Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 28 2月, 2013 1 次提交
    • A
      signal: allow to send any siginfo to itself · 66dd34ad
      由 Andrey Vagin 提交于 
      The idea is simple.  We need to get the siginfo for each signal on
checkpointing dump, and then return it back on restore.

The first problem is that the kernel doesn't report complete siginfos to
userspace.  In a signal handler the kernel strips SI_CODE from siginfo.
When a siginfo is received from signalfd, it has a different format with
fixed sizes of fields.  The interface of signalfd was extended.  If a
signalfd is created with the flag SFD_RAW, it returns siginfo in a raw
format.

rt_sigqueueinfo looks suitable for restoring signals, but it can't send
siginfo with a positive si_code, because these codes are reserved for
the kernel.  In the real world each person has right to do anything with
himself, so I think a process should able to send any siginfo to itself.

This patch:

The kernel prevents sending of siginfo with positive si_code, because
these codes are reserved for kernel.  I think we can allow a task to
send such a siginfo to itself.  This operation should not be dangerous.

This functionality is required for restoring signals in
checkpoint/restart.
Signed-off-by: NAndrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      66dd34ad
  3. 14 2月, 2013 2 次提交
  5. 04 2月, 2013 11 次提交
  7. 28 1月, 2013 1 次提交
    • F
      cputime: Use accessors to read task cputime stats · 6fac4829
      由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于 
      This is in preparation for the full dynticks feature. While
remotely reading the cputime of a task running in a full
dynticks CPU, we'll need to do some extra-computation. This
way we can account the time it spent tickless in userspace
since its last cputime snapshot.
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      6fac4829
  9. 23 1月, 2013 2 次提交
    • O
      ptrace: ensure arch_ptrace/ptrace_request can never race with SIGKILL · 9899d11f
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      putreg() assumes that the tracee is not running and pt_regs_access() can
safely play with its stack.  However a killed tracee can return from
ptrace_stop() to the low-level asm code and do RESTORE_REST, this means
that debugger can actually read/modify the kernel stack until the tracee
does SAVE_REST again.

set_task_blockstep() can race with SIGKILL too and in some sense this
race is even worse, the very fact the tracee can be woken up breaks the
logic.

As Linus suggested we can clear TASK_WAKEKILL around the arch_ptrace()
call, this ensures that nobody can ever wakeup the tracee while the
debugger looks at it.  Not only this fixes the mentioned problems, we
can do some cleanups/simplifications in arch_ptrace() paths.

Probably ptrace_unfreeze_traced() needs more callers, for example it
makes sense to make the tracee killable for oom-killer before
access_process_vm().

While at it, add the comment into may_ptrace_stop() to explain why
ptrace_stop() still can't rely on SIGKILL and signal_pending_state().
Reported-by: NSalman Qazi <sqazi@google.com>
Reported-by: NSuleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
Suggested-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      9899d11f
    • O
      ptrace: introduce signal_wake_up_state() and ptrace_signal_wake_up() · 910ffdb1
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      Cleanup and preparation for the next change.

signal_wake_up(resume => true) is overused. None of ptrace/jctl callers
actually want to wakeup a TASK_WAKEKILL task, but they can't specify the
necessary mask.

Turn signal_wake_up() into signal_wake_up_state(state), reintroduce
signal_wake_up() as a trivial helper, and add ptrace_signal_wake_up()
which adds __TASK_TRACED.

This way ptrace_signal_wake_up() can work "inside" ptrace_request()
even if the tracee doesn't have the TASK_WAKEKILL bit set.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      910ffdb1
  11. 06 1月, 2013 2 次提交
  13. 26 12月, 2012 1 次提交
  15. 20 12月, 2012 4 次提交
  17. 29 11月, 2012 4 次提交
  19. 19 11月, 2012 1 次提交
    • E
      pidns: Use task_active_pid_ns where appropriate · 17cf22c3
      由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于 
      The expressions tsk->nsproxy->pid_ns and task_active_pid_ns
aka ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk)) should have the same number of
cache line misses with the practical difference that
ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk)) is released later in a processes life.

Furthermore by using task_active_pid_ns it becomes trivial
to write an unshare implementation for the the pid namespace.

So I have used task_active_pid_ns everywhere I can.

In fork since the pid has not yet been attached to the
process I use ns_of_pid, to achieve the same effect.
Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      17cf22c3
  21. 27 10月, 2012 1 次提交
    • O
      freezer: change ptrace_stop/do_signal_stop to use freezable_schedule() · 5d8f72b5
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      try_to_freeze_tasks() and cgroup_freezer rely on scheduler locks
to ensure that a task doing STOPPED/TRACED -> RUNNING transition
can't escape freezing. This mostly works, but ptrace_stop() does
not necessarily call schedule(), it can change task->state back to
RUNNING and check freezing() without any lock/barrier in between.

We could add the necessary barrier, but this patch changes
ptrace_stop() and do_signal_stop() to use freezable_schedule().
This fixes the race, freezer_count() and freezer_should_skip()
carefully avoid the race.

And this simplifies the code, try_to_freeze_tasks/update_if_frozen
no longer need to use task_is_stopped_or_traced() checks with the
non trivial assumptions. We can rely on the mechanism which was
specially designed to mark the sleeping task as "frozen enough".

v2: As Tejun pointed out, we can also change get_signal_to_deliver()
and move try_to_freeze() up before 'relock' label.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      5d8f72b5
  23. 06 10月, 2012 2 次提交
  25. 13 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  27. 23 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  29. 02 6月, 2012 4 次提交
  31. 01 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  33. 22 5月, 2012 1 次提交