same warnings as far as sparse is concerned, doesn't change generated code (from gcc point of view we replaced unsigned int with typedef) and documents what's going on far better. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 10 9月, 2005 4 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
This shouldn't be a BUG. We should cope. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
If you try to assemble an array with too many missing devices, raid10 will now reject the attempt, instead of allowing it. Also check when hot-adding a drive and refuse the hot-add if the array is beyond hope. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
md does not yet support BIO_RW_BARRIER, so be honest about it and fail (-EOPNOTSUPP) any such requests. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
'this_sector' is a virtual (array) address while 'head_position' is a physical (device) address, so substraction doesn't make any sense. devs[slot].addr should be used instead of this_sector. However, this patch doesn't make much practical different to the read balancing due to the effects of later code. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 22 6月, 2005 5 次提交
-
-
由 Jesper Juhl 提交于
This patch removes some unneeded checks of pointers being NULL before calling kfree() on them. kfree() handles NULL pointers just fine, checking first is pointless. Signed-off-by: NJesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Before completing a 'write' the md superblock might need to be updated. This is best done by the md_thread. The current code schedules this up and queues the write request for later handling by the md_thread. However some personalities (Raid5/raid6) will deadlock if the md_thread tries to submit requests to its own array. So this patch changes things so the processes submitting the request waits for the superblock to be written and then submits the request itself. This fixes a recently-created deadlock in raid5/raid6 Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
1/ change the return value (which is number-of-sectors synced) from 'int' to 'sector_t'. The number of sectors is usually easily small enough to fit in an int, but if resync needs to abort, it may want to return the total number of remaining sectors, which could be large. Also errors cannot be returned as negative numbers now, so use 0 instead 2/ Add a 'skipped' return parameter to allow the array to report that it skipped the sectors. This allows md to take this into account in the speed calculations. Currently there is no important skipping, but the bitmap-based-resync that is coming will use this. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
When md marks the superblock dirty before a write, it calls generic_make_request (to write the superblock) from within generic_make_request (to write the first dirty block), which could cause problems later. With this patch, the superblock write is always done by the helper thread, and write request are delayed until that write completes. Also, the locking around marking the array dirty and writing the superblock is improved to avoid possible races. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
md_enter_safemode checks if it is time to mark the md superblock as 'clean'. i.e. if all writes have completed and a suitable delay has passed. This is currently called from md_handle_safemode which in-turn is called (almost) every time md_check_recovery is called, and from the end of md_do_sync which causes the mddev->thread to run, which will always call md_check_recovery as well. So it doesn't need to be a separate function and fits quite well into md_check_recovery. The "almost" is because multipathd calls md_check_recovery but not md_handle_safemode. This is OK because the code from md_enter_safemode is a no-op if mddev->safemode == 0, which it always is for a multipathd (providing we don't allow it to be set to 2 on a signal...) Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 17 5月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
We we set the too early, they may still be in place and possibly get called even though the array didn't get set up properly. Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-